Measuring The Acceleration Due To Gravity Lab
Measuring The Acceleration Due To Gravity Lab
Measuring The Acceleration Due To Gravity Lab
0.0167 0.009
0.0333 0.02
0.05 0.035
0.0667 0.053
0.0833 0.072
0.1 0.095
0.117 0.12
0.133 0.147
0.15 0.177
0.167 0.21
0.183 0.245
0.2 0.283
0.217 0.323
0.233 0.365
0.25 0.41
0.267 0.458
0.283 0.508
0.3 0.561
0.317 0.617
0.333 0.675
0.35 0.737
0.367 0.8
0.383 0.868
0.4 0.939
Raw Graph:
Transformed Data Table:
0.000279 0.009
0.00111 0.02
0.0025 0.035
0.00445 0.053
0.00694 0.072
0.01 0.095
0.0137 0.12
0.0177 0.147
0.0225 0.177
0.0279 0.21
0.0335 0.245
0.04 0.283
0.0471 0.323
0.0543 0.365
0.0625 0.41
0.0713 0.458
0.0801 0.508
0.09 0.561
0.1005 0.617
0.111 0.675
0.123 0.737
0.135 0.8
0.147 0.868
0.16 0.939
Transformed Graph:
Determining the Acceleration due to Gravity:
Our transformed graph uses time in seconds squared (s2) for its x-values and
position in meters (m) for its y-values. As a result of this, Logger Pro states that
the slope of our graph is about 5.727 m/s2. Since acceleration is measured in
m/s2 and the slope of our graph has this unit, the acceleration due to gravity in
our lab must be 5.727 m/s2.
Results:
My calculated value for the acceleration due to gravity is 5.727 m/s2, and the
accepted value for the acceleration due to gravity is approximately 9.8 m/s2.
Even though both of these values are in m/s2, my calculated value is smaller than
the accepted value for the acceleration due to gravity.
Sources of Error:
Questions:
1. Of all the sources of error listed above, which do you believe had the
greatest impact on your result? I believe that the position measurements
my group took had the greatest impact on our result because the lab
heavily relied on our measurements, and there is a large possibility that
some of them were a few millimeters off.
2. If the mass of the object attached to the tape was a heavy bowling ball,
what effect would that have on your result? Explain. The effect would be a
higher acceleration because the mass of the bowling ball would cause the
ticker tape to pass through the spark timer faster than the mass my group
used.
3. If the mass of the object attached to the tape was a small paper clip, what
effect would that have on your result? Explain. The effect would be a lower
acceleration because the mass of the paper clip would cause the ticker
tape to pass through the spark timer slower than the mass my group used.
4. If the rate at which the data was collected was increased to 120
points/second, what effect would that have on your result? Explain. This
would have no effect on my result because, even if there are more points
that will require more positions and times to be tracked, if all the points
change by a constant amount, my result will be the same.