This study examines the relationship between financial policy (debt policy, investment

policy, and dividend policy) and earnings management moderated by contextual variable
such as the internal mechanism of Corporate Governance. Specifically, this study examines
whether each moderated variables or the interaction some of them influence the relationship
between financial policy and earnings management. The sample in this study is the
manufacturing sector companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) and listed in the
Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange (KLSE) that providing annual financial reporting from 2004
through 2010, Analysis data on this study are based on data 2005-2010. The theory
underlying the agency theory. The results show that the listed companies in BEI and the
KLSE, the three policies (debt debt policy, dividend and investment policy) effect on the
management of earnings (before any impact of the GCG). Good corporate governance leads
to differences in the results of companies listed on the Stock Exchange and the KLSE.
Results for companies listed on the Stock Exchange after the impact of the GCG show that
only the dividend policy and investment policies that affect the management of earnings.
These results indicate that firms in Indonesia under Investment. In contrast results for
companies listed on the KLSE after the impact of GCG show that policy of debt and
investment policies affect the management of earnings. Results for companies listed on
KLSE indicates that the more over-Investment management, the more widely used internal
funds for investment and debt payments.

INTRODUCTION

The managerial relation is one of the Key agency problems since principal (share-holder) and
agent (management) can have Different interest and a conflict of interest. Whereas
shareholder seek the maximization Of their wealth and encourage the maxi- mization of the
firm’s value, managers’ Interests are usually linked to the compensation both with money and
perquisites. The that firm financial policy will appear on financial state- ment especially at
the earnings infor mation. Earnings information is important indi- cator for evaluating firm
financial perfor- mance. Manager determine the short termreported earnings of their
companies by : 1) Managing, providing leadership, and directing the use of resources in
operation, 2) Selecting the timing of some non operating events, and 3) Choosing the
accounting methods that are used to measure short term earnings. Most managers always
exerta stable financial performance. They know that managing earnings can be part of
managers’ job. Managers of firms routinely manipulate or“manage” reported financial
information in response to a wide variety of incentives with potentially significant
consequences tothe firm’s management, investor, creditor,and others. The level of earnings
management will be higher if management has incentive and opportunity to do so. The
existence of information asymmetry between firm management and firm shareholder is an
necessary condition, which must be met for earnings manage- ment to exist. When
information asymmetry is high, stakeholders do not have necessary resources, incentives or
access to relevant information to monitor manager’s action. On the contrary, the Corporate
Gover-nance mechanism can decrease the conflict of interests between managers and share
holder. Aim of research is to investigate the moderating effect of Corporate Governance (CG)
on the association between the financial policy (debt, dividend and investment policy) and the
magnitude of earnings manafement.

Corporate Policy and Earning Management

The effect of debt and debt covenants on earnings managemen. An appealing explanation is
that the managers’ perceived cost of technical default of debt covenants is higher than the
perceive loss in value resulting from managing the discretionary accrual. Therefore, they
engage in income increasing accruals when the debt covenant are likely to be binding and in
income decreasing to ‘bank’ some of the income for future periods of possible binding debt
constraints. If this is trur, in a pooled cross- sectional analysis, irrespective of whether the
debt constraints are binding or not, the magnitude of discretionary accrual must
besignificantly higher for firms with more debt than for firms with less debt. Suggesting that
managers of high-debt firms are more likely to manage earnings than low debt firms.

HYPOTHESIS

Influence of Corporate Policy (Debt Policy, Dividend Policy And Investment Policy) on
Earnings Management (H1)

The ratio of dividend payments and profits of the period. The ratio of dividend payments
reflects the company's policy to pay the rights of shareholders, usually causing the positive
sentiment from the market. Savov, (2006) found evidence that the announcement of dividend
has a positive relationship with stock returns. This means there is a positive relationship bet-
ween dividend policy with earnings mana- gement (Savov, 2006; Achmad, Subekti dan Sari,
2007).

H1: Debt Policy, Dividend Policy And Investment Policy Affect Of Earnings
Management.
Influence of Corporate Policy (Debt Policy, Dividend Policy and Invesment Policy) on
Earning Management if Moderated byThe Corporate Governance Mechanism. (H2a,
H2b, H2C)

Badera, (2006) found that the oversight mechanism, represented by board member has a
relationship with the company's performance, in other words the greater the commissioners
the more serious in mana- ging the company's management to increase corporate
performance.

Xie, Davidson and Dadalt, (2003) found that the audit committee from outside can protect the
interests of shareholders from actions earnings management made by management.

achmawati and Triatmoko, (2007) found that there is a negative influence and significance of
the audit committee and discreationari Accrual, contrary Siallagan, and Machfoedz, (2006)
found that the existence of the audit committee has a positive influence quality and value of
corporate profits.

Siallagan, and Machfoedz, (2006) found that leverage can reduce the conflict bet- ween the
manager and the bondholder.

From the above description, concluded that the research aims to see whether the presence of
corporate governance policies will minimize the impact of debt on ear- nings management.
Pratana and Mach- foedz, (2003); Xie, Biao, Wallace and Peter, (2003) concluded that the
independent commissioner could affect earnings mana- gement actions. In this study,
measurement for the CG do not use measurements sepa- rated as above, but using the
measurement of all indicators that form the internal control mechanism of the CG included
(Board of Commissioners, the Audit Com- mittee, as shareholders and management) by using
factor score. Thus derived hypotheses.

H2a: The negative effect of debt policy on the management of profit when controlled by
Corporate Governance mechanism

Provision of dividend policy will give a positive signal to the market, means that the dividend
policy will increase the market performance. Therefore the higher the pay out devidend
policy will affect management behavior to manage earnings. The existence of the audit
committee is expected to reduce the behavior of managers in the earnings management if
associated with dividend policy. Large agency conflicts will occur in the condition if the
number of audit committees are less and do not have financial expertise. Thusderived
hypotheses.

H2b: Dividend Policy a Negative Effect on Earnings Management When Control led By
Corporate Governance Mecha- nism.

if the company carrying out projects worth now positive, the investment will be taken
positively by the market because it expected to generate investment income flows and cash
flow will be the future that ultimately increase the value of the company. With the GCG it is
expected that expenditure will reduce the company's investment management to profit
management.

H2C : Investment Policies Negative Effect on Earnings Management When is