Manatad - Corporate Governance - Fraud and Error
Manatad - Corporate Governance - Fraud and Error
Manatad - Corporate Governance - Fraud and Error
Indubitably, fraud is one of those threats in a business for this entails intentional or
purposeful illicit act which greatly affects the flow of business operations. It is hard to
detect this kind of action due to the reason that everyone in the management can be a
possible link of fraud especially those in charge with such workpapers.
Fraudulent financial reporting and misappropriation of assets do have similarities
and differences. First and foremost, the most common characteristic that they similarly
possess is both of them are acts of fraud. These actions alter the documents and papers in
different ways which in return compromises the company as a whole. The difference that
arises among the two concepts is linked on the doer of the fraud. Fraudulent financial
reporting entails intentional misstatements or it may be omissions of amounts as well as
disclosures in the financial statements for the purpose blinding the financial statement
users of their sound and healthy results. Due to this reason, it requires higher authority to
perform such act including members of management and those charged with governance.
Examples include manipulation, falsification or alteration of records or documents,
recording of transactions without substance, intentional misapplication of accounting
policies, and many more. On the other hand, misappropriation of assets is commonly
performed among employees for this only pertains to theft of entity’s assets and amounts
are relatively small and immaterial. Actions such as embezzling receipts, stealing entity’s
assets such as cash, marketable securities and inventory, causing an entity to pay goods
and services not received, using entity’s assets for personal use, and lapping of accounts
receivable are few examples.
Simply stating, fraudulent financial reporting and misappropriation of assets are
both acts of fraud which only differs on the level of severity. Fraudulent financial reporting
is much heavier than misappropriation of assets which makes it become labeled as
management fraud in which the management team members are held countable. The other
one corresponds only to minor acts of asset misappropriation wherein employees are to be
questioned about.
Rationalization
The ability of the offender to justify actions that are recognized as fraudulent is
anticipated. The main causes of asset theft are employee mistreatment by the company, a
sense of entitlement, or both. Anything from personal greed to business survival can lead to
fraudulent action. The dishonest treatment given to the offenders also leads them to justify
their dishonest behavior.
B. If one of the three elements of the fraud triangle is not present, can fraud still be
perpetrated? Explain.
An entity with a low risk of fraud or one that is fraud-free will always prosper and
run one of the best operations. It must therefore be carefully investigated and scrutinized.
To prevent fraud, it is crucial to be aware of its prevalence as well as the variables that lead
to it, such as how they relate to opportunity and why they involve incentives and
rationalization. Therefore, in my opinion, all three requirements must be met for fraud to
occur. The first is the motivation, or motive, which is what motivates a person to commit
fraud and is largely dependent on the situation he finds himself in. Everyone has the
potential to conduct fraud, and those opportunities are always present. The rewards that
someone may receive can also occasionally be related to reasoning. He might adopt a
worldview that justifies dishonest behavior as a result of the rewards he might receive.