PP Vs Franco
PP Vs Franco
PP Vs Franco
RESOLUTION
PEREZ, J.:
For the resolution of the Court is the Motion for Reconsideration of our Decision dated 9 July
1
2014, which affirmed the conviction of accused appellant Benjie Consorte y Franco for the murder of
2
WHEREFORE, the Decision of the Court of Appeals dated 27 May 2010 in CA-G.R. CR HC No.
01806 is AFFIRMED with the following MODIFICATIONS (1) that the amount of civil indemnity is
increased from ₱50,000.00 to ₱75,000.00; and (2) that the amount of exemplary damages is
increased from ₱25,000.00 to ₱30,000.00. An interest, at the rate of six percent (6%) per annum
shall be imposed on all the damages awarded in this case from the date of finality of this judgment
until they are fully paid.
SO ORDERED. 3
Accused-appellant raises the incredibility of his identification as the perpetrator of the crime. He
4
avers that despite the alleged positive identification made by Rolando Visbe (Visbe), the testimony of
prosecution witness Aneline Mendoza clearly shows the impossibility of the same. Moreover, further
5
casting doubt on the alleged identification of accused appellant is Visbe’s unbelievable and
inconsistent statements on how such identification was made. Meanwhile, in a Letter dated 21
6
September 2014, the Officer-inCharge of the New Bilibid Prison (NBP) informed the Court that
7
accused appellant died on 14 July 2014, as evidenced by the attached Death Certificate issued by
NBP Medical Officer III Ruth B. Algones, M.D. 8
Owing to this development, the Court now addresses the effect of death pending accused-
appellant’s appeal with regard to his criminal and civil liabilities.
Art. 89. How criminal liability is totally extinguished. – Criminal liability is totally extinguished: (1) By
the death of the convict, as to the personal penalties; and as to pecuniary penalties, liability therefor
is extinguished only when the death of the offender occurs before final judgment;
xxxx
1. Death of the accused pending appeal of his conviction extinguishes his criminal liability as well as
the civil liability based solely thereon. As opined by Justice Regalado, in this regard, "the death of
1âwphi1
the accused prior to final judgment terminates his criminal liability and only the civil liability directly
arising from and based solely on the offense committed, i.e., civil liability ex delicto in senso
strictiore."
In the case at bar, accused-appellant died before final judgment, as in fact, his motion for
reconsideration is still pending resolution by the Court. As such, it therefore becomes necessary for
us to declare his criminal liability as well as his civil liability ex delicto to have been extinguished by
his death prior to final judgment.11
WHEREFORE, the criminal and civil liability ex delicto of accused appellant Benjie Consorte y
Franco are declared EXTINGUISHED by his death prior to final judgment. The judgment or
conviction against him is therefore SET ASIDE.
SO ORDERED.