Felix, Journal Manager, 216-787-1-CE
Felix, Journal Manager, 216-787-1-CE
Felix, Journal Manager, 216-787-1-CE
of Linguistics 241
Working Papers 42 (1994), 241-250
A Spectrographic Analysis of
Vowel Allophones in Kabardian
Sidney A . J. Wood
This article, a revised version of a paper given at the Maikop symposium of the Societas
Europeae Caucasiologica in 1992, reports some preliminary results from an invesdgation of
the spectra of vowel allophones in the NW Caucasian language Kabardian. It is concluded
that the environment for palatal vowel allophones consists only of the palatal semivowel and
not of other consonants with a palatal component, and that the unrounded palatovelar
environments need further investigation.
Introduction
The phonerruc analysis o f the Kabardian vowels is controversial and this
study is being undertaken i n order to clarify some of the problems
i n v o l v e d . Recent contributions on this topic have been p u b l i s h e d by
Anderson 1991, C h o i 1991, Colorusso 1988 (chapts. 3, 8), Smeets 1984 and
W o o d 1991a. The issue is central to phoneme theory since it concerns the
v a l i d i t y o f T r u b e t z k o y ' s 1939 doctrine that a l l phoneme systems must
consist o f a consonant system and a vowel system, and that any system must
contain at least three contrasting elements. The alternative is to disregard
that doctrine and push the analysis as far as the data w i l l allow, arriving at a
result that was anathema to Trubetzkoy and his followers, i.e. one or two
v o w e l phonemes contrasting syntagmatically with a l l consonants, or no
v o w e l phoneme at a l l . vowels i n speech being epenthetic. T w o typical
exponents of these approaches are illustrated in Figs. 1 and 2. Catford 1942
conforms to the standard vertical three-phoneme solution from Trubetzkoy
(i.e. a high phoneme versus a mid phoneme versus a low phoneme).
Kuipers 1960 disregards the Trubetzkoy doctrine and, f o l l o w i n g Jakovlev
1923, proposes a two-phoneme system w i t h mid and low vowels i n
complementary distribution. Jakovlev had identified the traditional 'short a'
as mid, and ' l o n g a ' as low, the timbre contrast being predictable from
quantity, whereas Kuipers was now proposing an underlying syntagmatic
contrast o f /ha/ vs. /a/ that surfaces after metathesis as [a] vs. [a].
242 SIDNEY A. J. WOOD VOWEL ALLOPHONES IN K A B A R D I A N 243
and the coiTCsponding set i n Figure 3 ('e', C h o i ' s postalveolar environment) T h e results i n F i g s . 3 and 4 agree that many of the tokens i n the
has an average F 2 - F 1 of 1400 H z (i.e. mean F 2 around 1750 H z ) . T h i s respective palatalising environments for the high v o w e l have F 2 m u c h
result can be partly explained by our having included different consonants lower than expected for an [i]-hke timbre, so low i n fact that they coincide
i n this environment. with the tokens i n the default environment. This indicates that we should
M y palatal set ' p ' i n Figure 4 theoretically comprises consonants from reconsider what constitutes die palatahsing environment i n Kabardian, and
[2,3,4] i n Table 1, i.e. laterals, unrounded palatovelar stops and fricatives that laterals, alveopalatals, palato-alveolars and unrounded palatovelars are
(said to be produced as palatal affricates and fricatives) and the palatal not part of it, despite the palatal component i n their articulations. That
semivowel, but there were i n fact no tokens with the s e m i v o w e l i n the leaves just the palatal semivowel, as i n Catford 1942.
present set o f data. Catford 1942, on the contrary, reports only the semi- The default environment consists of the labials and alveolars that remain
v o w e l yielding allophones [i,e], the rest producing tire default allophones. after removing die palatal, velar and uvular assimilation environments. The
F i g u r e 4, w h i c h shows F 2 ranging 1400-1700 H z i n m y lateral and common feature of tiie laterals, alveopalatals and palato-alveolars, diat must
unrounded palatovelar environment ' p ' , suggests he is correct i n counting now also be included i n the default environment, is that they are coronal,
only the semivowel i n the palatalising environment. like the alveolars already diere. The palatalising environment is simply die
C h o i ' s palatal set (that he calls postalveolar) does not include the laterals non-coronal palatal, i.e. just / j / .
or palatahsed velars, but instead it includes alveopalatals /<?', c. ?/ and What about the plain palatovelars, that are said to be so palatalised? They
palato-alveolars / / , 3/ from (1) in Table 1. H i s data does include examples certainly did not palatalise vowels i n m y data, and C h o i never had them as
with the semivowel / j / , which presumably explains why the average F 2 for palatalising environments anyway. D o they belong to the default environ-
this group is as high as 1750 H z . 1 would now expect that his tokens i n the ment tiiat yields [i] or do they belong to a velarising environment diat yields
semivowel environment were indeed [i]-like witii F 2 around 2000 H z , while [ui], along with the unrounded uvular environment? T h i s requires further
the alveoplatals and palato-alveolars yield the default allophone rather than clarification.
the palatal allophone (which consequently pulled his average F 2 - F 1 down
for the palatal context). References
The present material has no example of / j / witii a mid vowel, that yields Anderson, J . M . 1991. 'Kabardian disenivowelled. again". Studia Linguistica
[e], but C h o i ' s does. Once again, his average F 2 - F 1 is very l o w , 1100 H z . 45, 18-48.
(i.e. mean F 2 around 1550 H z ) . Something hke 1800 H z w o u l d be expected B a g o v . P. M . , B . X . B a l k a r o v , T. X . Kuaseva, M . A . K u m a x o v & G . B .
for an [e]-like timbre, and the discrepancy presumably once again reflects R o g o v a (eds.). 1970. Gratnmatika kabardino-cerkesskogo literaturnogo
the fact that alveopalatals etc. are not part o f the palatalising environment. jazyka; 1 fonetika i morfologija [Grammar of literary K a b a r d i n o -
C h o i also has a palatal set among the low vowels. N o n e o f the sources, Circassian. part 1, phonetics and morphology]. M o s c o w : N a u k a .
including Catford, reports a palatal allophone of a low vowel (compare e.g. Catford. J . C . 1942. 'The Kabardian language'. Maitre Phonetique 3rd
Figs. 1 and 2), and the absence of a l o w palatal allophone was part o f Series 78, 15-18.
Jakovlev's argument for complementary distribution between mid and low
Catford, J. C . 1977. ' M o u n t a i n o f tongues: the languages of the Caucasus'.
vowels - his default 'long a' is [a], default 'short a' is [a] and i n the palatal
Annual Review of Anthropology 6, 283-314.
environment they are [e(:)]. A proponent o f the three-phoneme solution
C h o i , J . - D . 1991. ' A n acoustic study of Kabardian v o w e l s ' . Journal of the
might instead argue that there is an accidental gap i n the lexikon so tiiat / j /
International Phonetic Association 21, 4-12.
never occurs with /a/. So what is C h o i ' s palatal environment with /a/?
Colarusso, J. 1988. The Northwest Caucasian languages, a phonological
Presumably tiie same alveopalatals etc. again, which now seem not to belong survey. N e w Y o r k : Garland.
there. Jakovlev, N . 1923. Tablitsy fonetiki kabardinskogo jazyka. Moscow:
Oriental Institute.
250 SIDNEY A . J . WOOD 251