3rd Generation Partnership Project;

Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network;

3GPP TR 36.819
Coordinated Multi-Point Operation for LTE
V0.0.1(2011-02)
Physical LayerTechnical
Aspects Report
(Release 11)

The present document has been developed within the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP TM) and may be further elaborated for the purposes of 3GPP.

The present document has not been subject to any approval process by the 3GPP Organizational Partners and shall not be implemented.
This Specification is provided for future development work within 3GPP only. The Organizational Partners accept no liability for any use of this
Specification.
Specifications and reports for implementation of the 3GPP TM system should be obtained via the 3GPP Organizational Partners' Publications Offices.
Release 11 2 3GPP TR 36.819 V0.0.1(2011-02)

Keywords
UMTS, Radio

3GPP

Postal address

3GPP support office address

650 Route des Lucioles - Sophia Antipolis
Valbonne - FRANCE
Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16

Internet
http://www.3gpp.org

Copyright Notification

No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission.

The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.

© 2011, 3GPP Organizational Partners (ARIB, ATIS, CCSA, ETSI, TTA, TTC).
All rights reserved.

3GPP
Release 11 3 3GPP TR 36.819 V0.0.1(2011-02)

Contents
Foreword...................................................................................................................................................4
1 Scope..............................................................................................................................................5
2 References.......................................................................................................................................5
3 Definitions, symbols and abbreviations..........................................................................................5
3.1 Definitions...................................................................................................................................................5
3.2 Symbols.......................................................................................................................................................5
3.3 Abbreviations..............................................................................................................................................5
4 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................6
5 Downlink coordinated multiple point transmission.........................................................................6
5.1 Terminology and definitions.................................................................................................................6
6 Uplink coordinated multiple point reception...................................................................................6
7 Evaluation of coordinated multiple point transmission/reception...................................................7
7.1 Scenario 1: Homogeneous network with intra-site CoMP..........................................................................7
7.2 Scenario 2: Homogeneous network with high Tx power RRHs.................................................................7
7.3 Scenario 3: Heterogeneous network with low power RRHs within the macrocell coverage - different
cell IDs........................................................................................................................................................7
7.4 Scenario 4: Heterogeneous network with low power RRHs within the macrocell coverage - same cell ID7

Annex A: Simulation model...........................................................................................................8

A.1 CoMP system-level simulation assumptions..............................................................................................8
A.2 References.................................................................................................................................................12

Annex B: Change history...............................................................................................................13

3GPP
Release 11 4 3GPP TR 36.819 V0.0.1(2011-02)

Foreword
This Technical Report has been produced by the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP).

The contents of the present document are subject to continuing work within the TSG and may change following formal
TSG approval. Should the TSG modify the contents of the present document, it will be re-released by the TSG with an
identifying change of release date and an increase in version number as follows:

Version x.y.z

where:

x the first digit:

1 presented to TSG for information;

2 presented to TSG for approval;

3 or greater indicates TSG approved document under change control.

y the second digit is incremented for all changes of substance, i.e. technical enhancements, corrections,
updates, etc.

z the third digit is incremented when editorial only changes have been incorporated in the document.

3GPP
Release 11 5 3GPP TR 36.819 V0.0.1(2011-02)

1 Scope
This document is related to the technical report for physical layer aspect of the study item “Coordinated Multi-Point
Operation for LTE” [1]. The purpose of this TR is to help TSG RAN WG1 to define the physical layer features and
enhancements under consideration to operate multi-point coordination and assess the performance benefits of those
features and the required specification support for both the downlink and the uplink.

This activity involves the Radio Access work area of the 3GPP studies and has impacts both on the Mobile Equipment
and Access Network of the 3GPP systems.

This document is intended to gather all information and draw a conclusion on way forward.

This document is a ‘living’ document, i.e. it is permanently updated and presented to TSG-RAN meetings.

2 References
The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of the present
document.

 References are either specific (identified by date of publication, edition number, version number, etc.) or
non-specific.

 For a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply.

 For a non-specific reference, the latest version applies. In the case of a reference to a 3GPP document (including
a GSM document), a non-specific reference implicitly refers to the latest version of that document in the same
Release as the present document.

[1] 3GPP TD RP-101425, "Revised SID Proposal: Coordinated Multi-Point Operation for LTE".

[2] 3GPP TR 21.905: "Vocabulary for 3GPP Specifications".

[3] 3GPP TR 36.913: “Requirements for Evolved UTRA (E-UTRA) and Evolved UTRAN (E-
UTRAN)

3 Definitions, symbols and abbreviations

3.1 Definitions
Void

3.2 Symbols
Void

3.3 Abbreviations
For the purposes of the present document, the abbreviations defined in 3GPP TS 21.905 [2] and the following apply:

3GPP
Release 11 6 3GPP TR 36.819 V0.0.1(2011-02)

4 Introduction
At the 3GPP TSG RAN #50 meeting, the Study Item description on “Coordinated Multi-Point Operation for LTE” was
agreed for Release 11 [1]. Coordinated multi-point (CoMP) transmission and reception is considered for LTE-Advanced
Rel. 11 as a tool to improve the coverage of high data rates, the cell-edge throughput, and also to increase system
throughput. The study item aims at evaluating the performance benefits and the standardization impact of enhanced
CoMP operation. The detailed objectives are as follows.

- Consider whether further refinements to the simulation assumptions from the agreements reached during the
LTE-Advanced study item are needed to align with potential deployment scenarios, considering possible
antenna configurations, data traffic model, network synchronization accuracy, and coordination capability
including centralized or distributed scheduler assumption and their message exchange data rate and latency

- Evaluate the performance benefits of CoMP operation and the required specification support for the following
scenarios:

o Inter- and intra-site CoMP in homogeneous macro networks

o Coordination between a cell(s) and the distributed RRHs connected to the cell(s): negligible latency is
assumed over the interface between a cell(s) and the RRHs connected to the cell(s). The RRHs may or
may not form separate cells from the cell to which they are connected. The coordination between
amongst different

o Coordination between different cell layers and within a cell layer in heterogeneous networks:
coordination is performed between a macro cell(s) and small cells in the coverage of the macro cell(s).
The small cells may be non-uniformly distributed in the coverage of a macro cell(s).

- Identify potential enhancements for DL-CoMP operation (relating to JP and/or CB/CS) in the following areas:

o Control signalling and procedures on Uu and network internal interfaces

o UE feedback of downlink channel state information for multiple cells configured in the CoMP operation.

o Uplink sounding

- Identify potential standardization impact for UL-CoMP operation and evaluate its performance benefit.

This technical report covers the physical-layer aspects of these technology components.

5 Downlink coordinated multiple point transmission

5.1 Terminology and definitions
Editor's note: Definitions on CoMP categories/ sets may need to be updated as to reflect the agreed deployment
scenarios.

6 Uplink coordinated multiple point reception

3GPP
Release 11 7 3GPP TR 36.819 V0.0.1(2011-02)

7 Evaluation of coordinated multiple point

transmission/reception

7.1 Scenario 1: Homogeneous network with intra-site CoMP

7.2 Scenario 2: Homogeneous network with high Tx power RRHs

7.3 Scenario 3: Heterogeneous network with low power RRHs

within the macrocell coverage - different cell IDs

7.4 Scenario 4: Heterogeneous network with low power RRHs

within the macrocell coverage - same cell ID

3GPP
Release 11 8 3GPP TR 36.819 V0.0.1(2011-02)

Annex A: Simulation model

Editor's note: This annex will capture the evaluation model agreed for performance evaluation of CoMP in RAN WG1.
The text colored in yellow will be updated based on RAN1 decisions.

A.1 CoMP system-level simulation assumptions

The system simulation baseline parameters for the homogeneous and heterogeneous deployment models are as specified
in [TR 36.814], with Table A.2.3-1 modified as Table A.1-1.

Table A.1-1: System simulation parameters for CoMP Evaluation

Parameter Values used for evaluation

 Full buffer traffic: Cell capacity, Cell-edge user throughput
 Non full buffer traffic as defined in Section A.2.1.3.2 in [TR 36.814]
Performance metrics
 Jain Index may be provided for information.

1. Scenario 1: Homogeneous network with intra-site CoMP, as illustrated in

Figure A.1-1
2. Scenario 2: Homogeneous network with high Tx power RRHs, as illustrated in
Figure A.1-2
 The central entity can coordinate 9 cells as a baseline, with the reference
layout as in Figure A.1-3
Choose between 3, 19, 21 cells as a potential optional value
Method for modelling of the out-of-coordinated area interference is to be
described
3. Scenario 3: Heterogeneous network with low power RRHs within the
macrocell coverage (Figure A.1-4).
 transmission/reception points created by the RRHs have different cell IDs
as the macro cell
Deployment scenarios  Coordination area includes:
Alt.1: 1 cell with N low-power nodes
Alt.2: 3 intra-site cells with 3*N low-power nodes
FFS until RAN1#64
 Benchmark is Rel-10 eICIC framework (association bias values FFS)
4. Scenario 4: Network with low power RRHs within the macrocell coverage
where the transmission/reception points created by the RRHs have the same
cell IDs as the macro cell (Figure A.1-4).
 Coordination area includes:
Alt.1: 1 cell with N low-power nodes
Alt.2: 3 intra-site cells with 3*N low-power nodes
FFS until RAN1#64
 Benchmark is Rel-10 eICIC framework (association bias values FFS)

Simulation case Deployment scenarios 1, 2:

 Need to check the impact of shadowing correlation on the CoMP
performance
 Baseline: 3GPP-Case1
o could be revisited depending on the impact of the shadowing
correlation on the CoMP performance
 Optional: ITU channel model

Deployment scenarios 3, 4:
 Alt. 1: Need to check whether fast fading model is consistent with pathloss
model 2 as defined in [TR 36.814] [ITU UMa for Macro, UMi for low power
node]
 Alt. 2: Need to check whether fast fading model is consistent with pathloss
model 1 as defined in TR36.814 [3GPP Case 1 UMa (high spread) for
Macro, UMi for low power node]
 Alt. 3: [3GPP Case 1]

3GPP
Release 11 9 3GPP TR 36.819 V0.0.1(2011-02)

Further study is needed with aim to converge on a single model as a baseline　for

comparison at RAN1 #64

Note: fast fading model for Heterogeneous based on spatial channel model
Configuration #4b [TR 36.814] with N low power nodes per macro cell
Number of low power node per Configuration #1 [TR 36.814] with N low power nodes per macro cell
macro-cell Baseline: N = 4
Optional: N = 1, 2, 10
High power RRH Tx power
46/49dBm in a 10, 20MHz carrier
(Ptotal)
Low power node TX power 30 dBm and 37 dBm for both FDD and TDD in 10MHz carrier, with higher priority
(Ptotal) for 30 dBm
Full buffer traffic model: 10 for Homogeneous networks; dependent on the targeted
Number of UEs per cell resource utilization for non-full-buffer traffic model.
Same as TR 36.814 for Heterogeneous networks
System bandwidth 10 MHz, 20MHz
 SU-MIMO
 MU-MIMO
Possible transmission  SU-MIMO with intra-eNB CS/CB
schemes in DL  MU-MIMO with intra-eNB CS/CB
 SU-MIMO with intra-eNB JP-CoMP
 MU-MIMO with intra-eNB JP-CoMP
How to assess the legacy impact is FFS
Legacy UE impact
Companies are encouraged to bring contributions how to address this issue
The following impairments are modelled. The modelling needs to be described.
 impairments of JP-CoMP
o Collision between CRS and PDSCH
Impairments modelling o Different control regions
 [time/frequency synchronization impairments - FFS]
 [PDCCH overhead/capacity should be taken into account in the
comparison - FFS]
Network synchronization Synchronized
Macro and high Tx power RRH: 1, 2, 4, 8 (2 and 4 antennas are baseline for FDD,
2 and 8 antennas are baseline for TDD)
Low power node: 1, 2, 4 (2 and 4 antennas are baseline).
Number of antennas at
Inclusion of 2 or 4 antennas as baseline may be revisited
transmission point
Baseline values for combinations (number of antennas at macro node, number of
antennas at low-power node) are FFS until RAN1#64. Candidate values (to be
further down-selected) are:
(2, 2), (4, 4), (4, 2), (2, 4), (8, 2)
Number of antennas at UE 2, 4, with higher priority for 2 antennas.
Antenna configuration For macro eNB and high power RRH, in priority order for each number of antennas:
 2 Tx antennas
1. 1 column, cross-polarized: X
2. 2 columns, closely-spaced vertically-polarized: | |
 4 Tx antennas
1. 2 columns, cross-polarized on each column, closely-spaced: X X
2. 2 columns, cross-polarized on each column, widely-spaced: X X
3. 4 columns, vertically-polarized, closely-spaced: | | | |
 8 Tx antennas
1. 4 columns, cross-polarized on each column, closely-spaced: X X X X
2. 4 columns, cross-polarized on each column, 2 widely-spaced sets of
closely-spaced columns: X X XX
3. 8 columns, vertically-polarized, closely-spaced: | | | | | | | |

For low power node

 1 Tx antenna: vertically-polarized
 2 Tx antennas: cross-polarized: X
 4 Tx antennas:
1. 1. 0.5 λ-spaced cross-polarized: X X
2. 2. 0.5 λ-spaced vertically-polarized: | | | |
Array orientation needs to be defined (e.g., random for 4 Tx)

When cross-polarized antenna configuration is applied to transmission point, it is

also applied to UE. When co-polarized antenna configuration is applied to

3GPP
Release 11 10 3GPP TR 36.819 V0.0.1(2011-02)

transmission point, it is also applied to UE.

For scenarios 3 and 4 and more that 1 antenna at the low power node, when cross-
polarized antenna configuration is applied at the macro, it is also applied at the low
power node; when co-polarized antenna configuration is applied at the macro, it is
also applied at the low power node
For macro eNB and high-power RRH:
3D as baseline and 2D as additional
Follow Annex A 2.1.1.1 Table A.2.1.1-2 in TR36.814

For low-power node:

2D as baseline and 3D as optional
Antenna pattern Horizontal plane: omnidirectional
Vertical plane:

= 40 degrees, SLAv = 20 dB

For macro eNB and high-power RRH: Different downtilt values may be evaluated.
eNB Antenna tilt
For low-power node: 0 or 10 degrees
Overhead is to be reported
The following benchmarks may be used:
 Rel-10 feedback (baseline) (with overhead as close as possible to overhead of
CoMP scheme)
Feedback scheme (e.g.  If CoMP scheme requires more feedback overhead than is possible in Rel-10,
CQI/PMI/RI/SRS) benchmark is a single-transmission/reception-point scheme (to be fully
described) with same feedback overhead as CoMP scheme
Baseline:
Per-transmission-point feedback is implicit
Inter-cell information feedback mechanism to be described
Non-ideal, based on CSI-RS.
Clarify in detail the following on CoMP evaluation:
 CSI knowledge of eNB
 Feedback scheme and/or UL sounding scheme
 [Feedback error model - FFS]
 Accuracy of CSI
o Quantization error
Channel estimation o Channel estimation error based on CSI-RS
o Channel estimation error based on SRS
 [Antennas mis-calibration for UL-DL channel reciprocity - FFS]
 [Antennas mis-calibration for DL Tx antennas with 0.5λ spacing - FFS]
 Channel estimation error for demodulation
 Any channel reciprocity modelling to be described.
 Any antenna calibration mechanism to be described.
Channel estimation error based on DM-RS should be modelled

Receiver for performance evaluation of scenarios 1 and 2:

 Mandatory (in context of the simulations): ‘MMSE receiver’
 Recommended: ‘Advanced MMSE receiver and/or IRC receiver’

Description for the ‘MMSE receiver’ assumption

 DM-RS Channel estimation
o only across layers in which the UE being scheduled
o No knowledge of channel estimate coefficients of other co-
UE receiver
scheduled DM-RS ports
 Assume that the total interference (i.e. including all signals other than the
intended data signal) has diagonal covariance matrix

For more ‘advanced MMSE receiver and/or IRC receiver’, each company should
describe MMSE/IRC modeling in detail
 Details such as covariance matrix, and frequency selectivity of the
covariance matrix, etc

FFS whether the same assumptions are made for scenarios 3 and 4.
DL overhead assumption Should be clarified for each transmission scheme, taking into account CSI-RS and

3GPP
Release 11 11 3GPP TR 36.819 V0.0.1(2011-02)

PDSCH muting overhead, as well as PDCCH overhead

Uniform distribution for homogeneous networks
Placing of UEs
For heterogeneous networks, placement according to the configuration.
 Full buffer
 Non-full-buffer according to Section A.2.1.3.1 in [TR 36.814], with the following
modifications:
o Model 1 with file size of 2 Mbytes is preferred, however Model 1 with
file size of 0.5 Mbytes and Model 2 with file size of 0.5 Mbytes can be
Traffic model
evaluated instead
o Simulations are run for various λ (for model 1) or K (for model 2) to
find performance metrics covering at least the HM-NCT values (See
A.2.1.3.2) that lead to [10 - 70]% of RU (See A.2.1.3.2 in [TR 36.814])
in non-CoMP SU-MIMO.
For deployment scenarios 1, 2 and 3:
Step 1: [point-to-point fiber, zero] latency and infinite capacity
Backhaul assumptions
Step 2: higher latency and limited capacity for scenarios 2 and 3
• Exact modeling of higher latency and lower capacity is FFS
Link adaptation Non-ideal; details to be provided

eNB

Coordination area

Figure A.1-1: Scenario 1 - Homogeneous network with intra-site CoMP

High Tx
power RRH

Optical fiber

 Assume high Tx power RRH

as same as eNB

Figure A.1-2: Scenario 2 - Homogeneous network with high Tx power RRHs

3GPP
Release 11 12 3GPP TR 36.819 V0.0.1(2011-02)

Figure A.1-3- Reference CoMP Coordination Cell Layout for Scenario 2

eNB
Low Tx power
RRH
(Omni-antenna)
Optical fiber
Figure A.1-4: Scenario 3/4 - Network with low power RRHs within the macrocell coverage

A.2 References
[TR 36.814] 3GPP TR 36.814: “Further Advancements for E-UTRA, Physical Layer Aspects”.

3GPP
Release 11 13 3GPP TR 36.819 V0.0.1(2011-02)

Annex B: Change history

Table A.1: Draft History

Change history
Date TSG # TSG Doc. Subject/Comment Old New
02-2011 RAN1#64 - Draft skeleton TR 0.0.1

3GPP