See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/284463697

Stability testing of pharmaceutical products in a global environment

Article · January 2006

CITATIONS READS

27 1,284

1 author:

Sabine Kopp
World Health Organization WHO
53 PUBLICATIONS   2,027 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Sabine Kopp on 17 November 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Regulatory Feature

Stability Testing of Pharmaceutical

Products in a Global Environment
Dr Sabine Kopp reports on the development of World Health
Organization policy on stability testing.

Following lengthy discussions, the World Health Organization (WHO) has revised its guidelines on
stability testing conditions for climatic zone IV, ie hot and humid countries. The guidelines are
expected to be made available shortly. This article summarises the key events that have marked the
WHO’s work on developing international stability testing guidelines.
The stability of finished pharmaceutical products depends on several factors. On the one
hand, it depends on environmental factors such as ambient temperature, humidity and light. On The stability of finished
the other, it depends on product-related factors such as the chemical and physical properties of the pharmaceutical products
active substance and pharmaceutical excipients, the dosage form and its composition, the depends on
manufacturing process, the nature of the container-closure system and the properties of the environmental and
packaging materials. product-related factors
For established drug substances in conventional dosage forms, literature data on the
decomposition process and degradability of the active substance are generally available together
with adequate analytical methods. Thus, the stability studies may be restricted to the dosage forms.
The actual stability of a dosage form will depend to a large extent on the formulation and
packaging-closure system selected by the manufacturer. Stability considerations, for example
selection of excipients, determination of their level and process development, should therefore be
given high priority in the developmental stage of the product. The possible interaction of the drug
product with the packaging material in which it will be delivered, transported and stored
throughout its shelf-life must also be investigated.
The shelf-life should be established with due regard to the climatic zone(s) in which the
product is to be marketed. For certain preparations, specific storage instructions must be complied
with if the shelf-life is to be guaranteed.
The storage conditions recommended by manufacturers on the basis of stability studies
should guarantee the maintenance of quality, safety and efficacy throughout the shelf-life of a
product. The effect on products of the extremely adverse climatic conditions in certain countries to
which they may be exported calls for special consideration.
To ensure both patient safety and the rational management of drug supplies, it is important
that the expiry date and, where necessary, the storage conditions are indicated on the label.

The beginning
Work on stability of pharmaceutical products was initiated by the WHO in 1988 and the WHO ICH and WHO started
Guidelines on Stability Testing for Well Established Drug Substances in Conventional Dosage Forms were discussions in 2000 to
adopted in 1996 by the WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations harmonise the number of
following extensive consultation1. stability tests and
In 2000, discussions began between the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) conditions employed
expert working group Q1 (stability) and the WHO to harmonise the number of stability tests and worldwide…
conditions employed worldwide.
The working group, when developing guidance Q1F Stability Data Package for Registration
Applications in Climatic Zones II and IV, proposed a modification to the WHO guidelines. The
proposal concerned the long-term storage conditions for climatic zone IV (hot and humid
countries). The group suggested that the WHO change its conditions from 30°C and 70% relative
humidity (RH) to 30°C and 60% RH. A detailed paper including the rationale for the change was
widely circulated for comment. Non-governmental organisations, international professionals’
bodies and specialists, and members of the WHO expert advisory panel on the international
pharmacopoeia and pharmaceutical preparations were among those consulted.
Responses to the proposal varied. A number of experts agreed that the proposal constituted a …but there was little
sound scientific approach. It was recognised that packaging was very important and common agreement from
testing conditions should be agreed upon for WHO and ICH guidelines. Others criticised the interested parties on an
approach as being too scientific and impractical while pointing out that actual meteorological and ICH proposal regarding
physical storage conditions in these countries would not allow simulation of long-term storage long-term storage
conditions as defined by the new proposal. Arguments were also put forward against the conditions in zone IV
application of some parameters used in the calculations. (hot and humid
countries)
Dr Sabine Kopp is the secretary of the World Health Organization’s Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical
Preparations.

© Informa UK Ltd 2006 www.rajpharma.com RAJ Pharma May 2006 291

Regulatory Feature

In 2001, in a further round of discussions, it was proposed to change the real-time storage
conditions for zone IV from 30°C and 70% RH to 30°C and 65% RH. This suggestion was again
circulated widely for comments and the results discussed in July 2001.
In October 2001, the WHO expert committee modified the storage conditions and these were
subsequently published in the WHO guidelines for stability testing of pharmaceutical products
containing well established drug substances in conventional dosage forms, to read 30°C (±2°C) and
65% (±5%) RH for real-time stability studies defined for climatic zone IV. It was also agreed that
where special transportation and storage conditions did not comply with these criteria, additional
study data supporting these conditions might be needed2,3.

ASEAN stability testing guidelines

ASEAN bloc countries The Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) comprises Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia,
rejected the conditions Indonesia, Lao PDR (Laos), Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam.
described in revised ICH These countries are all situated in a hot and humid climatic zone (zone IV). ASEAN regulatory
and WHO guidelines… authorities have defined harmonised requirements for marketing authorisation for
pharmaceuticals with a view to establishing a common market for their pharmaceutical products.
This process includes harmonisation of requirements for stability testing.
Regulators and experts from ASEAN countries have met regularly with the WHO and experts
from the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers & Associations to discuss
whether the conditions outlined in the WHO and ICH guidelines as described above are
appropriate for countries which have vast areas with climatic conditions that are above the average
RH and temperature used to characterise zone IV4.
…saying they were not After consultation and several meetings, a meeting held in Jakarta on 12-13 January 2004
appropriate for the concluded that the conditions described in the WHO and ICH guidelines cited above did not
climatic conditions in adequately address the climatic conditions prevalent in the majority of ASEAN countries. The
their countries… conditions shown in Table 1 were then adopted for stability studies in ASEAN countries.
Arguments supporting this conclusion have been set out5.

Table 1. Conditions for stability testing in ASEAN countries

Type Conditions
Products in primary containers permeable to 30°C ±2°C/75% ±5% RH
water vapour
Products in primary containers impermeable to 30°C ±2°C/RH not specified
water vapour
Accelerated studies 40°C ±2°C/75% ±5% RH
Stress studies Unnecessary if accelerated studies at above
conditions are available

ASEAN based its considerations on the principle that testing should be biased towards more
stressful rather than less stressful conditions so as to provide a margin of error in favour of the
patients and to increase the likelihood of identifying substances or formulations that pose
particular stability problems.
different conditions for ASEAN also concluded that stability is obviously affected to a large extent by the permeability
stability testing were of primary packaging materials. Products packed in primary containers demonstrated to be
adopted… impermeable to water vapour do not require testing at any specific RH, storage at constant
temperature of 30°C throughout real-time testing being sufficient. However, guidelines will be
needed to specify parameters, such as a thickness and permeability coefficient, which indicates
demonstrated impermeability of packaging materials.
Implementation of the above decision will be preceded by a transition period during which
existing national guidelines will still be applicable. In addition, a science-based approach will be
taken to ensure correct evaluation when submitted data is based on conditions that are less
stressful than those required (eg 30°C/65% RH). Factors to be taken into consideration include:
• complementary data provided to enable proper scientific evaluation;
• detected instability;
…and these will be • data obtained under accelerated conditions;
implemented after a • when more protective packaging is provided; and
transition period • commitment to generate data under the new guideline conditions (30°C/75% RH, or
40°C/75% RH, or both) within a specified period.
A suitable label recommendation such as “Store below 30°C and protect from moisture” may also
be applied.

292 May 2006 RAJ Pharma www.rajpharma.com © Informa UK Ltd 2006

 Regulatory Feature

Next steps in WHO’s harmonisation efforts

In view of the decisions taken by ASEAN as described above, the WHO responded with the
following action plan. First, a WHO document was circulated in early 2004, in accordance with the
WHO consultative procedure, to interested parties for consultation. The document requested The ASEAN
comments on whether the WHO guidance on stability testing should be modified for long-term developments meant a
stability testing conditions (hot and humid climatic zone) and sought suggestions on how decision would have to be
modifications should be implemented. Thereafter an informal consultation discussed comments made on whether to
received, in preparation for the meeting of the WHO expert committee on specifications which met amend the WHO
in October 2004. guidance
As the ASEAN guidance was confirmed and adopted, the WHO organised a meeting
including ASEAN, WHO and ICH experts and other interested parties in December 20046. The
following recommendations were agreed during the meeting:
• the existing WHO guideline on stability testing should be reviewed in the light of new
information on climatic conditions in zone IV as raised by the ASEAN countries; and
• all concerned parties represented at the meeting should return to their constituencies,
consider the options that were discussed, and provide feedback and recommendations to
the WHO, indicating preferences and giving reasons. Those parties will be invited to be
involved in the continuation of the consultative process. The options are:
– revert to 30°C/70% RH as the long-term stability testing condition for zone IV as it is
likely that considerable data are already available. This might serve as a potential
platform for future harmonisation between ICH and the WHO;
– change to 30°C/75% RH as the long-term stability testing condition for zone IV in the
interest of patient safety worldwide; or
– add a new climatic zone IVb to accommodate hot and very humid areas (30°C/75% RH).
The present zone IV (30°C/65% RH) would become zone IVa.
Feedback was requested by the end of March 2005. WHO member states not represented at the
meeting were also invited to give their feedback.
Answers were received from the following member states and partners: Amazonian Countries
(Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Equator, Peru, Suriname and Venezuela), ASEAN (Brunei
Darussalam, Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand), ICH parties (the EU on behalf of European,
Japanese and US regulators, as well as their respective industry associations), the South African
Development Community (South Africa on behalf of SADC), the International Generic
Pharmaceutical Alliance and the World Self-Medication Industry. There was no consensus among
the various parties. Each option was favoured by at least one party.

Current status
Based on the above outcome, the experts who met during the 40th WHO expert committee meeting A decision was
at the end of October 2005 had to take a decision about the WHO position for future stability eventually taken to split
testing. They were faced with a difficult situation. The WHO secretariat reminded the expert zone IV into two zones,
committee members that the WHO guideline had been revised in the light of harmonisation efforts with zone IVb being hot
in collaboration with ICH. After extensive discussion, the committee reached consensus that the and very humid areas
WHO stability guidelines should be amended to reflect conditions for zone IV as follows: and zone IVa being hot
and humid areas
• zone IVa – 30°C and 65% RH; and
• zone IVb – 30°C and 75% RH.

It was agreed that each individual member state within the former zone IV would need to indicate
which of these conditions (zones IVa or IVb), would be applicable in its territory. This was intended
to accommodate the two conditions currently in use.
The report and its outcomes, including annexes, ie the new guidelines adopted during the The official revised
WHO expert committee meeting, are now with editors. It is expected that the recommendations guideline could be
and the report will be presented to the WHO executive board in May 2006 (final step). The report available by the end of
will be available thereafter on the web and in printed form7. May 2006

International Conference of Drug Regulatory

Authorities
A discussion on stability conditions was held during the International Conference of Drug
Regulatory Authorities (ICDRA) in Seoul in April 2006 (www.icdra.org). During this session, entitled
“Stability: Global challenges for harmonisation”, the following topics were addressed:

© Informa UK Ltd 2006 www.rajpharma.com RAJ Pharma May 2006 293

 Regulatory Feature

• news from Asia: how to deal with real humid and hot storage conditions in ASEAN
countries;
• what’s new in the Americas? Stability testing for varying climatic conditions; and
• challenges for the ICH stability guidelines outside the ICH regions.

Recommendations from this meeting will be available on the WHO medicines website
(www.who.int/medicines).

Future implementation
The WHO now wants It remains to be seen how these new conditions will be implemented in the WHO member states.
member countries to tell The WHO would be very interested to receive information from its individual member states as to
it whether zone IVa or which of the above described conditions (zones IVa or IVb) would be applicable in their territory.
IVb would apply in their The intention is to make this information easily accessible to third parties on an international basis
territory and to see which of the two conditions is most commonly applied.
References
1. World Health Organization, Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations, 34th
Report, Technical Report series, No 863 Annex 5 (1996) (www.who.int/medicines/strategy/quality_safety/
annex5_trs863.doc)
2. World Health Organization, Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations, 37th
Report, Technical Report Series, No 908, page 13 (2003), http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_908.pdf
3. World Health Organization, WHO guidelines on stability testing, WHO Drug Information, 16(1): 35,
(2002), www.who.int/druginformation/vol16num1_2002/16-1table_of_contents.shtml
4. International Conference on Harmonization, guidelines Q1A and Q1F, www.ich.org/
5. Stability testing for hot and humid climates, WHO Drug Information Vol 18, No 2, 2004, page 113ff,
www.who.int/druginformation/vol18num2_2004/DI18-2.pdf
6. Consultation of stability studies in a global environment,
www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/quality_assurance/ConsultStabstudies/en/index.html
7. World Health Organization, Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations, 40th
Report, Technical Report Series, No 937, 2006

New
for
2006
Coming Soon
Forthcoming titles include:
● Pricing & Reimbursement ● R&D Databook
in Asia-Pacific
● Scrip League Tables 2006
● Generics
● Scrip Yearbook 2007

Thoroughly researched, written by experts and compiled using

only reliable sources, Scrip Reports provide biopharma industry
intelligence you can trust. That’s why we’ve been a leading source
of data, analysis and commentary for more than 20 years.

To receive more information and pre-publication offers,

email [email protected] and quote JR20060A

www.scripreports.com/forthcoming
294 May 2006 RAJ Pharma www.rajpharma.com © Informa UK Ltd 2006

View publication stats