AstrOpt 03telescopes56

Astronomical Optics
2. Fundamentals of Telescopes designs
2.1. Telescope types: refracting, reflecting

OUTLINE:
Shaping light into an image: first principles

Telescope elements: lenses and mirrors
Telescope types
– refracting (lenses)
– reflecting (mirrors)
Keeping the image sharp on large telescopes: challenges

Optical principle and notations (shown here with lenses)
Diameter = D F ratio = F/D

Focal length = F
Focal plane
Pupil plane = aperture stop (usually)
F gives the plate scale at the focal plane (ratio between physical
dimension in focal plane and angle on the sky): δ = angle x F
F/D gives physical size of diffraction limit at the focal plane = (F/D) λ
Afocal telescope (= beam reducer)
Instrument
Pupil plane Focal plane

Pupil plane (exit pupil)
Shaping light into an image: first principles
A telescope must bend or reflect light rays to make them converge to a small (ideally
smaller that the atmospheric seeing size for ground telescopes) zone in the focal
plane
At optical/nearIR wavelengths, this is done with mirrors or lenses

• choice of materials is important for lenses and mirrors
• coatings (especially for mirrors) are essential to the telescope performance
• optical surfaces of mirrors and lenses must be accurately controlled
At longer wavelength (radio), metal panels or grid can be used
At shorter wavelength (X ray, Gamma ray), materials are poorly reflecive (see next
slide)
The telescope must satisfy the previous requirement over a finite field of view with
high throughput
Field of view + good image quality → telescope designs with multiple elements (this will be
covered in the next lecture)
High throughput over large field of view requires good coating and an optical design which
can transmit the full size of the beam for any point in the field of view (no beam clipping)
Chandra X-ray Observatory
Schematic of Grazing Incidence, X-ray Mirrors
CXC
(Illustration: NASA/CXC/D.Berry)
Refracting telescopes (lenses)
Lenses are easy to manufacture when small
First telescopes were refractors (Galileo)
Refractors suffer from serious limitations:

- chromaticity
– refraction index is chromatic: a simple lens has a focal length which changes with
wavelength
– achromatic lense designs use combination of several materials to reduce
chromaticity
- Difficult to implement for large telescopes:
– lens thickness increases with diameter, and needs to be held at its edges
– lens is located at the front of the telescope: center of mass is close to the top of the
telescope (top-heavy)
Galileo's telescope
(1609)
Yerkes obs.
refractor
(1-m diameter,
1900)
Refracting telescopes (lenses)
Chromaticity problem can be mitigated by adopting long focal length → Refracting
telescopes used to be very long and narrow field of view
More recently, developments in lens design and manufacturing technology have led to high
quality short refractors → Refractors are still used in astronomy for wide field small diameter
systems, and the same technology is used to correct for aberrations in wide field reflecting
telescopes.
Johann Hevelius 45m long telescope (1673)

Modern wide angle lens
Reflecting telescopes (mirrors)
Challenges:
Light bounces back toward the object: focal plane in front of the telescope, or secondary
mirror needs to be used to send light to instrument / viewer.
Mirrors have ~4x tighter optical surface tolerances than lenses

For surface defect h, wavefront error is 2h in reflection, h(n-1) in refraction
→ mirrors often need to be made non-spherical with <100nm surface accuracy
Mirrors need to be reflective

At first, mirrors were made of metal, then glass
Advantages:
- achromatic by design (reflection is achromatic)
- Ideally suited for large telescopes:

– Mirror is supported from the bottom, and can be thin with active control
– Mirror is located at the back of the telescope: center of mass is low
– Telescope tube can be relatively short (F ratio of modern large telescopes is ~1 to 2)
Early reflecting telescopes (metal mirrors)
Hershel's telescope
primary mirror (1.2m)
(1875-1879)
Newton's telescope
(1668-1672)
Birr Castle 1.8m telescope (metal mirror, 1845)

Modern reflecting telescopes (glass mirrors)
Large Binocular Telescope (LBT): 2x 8.4 m

Very Large Telescope (VLT): 4x 8 m + 1.8m aux. telescopes
Mauna Kea, Hawaii: 4 telescope 8 m to 10 m
Optical quality ↔ Image quality
How good does the telescope primary mirror need to be ?
Ground-based telescopes:
Optics need to produce an image which is sharper that the atmosphere delivers
In optical, very good site / very good night: seeing = 0.3”
On large telescope (8m), this is equivalent to ~1 μm of wavefront error (0.5 μm on the mirror
surface)
→ Primary mirror surface should be good to ~100nm
for high spatial frequencies, this is achieved through figuring and polishing of the surface
for low spatial frequencies, this is achieved by active optics
Space-based telescopes:
Optics need to produce a diffraction limited image
In optical, mirror surface should ideally be ~1/40 of a wave (1/20 of a wave wavefront) ~ 10nm
Note: for some applications (wide field imaging for example), the telescope may not be required to
reach diffraction limit
Example: Kepler telescope (NASA), 0.95m aperture, but 10” size image. Does high precision
photometry of stars to detect planetary transits.
Challenges associated with large telescopes:
Maintaining optical surface on large primary mirror
Larger size requires fundamental changes in the telescope design

Maintaining good optical surface on large telescopes cannot be achieved passively, as it
used to be done on small telescopes
plate stiffness: t
D = E/(1-v2) x (t3 / 12)
E = Young modulus
t = plate thickness
v = Poisson's ratio
Mirror surface deformation is proportional to q (N/A)-2 D-1

q = ρt = areal density (proportional to t for simple plate)
N/A = actuator density (number of support points N per unit area A)
For a simple plate and a fixed number of support points:

N/A goes as power -2 of telescope diameter D
D goes as t3 → deformation goes as : D4 x t-2
Keeping the deformation constant requires t ~ D2

A 1m diameter mirror, 10cm thick would have the same deformation as a 5m diameter mirror
with a 2.5m thickness
Large mirror mass → even larger telescope structure mass
Challenges associated with large telescopes:
Thermal issues for a large primary mirror
A difference in temperature between the mirror and ambiant air is bad for astronomy: it
creates turbulence just above the mirror and makes the image less sharp
PROBLEM: the air temperature is constantly changing, and the mirror needs to follow it
closely → thermal time constant for the mirror needs to be short → thick massive mirrors
are problematic !
Racine et al. 1991

(3.6-m Canada France
Hawaii Telescope)
Larger size telescopes were made possible by fundamental
changes in the primary mirror design
Honeycomb mirrors
Honeycomb stiffness: t/2
D ~ E/(1-v2) x ((2/3)x(d/2+t/2)3 – d3/12)
t/2 = top plate thickness = bottom plate thickness d
d = core thickness
→ allows high stiffness without increasing mass t/2
→ reduced thermal time constant by circulating air inside the mirror
Segmented mirrors
The mirror is made of segments individually controlled in position
KECK telescope: hexagonal segments form the primary mirror

Active optics to enable thin mirror telescopes

The telescope mirror shape is actively controlled by computers driving force actuators
→ thinner mirrors can be used
Gemini Telescope mirror: 8m diameter, 20cm thick
Courtesy of ESO
All large modern telescope include computer-controlled active
optics
VLT mirror cell for 8m mirror, ~20cm thick

Vibrations, Dome
Vibrations are mostly introduced by wind, but can also be generated by telescope
drive motors
The telescope structure must be as stiff as possible
stiff = high frequency resonances = small amplitude resonances
Lowest resonance frequencies on large telescopes are ~10 Hz

Active correction is possible (vibrations can be measured optically or with
accelerometers)
Dome must be carefully designed:
Dome must let air flow through telescope to avoid temperature gradients
Dome must block wind before it exites telescope structure resonances
Gemini Telescope
dome includes
side vents
low wind: open
high wind: closed

AstrOpt 03telescopes56

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

AstrOpt 03telescopes56

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

AstrOpt 03telescopes56

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Astronomical Optics

2. Fundamentals of Telescopes designs

2.1. Telescope types: refracting, reflecting

Shaping light into an image: first principles

Keeping the image sharp on large telescopes: challenges

Diameter = D F ratio = F/D

Afocal telescope (= beam reducer)

Pupil plane Focal plane

At optical/nearIR wavelengths, this is done with mirrors or lenses

Refractors suffer from serious limitations:

Johann Hevelius 45m long telescope (1673)

Mirrors have ~4x tighter optical surface tolerances than lenses

Mirrors need to be reflective

- achromatic by design (reflection is achromatic)

- Ideally suited for large telescopes:

Birr Castle 1.8m telescope (metal mirror, 1845)

Large Binocular Telescope (LBT): 2x 8.4 m

How good does the telescope primary mirror need to be ?

Larger size requires fundamental changes in the telescope design

Mirror surface deformation is proportional to q (N/A)-2 D-1

For a simple plate and a fixed number of support points:

Keeping the deformation constant requires t ~ D2

Racine et al. 1991

KECK telescope: hexagonal segments form the primary mirror

Active optics to enable thin mirror telescopes

Gemini Telescope mirror: 8m diameter, 20cm thick

VLT mirror cell for 8m mirror, ~20cm thick

Lowest resonance frequencies on large telescopes are ~10 Hz

You might also like