Bongalonta vs. Castilo

EDA MARIE L.
ENCLONAR
BONGALONTA VS. CASTILO

240 SCRA 310
FACTS:
In a sworn letter-complaint dated February 15, 1995, addressed to the Commission on Bar
Discipline, National Grievance Investigation Office, Integrated Bar of the Philippines, complainant
Sally Bongalonta charged Pablito M. Castillo and Alfonso M. Martija, members of the Philippine Bar,
with unjust and unethical conduct, to wit: representing conflicting interests and abetting a scheme
to frustrate the execution or satisfaction of a judgment which complainant might obtain.
The letter-complaint stated that complainant filed with the Regional Trial Court of Pasig,
Criminal Case No. 7635-55, for estafa, against the Sps. Luisa and Solomer Abuel. She also filed, a
separate civil action Civil Case No. 56934, where she was able to obtain a writ of preliminary
attachment and by virtue thereof, a piece of real property situated in Pasig, Rizal and registered in
the name of the Sps. Abuel under TCT No. 38374 was attached. Atty. Pablito Castillo was the
counsel of the Sps. Abuel in the aforesaid criminal and civil cases.
During the pendency of these cases, one Gregorio Lantin filed civil Case No. 58650 for
collection of a sum of money based on a promissory note, also with the Pasig Regional Trial Court,
against the Sps. Abuel. In the said case Gregorio Lantin was represented by Atty. Alfonso Martija. In
this case, the Sps. Abuel were declared in default for their failure to file the necessary responsive
pleading and evidence ex
parte was received against them followed by a judgment by default rendered in favor of Gregorio
Lantin. A writ of execution was, in due time, issued and the same property previously attached by
complainant was levied upon.
It is further alleged that in all the pleadings filed in these three (3) aforementioned cases,
Atty. Pablito Castillo and Atty. Alfonso Martija placed the same address, the same PTR and the
same IBP receipt number to wit" Permanent Light Center, No. 7, 21st Avenue, Cubao, Quezon City,
PTR No. 629411 dated 11-5-89 IBP No. 246722 dated 1-12-88.
Thus, complainant concluded that civil Case No. 58650 filed by Gregorio Lantin was merely
a part of the scheme of the Sps. Abuel to frustrate the satisfaction of the money judgment which
complainant might obtain in Civil Case No. 56934.
After hearing, the IBP Board of Governors issued it Resolution with the following findings
and recommendations:
Among the several documentary exhibits submitted by Bongalonta and attached to the
records is a xerox copy of TCT No. 38374, which Bongalonta and the respondents admitted to be a
faithful reproduction of the original. And it clearly appears under the Memorandum of
Encumbrances on aid TCT that the Notice of Levy in favor of Bongalonta and her husband was
registered and annotated in said title of February 7, 1989, whereas, that in favor of Gregorio
Lantin, on October 18, 1989. Needless to state, the notice of levy in favor of Bongalonta and her
husband is a superior lien on the said registered property of the Abuel spouses over that of
Gregorio Lantin.
Consequently, the charge against the two respondents (i.e. representing conflicting
interests and abetting a scheme to frustrate the execution or satisfaction of a judgment which
Bongalonta and her husband might obtain against the Abuel spouses) has no leg to stand on.
However, as to the fact that indeed the two respondents placed in their appearances and in
their pleadings the same IBP No. "246722 dated 1-12-88", respondent Atty. Pablito M. Castillo
deserves to be SUSPENDED for using, apparently thru his negligence, the IBP official receipt
number of respondent Atty. Alfonso M. Martija. According to the records of the IBP National Office,
Atty. Castillo paid P1,040.00 as his delinquent and current membership dues, on February 20,
1990, under IBP O.R. No. 2900538, after Bongalonta filed her complaint with the IBP Committee on
Bar Discipline.
The explanation of Atty. Castillo's Cashier-Secretary by the name of Ester Fraginal who
alleged in her affidavit dated March 4, 1993, that it was all her fault in placing the IBP official
receipt number pertaining to Atty. Alfonso M. Martija in the appearance and pleadings Atty. Castillo
and in failing to pay in due time the IBP membership dues of her employer, deserves scant
consideration, for it is the bounded duty and obligation of every lawyer to see to it that he pays his
IBP membership dues on time, especially when he practices before the courts, as required by the
Supreme Court.
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully recommended that Atty. Pablito M. Castillo be SUSPENDED
from the practice of law for a period of six (6) months for using the IBP Official Receipt No. of his
co-respondent Atty. Alfonso M. Martija.
ISSUE/S:
Whether or not the Board of Governors of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines grant the
recommendation for Castillo’s suspension.
RULING:
The Court agrees with the foregoing findings and recommendations. It is well to stress again that
the practice of law is not a right but a privilege bestowed by the State on those who show that they
possess, and continue to possess, the qualifications required by law for the conferment of such
privilege. One of these requirements is the observance of honesty and candor. Courts are entitled
to expect only complete candor and honesty from the lawyers appearing and pleading before them.
A lawyer, on the other hand, has the fundamental duty to satisfy that expectation. for this reason,
he is required to swear to do no falsehood, nor consent to the doing of any in court.
WHEREFORE, finding respondent Atty. Pablito M. Castillo guilty committing a falsehood in
violation of his lawyer's oath and of the Code of Professional Responsibility, the Court Resolved to
SUSPEND him from the practice of law for a period of six (6) months, with a warning that
commission of the same or similar offense in the future will result in the imposition of a more
severe penalty. A copy of the Resolution shall be spread on the personal record of respondent in
the Office of the Bar Confidant. SO ORDERED.

Bongalonta vs. Castilo

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Bongalonta vs. Castilo

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Bongalonta vs. Castilo

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

EDA MARIE L.

BONGALONTA VS. CASTILO

You might also like