Ic2p2-2023 - 182906a
Ic2p2-2023 - 182906a
Ic2p2-2023 - 182906a
Maheshi, Bandara
University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa, Sri Lanka
Abstract
This study delves into the subject via three case studies set in the city of
Colombo, Sri Lanka; through a mixed research methodology. The evaluation is
based on a four-factor theoretical framework on socio-spatial dimensions of
SOC adapted from the work of Kim & Kaplan (2004). Each case study was
further examined through four interactive categories of OOS.
Corresponding Author: Maheshi Bandara; E-mail- [email protected]
1
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Introduction
I. Background to the study
A safe and secure place to call home is one of the fundamental human needs; one that
promotes not only physical but also mental health, social interaction, economic productivity,
and personal security. Socially functional outdoor spaces play an important role in the
establishment of healthy communities and neighbourhoods. In a broad sense, it has a direct
bearing on a country's standard of living and economic development.
Being the economic hub of the country, many Sri Lankans seek employment and business
opportunities in the city of Colombo, resulting in densely populated areas. This pattern was
accelerated by the advent of open economic policies in 1977. However, Colombo and its major
suburbs already had a limited amount of land footprint available for residential development by
the 1950s, in response, the government initiated mass housing projects as an alternative for
government employees who represented the middle-income category of Sri Lanka.
It is being long considered community as containing certain curative qualities that can be utilised
to address a variety of contemporary societal issues (Bryson & Mowbray, 2005). Numerous
macro-level issues with Urban Middle-income Mass Housing (UMMH) neighbourhoods include
the unsuitability of open spaces, the non-availability of informal identity, indifference to
prevailing environmental conditions, and the absence of visual and spatial character. Francis et
al. (2012) identify that a strong Sense Of Community (SOC) has been related to enhanced
emotions of safety and security, participation in communal affairs, and civic responsibility.
Humans are innately sociable creatures with a profound need to belong (Heinrich & Gullone,
2006). In a situation where residents share close quarters with other people, the ability to
provide people with the feeling of being in a space where they can be independent and still feel
connected to society is important. It should come as no surprise that UN Sustainable
Development Goal 11, which aims to make urban spaces more inclusive, safe, resilient, and
sustainable (Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform 2017), lays a strong focus on
ensuring safe, high-quality access to public open spaces.
While there is an increasing awareness of the significance of OOS to the social well-being of the
urban population referring to gardens, green spaces, parks etc., there is little research on the
role of OOS inside urban mass housing establishments, particularly in the middle-income
category and their ability to fostering a SOC. This study explores this topic using three case
studies based in the city of Colombo, Sri Lanka.
II. Research gap/ issues of interest
As a landscape component in UMMH, OOS have a huge potential in creating meaningful social
connections. Although the planning and landscape architectural aspects connected with open
spaces in urban public spaces are well-understood, there is still much to learn about why
occupation and preference levels of OOS differentiate between communities and their
effectiveness in terms of their capacity to foster a SOC in UMMH projects. Also, the majority of
existing work on SOC has overlooked the physical aspects of SOC.
Against this backdrop, this study aims to explore the following ROs and RQs in relation to place
theory, place attachment, place identity and sense of place in UMMH; specifically at the
neighbourhood scale.
2
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
3
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
4
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Source: Adapted from Jayawardhana, K. V. G. K. S. (2007). Facilitating spaces for social interaction through
architecture: an examination with special reference to middle income class housing schemes in Colombo
and suburbs (Doctoral dissertation).
The majority of Sri Lanka's population corresponds to the middle-income category while
workers in the public and private sectors, make up the bulk. It is made up of people who are
looking to improve their standard of living. The middle class can be subdivided into the upper
middle class, the middle class, and the artisan class (lower middle class) according to distinctions
in education, income, and social standing (Manawadu et al., 2018).
5
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Nahiduzzaman (2012) identifies housing as more than a technological solution, and its definition
cannot be restricted to a house as a physical structure. The purpose of mass housing is to
provide not just shelter but also a social structure for communities. People celebrate their way
of life by utilising the available areas in these developments (Manawadu et al., 2018).
1.1.3 Middle-income mass housing in Sri Lanka
After the establishment of the open economy in 1977, the Sri Lankan government
acknowledged housing as a critical concern. United Nations Development Program's 1978
regional framework for Colombo included housing as a crucial component, demonstrating the
government's emphasis on housing. In the beginning, the National Housing Development
Authority (NHDA) and State Engineering Corporation (SEC) collaborated to construct mass
housing projects.
Mass housing projects are typically made up of a series of repetitive housing units, (usually
multi-storey buildings). In response to the fluctuating demand, these dwellings are constructed
in a variety of configurations, such as housing units, low-rise residences, multi-story walk-ups,
and high-rise blocks. Additionally, housing units are distributed in clusters adjacent to
unobstructed spaces, parallel rows etc. (Mohanani, 2017). Since this is a quantitative rather than
qualitative solution to housing, there is a compatibility issue among individuals and the
sociological impacts of outdoor design are not adequately concerned in the Sri Lankan context.
The 1970s were the heyday of mass housing in and around Colombo, with later additions.
However, there were some housing complexes developments were there that were established
before this period (Aamar weediya flats -1958, Bluemendal flats – 1959, Aduruppu veediya flats
– in the 1960s etc.) (A. Perera, personal communication, September 20, 2022).
Sri Lankan UMMH falls into two categories. The traditional housing developed by the
government aimed the government workers and the more recent phenomenon, commercially
developed UMMH by the private sector real estate developers. Back then it was not only
middle-income but also a very distinctive category. Back then in the 1950s when there were
hardly any private-sector mass housing projects in Sri Lanka, only UMMH initiation was the first
category. This dissertation focuses on that category.
Although now there are residents of various backgrounds have settled in these UMMH, the
initial owners of these houses are government servants and sometimes the houses have been
passed down to their children. Now they can sell those housing units. However, even today, the
majority of occupants consist of the middle-income category of Sri Lanka. Now more than ever,
the private sector leads the way in residential construction, yet historically, the government has
been the primary producer of UMMH. However, private investors in the middle-income housing
market remain elusive even in the present day.
1.2 Outdoor open spaces
Since this research is based on mass housing in an urban setting (Colombo), OOS can also be
viewed as urban open spaces. Thompson (2002) defines urban open spaces as locations to
celebrate the cultural diversity that enables outdoor recreation to improve citizens' social lives.
The importance of quality OOS to the healthy functionality of a community was not given
sufficient attention in the earlier mass housing developments in Sri Lanka. Although later
designs placed a premium on public open areas, they were underutilised by residents. There are
instances in which spaces are utilised contradictory to the original intent of the designers. (H.
Wickramaratne, personal communication, August 14, 2022).
6
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
The indoor open spaces do not exist in the majority of government initiated UMMS in the early
stages, but they are becoming more present in newer mass housing projects. The focus of this
study is set on OOS.
Mass housing developers must reserve 10% of the property for OOS in Sri Lanka. In many cases,
these areas shrink with time due to illegal encroachments and constructions by residents.
From the perspective of the user, open spaces can be defined as a location that allows for a
variety of activities, including necessary, optional, and social activities (Gehl, 1987). Gehl (1987)
further states that life between buildings consists of more than pedestrian traffic, leisure
activities, and social interactions. Life between buildings encompasses the complete spectrum of
activities that contribute to the significance and attractiveness of urban and residential public
spaces.
Trancik (1991) introduces the idea of “lost spaces” as ill-defined ones, that fail to connect
elements coherently, and lack a true understanding of human behaviour. This concept can also
be applied to OOS in mass housing. Through an in-depth analysis, these lost spaces can be
transformed into spaces that foster social connections and improve the quality of life.
7
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Source: Adapted from Gusfield, J. R. (1975). Community: A critical response. New York: Harper & Row.
This indicates that people can create communities in their neighbourhoods, but they can belong
to other communities consisting of religious and common interests-based groups (sport, a
certain activity club etc.). All UMMH residents will be part of several communities outside of
their mass housing neighbourhoods.
1.3.2 Defining the neighbourhood
“Neighbourhood” also can be defined in two concepts; the first one being the physical concept
indicating the place in which people live – district; and the second one is the social concept
characterising the people who inhabit there – community (Briggs, 1997, p.208; Galster, 2001).
Therefore, the physical and social environment inside a mass housing project is the residents'
local neighbourhood.
8
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Cochran & Minaker (2020) states that planners can protect and enhance a neighbourhood's
SOC by employing both social policies and physical design tactics. It has been identified that
neighbourhood environments and social networks are becoming obsolete because technology
and mobility enable individuals to access extensive social networks.
The vicinity of neighbours gives an extraordinary opportunity for social interaction and
assistance, such as house surveillance, mail collection, and emergency child care (Ife, 1995).
However, not all interactions between neighbours are pleasant. For example, neighbours can be
a unique source of stress owing to excessive noise, invasion of privacy, and competition for
resources (Unger & Wandersman 1985; Halpern 1995). Therefore, it is vital to develop
surroundings that promote neighbourly aid and safeguard against potentially stressful situations
(Halpern 1995).
Unger & Wandersman (1985) explains SOC as an affective component of neighbouring.
Source: From Unger, D. G., & Wandersman, A. (1985). The importance of neighbors: The social, cognitive,
and affective components of neighboring. American journal of community psychology, 13(2), 139-169.
9
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
According to Mahmoudi Farahani (2016), local communities are not responsible for fostering the
greatest number of effective attachments at all levels and among all individuals, but rather for
enhancing the quality of life in neighbourhoods.
1.3.4 Significance of sense of community
Hummon (1992) states that despite local circumstances, individuals will seek to foster a SOC.
And also Kim & Kaplan (2004) describes the SOC as an asset of new urbanism.
Fig 6: Significance of SOC
10
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Fig 7: Conceptual Model of the Relationship Between Public Space and Sense of Community
Source: From Francis, J., Giles-Corti, B., Wood, L., & Knuiman, M. (2012). Creating sense of community:
The role of public space. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 401–409.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.07.002
This model provides insights into further studies on the relation of UMMH, SOC and OOS.
11
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
12
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Source: Adapted from Kim, J., & Kaplan, R. (2004). Physical and psychological factors in sense of
community: New urbanist Kentlands and nearby orchard village. Environment and Behavior, 36(3), 313–
340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503260236
Kim & Kaplan (2004) further hypothesized the relationship between the above four domains as
depicted in Fig 8.
13
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Source: From Kim, J., & Kaplan, R. (2004). Physical and psychological factors in sense of community: New
urbanist Kentlands and nearby orchard village. Environment and Behavior, 36(3), 313–340.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503260236
14
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
15
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Source: Adapted from Sandbakken - Projects - C.F. Møller. (n.d.). Retrieved November 2, 2022, from
https://www.cfmoller.com/p/Sandbakken-i40.html
The project covers a total area of 19 000m 2 and it includes 212 housing units. It possesses two
opposing outdoor areas: first, the packed urban squares of the rectangular courtyards, which all
the front doors open onto; and second, the broad green spaces between the three clusters of
dwellings are reminiscent of the comparatively unspoilt hilly terrain of East Jutland (C.F. Møller,
n.d.).
1.5.2 Tinggarden, Denmark
Source: Tinggården - Communal building. (n.d.). Retrieved August 28, 2022, from
https://vandkunsten.com/en/projects/tinggaarden
16
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Fig 11: Small Houses of Tinggården with Expansive Views and Easy Access to
Community Spaces
Source: Tinggården - Communal building. (n.d.). Retrieved August 28, 2022, from
https://vandkunsten.com/en/projects/tinggaarden
17
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
The open floor concept and facade compositions (Fig 11) with a more expansive view of private
space encourage residents to participate actively in the neighbourhood which allows them to
improve a SOC.
Tinggården community design promotes the idea of elementary flexibility. For example, sturdy,
minimalist homes have flexible walls that permit further alteration, So that, for instance, one
family may acquire and take over a room from a neighbour. This flexibility limits illegal
encroachments. (Fig 12)
Fig 13: Altered Houses in Tinggården to Expand the Space with Zero Illegal Encroachments
Fig 12: Tinggården's Purposefully Designed OOS that Promotes Social Life and a SOC
Source: Tinggården - Communal building. (n.d.). Retrieved August 28, 2022, from
https://vandkunsten.com/en/projects/tinggaarden
The average size of a housing unit is about 78 m 2. However, even families with children find that
they have sufficient room because of the availability of communal areas and houses, which
account for about 10% of the space. ( Fig: 13)
Source: Tinggården - Communal building. (n.d.). Retrieved August 28, 2022, from
https://vandkunsten.com/en/projects/tinggaarden
18
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
19
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
20
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
21
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
22
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Fig 17: UMMH Projects that were Analysed During the Preliminary Stage
23
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Unstructured interviews were carried out among the residents accompanied by thorough
observations to screen the most suitable locations for the data collection. Case study selection
through screening was done according to Fig 18. Screening intends to select 3 case studies with
similar social backgrounds to examine RO 1 and RO 2.
Fig 18: Conceptual Model - Use of OOS Factors Rooted in Place-Based Attachment and Identity Towards a
SOC
Source: Adapted from Francis, J. (2010). Associations between public space and mental health in new
residential developments (Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Australia).
Physical and policy factors for case studies are considered definite (All case studies are
government-initiated housing developments, and they are governed under the Condominium
Management Authority's same condominium management laws). Individual factors affecting
SOC were neglected as a study limitation. Case study screening outcomes are as in Fig 19.
24
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
25
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
26
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
27
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
28
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
For RO 2: Table 4
Bar charts (As depicted in Fig 21 and Fig 22)
29
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
For RO 3: Table 5
Photographic analysis
Sketches
Table 5: Data Analysing Table for RO 3
Data analysing for this study was primarily done using Microsoft Excel.
30
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
The SCI II is also interpreted through a Likert scale. But the scoring procedure of SCI II is rather
simple.
31
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Scoring procedure
For the analysis or comparison of the data obtained for a factor, the answers obtained were
assigned a scoring index “i”. (If a respondent mark 5, it will calculate as 5)
Ex: A = Pedestrianism
iii. Questionnaire 3 - The standard SCI II by (Mcmillan & Chavis, 1986) to test the reliability
of SOC measures taken in questionnaire 2 in each case study.
4. On-site interviews
Both structured and unstructured interviews were used to get in-depth information from the
respondents and resource persons.
5. Focus Groups
Powell & Single (1996, p.499) defined the focus group as “a group of individuals selected
assembled by researchers to discuss and comment on, from personal experience, the topic that
32
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
is the subject of the research”. Focus groups provide a closer view of a community. Three focus
groups were conducted among 3 groups for 3 case studies (10 residents per case study) to
gather extensive information. The conversations built within the focus groups aided to
overcome the shortcomings of the interviews and analyse the specific spaces in the case studies
and how people created meaningful spaces and more SOC.
2.2.6 Data presentation methods
The following data presentation methods were utilized for the study.
Tables and graphs
Photographic / sketch analysis
Graphical representations
Fig 23: Location Map of the Case Studies in the Colombo District
33
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
34
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Fig 25: Site Boundary and Access Ways of Maligawatte Housing Scheme
35
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
36
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
and Soysa road. The project consists of 1264 housing units spread around 44 four-storey blocks.
The current playground was added subsequently, in 1997.
37
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
38
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
This section summarizes the outcomes of questionnaire 1, interviews and observations with
short descriptions of specific facts.
3.2.1 Findings about community attachment
C o m m u n ity a tta ch m en t
Maligawatte housing scheme Bambalapitiya flats Soysapura
72.5
78
70.5
70.5
75
73
72
71
63.5
63.5
55.5
55.5
n s ip n
t io es h t io
n s
ac te
d er ra
sf n g
at
i ec o
w te
s n
n
f in
y o o l
it C
se ca
n lo
m
u en
m
S rm
o te
C g
n
o
L
According to Questionnaire 1, over 70% of respondents had lived in their housing projects for
over 20 years.
Maligawatte residents had the highest community attachment, while Bambalapitiya residents
had the lowest. The following bar charts analyse the impact of community attachment
subfactors in each case study.
Maligawatte housing scheme
Community Attachment
Long term local integration 70.5
Sense of ownership 72
Connectedness 73
Community satisfaction 72.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Fig 31:Subfactor Analysis of Community Attachment – Maligawatte Housing Scheme
39
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Maligawatte housing scheme scored equally on each community attachment subfactor. Semi-
structured interviews revealed that most residents had other housing options, but they
preferred the scheme as the place of residence. Residents expressed that they feel connected
to their places and were satisfied with the OOS, noting specific spaces ( Further discussed in
section 3.2) in general although the outdoor environment was not the beat.
Sense of ownership can increase community attachment, but it was observed that residents
carry out illegal encroachments (specifically in recently built blocks) which affect OOS quality as
well as the structural stability of the blocks in the long run. One identified the reason for this is
that the floor area of the early-built UMMH was large enough to comfortably accommodate a
family of 4-5 members. Initial housing layouts in all three case studies have adequate OOS. With
the addition of new blocks, the land becomes scarce. This resulted in the allocation of less floor
space per new residential unit.
Bambalapitiya flats
Community Attachment
Long term local integration 75
Sense of ownership 55.5
Connectedness 63.5
Community satisfaction 55.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Fig 32: Subfactor Analysis of Community Attachment – Bambalapitiya Flats
40
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Soysapura
Community Attachment
Long term local integration 78
Sense of ownership 70.5
Connectedness 71
Community satisfaction 63.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Fig 33: Sub Factor Analysis of Community Attachment: Soysapura
Soysapura scored 78% for the length of residency implying the residents have lived there for a
long period. Soysapura had a high sense of ownership over their outdoor spaces. Interblock
spaces were not assigned a specific function when considering the overall layout of the housing
scheme, but residents of some blocks have utilised them for community needs such
as gardening spaces, small playing spaces, parking spaces etc. rather than letting those spaces
go abandoned.
3.2.2 Findings about community identity
C o m m u n ity id en tity
Maligawatta housing scheme Bambalapitiya flats Soysapura
85
84
77
73.5
73.5
66
62.5
65
61.5
58.5
60
59
50.5
53
53
Fig 34: Community Identity Subfactor Levels Across the Case Studies
41
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Community identity can be interpreted in many ways. An identity can base on the social factors
as well as the physical factors of a setting. In this instance, the community identity was
measured according to residents’ responsive adaptability according to socio-spatial needs.
Maligawatte housing scheme community had the most vibrant and unique identity out of all 3
case studies. The lack of OOS and their rigid nature has led to decreased amount of community
identity in socio-spatial wise, in Bambalapitiya flats.
Maligawatte housing scheme
Community identity
Cohesiveness 85
Congruence 65
Significance 73.5
Continuity 58.5
Uniqueness 84
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Fig 35: Subfactor Analysis of Community Identity -Maligawatte Housing Scheme
The vibrance of social diversity inside the Maligawatte community has helped to build a physical
environment that symbolizes their uniqueness which has been shaped by the community. They
have made their own places with unique meanings.OOS facilitated community needs in general.
But there were instances where the design shortcomings and poor maintenance of spaces
interrupted the use of OOS.
Bambalapitiya flats
Community identity
Cohesiveness 62.5
Congruence 66
Significance 61.5
Continuity 53
Uniqueness 53
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Fig 36: Subfactor Analysis of Community Identity – Bambalapitiya Flats
Bambalapitiya flats had the least variations in the outdoor environment. The community identity
in Bambalapitiya flats was rather a maintained one over the years than a community-built
42
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
identity. The residents have practiced keeping existing OOS in a more arranged way which
demonstrates the community personality of the community. But some residents have adapted
the spaces between blocks into nice gardening spaces where the people in the same block work
together to maintain them.
Soysapura
Community Identity
Cohesiveness 77
Congruence 59
Significance 73.5
Continuity 50.5
Uniqueness 60
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Fig 37: Subfactor Analysis of Community Identity - Soysapura
Soysapura has a serene nature to its identity. Residents’ shared values on OOS can be seen
through the way they utilise them.
3.2.3 Findings about social interactions
Social interaction
Maligawatte housing scheme Bambalapitiya flats Soysapura
78.5
79
71.5
75
75
67.5
65.5
64.5
55
49.5
54
43
n
g
te
r n rt
ri io po
u un at p
b
o co ip su
h en t ic l
ig ar ia
e al p oc
N ci y S
so n
it
al u
u m
as m
C o
C
43
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Fig 38: Social Interaction Subfactor Levels Across the Case Studies
Source: Compiled by the author
A higher level of social interaction was identified in the Maligawatte housing scheme. The spatial
layout and the arrangement of outdoor spaces allowed more social contact among the
residents.
Maligawatte housing scheme
Social interaction
Social support 75
Community participation 75
Casual social encounter 79
Neighbouring 78.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Fig 39: Subfactor Analysis of Social Interaction -Maligawatte Housing Scheme
A higher level of social interaction could be identified in Maligawatte housing scheme. The
spatial layout and the arrangement of outdoor spaces allowed more social contact among the
residents. The residents have diverse cultural backgrounds and events such as processions,
almsgiving takes place inside the neighbourhood frequently.
Bambalapitiya flats
Social interaction
Social support 55
Community participation 54
Casual social encounter 43
Neighbouring 49.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Fig 40: Sub Factor Analysis of Social Interaction - Bambalapitiya Flats
The questionnaire survey revealed that Bambalapitiya flats had the least level of social
interactions within the community. Interactive OOS other than the street network and
playground/children's park was minimal in this case study which has affected the lower levels of
social ties. The spatial organization has not facilitated social activities.
44
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
OOS in this case study is not thoughtfully planned considering the hot, humid climate of the area
which makes OOS less preferable during day time. Also, the lack of seating/ resting spaces
around the premises discourages the residents from having informal social interactions.
However, there were indoor spaces dedicated to societies of the community (Buddhists
association of Bambalapitiya flats etc.) but they were reserved for more formal events. In this
manner, the informal interaction level of the community was low.
Soysapura
Social interaction
Social support 65.5
Community participation 71.5
Casual social encounter 67.5
Neighbouring 64.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Fig 41: Subfactor Analysis of Social Interaction - Soysapura
It was revealed that residents have various community events such as new year celebrations,
Vesak celebrations as community events which facilitate social interactions where the
community has high participation. Casual encounters between the residents were observed as
friendly and more frequent compared to Bambalapitiya flats residents. They enjoy such
occasional encounters and there is a higher level of contact among the people from different
blocks.
45
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Pedestrianism
Maligawatta housing scheme Bambalapitiya flats Soysapura
86.5
92
90
75.5
66.5
76
61.5
64
64
55
42.5
49
y y t s
it it si ie
il u n t
ab
q ra vi
k in s
t ti
al p
as ac
W ro el
p M v
a n le
ri et
e st re
ed st
P e
al
sc
an
t ri
es
ed
P
In all three case studies, extensive pedestrian activity is observed during weekends. Maligawatte
flats had a higher level of street-side interactions while in Bambalapitiya flats, it was far less.
Street networks across all case studies were maintained properly.
Maligawatte housing scheme
Pedestrianism
86.5
Mass transit 92
76
Walkability 90
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Fig 43: Subfactor Analysis of Pedestrianism - Maligawatte Housing Scheme
46
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
also. Roads facilitate convenient mass transit within the community. Streetside mobile shops
were a frequent observation, and such spaces have a higher level of interaction.
Bambalapitiya flats
Pedestrianism
42.5
Mass transit 66.5
55
Walkability 49
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Fig 44: Subfactor Analysis of Pedestrianism - Bambalapitiya Flats
The location of the Bambalapitiya flats facilitates easy access to public transit for its residents.
However, most of them use private transportation methods. The street network inside provides
adequate space for vehicular activities. There were no alleyways or pathways that are functional
inside, except the main street network provided through the design of the housing scheme.
Pedestrian scale activities were minimal inside the premises. Residents preferred the streets
with more shade for pedestrian scale street-level activities.
Soysapura
Pedestrianism
Pedestrian scale street
75.5
level activities
Mass transit 61.5
Pedestrian propinquity 64
Walkability 64
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Fig 45: Subfactor Analysis of Pedestrianism - Soysapura
With a rate of 75.5 pedestrian-scale street activities, Soysapura street network provided a
variety of pedestrian-scale activities. Some residents are engaged in small businesses in street
sides, but it does not disturb vehicular or pedestrian activity. Streets are in good condition and
can be identified as safe and quality spaces.
47
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
SCI II score
90
81
80
71
70
60
50 42
40
30
20
10
0
Maligawatte housing Bambalapitiya flats Soysapura
scheme
48
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
This section qualitatively analyse the spatial characteristics OOS categories based on the results
of questionnaire 2, focus group outcomes and observations.
3.4.1 Mobility network
Streets define the boundaries and fabric of a neighbourhood, while being the dominant OOS
category in UMMH, mobility networks facilitate various community activities. Together, their
walkability and ability to shelter roadside activities form emotional bonds among residents.
Fig 48: The Higher Level of Shade Along the Street Network in Maligawatte Housing Scheme and a Hindu
Procession Happening in the Opposite Direction of the Same Street
49
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
People have formed their own short paths to minimize walking distances. These spaces are
highly functional in social interaction. This suggests missing parts of the original design but also
depicts the adaptive nature of the design through informal interactive spaces.
Small temporary shops and mobile vendors were observed occupying shaded roadsides and
pathways of the property. These were the most-used mobility network spaces.
It has been observed that older individuals gather along roadsides and engage in casual
conversation.
In highly interactive spaces, there was a deficiency in properly arranged seating. Oftentimes,
older men were observed gathering and exchanging stories on roadsides. They bring chairs or
another sort of movable seating to the roadside to communicate and interact with neighbours.
50
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Fig 51: Wide Streets Without Shade and No Streetside Interactions - Bambalapitiya Flats
Fig 52: Clean and Well-maintained Fig 53: Street-Side Resting Places Created
Mobility Network by the Community
Source: Compiled by the author Source: Compiled by the author
Residents who engage in jogging expressed the need for more informal resting spaces as the
community is more sociable compared to Bambalapitiya flats’ community.
51
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
3.4.2 Enclaves
52
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
The placement and character of enclaves are determined by the cluster identity. The identity
and character of different enclaves attract individuals of similar interests that make it easier to
develop bonds. Residents expressed that they have created such spaces to match their
identities. Enclaves with high-quality place identity make up the mental picture of the entire
community making them an important part of the community.
One such space is the Christian enclave located at the ramp that goes up to the tallest block in
the Maligawatte housing scheme. The location, colour and character of that space speak a lot
about the cluster identity of that block.
Fig 57: The Christian Enclave at the Edge of the Ramp; Place Identity that has Developed through
Multifunctionality, Character of Space and Burrowed View of ‘Nelum Kuluna’
53
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
3.4.2.3 Soysapura
The specific enclave observed in Soysapura attracted more young people due to its location.
Although there were not many interactions observed during day time, residents mentioned that
the space is highly occupied during late evenings.
Playgrounds and children's parks are the planned recreational spaces that were provided in the
case studies. During the focus groups, playgrounds and open spaces were usually viewed
favourably, but negative issues also arose.
54
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Fig 60: The Basketball Court with High Visibility and Easy Access
Source: Compiled by the author
55
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Fig 62: Childrens' Playground of Bambalapitiya Fig 63: Public Playground of Bambalapitiya Flats
Flats
Source: Compiled by the author Source: Compiled by the author
It was unable to observe any interactive activity during the daytime of weekday site visits in
planned recreation spaces of Bambalapitiya flats. Some activities were happening in the late
evenings. But according to residents, these places become more active on certain days like
school vacation periods etc. Residents were satisfied with the spaces but mentioned the need
for more play equipment in the children’s park. Not much character could be seen in terms of
place identity in both spaces. Also, both of them had a low sheltering nature.
3.4.3.3 Soysapura
Soysapura is equipped with a large public playground which hosts various sports events. The
large trees at the edge of the playground improve the sheltering nature of the space. The
ground has a higher level of visibility and therefore residents expressed that they felt it safer
even during the night time. Maintenance of the ground was in a preferable state as identified.
3.4.4 Interblock spaces
56
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
In most cases, neighbourhood OOS are merely residual spaces, as opposed to purposefully
created activity or interaction places. As a result, most Sri Lankan government-funded housing
developments are abundant in interblock spaces that do not foster positive social functions
except providing ventilation requirements.
For instance, open areas without a specific function occasionally drew vandals from
neighbouring suburbs and also within the community.
Illegal encroachments of interblock spaces were prominent. Some residents even modified the
original housing units despite the overall structural stability of the construction. Such additions
and encroachments are a major threat to the further reduction of OOS as well as to the overall
quality of the outdoor environment. The elementary flexibility that was discussed in the
literature review was observed as people have tried to make extensions from the home units to
create new additions to places making one-of-a-kind spaces. These illegal attempts demonstrate
the need for elementary flexibility through the planning of UMMH.
Residents on the first level are more engaged in gardening and yard chores due to their
proximity to outdoor environments. In this instance, outdoor spaces served as extensions of the
inside living space of the block.
The spatial organisation plan (Appendix D) demonstrates that, despite the variety of block
layouts, the overall project lacks a sense of proximity due to not having more private and
dedicated OOS per block opposed to Bambalapitiya flats. There were some housing clusters
which had better and more dedicated spaces. The residents of those blocks seem to be more
reserved than the others.
58
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
3.4.4.3 Soysapura
Interblock spaces are used for various purposes in Soysapura housing scheme. One main and
frequent use is gardening activities and the other utilisation is using them as play spaces by
the children who live in immediate blocks.
59
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
3.5 Discussion
Outcomes for RO 1:
Fig 69: Comparison between SCI II Scores with Average Scores of SOC Conducive Ability of OOS
60
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Outcomes for RO 2:
61
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Outcomes for RO 3:
62
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Conclusion
Quality and sufficient OOS should be offered in urban mass housing developments. A built-up
residential area alone cannot sustain the social needs of its population. OOS provide the ground
for unrelated individuals who voluntarily combine their efforts to integrate aspects of their lives
for the collective community's benefit.
As per the outcomes of this study;
i. The SCI II scores fluctuated in harmony with SOC conducive ability of OOS. There were
only slight differentiations between the scores. Therefore, it can be concluded that OOS
act as a catalyst for a SOC in UMMH.
ii. Out of four interactive categories of OOS, planned recreational spaces have the highest
effect on SOC as an average.
iii. There are specific features of OOS in UMMH that elevate their SOC conducive ability.
Also recognising and responding to the diversity of the communities, the sentimental values
attached to OOS, and their identities are important facts of consideration during refurbishments
of existing UMMH.
63
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Landscape architecture is a social art with a strong focus on social challenges. The landscape
architectural output cannot meet the expectations of the public if the design does not meet the
requirements of a community. A community’s needs, and their preferences vary, so do the
spaces they demand. Thus, they respond and react in response to changing needs by adapting
their surroundings to better accommodate new options.
References
Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., & Seeman, T. E. (2000). From social integration to health:
Durkheim in the new millennium. Social science & medicine, 51(6), 843-857.
Brown, B. B., & Perkins, D. D. (1992). Disruptions in place attachment. In Place attachment (pp.
279-304). Springer, Boston, MA.
Bryson, L., & Mowbray, M. (2005). More spray on solution: Community, social capital and
evidence based policy. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 40(1), 91-106.
Chavis, D. M., Lee, K. S., & Acosta, J. D. (2008). The Sense of Community (SCI) Revised: The
Reliability and Validity of the SCI-2. Paper presented at the 2nd International Community
Psychology Conference, Lisboa, Portugal. Retrieved from
http://www.communityscience.com/pdfs/Sense%20of%20 Community%20Index-2(SCI-
2).pdf
Cochran, S., & Minaker, L. (2020). The value in community gardens: a return on investment
analysis. Canadian Food Studies/La Revue canadienne des études sur l'alimentation, 7(1),
154-177.
Creswell, J. W., Klassen, A. C., Plano Clark, V. L., & Smith, K. C. (2011). Best practices for mixed
methods research in the health sciences. Bethesda (Maryland): National Institutes of
Health, 2013, 541-545.
de Souza Briggs, X. (1997). Moving up versus moving out: Neighborhood effects in housing
mobility programs. Housing policy debate, 8(1), 195-234.
Duany, A., & Plater-Zyberk, E. (1994). The neighborhood, the district and the corridor. The new
urbanism: Toward an architecture of community, 17-20.
64
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Eisenhauer, B. W., Krannich, R. S., & Blahna, D. J. (2000). Attachments to special places on public
lands: An analysis of activities, reason for attachments, and community
connections. Society & Natural Resources, 13(5), 421-441.
Francis, J., Giles-Corti, B., Wood, L., & Knuiman, M. (2012). Creating sense of community: The
role of public space. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 401–409.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.07.002
Hanaw Mohammed, H. M. T. (2018). The impact of heritage decline on urban social life. Journal
of Environmental Psychology, 55, 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2017.12.002
Heinrich, L. M., & Gullone, E. (2006). The clinical significance of loneliness: A literature review.
Clinical Psychology Review, 26(6), 695–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPR.2006.04.002
Hidalgo, M. C., & Hernández, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions.
Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 273–281.
https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0221
Jorgensen, B. S., & Stedman, R. C. (2001). Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners
attitudes toward their properties. Journal of environmental psychology, 21(3), 233-248.
Kamalipour, H., Yeganeh, A. J., & Alalhesabi, M. (2012). Predictors of place attachment in urban
residential environments: A residential complex case study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 35, 459-467.
65
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Kim, J., & Kaplan, R. (2004). Physical and psychological factors in sense of community: New
urbanist Kentlands and nearby orchard village. Environment and Behavior, 36(3), 313–340.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503260236
Lynch, K. (1981). The Form of the City. In Cities and City Planning (p.131). Springer, Boston, MA.
Mahmoudi Farahani, L. (2016). The Value of the Sense of Community and Neighbouring. In
Housing, Theory and Society (Vol. 33, Issue 3, pp. 357–376). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2016.1155480
Manawadu, T., & Dharmasena, J. (2018). Impact of spatial perception on place making in open
spaces of middle class housing schemes around Colombo. Sustainability for people, 50.
Mannarini, T., & Fedi, A. (2009). Multiple senses of community: The experience and meaning of
community. Journal of Community Psychology, 37(2), 211–
227. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20289
Mohanani, A. (2022, September 12). Mass housing: A budding and compelling segment. 99
acres. https://www.99acres.com/articles/mass-housing-a-budding-and-compelling-
segment.html
Powell, R. A., & Single, H. M. (1996). Focus groups. International journal for quality in health
care, 8(5), 499-504.
Pooley, J. A., Cohen, L., & Pike, L. T. (2005). Can sense of community inform social capital?. The
Social Science Journal, 42(1), 71-79.
Riley, R. (1992). Attachment to the ordinary landscape. In I. Altman & S. M. Low (Eds.), Place
attachment (pp. 13–35). New York: Plenum Press.
Sandbakken - Projects - C.F. Møller. (n.d.). Retrieved October 28, 2022, from
https://www.cfmoller.com/p/Sandbakken-i40.html
Thompson, C. W. (2002). Urban open space in the 21st century. Landscape and urban planning,
60(2), 59-72.
66
Proceedings of the International e- Conference on 'Cities, People and Places'- IC 2P2-2023
March 24th – 25th, 2023, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Trancik, R. (1991). Finding lost space: theories of urban design. John Wiley & Sons.
Unger, D. G., & Wandersman, A. (1985). The importance of neighbors: The social, cognitive, and
affective components of neighboring. American journal of community psychology, 13(2),
139-169.
67