Rough Draft Do We Own Our Body

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Grace Mullins 

Prof. Koulen

English 1301

25 September 2022

Our Body’s 

I never really thought about if I really own my own body, but after reading the intriguing article

“Do we own our Bodies” by Calabresi, Guido I now have a new perspective on the classic “are

we our own individual person'' question… we are not, and throughout the article this is

constantly proven on many accounts . It made me realize how much control the government has

over my body. The article I will be analyzing was based on a lecture Dean Calabresi gave as the

Schroeder Scholar-in- Residence at Case Western Reserve University. In his lecture Calabresi

talks about different scenarios where who owns our body becomes a little grey, like suing your

own family member for not giving you bone marrow (1) or if men could become pregnant

abortion laws would be constitutional(12) or even why is it illegal to sell body parts if you are

willing(10). While you may think you own your body, we don’t truly have autonomy over our

bodies and this is evident when we look at examples of cases of organ donation versus selling

them(10), abortion(7), and conscription( 7)

The article talks about lots of different scenarios where we question if we really do own our

body. The first example given is about a man who needed a bone marrow transplant to survive

and the only suitable donor was his cousin. His cousin however did not feel comfortable

donating the marrow so the man sued for an injunction to order his cousin to give him the bone
marrow. In the end his cousin didn’t give him the marrow and he died but this sparked a

question; was the court correct in its view of the precedent and would it be constitutional for the

state to order us to give our body parts to those who need them? (1) This leads us into the topic

of abortion, in a sense it is similar to the court case because to some extent a woman’s body as

calabresi phrases it; required for life preserving services (7). In a sense the woman is giving up

her body for the child. Another example used is in cases of conscription; we are suddenly forced

to go because all of a sudden our bodies belong to a nation(7). The article moves on to talk less

dramatic examples so that we can find the issue a little easier to understand (17). Would it really

be that objectionable to decide after death our body does not belong to us rather, those in need.

This can go beyond organs, it shows what we are as a society and how we view people as

disposable. (17)

The author, in my opinion, did an excellent job at presenting his argument throughout the article

by using different examples, court cases and laws to shape the main idea that we don’t truly have

autonomy over our bodies; and proves this by giving examples of cases of organ donation versus

selling them(10), abortion(7), conscription(7), and so many more examples. This credible author,

Guido Calabresti is the Dean and Sterling professor of law at Yale university. He is a

distinguished scholar who is considered to be extremely knowledgeable and respected. Calabresi

is an American legal scholar and Senior United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of

Appeals for the Second Circuit. He is a former Dean of Yale Law School, where he has been a

professor since 1959. He uses the three persuasive appeals: Ethos, pathos and logos; firstly he

uses pathos, by making us feel emotion towards his work, hearing that you don’t really on your

body can make you feel angry and upset. For example in this case abrotion strikes a nerve. 

When Calabresi talks about abortion describing how forced pregnancy is a life preserving service
(7); I know I speak for many woman when I say this I think about abortion and how upset I feel

when my basic right to a health care procedure is taken away from me. It’s aggravating when

people tell us what we can and cannot do with our bodies and we tend not to take it lightly. He

appeals to logos; the logical side of things when he talks about how things don’t really make

sense when it comes to what is deemed constitutional or unconstitutional or even what is right or

wrong, such as self mutilation was once illegal and frowned upon but organ donation before

death wasn’t (10) or how you can sell your plasma and hair but not your kidneys (15) .Calabresi

appeals to ethos because of his high credibility, being a respected professor and scholar. So we

know what he talks about is accurate and a trusted source when it comes to this topic. 

Evidently the main idea of this article is not only about not having ownership of your own body

but really what kind of society we are, how we are all in a sense deemed as “disposable”(17).

This article contributes to a bigger picture of the type of world we live in. This article even goes

further and could tie into things such as prostitution, drug usage, laws surrounding personal

safety and even vaccines. Through the use of the three persuasive appeals, his anecdotes and

even his expert opinion Calabresi was able to formulate a strong argument on do we really own

our bodies and how in a way we can be “scapegoats for the government”(18). By using examples

such as cases of organ donation versus selling them, abortion, and conscription he was able to

prove his point. Even though at first it can seem like a silly and obvious question, the fact of the

matter is it’s not as easy to answer as you probably thought. “So do we own our own body?”(18) 

Work cited : Calabresi, Guido. “Do We Own Our Bodies?” Health Matrix, vol 1:5, 1991.

https://openyls.law.yale.edu/bitstream/handle/20.500.13051/1295/Do_We_Own_Our_Bo

dies.pdf?sequence=2

You might also like