News in Focus: Omicron Likely To Weaken Covid Vaccine Protection
News in Focus: Omicron Likely To Weaken Covid Vaccine Protection
News in Focus: Omicron Likely To Weaken Covid Vaccine Protection
News in focus
SPENCER PLATT/GETTY
OMICRON LIKELY
TO WEAKEN COVID
VACCINE PROTECTION
Existing vaccines could be less effective against the fast-spreading coronavirus
variant, but boosters should improve immunity.
By Ewen Callaway
T
“We’re likely to see reduced effectiveness of “We still need to wait for more effectiveness
vaccines against preventing infection,” says data and clear signals from the places where
he fast-spreading Omicron SARS-CoV-2 Penny Moore, a virologist at the University of this is blowing up first,” says Ben Murrell, an
variant is highly likely to compromise Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa, interdisciplinary virologist and immunologist
some of the protection from vaccines, who co-authored one of the studies. “I think it’s at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, who
suggest the first laboratory studies of a strong argument to get boosters out there.” co-led one of the studies.
Omicron’s ability to evade immunity. The studies, which measure the capacity
But the preliminary results — released by of antibodies in people’s blood to block the Many mutations
teams in South Africa, Germany and Sweden, infection of cells in a dish, have not yet been Researchers in Botswana and South Africa
as well as by the Pfizer–BioNTech collaboration peer reviewed, and do not tell researchers identified Omicron in late November, and
— hint that protection from existing vaccines the extent to which vaccines’ ability to pro- teams worldwide have since been racing to
won’t be totally wiped out, and that boosters tect against COVID-19 — in particular, its most understand the variant’s properties and the
should improve immunity to Omicron. severe forms — could be compromised. risks that it poses. Preliminary data from South
FAIL HIGH-PROFILE
against Omicron, on average, than against
an earlier strain of SARS-CoV-2. That find-
REPLICATION TEST
ing was similar to the results from two other
studies: one reported by Pfizer and BioNTech
in an 8 December press release, and the
other released on Twitter and later posted
on medRxiv by virologist Sandra Ciesek at Barriers to reproducing preclinical results included
the Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany
(A. Wilhelm et al. Preprint at medRxiv https:// unhelpful author communication.
doi.org/g8sz; 2021).
By Asher Mullard
A
A fourth study, led by Murrell and virolo- The low replication rate is “frankly,
gist Daniel Sheward, also at the Karolinska outrageous”, says Glenn Begley, an oncologist
Institute, reported a smaller reduction in US$2-million, 8-year attempt to and co-founder of Parthenon Therapeutics
levels of Omicron-neutralizing antibodies replicate influential preclinical cancer in Cambridge, Massachusetts, who was not
in two groups of participants: 17 health-care research papers has released its final involved in the study. But it isn’t unexpected,
workers, who had all been previously infected, — and disquieting — results. Fewer he agrees. In 2012, while at the biotech firm
and 17 Swedish blood donors. The research- than half of the experiments assessed Amgen in Thousand Oaks, California, Begley’s
ers cannot determine the vaccine status of stood up to scrutiny, reports the Reproduci- team helped to draw attention to growing evi-
the anonymous blood donors, but say they bility Project: Cancer Biology (RPCB) team in dence of a ‘reproducibility crisis’, the concern
will soon update their paper with vaccination eLife1,2. The project — one of the most robust that many research findings cannot be repli-
information from the health-care workers. reproducibility studies performed so far — cated. Over the previous decade, his haema-
Despite differences in results — which are documented how hurdles including vague tology and oncology team had been able to
common in such virus-neutralization assays — research protocols and uncooperative authors confirm the results of only 6 of the 53 (11%)
the labs’ conclusions are similar, and show that delayed the initiative by five years and halved landmark papers it assessed, despite working
Omicron’s effects on neutralizing antibodies its scope. alongside the papers’ original authors. Other
are “not complete knockouts”, says Murrell. “These results aren’t surprising. And, simul- analyses have reported low replication rates in
“The magnitude is still a little up for question.” taneously, they’re shocking,” says Brian Nosek, drug discovery, neuroscience and psychology.
an RPCB investigator and executive director of
Booster protection the Center for Open Science in Charlottesville, Double take
The results suggest that vaccines’ effective- Virginia. Although initially planning to repeat The RPCB — a partnership between the Center
ness is likely to be significantly modified by 193 experiments from 53 papers, the team ran for Open Science and Science Exchange, a
Omicron — but precisely how much is hard to just 50 experiments from 23 papers. marketplace for research services in Palo