TRANSMISIÓN ASCENSOR – MEMORIA

DE CÁLCULO
Page 2 of 57
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................. 4
2 SCOPE .................................................................................................................................. 4
3 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ................................................................................................ 4
4 GLOSARY ............................................................................................................................. 4
5 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................... 4
6 CALCULATIONS................................................................................................................... 5
6.1 Load Data.............................................................................................................................. 5
6.2 Cable Selection .................................................................................................................... 5
6.3 Drum Geometry.................................................................................................................... 5
6.4 Efficiencies & Powers ......................................................................................................... 7
6.4.1 Efficiencies ..................................................................................................................... 7
6.4.2 Powers ........................................................................................................................... 7
6.5 Motor Selection .................................................................................................................... 8
6.6 Reduction Ratios ............................................................................................................... 12
6.7 Speeds ................................................................................................................................ 13
6.8 Maximum Steady State Forces & Torques...................................................................... 13
6.9 Startup Torques & Cable Force........................................................................................ 14
6.10 Toothed Belt Selection...................................................................................................... 15
6.10.1 Data.............................................................................................................................. 15
6.10.2 Design Power Calculation ............................................................................................ 16
6.10.3 Section Size Selection ................................................................................................. 17
6.10.4 Pulley Combination ...................................................................................................... 17
6.10.5 Belt Length and Centre Distance ................................................................................. 20
6.10.6 Belt Width ..................................................................................................................... 22
6.10.6.1 Power capacity for 1 mm width ............................................................................... 22
6.10.6.2 Number of teeth in mesh......................................................................................... 23
6.10.7 Belt & Pulleys Designation ........................................................................................... 24
6.10.8 Belt Installation Tension ............................................................................................... 26
6.11 Speed Reducer Selection.................................................................................................. 27
6.11.1 Load Factor .................................................................................................................. 28
6.11.2 Model Selection............................................................................................................ 30
6.11.3 Reducer Shafts Load Checking ................................................................................... 32
6.11.4 Reducer Lubrication Method ........................................................................................ 34
6.11.5 Reducer Designation.................................................................................................... 34
6.11.6 Reducer Dimensions.................................................................................................... 34
6.12 Through Wall Axle Calculation......................................................................................... 40
6.13 Angular Gearbox Selection............................................................................................... 41
6.14 Couplings Selection .......................................................................................................... 45
6.14.1 Coupling for Reducer Output Shaft.............................................................................. 45
6.14.2 Coupling for Angular Gearbox Input Shaft ................................................................... 46
6.14.3 Coupling for Angular Gearbox Output Shaft ................................................................ 46
6.15 Torque Limiter Selection................................................................................................... 49
6.16 Reducer Service Factor Verification ................................................................................ 54
6.17 Startup Time ....................................................................................................................... 55
7 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................. 57

Page 3 of 57
1 PURPOSE

1. To calculate the basic data for transmission commercial components selection.

2. To select the commercial preliminary components for the Service Pool Elevator driving system.

2 SCOPE

1. This report shows only a preliminary calculation and selection process. It must be checked later,
when the final configuration and commercial components of the elevator are defined.
2. Selected commercial components are only for reference and may vary according to those available
in the market.
3. Also mock up results will serve the as a guide for any future modification prior to the final calculation
and components procurement.
4. Dimensions of preliminarily selected commercial components serve as a reference for people
involved in issuing detailed engineering and manufacturing drawings and specifications.

3 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

a) RRRP-6810-2BEIN-001 – Service Pool Elevator (SPE) – Technical Specification.

b) RRRP-6810-3AEIN-003 – Service Pool Elevator (SPE) – General Assembly.
c) RRRP-6810-3AEIN-005 – Service Pool Elevator (SPE) – Driving System Subassy.
4 GLOSARY

a) SPE: Service Pool Elevator

b) THC: Transfer Hot Cell
c) SPO: Service Pool
5 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

1. The Figure 1 shows schematically the selected arrangement for the different components.
2. The system comprises the following main components:
a) An electric motor.
b) A torque limiter to avoid overloading the system.
c) A toothed belt that ensures low noise at high speed and avoids excessive radial loads on motor
and reducer shafts.
d) A cycloidal reducer with coaxial input and output.
e) An axle that connects the components outside and inside the cell.
f) An angular gearbox to set the drum axle orientation.
g) A drum to roll the cable.
h) A cable tension detector with guiding pulleys to stop the motor in case of an overload.
i) A set of couplings to link shafts of different components.
3. The motor and the reducer are linked by means of a belt in order to have the motor shaft pointing
outside the enclosure. This is for using a crank to move the system in case of an energy failure.
4. The system will be calculated for four (4) timing belts. This is for changing the final ratio in order to
match the carrier speed and the required speed for the gamma detector.
5. The design tries to keep as much components as possible, outside the cell to avoid exposure to
radiation.

Page 4 of 57
 Reducer
N2 n2T2γ 2 η2 i2 J2i
Couplings Jcp η3 i3 J3i
E2 Angular
Gearbox

D21 Z 21 J 21
Timing
Pulley
N4 n4T4 γ 4
E4
i η1
Timing 1 Drum Guiding Carrier
Belt ηd J Pulleys
d
ηp ηc mc vc

Torque
Limiter
&
Timing D11Z11 J11
Pulley
N3n3T3 γ 3 Through
N1n1T1 γ 1 E3 wall
E1 Motor Jmot Ja η a axle

Figure 1: General scheme of the transmission arrangement.

6 CALCULATIONS

6.1 LOAD DATA

Estimated carrier mass: mc := 25 ⋅ kg

⎛ 2.5 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Carrier speed: vc :=
⎜ 3 ⎟ m
⎜ 4 ⎟ min
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 5.5 ⎠

6.2 CABLE SELECTION

1. The selected cable has the following data: Galvanised, 1 x 37, tensile strength 1765 MPa, break load
11100 N.

Cable diameter: dc := 3.5mm

Preliminary cable length: Lc := 10.5m

Gap between grooves: gp := 1mm

6.3 DRUM GEOMETRY

1. If the cable is rolled "nc" turns around the drum, the straightened out helix will look like in Figure 2,

Page 5 of 57
 Lc
A
α n c.p

φdm
n c. π. φdm

Figure 2: Scheme of the rolling drum and cable layout.

2. The helix pitch is calculated based on the previous data. Observe that the factor 1.1 is an adjustment
made to consider that the helix groove is wider than the cable as recommended by cable
manufacturers.
3. In Figure 3 it is possible to see a cut view of the drum, showing the groove and the main dimensions
calculated.

gp dc

1.1*dc p

Figure 3: Drum groove arrangement

Cable pitch: p := 1.1 ⋅ dc + gp p = 4.85 mm

If the drum diameter is assumed as a nominal pipe size (6" sch 40) it will be:

Drum maximum diameter: φ dm := 166.5mm equal to cable mean diameter

Helix root diameter: φ hr := φ dm − dc φ hr = 163.00 mm

Page 6 of 57
From the helix graphic it is possible to derive the following expression
Lc
Rolled cable turns: nc := nc = 20.07
(π⋅φ dm) 2
+p
2

Minimum cable rolling length: A := nc ⋅ p A = 97.35 mm

α := atan ⎜
⎛ p ⎞ α = 0.01 rad
Helix angle: ⎟
⎝ π⋅φ dm ⎠
α = 0.53 deg

6.4 EFFICIENCIES & POWERS

6.4.1 Efficiencies
1. Based on commercial data, type of device, type of service, lubrication and experience it is possible to
state the following efficiencies for different components of the driving system and for the whole
system.

Carrier efficiency: η c := 0.90

Guiding pulleys efficiency: η p := 0.99

Drum efficiency: η d := 0.99

Angular gearbox efficiency: η 3 := 0.95

Trough wall axle efficiency: η a := 0.99

Reducer efficiency: η 2 := 0.92

Timing belt efficiency: η 1 := 0.98

Total efficiency w/o motor: η twm := η c ⋅ η p ⋅ η d ⋅ η 3 ⋅ η a ⋅ η 2 ⋅ η 1 η twm = 0.748

6.4.2 Powers
1. The following calculations show the required powers in different stages of the driving system.

Load force: Fc := mc ⋅ g Fc = 245.17 N

⎛ 10.22 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Net output power: Nc := Fc ⋅ vc Nc =
⎜ 12.26 ⎟W
⎜ 16.34 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 22.47 ⎠

Page 7 of 57
 ⎛ 11.58 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Nc
N4 = ⎜ ⎟W
13.90
Angular gearbox output power: N4 :=
ηc ⋅ηp ⋅ηd ⎜ 18.53 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 25.48 ⎠
⎛ 12.19 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
N4
N3 = ⎜ ⎟W
14.63
Angular gearbox input power: N3 :=
η3 ⎜ 19.50 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 26.82 ⎠
⎛ 12.31 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
N3
N3r = ⎜ ⎟W
14.78
Speed reducer output power: N3r :=
ηa ⎜ 19.70 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 27.09 ⎠
⎛ 13.38 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
N3r
N2 = ⎜ ⎟W
16.06
Speed reducer input power: N2 :=
η2 ⎜ 21.41 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 29.45 ⎠
⎛ 13.66 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
N2
N1 = ⎜ ⎟W
16.39
Motor output power: N1 :=
η1 ⎜ 21.85 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 30.05 ⎠
6.5 MOTOR SELECTION
1. Now an electric motor is preliminarily selected in order to know its speed.
2. Based on the output power, required output speed and the possibility to find the motor in the market,
the preliminarily selected motor has the following data:

π rad
Units equivalence: rpm := ⋅
30 s
Output power: Pmn := 0.167hp Pmn = 124.53 W

Nº of poles: Np := 6

Frequency : f := 50Hz

Tension : Vm := 415V

Full power speed : nmfp := 920rpm f=50 Hz, p=6

Full load torque (nominal): Tmf := 1.25N⋅ m

Maximum torque: Tmm := 2.40 ⋅ Tmf Tmm = 3.00 N⋅ m

Starting torque: Tms := 2.40 ⋅ Tmf Tms = 3.00 N⋅ m

3. In this case, WEG is the selected trademark.

Page 8 of 57
4. The Figure 4 shows the technical data for the preliminary motor.
5. Motor dimensions are shown in Figure 7.

Figure 4: Motor technical data.

Page 9 of 57
Figure 5: Torque (T/Tn) and Current (I/In) curves related to speed.

Figure 6: Efficiency, Power factor, Current and Slip curves related to load.

Page 10 of 57
Figure 7: Motor frame dimensions.

6. It is important to point out that the characteristics of the definitive motor could be different, because
those depend on the trademark.
7. Taking into account that the motor casing and general characteristics is standardised (IEC in this
case), is likely to find an equivalent motor of another trademark which has similar data.
8. It is possible to see that the motor has a power that exceeds the maximum required.
9. If components are selected for the required torques and powers, the motor full load torque will be
much greater than the required one and the components of the driving system would not support a
peak torque from the motor.
10. For this reason, all components will be calculated for the motor starting torque and for nominal
power. Also there will be a torque limiter between the motor and the belt, or an electrical switch,
which will avoid overloading the components located after it.
11. Taking into account the preceding values and the motor slip curve (curve C Figure 6) it is possible to
know the slip at the estimated power rates actually given by the motor. Thus the actual speed is
approximately calculated as follows:
⎛ 10.97 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
N1 ⋅ 100
L% = ⎜ ⎟
13.16
Actual load: L% := %
Pmn ⎜ 17.55 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 24.13 ⎠

Page 11 of 57
 ⎛ 0.74% ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Motor slip%: Sp := ⎜ 0.9% ⎟
⎜ 1.1% ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 1.6% ⎠
⎛ 992.60 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
n1 = ⎜ ⎟ rpm
991.00
Actual speed: n1 := 1000rpm − Sp ⋅ 1000 rpm
⎜ 989.00 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 984.00 ⎠

6.6 REDUCTION RATIOS

⎛ 4.78 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
2 ⋅ vc
n4 = ⎜ ⎟ rpm
5.74
Drum speed: n4 :=
φ dm ⎜ 7.65 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 10.51 ⎠
⎛ 207.68 ⎞
n1 ⎜ ⎟
it = ⎜ ⎟
i 172.79
Total reduction ratios: i := 1 .. 4 it :=
i n4 ⎜ 129.33 ⎟
i ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 93.58 ⎠

These ratios will be approximately achieved in three stages:

Reducer ratio: i2 := 87

Angular gearbox ratio: i3 := 1

⎛ 2.39 ⎞
it ⎜ ⎟
i1 = ⎜ ⎟
i 1.99
Calculated belt ratios: i1 :=
i i2 ⋅ i3 ⎜ 1.49 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 1.08 ⎠

Now belt ratio is selected from commercial tables. Then the total ratio and carrier speed
is verified.

⎛ 2.40 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Selected belt ratio: i1 := ⎜ 2.00 ⎟
⎜ 1.50 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 1.07 ⎠
⎛ 208.80 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Recalculated total reduction ratio: it := i1 ⋅ i2 ⋅ i3 it = ⎜ 174.00 ⎟
⎜ 130.50 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 93.09 ⎠

Page 12 of 57
6.7 SPEEDS

⎛ 992.60 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
n1 = ⎜ ⎟ rpm
991.00
Motor speed:
⎜ 989.00 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 984.00 ⎠
⎛ 413.58 ⎞
n1 ⎜ ⎟
n2 = ⎜ ⎟ rpm
i 495.50
Reducer input speed: n2 :=
i i1 ⎜ 659.33 ⎟
i ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 919.63 ⎠
⎛ 4.75 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
n2
n3 = ⎜ ⎟ rpm
5.70
Reducer output speed: n3 :=
i2 ⎜ 7.58 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 10.57 ⎠
⎛ 4.75 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
n4 = ⎜ ⎟ rpm
5.70
Drum speed: n4 := n3
⎜ 7.58 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 10.57 ⎠
⎛ 2.49 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
φ dm
vc = ⎜ ⎟ m
2.98
Carrier speed: vc := n3 ⋅
2 ⎜ 3.96 ⎟ min
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 5.53 ⎠

6.8 MAXIMUM STEADY STATE FORCES & TORQUES

1. Supposing that carrier load does not vary with speed for steady state:

Fc
Force in the cable: F cb := F cb = 277.97 N
η c ⋅η 1
⎛ 23.26 ⎞
N4 ⎜ ⎟
Drum torque: T 4 :=
i
T4 =
⎜ 23.30 ⎟ N⋅ m
i n4 ⎜ 23.35 ⎟
i ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 23.02 ⎠

Page 13 of 57
 ⎛ 24.49 ⎞
N3 ⎜ ⎟
T3 = ⎜ ⎟ N⋅m
i 24.53
Angular gearbox input torque: T3 :=
i n3 ⎜ 24.58 ⎟
i ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 24.23 ⎠
⎛ 24.73 ⎞
N3r ⎜ ⎟
T3r = ⎜ ⎟ N⋅m
i 24.77
Reducer output torque: T3r :=
i n3 ⎜ 24.82 ⎟
i ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 24.47 ⎠
⎛ 0.31 ⎞
N2 ⎜ ⎟
T2 = ⎜ ⎟ N⋅m
i 0.31
Reducer input torque: T2 :=
i n2 ⎜ 0.31 ⎟
i ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 0.31 ⎠
⎛ 0.13 ⎞
N1 ⎜ ⎟
T1 = ⎜ ⎟ N⋅m
i 0.16
Motor torque: T1 :=
i n1 ⎜ 0.21 ⎟
i ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 0.29 ⎠

6.9 STARTUP TORQUES & CABLE FORCE

1. At start up, the motor gives the locked rotor torque to the system, so the intermediate transmission
components are, in the first moment, under the action of torques which are derived from that one.
2. Now the torques in the components of the transmission will be calculated for the moment when the
motor applies the locked rotor torque and starts moving the system.

Startup motor torque: T1s := Tms T1s = 3.00 N⋅ m

⎛ 7.20 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Startup reducer input torque: T2s := i1 ⋅ T1s T2s =
⎜ 6.00 ⎟ N⋅m
⎜ 4.50 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 3.21 ⎠

⎛ 626.40 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Startup reducer output torque: T3s := T1s ⋅ i1 ⋅ i2 T3s =
⎜ 522.00 ⎟ N⋅m
⎜ 391.50 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 279.27 ⎠

Page 14 of 57
 ⎛ 626.40 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
T4s = ⎜ ⎟ N⋅m
522.00
Startup drum torque: T4s := T1s ⋅ i1 ⋅ i2 ⋅ i3
⎜ 391.50 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 279.27 ⎠

⎛ 7524.32 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
2 ⋅ T4s
Fcs = ⎜ ⎟N
6270.27
Startup cable force: Fcs :=
φ dm ⎜ 4702.70 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 3354.59 ⎠

6.10 TOOTHED BELT SELECTION

1. In case of an occasional friction force in the system, a power raise (peak) will appear and the motor
power and torque will increase beyond the normal limits. The toothed belt is calculated for that
maximum motor power in order to have a safety factor.
2. Figure 8 shows some terms and dimensions of synchronous drives.

6.10.1 Data

Type of motor: Three-phase Induction Motor - Squirrel Cage - AC

electrical motor - High Torque

Motor power: N1r := Pmn N1r = 0.125 kW

⎛ 992.60 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Motor speed: n1 =
⎜ 991.00 ⎟ rpm
⎜ 989.00 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 984.00 ⎠

⎛ 2.40 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Required reduction ratio: i1 =
⎜ 2.00 ⎟
⎜ 1.50 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 1.07 ⎠

Required center distance: Cbrmin := 260mm Cbrmax := 290mm

Page 15 of 57
 D

Figure 8:
Basic terminology and dimensions of a synchronous drive.

6.10.2 Design Power Calculation

1. From Table 1, depending on the driven system, motor and service type, the service class factor is
selected.
2. Also from Table 1 the multiplicative ratio coefficient and the operation time coefficient are selected.

Page 16 of 57
3. Then the Service Factor and design power are calculated.

Service class factor: K1 := 1.8

Operation time factor: K2 := −0.2

Multiplicative ratio factor: K3 := 0

Service factor: Fs := K1 + K2 + K3 Fs = 1.60

Design power: N1d := F s ⋅ N1r N1d = 0.199 kW

6.10.3 Section Size Selection

1. From Table 2, depending on design power and driver pulley speed, the recommended section size is
selected.
2. The selected size for this case is L

Belt pitch: pb := 9.52mm

6.10.4 Pulley Combination

1. Observing the minimum diameters from Table 3, a standard reduction ratio, and pulleys
characteristics are selected from Table 4. Then the RIM speed is verified.

⎛ 2.40 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
i1 = ⎜ ⎟
2.00
Selected ratio:
⎜ 1.50 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 1.07 ⎠

Page 17 of 57
Table 1: Service Factor Chart

Page 18 of 57
Table 2: Cross Section Selection Chart

⎛ 30 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Z11 := ⎜
30 ⎟
Driver pulley teeth:
⎜ 24 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 30 ⎠
⎛ 72 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Z21 := ⎜
60 ⎟
Driven pulley teeth:
⎜ 36 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 32 ⎠
⎛ 90.96 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
D11 := ⎜ ⎟ mm
90.96
Driver pulley primitive diameter:
⎜ 72.77 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 90.96 ⎠
⎛ 218.29 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
D21 := ⎜ ⎟ mm
181.92
Driven pulley primitive diameter:
⎜ 109.14 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 97.03 ⎠

Page 19 of 57
 ⎛ 29.69 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
vb = ⎜ ⎟m
29.64
RIM speed: vb := pb ⋅ Z11 ⋅ n1
i i i ⎜ 23.66 ⎟ s
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 29.43 ⎠
2. As recommended by manufacturers it is less than 33 m/s

Table 3: Minimum Pulley Diameters Chart

6.10.5 Belt Length and Centre Distance

1. From Table 4 and Table 5, theoretical distance between centres and belt denomination are selected.
Then the belt length is calculated and the centre distance corrected.

⎛ 283.3 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Theoretical distance between shafts' centres: Cb1 :=
⎜ 277.2 ⎟ mm
⎜ 266.1 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 261.9 ⎠
Belt length code designation: 420L
390L
322L
322L

⎛ 112 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Number of belt teeth: Zb1 :=
⎜ 104 ⎟
⎜ 86 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 86 ⎠

⎛ 42.00 ⎞ ⎛ 1066.80 ⎞
⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
Lb1 := ⎜ ⎟ in L = ⎜ 990.60 ⎟ mm
39.00
Standard belt primitive (pitch) length:
⎜ 32.25 ⎟ b1 ⎜
819.15 ⎟
⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 32.25 ⎠ ⎝ 819.15 ⎠

Page 20 of 57
 ( i)
2
D21 − D11
( )
i
Belt primitive (pitch) length: Lbc := 2 ⋅ Cb1 + 1.57 ⋅ D21 + D11 +
i i i i 4 ⋅ Cb1
i

⎛ 1066.43 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Lbc =
⎜ 990.28 ⎟ mm
⎜ 819.04 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 818.98 ⎠

⎛ 0.37 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Center distance correction factor: Ccf := Lb1 − Lbc Ccf =
⎜ 0.32 ⎟ mm
⎜ 0.11 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 0.17 ⎠

⎛ 283.67 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Corrected center distance: Cbc := Cb1 + Ccf Cbc =
⎜ 277.52 ⎟ mm
⎜ 266.21 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 262.07 ⎠

2. The calculated centre distance is a minimum and must be adjustable in order to give the belt a little
amount of tension.

Adjusting distance: ( )
da := max Cbc − min Cbc( )

da = 21.60 mm

Table 4: Centre Distance Chart

Page 21 of 57
Table 5: Centre Distance Chart

6.10.6 Belt Width

6.10.6.1 Power capacity for 1 mm width

1. From Table 6, the power capacity per mm of belt width is calculated, interpolating for the actual
speed.
2. The belt width is then calculated as follows:

⎛ 1.04 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Nt1 := ⎜ ⎟ kW
1.04
Power capacity at 900 rpm: nt1 := 900rpm
(for 24 and 30 teeth) ⎜ 0.84 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 1.04 ⎠
⎛ 1.16 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Nt2 := ⎜ ⎟ kW
1.16
Power capacity at 1000 rpm: nt2 := 1000rpm
(for 24 and 30 teeth) ⎜ 0.93 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 1.16 ⎠

Page 22 of 57
 Power capacity at actual speed: Nbc1 := Nt1 +
( i ) ( i i)
n1 − nt1 ⋅ Nt2 − Nt1

i i nt2 − nt1
( interpolated )
⎛ 1.15 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Nbc1 =
⎜ 1.15 ⎟ kW
⎜ 0.92 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 1.14 ⎠

6.10.6.2 Number of teeth in mesh

1. The TIM is the number of teeth that are in contact with teeth in the pulley at the same time.

⎛ 153.03 ⎞
Arc of contact: α 11 := 180 − 60 ⋅
( D21 − D11
i i ) ⎜
α 11 = ⎜
160.31
⎟
⎟
i Cb1 ⎜ 171.80 ⎟
i ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 178.61 ⎠
⎛ 12.75 ⎞
α 11 ⋅ Z11 ⎜ ⎟
TIM = ⎜ ⎟
i i 13.36
Teeth in mesh: TIM :=
i 360 ⎜ 11.45 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 14.88 ⎠
2. The TIM is greater than 5 so it is no necessary to correct the power per mm of belt width. Then,
⎛1⎞
⎜ ⎟
TIMF := ⎜ ⎟
1
TIM factor:
⎜1⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝1⎠
⎛ 1.15 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Nbc1c = ⎜ ⎟ kW
1.15
Corrected power: Nbc1c := TIMF ⋅ Nbc1
i i i ⎜ 0.92 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 1.14 ⎠
3. From Table 6, with the ratio between design power and corrected power capacity for 1 mm width
(width factor), the necessary width for the actual power to transmit is found.

⎛ 0.17 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
N1d
Fw1 = ⎜ ⎟
0.17
Width factor: Fw1 :=
i Nbc1c ⎜ 0.22 ⎟
i ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 0.17 ⎠
Minimum width (Manufacturer's table): Bw := 9.525mm

4. Belt final width is greater than the given above for the following two reasons. Because the previous is
a non-standard width and because the minimum pulley that fits on a commercial torque limiter is for a
L075 belt. Then the width selected is:

Page 23 of 57
 Selected width (Manufacturer's table): Bw := 19.1mm

Table 6: Power Ratings Chart

6.10.7 Belt & Pulleys Designation

1. The ANSI codes to purchase belt and pulleys are the following

Page 24 of 57
Designation for selected belts: 420 L 075
390 L 075
322 L 075
322 L 075

Designation for pulleys: TB30 L 075 and 72 L 075

TB30 L 075 and 60 L 075
TB24 L 075 and 36 L 075
TB30 L 075 and 32 L 075

2. The pulleys will be flanged. One will be type “bored and keyed hub” (Type 1F) and the other will be of
the “taper bushed” type (Type 2F) (later will be machined to adapt it to the torque limiter) as shown in
Figure 9.

F
L
F
P.D.

A
P.D.
A

Figure 9: Selected pulleys types.

Table 7: Sizes for Taper Bushed Type Pulleys

Page 25 of 57
Table 8: Sizes for Bored Hub Type Pulleys

6.10.8 Belt Installation Tension

1. Installation tension must be reached applying a transversal force to the belt in the middle of a strand.
This force should be enough to deflect the belt to the value Db.
2. If the force is between the minimum (Fmi) and maximum (Fma) value calculated below, the belt tension
is correct.
3. As recommended by manufacturers, the proper tension is reached when all the following conditions
for deflecting force and belt deflection are met:

⎛ 23.00 ⎞
N1 ⎜ ⎟
Fma = ⎜ ⎟N
i 27.65
Maximum installation tension: Fma := 50 ⋅
i vb ⎜ 46.17 ⎟
i ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 51.05 ⎠

Page 26 of 57
 ⎛ 11.50 ⎞
N1 ⎜ ⎟
Fmi = ⎜ ⎟N
i 13.82
Minimum installation tension: Fmi := 25 ⋅
i vb ⎜ 23.09 ⎟
i ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 25.52 ⎠

⎛ 276.43 ⎞
⎛ D21i − D11i ⎞
2 ⎜ ⎟
S=⎜ ⎟ mm
( )
2 ⎜ 273.76
Belt span: S := Cbc − ⎟
i i ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎜ 265.59 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 262.05 ⎠

S
Required belt deflection: Db :=
50

⎛ 5.53 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Db = ⎜ ⎟ mm
5.48
⎜ 5.31 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 5.24 ⎠

Figure 10: Scheme of belt tension setup.

6.11 SPEED REDUCER SELECTION

1. For selection purposes, the selected trademark is Sumitomo. The type of reducer can be seen in
Figure 11.

Page 27 of 57
2. Some specifications of the Sumitomo reducers are in Table 9

Figure 11: Reducer type.

Table 9: Cyclo Speed Reducers Standard Specifications

6.11.1 Load Factor

1. From Table 10, with the type of driven system the service classification is “uniform load” (U). From
Table 11 with less than 3 hr/day of operation, the load factor selected is:
Load factor: LF := 0.8

Page 28 of 57
Table 10: AGMA Load Classifications

Page 29 of 57
Table 11: Recommended Reducer Service Factors

6.11.2 Model Selection

1. The speed reducer selection is based on torques or powers. In this case, the reducer is selected for
the startup torque.
⎛ 626.40 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
T3re = ⎜ ⎟ N⋅m
522.00
Required output torque: T3re := T3s
⎜ 391.50 ⎟
( slowspeed shaft ) ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 279.27 ⎠
⎛ 7.20 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
T3re
T2re = ⎜ ⎟ N⋅m
6.00
Required input torque: T2re :=
i2 ⎜ 4.50 ⎟
(high speed shaft) ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 3.21 ⎠
⎛ 4.75 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
n3 = ⎜ ⎟ rpm
5.70
Output speed:
⎜ 7.58 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 10.57 ⎠
⎛ 413.58 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
n2 = ⎜ ⎟ rpm
495.50
Input speed:
⎜ 659.33 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 919.63 ⎠
Adopted reduction ratio: i2 = 87.00

Page 30 of 57
 ⎛ 501.12 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
T3a = ⎜ ⎟ N⋅m
417.60
Actual output torque: T3a := T 3re ⋅ LF
⎜ 313.20 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 223.42 ⎠
⎛ 5.76 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
T2a = ⎜ ⎟ N⋅m
4.80
Actual input torque: T2a := T 2re ⋅ LF
⎜ 3.60 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 2.57 ⎠
2. From the manufacturer's model selection chart (Table 12), for every speed (the closest speed to
each case), 87:1 speed ratio and the actual torque, the selected frame size is 6120
3. The allowable torque for this size (525 N.m) exceeds the calculated actual output torque.
4. Now verification for radial load, axial load and lubrication method will be done in order to confirm the
selected model.

Table 12: Model selection chart

Page 31 of 57
6.11.3 Reducer Shafts Load Checking
1. Types of shaft connections are needed to know the service condition for the shafts. In this case the
connections are:

Coupling with driven system: Free shaft

Coupling with motor: Toothed Belt

Actual loads:

Actual radial load on slow speed shaft: Fr3 := 0

Actual axial load on slow speed shaft: Fa3 := 0

⎛ 66.0 ⎞
2 ⋅ T2re ⎜ ⎟
Actual radial load on high speed shaft: Fr2 :=
i
Fr2 =
⎜ 66.0 ⎟N
i D21 ⎜ 82.5 ⎟
i ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 66.2 ⎠

Actual axial load on high speed shaft: Fa2 := 0

2. The standard allowable radial load for slow speed shaft is taken, for the selected frame size, from
Table 12.

⎛ 9780 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Fr3at := ⎜ ⎟N
9780
Table radial load on slow speed shaft:
(speed 6.67, 8.28 and 10 rpm) ⎜ 9780 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 9780 ⎠

Page 32 of 57
3. The standard allowable radial load for high speed shaft is taken, for the selected frame size, from
Table 13.

⎛ 880 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Fr2at := ⎜ ⎟N
880
Table radial load on high speed shaft:
(speed 580, 720 and 870 rpm) ⎜ 880 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 540 ⎠

4. Now the previously selected values are affected by correction coefficients (from Table 14, Table 15,
and Table 16).
5. These factors take into account the various working conditions like type of connection, shocks and
load location for each shaft.

High speed shaft coupling factor: Cfh := 1.25 timing belt

Slow speed shaft coupling factor: Cfs := 1 no radial loads

High speed shaft shock factor: Fsh := 1 steady load

Slow speed shaft shock factor: Fss := 1 steady load

High speed shaft load location factor: Lfh := 2.22 load at 40 mm from
frame

Slow speed shaft load location factor: Lfs := 1 there is no radial load

Page 33 of 57
 ⎛ 9780.0 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Fr3at
F r3a = ⎜ ⎟N
9780.0
Slow speed shaft: F r3a :=
Cfs ⋅ F ss ⋅ Lfs ⎜ 9780.0 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 9780.0 ⎠

⎛ 317.1 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Fr2at
F r2a = ⎜ ⎟N
317.1
High speed shaft: F r2a :=
Cfh ⋅ Fsh ⋅ Lfh ⎜ 317.1 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 194.6 ⎠

Then F r3 is less than F r3a and F r2 is less than F r2a

6.11.4 Reducer Lubrication Method

1. In Table 22 the lubrication method is verified.

2. In this case the selected reducer uses grease and is maintenance free.

6.11.5 Reducer Designation

1. The ordering code can be made as shown in Figure 12, Table 18 and Table 19.
2. The selected model code is for this case:

CNH - 6120 - G -LB – 87

3. Note that the LB suffix stands for “low backlash” in order to prevent any inverse motion after the
elevator stops.

6.11.6 Reducer Dimensions

1. Refer to Table 20 for general reducer dimensions and to Table 21 for reducer shaft dimensions and
tolerances.

Page 34 of 57
Table 13: High Speed Shaft Overhung Load Capacity (Cf, Lf, Fs = 1)

Table 14: Load Connection Factor – Cf

Page 35 of 57
Table 15: Service Factor – Fs

Table 16: High Speed Shaft Load Location Factor, Lf

Table 17: Moment of Inertia on High Speed Shaft of Cyclo Reducer

UNITS: Jc = x 10-4 kg•m2

Page 36 of 57
Figure 12: Ordering code structure.

Page 37 of 57
Table 18: Suffix designation

Table 19: Mounting positions

Page 38 of 57
Table 20: Reducer dimensions

Page 39 of 57
Table 21: Single Reduction Cyclo Shaft Tolerances

Table 22: Lubrication for Horizontal Mounted Single Reduction Reducers

6.12 THROUGH WALL AXLE CALCULATION

1. The axle is calculated based on the startup torque.

Shaft material: AISI 440F Tempered at 315 ºC

ASTM A 580

6
Yeld strength: σ y := 1900 ⋅ 10 Pa

⎛ 626.40 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Nominal torque: T3s =
⎜ 522.00 ⎟ N⋅m
⎜ 391.50 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 279.27 ⎠

Page 40 of 57
 Nominal bending moment: Ma := 0N⋅ m

Safety factor: sf := 1.25

Using the theory of the strain energy, the required axle diameter is:

3
1 ⎛ 15.38 ⎞
2
⎜ ⎟
⎜ 14.47 ⎟ mm
( )2⎤⎥⎦
⋅ ⎡⎢ 4Ma + 3 ⋅ T 3s
sf 2
Axle diameter: da := 16 ⋅ da =
i π⋅ σ y ⎣ i ⎜ 13.15 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 11.75 ⎠
Using the theory of the maximum shear stress, the diameter will be:
3
1 ⎛ 16.13 ⎞
2
⎜ ⎟
⎜ 15.18 ⎟ mm
⋅ ⎡⎢ Ma + T3s ( )2⎤⎥⎦
sf 2
Axle diameter: da := 32 ⋅ da =
i π⋅ σ y ⎣ i ⎜ 13.79 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 12.32 ⎠
The minimum recommended shaft diameter:

da := 18mm

6.13 ANGULAR GEARBOX SELECTION

1. The selected manufacturer is Superior Gearbox Company. In Figure 13 the selected right angle
gearbox type is shown.

Figure 13: Selected gearbox type.

2. The data for selection process are the following:

Page 41 of 57
 Angular gearbox ratio: i3 = 1.00

⎛ 4.75 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Input speed: n3 =
⎜ 5.70 ⎟ rpm
⎜ 7.58 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 10.57 ⎠
⎛ 626.40 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Actual output torque: T4s =
⎜ 522.00 ⎟ N⋅m
⎜ 391.50 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 279.27 ⎠
3. In Figure 14, (for 1:1 ratio) entering with RPM and HP to transmit, the series is defined. In this case
the values are out of the chart range, but it is possible to see that the selection will be between the
series 100 and 200. Calculations start with Series 200.

Figure 14: Series selection chart

4. From Table 23 the service factor is selected with driver and driven shock characteristics and daily
operation time.
Service factor: sfg := 0.8

Then the design torque and power are the following:

Page 42 of 57
 ⎛ 4435.29 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
T4a = ⎜ ⎟ lbf ⋅in
3696.07
Design output torque: T4a := sfg ⋅ T 4s
⎜ 2772.05 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 1977.40 ⎠
⎛ 501.12 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
T4a = ⎜ ⎟ N⋅m
417.60
⎜ 313.20 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 223.42 ⎠
⎛ 0.335 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
N4 = ⎜ ⎟ hp
0.334
Design output power: N4 := n3 ⋅ T4a
i i i ⎜ 0.333 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 0.332 ⎠
⎛ 249.468 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
N4 = ⎜ ⎟W
249.065
⎜ 248.563 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 247.306 ⎠
5. In Table 24, for the desired reduction ratio, and operation speed, the power and torque capacity are
shown.
6. In this case, the operation speed is out of the table range. Then it will be necessary to extrapolate the
values in order to find the torque for the actual speed.
7. The Series 200 with 1:1 ratio at 100 rpm has the following data:

Input speed: nigt := 100rpm

Output power: POgt := 8.43hp POgt = 6286.25 W

Output torque: Tgt := 5313lbf ⋅ in Tgt = 600.29 N⋅ m

8. Extrapolating values for the actual speed:

lbf ⋅ in
Linearly extrapolated torque: T4 := −2.673 ⋅ ⋅ n3 + 5580.27lbf ⋅ in
i rpm i

Page 43 of 57
 ⎛ 629.05 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
T4 =
⎜ 628.77 ⎟ N⋅m
⎜ 628.20 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 627.29 ⎠
⎛ 313.154 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Output power: Ngo := T 4 ⋅ n3 Ngo =
⎜ 375.009 ⎟W
i i i ⎜ 498.552 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 694.371 ⎠
These values exceed the design torque and power.

9. Looking at the Figure 15 the selected shaft arrangement is “B”, so the final denomination for the
selected model will be:

Superior Gearbox Company - Series 200 - 1:1 - Arrangement "B"

10. In Figure 16 are shown the dimensions of the selected gearbox.

Table 23: Service factor selection

Table 24: Torque and power rate

Figure 15: Shaft arrangement chart.

Page 44 of 57
Figure 16: Gearbox dimensions.

6.14 COUPLINGS SELECTION

1. Pre-selected couplings are from GUARDIAN. The selection information is shown in

Figure 17: Flexible jaw coupling.

6.14.1 Coupling for Reducer Output Shaft

Selection Data:

Page 45 of 57
 ⎛ 5544.11 ⎞ ⎛ 626.40 ⎞
⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
T3s = ⎜ ⎟ lbf ⋅in T3s = ⎜ ⎟ N⋅m
4620.09 522.00
Máximum torque:
⎜ 3465.07 ⎟ ⎜ 391.50 ⎟
⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 2471.75 ⎠ ⎝ 279.27 ⎠

Input shaft diameter: φ is := 38mm

Output shaft diameter: φ os := 20mm

From Table 25 the selected model is:

GUARDIAN - Flexible Jaw Coupling - Model 38/45 98 Red - Aluminum - Hub A

(bore 38 mm - keyway 10 mm) - Hub A (bore 20 mm - keway 6 mm)

Selected coupling torque: T cc := 5640lbf ⋅ in T cc = 637.23 N⋅ m

6.14.2 Coupling for Angular Gearbox Input Shaft

Selection Data:

⎛ 5544.11 ⎞ ⎛ 626.40 ⎞
⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
T3s = ⎜ ⎟ lbf ⋅in T3s = ⎜ ⎟ N⋅m
4620.09 522.00
Máximum torque:
⎜ 3465.07 ⎟ ⎜ 391.50 ⎟
⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 2471.75 ⎠ ⎝ 279.27 ⎠

Input shaft diameter: φ is := 20mm

Output shaft diameter: φ os := 1in φ os = 25.40 mm

From Table 25 the selected model is:

GUARDIAN - Flexible Jaw Coupling - Model 38/45 98 Red - Aluminum - Hub A

(bore 20 mm - keyway 6 mm) - Hub A (bore 1" - keway 1/4"x1/8")

Selected coupling torque: T cc := 5640lbf ⋅ in T cc = 637.23 N⋅ m

6.14.3 Coupling for Angular Gearbox Output Shaft

Selection Data:

Page 46 of 57
 ⎛ 5544.11 ⎞ ⎛ 626.40 ⎞
⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
T3s = ⎜ ⎟ lbf ⋅in T3s = ⎜ ⎟ N⋅m
4620.09 522.00
Máximum torque:
⎜ 3465.07 ⎟ ⎜ 391.50 ⎟
⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 2471.75 ⎠ ⎝ 279.27 ⎠

Input shaft diameter: φ is := 1in φ is = 25.40 mm

Output shaft diameter: φ os := 18mm

From Table 25 the selected model is:

GUARDIAN - Flexible Jaw Coupling - Model 38/45 98 Red - Aluminum - Hub A (bore
1" mm - keyway 1/4"x1/8") - Hub A (bore 18 mm - keway 6 mm)

Selected coupling torque: T cc := 5640lbf ⋅ in T cc = 637.23 N⋅ m

Table 25: Maximum Continuous Torque Rating of Coupling

Page 47 of 57
Table 26. Coupling Dimensions

2. The Figure 18 and the Table 27 show allowable values for installation misalignments and
displacements.

Figure 18: Misalignments (parallel/angular) and axial displacement.

Table 27: Allowable Misalignments and Displacements.

Page 48 of 57
Table 28: Coupling Bores and Keyways

6.15 TORQUE LIMITER SELECTION

1. Torque limiter selection involves the evaluation of the inertia of the system.
2. The inertia to be calculated are for what the torque limiter sees before and after itself following the
force flow direction.
3. Because of the placement of the torque limiter in the transmission, the system will be divided in a
“motor” section and a “load” section. In this case “load” are all the components after the torque
limiter.

Motor:

Peak motor torque: Tmm = 3.00 N⋅ m

2
Motor moment of inertia: Jmot := 0.0007kg ⋅ m

Motor shaft diameter: dsm := 11mm

Load:

−4 2
Reducer input shaft moment of inertia (from tables): Jred := 1.11 ⋅ 10 ⋅ kg ⋅ m

−3 2
Reducer bigest pulley moment of inertia (estimated)): J21 := 0.2 ⋅ 10 kg ⋅ m

−3 2
Torque limiter moment of inertia (preselected from tables): J11 := 0.22 ⋅ 10 kg ⋅ m

−3 2
Flexible Jaw Coupling moment of inertia (from tables): Jfjc := 7.11 ⋅ 10 lbf ⋅ in ⋅ sec

2
Jfjc = 0.000803 kg m

Page 49 of 57
 Trough wall axle moment of inertia:

kg
Axle material density: δ sa := 7850
3
m
Axle average diameter: dam := 30mm

Axle length: la := 1050mm

2
π⋅ dam
3
Axle volume: va := ⋅ la va = 0.000742 m
4
Axle mass: ma := va ⋅ δ sa ma = 5.83 kg

2
ma ⋅ da
2
Moment of inertia: Jtwa := Jtwa = 0.000236 kg m
8

2
Angular gearbox moment of inertia (etimated): Jagb := 0.00297kg ⋅ m

Drum moment of inertia:

Drum internal diameter: φ di := 154mm

Drum mass: mt := 4.8kg

⎛ φ 2 − φ 2⎞
Moment of inertia: Jd := mt ⋅
⎝ dm di ⎠
Jd = 0.002404 kg m
2
8

2
mc ⋅ φ dm
2
Carrier moment of inertia: Jca := Jca = 0.1733 kg m
4

Load moment of inertia on motor shaft:

it := i1 ⋅ i2 ⋅ i3

2 J21 Jred Jfjc Jfjc Jtwa Jagb Jd Jca

Jmach := J11 + + + 2⋅ + + + + +
( ) ( ) ( ) () ( ) ( ) () ()
i 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
i1 i1 i1 ⋅ i2 it i1 ⋅ i2 i1 ⋅ i2 it it
i i i i i i i i

⎛ 0.000146 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Jmach = ⎜ ⎟ kg m2
0.000172
⎜ 0.000237 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 0.000381 ⎠
3 2
Jdrive := Jmot + ⋅ J11 Jdrive = 0.000832 kg m
5

Page 50 of 57
4. As manufacturers recommend the nominal cutoff torque of the limiter is calculated in the following
way:

MNmind := 1.5 ⋅ T mm MNmind = 4.50 N⋅ m

⎛ 1.12 ⎞
Jmach ⎜ ⎟
Md := Tms⋅
i
⋅ 2.5 Md =
⎜ 1.28 ⎟ N⋅m
i Jmach + Jdrive ⎜ 1.66 ⎟
i ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 2.35 ⎠
5. MNmind is used to select the TL. The condition is that the standard torque (MNmind)of the selected
model must be greater than the calculated one, and also the dynamic torque Md.

6. In this case two possible trademarks are pre-selected: ENEMAC (Figure 19) and JAKOB (Figure 22).

j) From Table 29 the model selected is ENEMAC ECA 6 - D = 11j6 - Ta = 4.5 N.m

k) From Table 31 the model selected is JAKOB SKG 9 – D = 11j6 - Ta = 4.5 N.m

7. A reference picture for dimensions is in Figure 21 and in Table 30 all dimensions values for ENEMAC
ECA models are shown.

8. In Table 32 for JAKOB SKG models there is a reference picture and all the corresponding
dimensions.

Figure 19: ENEMAC ECA torque limiter w/timing pulley.

Page 51 of 57
Figure 20: Basic scheme of the torque limiter.

Table 29: ENEMAC ECA Selection Chart

Figure 21: Dimensions denominations for ENEMAC ECA torque limiter.

Page 52 of 57
Table 30: ENEMAC ECA Dimensions Values

Figure 22: JAKOB SKG torque limiter.

Page 53 of 57
Table 31: JAKOB SKG Selection Chart

Table 32: JAKOB SKG Dimensions

6.16 REDUCER SERVICE FACTOR VERIFICATION

1. For applications having a large number of hourly starts and stops the load classification service factor
must be multiplied by the following supplemental service factor (Table 33) to obtain a new service
factor. The reducer must be selected using the new service factor.
Page 54 of 57
2. In order to classify the type of service the following factor must be calculated:

⎛ 0.21 ⎞
Jmach ⎜ ⎟
RatioIM = ⎜ ⎟
i 0.25
Ratio of Inertia Motion: RatioIM :=
i Jmot ⎜ 0.34 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 0.54 ⎠

U (Uniform load) if: RatioIM ≤ 0.3

M (Moderate shock) if: RatioIM ≤ 3

H (Heavy shock) if: RatioIM ≤ 10

Table 33: Supplemental Service Factor

3. In this case the factors for type “U” and “M” services, less than 10 starts per hour and less than 3
hours of operation per day are: SsfaU = 0.8 and SsfaM = 1.
4. The previous paragraph means that the service factor selected is correct because the considered
case in this report is the most conservative (SsfaM = 1).

6.17 STARTUP TIME

Inertias:

2
Drive flywheel effect: GD2d := 4 ⋅ g Jdrive GD2d = 0.0326 N⋅ m

⎛ 0.00573301 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Load flywheel effect: GD2L := 4 ⋅ g ⋅ Jmach GD2L =
⎜ 0.00673669 ⎟ N⋅m2
i i ⎜ 0.00929149 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 0.01492804 ⎠

Page 55 of 57
Average accelerating torque:

⎛ 0.13 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Load torque: TL := T 1 TL =
⎜ 0.16 ⎟ N⋅m
⎜ 0.21 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 0.29 ⎠
⎛ 2.27 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Average accel. torque: Ta :=
(
0.8 ⋅ Tms + T mm
− TL
) Ta =
⎜ 2.24 ⎟ N⋅m
i 2 i ⎜ 2.19 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 2.11 ⎠

Starting time:

⎛ 992.60 ⎞
⎜ ⎟
Motor speed: n1 =
⎜ 991.00 ⎟ rpm
⎜ 989.00 ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ 984.00 ⎠
⎛ 0.0448 ⎞
Accelerating time: ts :=
(GD2d + GD2L ⋅ n1
i i ) ts =
⎜
⎜ 0.0465
⎟
⎟s
i 4 ⋅g ⋅Ta ⎜ 0.0506 ⎟
i ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 0.0593 ⎠

Starting accelerations:

⎛ 2319.28 ⎞
n1 ⎜ ⎟
Motor shaft accel: γ 1 :=
i
γ1 =
⎜ 2233.73 ⎟ 1
i ts ⎜ 2047.97 ⎟ 2
i ⎜ ⎟s
⎝ 1738.82 ⎠
⎛ 966.37 ⎞
n2 ⎜ ⎟
Reducer input shaft accel: γ 2 :=
i
γ2 =
⎜ 1116.86 ⎟ 1
i ts ⎜ 1365.32 ⎟ 2
i ⎜ ⎟s
⎝ 1625.06 ⎠
⎛ 11.11 ⎞
n3 ⎜ ⎟
γ3 = ⎜ ⎟ 1
i 12.84
Reducer output shaft accel: γ 3 :=
i ts ⎜ 15.69 ⎟ 2
i ⎜ ⎟s
⎝ 18.68 ⎠

Page 56 of 57
 ⎛ 11.11 ⎞
n4 ⎜ ⎟
γ4 = ⎜ ⎟ 1
i 12.84
Drum shaft accel: γ 4 :=
i ts ⎜ 15.69 ⎟ 2
i ⎜ ⎟s
⎝ 18.68 ⎠

7 CONCLUSIONS

1. Using the data obtained from calculation it is possible to find commercial components for the system.
2. The power capacity and strength of the different components is enough to carry out the normal
operation.
3. The components selection is only for reference and may vary, so this report will be corrected in order
to adjust the values of the definitive components, once those are selected.

Page 57 of 57