School Building

-, Nepal

Structural Analysis Report

Owner Name: - Designed By: Alija Shrestha

Address: - NEC Reg. :20491”Civil A”

Nov, 2022
Contents
Project Detail.................................................................................................4
1.2 Building Design Parameters.........................................................................................5
1.3 Materials.......................................................................................................................5
1.3.1 Concrete................................................................................................................5
1.3.2 Reinforcement.......................................................................................................5
1.4 Load Calculations.........................................................................................................6
1.4.1 Dead Load.............................................................................................................6
1.4.2 Superimposed Dead Loads....................................................................................6
1.4.3 Live Loads.............................................................................................................6
1.4.4 Seismic Loads.......................................................................................................7
1.5 Load Combination......................................................................................................10
1. Structural Analysis...............................................................................11
1.6 3D modeling of the building.......................................................................................11
Design of Elements:.....................................................................................21
1.6.1 Design of Column...............................................................................................21
1.6.2 Design of Beam...................................................................................................22
1.6.3 Sample Design of Footing...................................................................................30
Slab Design.......................................................................................................................32
19: Wall Load....................................................................................................................35

1.1

Structural Analysis Report for School

2
Figure 1: Architectural Plan of Building.................................................................................................4
Figure 2: 3D modeling of the building..................................................................................................12
Figure 3: Plan of the building...............................................................................................................13
Figure 4: Elevation of the building.......................................................................................................14
Figure 5: Story Drift along X-Direction(ULS)......................................................................................16
Figure 6: Story Drift along Y-Direction(ULS)......................................................................................17
Figure 7: Story Displacement along X-Direction(ULS)........................................................................18
Figure 8: Story Displacement along Y-Direction(ULS)........................................................................18
Figure 9:Bending Moment along grid 1-1............................................................................................19
Figure 10: Shear Force Diagram along Grid 1-1...................................................................................20
Figure 11: Reinforcement Details along Grid 1-1.................................................................................24
Figure 12: Reinforcement Details along Grid 2-2.................................................................................24
Figure 13: Reinforcement Details along Grid 3-3.................................................................................25
Figure 15: Reinforcement Details along Grid 5-5.................................................................................27
19: Wall Load.......................................................................................................................................35
Figure 20: Live Load along the Building..............................................................................................36
Figure 21: Floor Finishing Load along the Building.............................................................................37

Table 1: Auto Seismic - NBC 105:2020.................................................................................................9

Table 2: Modal Participating Mass Ratios:...........................................................................................14
Table 3: CENTERS OF MASS AND RIGIDITY.................................................................................15
Table 4: BASE SHEAR CALCULATED.............................................................................................15
Table 5: Maximum drift ratios: within the limit of 0.006.....................................................................15
Table 6: Maximum Displacements are within limit of 51.18mm..........................................................17

Structural Analysis Report for School

3
Project Detail

Name of the Project: School at -

Location : -, Nepal

Type of Building: The Building covers a total plinth area of 1310 sq.ft. The
building has been designed for three and half stories.

This report has been prepared as a part of the structural engineering analysis and design
of buildings.

Figure 1: Architectural Plan of Building

Structural Analysis Report for School

4
1.2 Building Design Parameters
The building consists of a RCC framed structure, which is essentially an assembly of cast-in-
situ-concrete beams and columns. Floors and roof consist of cast-in-place concrete slabs.
Lateral load resisting system consists of bare frame elements only and the system has been
designed to meet the ductility requirements of IS 13920 - 1993.

For the design of the building, the Nepal Standard criteria for earthquake resistant NBC
105:2020 have been referred to. According to the NBC 105:2020Kathmandu lies in seismic
Zone D. All other factors related with the seismic design were also adopted as for zone D of
NBC 105:2020.

1.3 Materials
Following loads have been considered for the analysis and design of the building based on the
relevant Indian Standards.

1.3.1 Concrete
Concrete is to conform to IS 456: Structural use of concrete. Unless noted otherwise
concrete is to be normal-weight, with a typical dry density of 2400 kg/m 3. Concrete is to
achieve the 28-day cube strength as 20 N/mm2and 25 N/mm2.

1.3.2 Reinforcement
Reinforcement bars are to be in accordance with IS 456: specification for carbon
steel bars for the reinforcement of concrete is to be in accordance with IS 1786:
specification for high deformed steel bars for the reinforcement of concrete.

The following design strengths are to be used for the design of concrete and
reinforcement.

Grade of Concrete : M25 for all columns and M20 for all other
Grade of steel : High Yield Fe 500 N/mm2

1.4 Load Calculations

Structural Analysis Report for School

5
1.4.1 Dead Load
Dead loads are calculated on the basis of unit weights of the specified construction
materials in accordance with IS 875.
Reinforced concrete: 25 KN / m3 and 20KN/m3
Brick work with plaster: 18.85 KN/m3
Sand/ cement screed: 20 KN/m2

1.4.2 Superimposed Dead Loads

Based on architectural drawing of the building, dead loads due to partition walls,
floor finish and other special purpose services has been calculated.

1.4.3 Live Loads

The Live Load for building has been adopted as given IS 875 - Part VI Section I
Loads for residence buildings.

Room 3 kN/m2

Kitchen 3 kN/m2

Balcony/ lobby 3kN/m2

For terrace 1.5 kN / m2

Structural Analysis Report for School

6
1.4.4 Seismic Loads
CALCULATION OF SEISMIC CO-EFFICENT AS PER NBC 105 :2020
Input:
Location of Building : Kathmandu
Type of Structure: Moment resisting concrete frame
Type of Building : Reinforced Moment Resisting
Frame
Seismic Zoning Factor (Table 4.5 NBC 105-2020) Z= 0.35
Importance Factor : (Table 4.6 NBC 105-2020) I= 1.5
Height of Building : h= 7.01
Method of Analysis: Equivalent Static Method
Soil Type D

Period of Vibration :
For Reinforced Moment Resisting Frame T1 = 1.25*kt h0.75 0.404 Sec
Lower Period of the Flat Part of the Spectrum Ta = 0
Upper Period of the Flat Part of the Spectrum Tc = 2
Peak Spectral Acceleration Normalized by PGA α= 2.25
Coefficient to control the descending branch of the Spectrum K= 0.8

Ref Table 5.2 NBC 105 :2020

Ductility Factor for ULS State Ru = 4
Overstrength Factor for ULS State Ωu = 1.5
Overstrength Factor for SLS State Ωs = 1.25

Calculation of Spectral Shape Factor : Ch (T)

Since Ta<=T1<=Tc Ch (T) = 2.250

Elastic Site Spectra for the Horizontal Loading (Clause 4.1.1 NBC 105-2020) C(T) = Ch(T) Z I = 1.181

Elastic Site Spectra for the Vertical Loading (Clause 4.2 NBC 105-2020) Cv = 2/3*Z 0.233

Elastic Site Spectra for the SLS State (Clause 4.2 NBC 105-2020) Cs = 0.2 * C(T) = 0.236

Horizontal Base Shear Coefficient for Equivalent Static Method :

Horizontal Base Shear Coefficient at the ULS State
Cdu = C(T)/ (Ru Ωu) = 0.197

Horizontal Base Shear Coefficient at the SLS State

Cds = Cs/ Ωs = 0.189

Exponent related to the structural period k 1.0000

Structural Analysis Report for School

7
  Load parameter
a. Dead Load :- as per IS 875
b. Live Load :- as per IS 875
c. Seismic Load: -as per NBC 105:2020
1. Zone Factor :-0.35 (for Kathmandu)
2. Importance Factor :-1.0
3. Fundamental Time Period: -0.404 sec
Period of vibration (NBC 105:2020)
Using Empirical Equations
T1 = kt H ¾

Where, kt
= 0.075 for Moment resisting concrete frame
= 0.085 for Moment resisting structural steel frame
= 0.075 for Eccentrically braced structural steel
frame
= 0.05 for all other structural systems

Calculation
T1 = kt H ¾ kt = 0.075
H = 7.01

Amplification of Approximate Period

The approximate fundamental time period calculated
using empirical equation shall be increased by a factor of 1.25.

T = 0.404 sec

4. Seismic Weight(Uls&Sls): 1684.44 KN

5. Base Shear (Uls&Sls): 331.83 KN, 318.35 KN
6. Soil Type:D
7. Damping :-0.05
8. Building Height Exp. K= 1.0

 Method of analysis: Static Coefficient Method of Analysis

Structural Analysis Report for School

8
 a. No. of modes considered: 12
b. Modal Mass Participation:100,100: greater than 90 %

 Total Deflection of Building: -

a. Along X - direction (Eqx Uls& Eqx Sls):38.02 mm<51.8mm, 36.57 mm<
51.8mm
b. Along Y- direction (Eqy Uls& Eqy Sls):35.83 mm<51.8mm,34.46 mm<
51.8mm
 Inter Stores Drift: Eqx Uls/ Eqy Uls :0.0046, 0.0031
Eqx Sls/Eqy Sls:0.0044, 0.0030 within the limit i.e.,0.006
 Load combination: IS1893(Part1) :2000
 Concrete design Code: IS 456: 2000
 Ductile Detailing Code: IS 13920: 1993
 Concrete Grade: M25 in specific columns and M20 in other structural members
 Reinforcement Grade: Fe500

Table 1: Auto Seismic - NBC 105:2020

Load Directi Eccentri Ecc. Top Bottom Weight Base
Pattern Type on city Overridden Story Story C K Used Shear
% kN kN
Seis X+ 0.1 1684.441
EQX ULS mic Ecc. Y 10 No Story2 Base 97 1 5 331.835
Seis Y+ 0.1 1684.441
EQY ULS mic Ecc. X 10 No Story2 Base 97 1 5 331.835
Seis X+ 0.1 1684.441 318.359
EQX SLS mic Ecc. Y 10 No Story2 Base 89 1 5 4
Seis Y+ 0.1 1684.441 318.359
EQY SLS mic Ecc. X 10 No Story2 Base 89 1 5 4

Structural Analysis Report for School

9
1.5 Load Combination
The load combination has been taken as given NBC 105:2020. The said code has
recommended the following load combination

 1.2DL + 1.5LL
 DL + λLL + -EQ
Where, λ = 0.6 for storage facilities = 0.3 for other usage

Design Assumptions
Concrete Grade, M25 fck = 25 MPa for column
Concrete Grade, M20 fck = 20 MPa for another member
Steel Grade, Fe 500 fy = 500 MPa for alL

Structural Analysis Report for School

10
1. Structural Analysis
The analysis and design have been carried out using software called ETABS v16.2.1, which is
a special purpose computer program developed specifically for building structures. It provides
the Structural Engineer with all the tools necessary to create, modify, analyze, design, and
optimize the structural elements in a building model. The building geometry based on
architectural drawings been generated using above named software. The dead load, live load
and lateral loads were supplied to the digital models as per standard code of practices. Several
analysis run were performed to achieve the best result to meet the design and service
requirements.

For the analysis, following loading parameters were considered:

i. Self-weight of the frames and slabs

ii. Floor finishing dead loads

iii. Fixed wall loads as per architectural drawings

iv. Staircase load

v. Partition wall loads as per architectural drawings only.

vi. Live loads

1.6 3D modeling of the building

i. 3D model of the building
ii. Plan of the building
iii. Elevation of the building

Structural Analysis Report for School

11
 Figure 2: 3D modeling of the building

Structural Analysis Report for School

12
 Figure 3: Plan of the building

Structural Analysis Report for School

13
 Figure 4: Elevation of the building

Table 2: Modal Participating Mass Ratios:

Case Mode Period UX UY Sum UX Sum UY
sec
Modal 1 0.549 0.8937 0.0014 0.8937 0.0014
Modal 2 0.485 0.0128 0.5094 0.9066 0.5108
Modal 3 0.456 0.0042 0.4777 0.9108 0.9885
Modal 4 0.247 0.0881 0 0.9989 0.9885
Modal 5 0.191 0.0011 0.000007865 1 0.9885
Modal 6 0.154 0.000004704 0.0115 1 1
Modal 7 0.07 0 0 1 1
Modal 8 0.067 0 0 1 1

Structural Analysis Report for School

14
Modal 9 0.063 0 0 1 1
Modal 10 0.059 0 0 1 1
Modal 11 0.049 0 0 1 1
Modal 12 0.041 0 0 1 1

Table 3: CENTERS OF MASS AND RIGIDITY

Diaphrag
Story m Mass X Mass Y XCM YCM XCCM YCCM XCR YCR
kg kg m m m m m m
Story1 D1 98206.58 98206.58 2.9911 9.0674 2.9911 9.0674 2.6056 9.1324
Story2 D2 20447.08 20447.08 2.6235 8.9953 2.6235 8.9953 2.6493 9.0318

Table 4: BASE SHEAR CALCULATED

Load Locatio
Story Case/Combo n P VX VY T MX MY
kN kN kN kN-m kN-m kN-m
Story2 EQX ULS Top 0 -70.3272 0 758.0124 0 0
Story2 EQX ULS Bottom 0 -72.8878 0 780.8748 0 -254.2016
Story2 EQY ULS Top 0 0 -70.3272 -220.2267 0 0
Story2 EQY ULS Bottom 0 0 -72.8878 -236.4226 254.2016 0
Story2 EQX SLS Top 0 -67.4713 0 727.2302 0 0
Story2 EQX SLS Bottom 0 -69.9279 0 749.1641 0 -243.8787
Story2 EQY SLS Top 0 0 -67.4713 -211.2835 0 0
Story2 EQY SLS Bottom 0 0 -69.9279 -226.8217 243.8787 0
Story1 EQX ULS Top 0 -331.835 0 3319.2908 0 -254.2016
Story1 EQX ULS Bottom 0 -331.835 0 3319.2908 0 -1417.3496
Story1 EQY ULS Top 0 0 -331.835 -1151.7439 254.2016 0
1417.349
Story1 EQY ULS Bottom 0 0 -331.835 -1151.7439 6 0
-
Story1 EQX SLS Top 0 318.3594 0 3184.4972 0 -243.8787
-
Story1 EQX SLS Bottom 0 318.3594 0 3184.4972 0 -1359.7922
-
Story1 EQY SLS Top 0 0 318.3594 -1104.9726 243.8787 0
- 1359.792
Story1 EQY SLS Bottom 0 0 318.3594 -1104.9726 2 0

Table 5: Maximum drift ratios: within the limit of 0.006

Story Load Case/Combo Direction Drift Label X Y Z
m m m
Story2 EQX ULS X 0.004673 12 5.08 17.8308 7.0104

Structural Analysis Report for School

15
Story2 EQY ULS Y 0.001302 12 5.08 17.8308 7.0104
Story2 EQX SLS X 0.004483 12 5.08 17.8308 7.0104
Story2 EQY SLS Y 0.001249 12 5.08 17.8308 7.0104
Story1 EQX ULS X 0.004305 12 5.08 17.8308 3.5052
Story1 EQY ULS Y 0.003145 12 5.08 17.8308 3.5052
Story1 EQX SLS X 0.00413 12 5.08 17.8308 3.5052
Story1 EQY SLS Y 0.003017 12 5.08 17.8308 3.5052

Figure 5: Story Drift along X-Direction(ULS)

Structural Analysis Report for School

16
 Figure 6: Story Drift along Y-Direction(ULS)

Table 6: Maximum Displacements are within limit of 51.18mm

Diaphrag Load
Story m Case/Combo UX UY RZ Point X Y Z
mm mm rad m m m
-
Story2 D2 EQX ULS 26.57 0.021 0.000555 109 2.6235 8.9953 7.0104
Story2 D2 EQY ULS 0.006 14.735 0.000347 109 2.6235 8.9953 7.0104
-
Story2 D2 EQX SLS 25.491 0.02 0.000532 109 2.6235 8.9953 7.0104
Story2 D2 EQY SLS 0.006 14.136 0.000333 109 2.6235 8.9953 7.0104
-
Story1 D1 EQX ULS 12.857 -0.086 0.000255 110 2.9911 9.0674 3.5052
Story1 D1 EQY ULS 0.014 10.56 0.000222 110 2.9911 9.0674 3.5052
-
Story1 D1 EQX SLS 12.335 -0.082 0.000244 110 2.9911 9.0674 3.5052
Story1 D1 EQY SLS 0.013 10.132 0.000213 110 2.9911 9.0674 3.5052

Structural Analysis Report for School

17
 Figure 7: Story Displacement along X-Direction(ULS)

Figure 8: Story Displacement along Y-Direction(ULS)

Structural Analysis Report for School

18
 Figure 9:Bending Moment along grid 1-1

Structural Analysis Report for School

19
 Figure 10: Shear Force Diagram along Grid 1-1

Structural Analysis Report for School

20
Design of Elements:
The design of all structural elements is done using ‘Limit State Method’. All relevant Limit
State is considered in design to ensure adequate safety and serviceability.

The design includes design for durability, construction and use in service should be
considered as a whole. The realization of design objectives requires compliance with clearly
defined standards for materials, production, workmanship, and also maintenance and use of
structure in service.

This section includes all the design process of sample calculation for a single element as
column, beam, slab and foundation.

1.6.1 Design of Column

Combo ID DL+0.3LL+EQX
Element C12 300X300
GF B1
Axial Force Pu = 124.750 KN
Mux
Factored Moment about x-axis = 2.490 KN-m
Muy
Factored Moment about y-axis = 71.240 KN-m
Breadth b= 300.000 mm
Depth D= 300.000 mm
Grade of concrete fck = 25.000 N/mm2
Grade of reinforcement fy = 500.000 N/mm2
Cover considered d' = 40.000 mm
d'/D 0.133
Percentage of steel Pt = 1.750 %
Pt/fck = 0.070
Pu/(fck*b*D) = 0.055
From graph of SP16, Mu/(fck*b*D^2 ) 0.130
Moment carrying capacity of Column
Along X-axis (Mux1) = (Mu/fckbD^2)*(fck*b*D^2) 87.750 KN-m
Along Y-axis (Muy1)= (Mu/fck*b*D^2)* (fck*D*b^2) 87.750 KN-m
Gross Area (Ac) = 90,000.000 mm2
Area of steel taken from software 1,575.00 mm2
Axial Load Carrying capacity of Column (Pz)=0.45*fck*Ac+0.75*fy*Asc 1,603.125 KN
Pu/Pz 0.078
Mux/Mux1 0.028
Muy/Muy1 0.812
α =1+((Pu/Pz-0.2)/(Pt-0.2))*1 0.921
(Mux/Mux1) ^ α + (Muy/Muy1) ^ α 0.863 <1
SAFE

Structural Analysis Report for School

21
 Area of reinforcement required(As) 1,575.000 mm2

1.6.2 Design of Beam

Along grid 1-1(A-B)
FF
Breadth b= 230.000 mm
Depth D= 425.000 mm
Grade of concrete fck = 20.000 N/mm2
Grade of reinforcement fy = 500.000 N/mm2
Cover considered d' = 25.000 mm
effective depth d= 400.000
Limiting bending moment (Mlim)=0.133*fck*b*d^2 97.89 KN-m
Moment at left span DL+0.3LL+EQX 83.13
Mu<Mlim
Minimum tension steel= 0.85*b*d/fy 156.40 mm2
Mu<Mlim
Mu= 0.87*fy*Ast*(d-(fy*Ast)/(fck*b)
a 0.03
b -400.00

Ast= 492.95 mm2

Area of steel from software= 595.00 mm2

Moment at mid span DL+0.3LL+EQX 22.53

Mu<Mlim
Minimum tension steel= 0.85*b*d/fy 156.40 mm2
Mu<Mlim
Mu= 0.87*fy*Ast*(d-(fy*Ast)/(fck*b)
a 0.03
b -400.00

Ast= 130.55 mm2

Area of steel from software= 228.00 mm2

Moment at right end DL+0.3LL+EQX 30.77 KN-m

Mu<Mlim
Minimum tension steel= 0.85*b*d/fy 156.40 mm2
Mu<Mlim
Mu= 0.87*fy*Ast*(d-(fy*Ast)/(fck*b)
a 0.03

Structural Analysis Report for School

22
 b -400.00

Ast= 178.84 mm2

Area of steel from software= 440.00 mm2

Structural Analysis Report for School

23
 Figure 11: Reinforcement Details along Grid 1-1

Figure 12: Reinforcement Details along Grid 2-2

Structural Analysis Report for School

24
 Figure 13: Reinforcement Details along Grid 3-3

Structural Analysis Report for School

25
 Figure 14: Reinforcement Details along Grid 4-4

Structural Analysis Report for School

26
 Figure 145: Reinforcement Details along Grid 5-5

Structural Analysis Report for School

27
 Figure 16: Reinforcement Details along Grid 6-6

Structural Analysis Report for School

28
 Figure 17: Reinforcement Details along Grid A-A

Figure 18: Reinforcement Details along Grid B-B

Structural Analysis Report for School

29
1.6.3 Sample Design of Footing
Isolated Footing
Fck = 20
Fy = 500
Depth of Foundation (Df) = 1.52 m
Allowable soil pressure (Palw) = 120 KN/m2
yt 16
Effective cover (d') = 50
d0 = 200

MODEL NODE 16
265.0
Pu From Model 0
265.0
Pu (KN) 0
Mux (from model) 1.6 KN-m
Muy (from model) 9.9 KN-m
30
Width of column (Bc) 0 mm
30
Depth of column (Dc) 0 mm
2.1
Required Area 2 m2
4.7
Required Length 8 ft
4.7
Required Breadth 8 ft
Provided
6.0
Length of Foundation (Lf) 0 ft
6.0
Breadth of Foundation(Bf) 0 ft
88.9
Actual Bearing Capacity (S) 6 KN/m2
25.9
BM/M 9
71.7
Effective depth according to moment (d M) 5 mm
750.0
Assumed Deptrh (D) 0 mm
1
Bar dia 6 mm
15.0
Spacing 0 cm c/c
7.8
Ast 0 (cm2)/M
423.3
Effective depth due to tapper section (d) 8 (mm)
88.9
p2 6 KN/m2

Structural Analysis Report for School

30
 80.8
p3 1 KN/m2
25.9
BM2 9
23.6
BM3 1
40.0
K 0
0.1
percentage of tension steel (pt %) 8
One way shear
55.4
Vu 7
0.3
Shear strength of M20 concrete (Tc>) 1 N/mm2
0.0
Shear Stress (Tv) 7 N/mm2
Tc>Tv OK

Two Way shear

250.9
Vu 3
2.8
Perimeter (b0) 9 m
1.1
Shear strength of concrete (Tc' >) 2 N/mm2
0.2
Shear Stress (Tv) 0 N/mm2
Tc'>Tv OK

Description size(mm) D
L B (mm)
F1
1800 1800 750

d/2 d0 dia spacing

(mm) (mm) (mm)
20
324.00 0 16.00 150

Structural Analysis Report for School

31
 2. Design of Isolated footing

Structural Analysis Report for School

32
 3. Finite element model and Size of Footing

4.

Structural Analysis Report for School

33
 CONSTRUCTION SITE
Soil type Type II
Bearing capacity 150 KN/m2
 DIMENSIONS AND MATERIALS
Footing 760mm (2’-6”)

 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
Cement Ordinary Portland cement
Grade of concrete M20 for the entire member
Grade of steel Fe500 for both main and shear reinforcement

 METHOD OF ANALYSIS
Load Combination Used for Design :(DL+LL)

Load Patterns
TABLE: Load Patterns
LoadPat Type SelfWtMult
Text Text Unitless
Dead DEAD 1
Live LIVE 0

Structural Analysis Report for School

34
 Fig 1: Load Assigned

Fig 2: Soil pressure diagram (Max permissible= 150)

Max soil pressure= 125.27 KN/m2

Structural Analysis Report for School

35
 Fig 3: Displacement diagram (Max permissible = 25mm)
Max displacement= 3.41 mm

Structural Analysis Report for School

36
 Fig4: Punching shear demand capacity ratio less than 1

Fig5:Bottom Rebar Required (Direction 1)

Max bottom rebar required= 595.88mm2/m

Structural Analysis Report for School

37
 Fig6:Bottom Rebar Required (Direction 2)
Max bottom rebar required= 642.188mm2/m

Fig7:Top Rebar Required (Direction 1)

Max bottom rebar required= 236.741mm2/m

Structural Analysis Report for School

38
 Fig8:Top Rebar Required (Direction 2)
Max bottom rebar required= 254.11mm2/m

Summary:

Thickness of all footing is 2’-6”

Provide all bars of 16mm @ 6” c/c bars as described

Structural Analysis Report for School

39
Slab Design
1. DESIGN DATA

Longer Span of the critical Slab (Ly) = 5.08 m

Shorter Span of the critical Slab (Lx)= 3.81 m
Grade of Concrete used (σck) = 20 N/mm2
Width of slab, b = 1000 mm
Grade of steel used (σy)
= 500 N/mm2
Unit weight of Marble= 27 kN/m3
Unit weight of screed = 20.4 kN/m3
Unit weight of plaster = 20.4 kN/m3
Thickness of screed = 25 mm
Thickness of plaster = 12.5 mm
Assume Thickness of slab (D) = 125 mm
Effective depth of slab
d= 105 mm

2. BENDING MOMENT COEFFICIENT

Type of slab Panal = 1 Short Edge Discontinuous

Aspect Ratio of the slab Considered Ly/Lx = 1.333
Bending Moment Coefficient for 1.3 for 1.4 for 1.333
Coeff for -ve moment, βx = 0.048 0.051 0.049
Coeff for +ve moment, βx = 0.036 0.039 0.037
Coeff for -ve moment, βy = 0.047 0.047
Coeff for +ve moment, βy = 0.035 0.035

3. LOAD CALCULATION

Dead load of slab = 3.125 kN/m2

Dead load due to screed
= 0.51 kN/m2
Dead load due to plaster
= 0.255 kN/m2
Dead load due to Partition Wall = 1 kN/m2
Live load at Slab = 2 kN/m2
Total Load
= 6.89 kN/m2
Factored Design Load = 10.335 kN/m2
Factored Design Load per meter = 10.335 kN/m

4. MOMENT CALCULATION

Structural Analysis Report for School

40
 Design -ve moment for short span, Mx 7.4 kN-m
Design +ve moment for short span, Mx 5.6 kN-m
Design -ve moment for long span, My 7.1 kN-m
Design +ve moment for long span, My 5.3 kN-m

5. CALCULATION OF REINFORCEMENT

Design for -ve Reinforcement =

Along Short span 167.6 mm2
Along Long span 160.5 mm2
Design for +ve Reinforcement =
Along Short span 125.3 mm2
Along Long span 118.3 mm2

Minimum reinforcement required (Ast)= 187.5 mm2

Bar dia. Area Spacing Area

Spacing
Direction Provided Required No. of bar Provided provided
Required mm
mm mm2 mm mm2

Shorter
Support 8 168 4 250.00 150 334.93
Shorter
Mid 8 125 4 267.95 150 334.93
Longer
Support 8 161 4 267.95 150 334.93
Longer
Mid 8 118 4 267.95 150 334.93

6. CHECK FOR SHEAR

Shear coefficient = 0.60

Design Shear Force Vu
= 23.63 kN
Nominal shear stress (tv)
= 0.23 N/mm2
Percent tension steel (Pt) = 0.27 N/mm2
Shear strength of M20 Concrete and 0.27% steel tc = 0.37 N/mm2
Shear Strength Coefficient for(d<=150) ks = 1.30 N/mm2
Shear strength in slab t'c = 0.48 N/mm2
Maximum Shear stress for M20 Grade Concrete tc, max
= 2.80 N/mm2
Safe in
shear

Structural Analysis Report for School

41
 7. CHECK FOR DEFLECTION:

Required Tension reinforcement % for short span Pt= 0.21

Provided Tension reinforcement % for short span Pt= 0.27
Basic value of span to effective depth (L/d) ) ratio α = 26
Modification factor for span > 10m β = 1
Mu/bd =2
0.50
Steel stress of service
fs= 162.35
Required modification factor for tension reinforcement 1.40
Actual Modification factor for tension reinforcement =γ 2.00
Allowable short span to effective depth ratio Lx/d = 52.00
Calculated short span to effective depth ratio (Lx/d) = 36.29
Safe in deflection

Structural Analysis Report for School

42
 15: Wall Load

Structural Analysis Report for School

43
 Figure 16: Live Load along the Building

Structural Analysis Report for School

44
 Figure 17: Floor Finishing Load along the Building

Structural Analysis Report for School

45