Position Paper

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

POSITION PAPER

IN PHILIPPINE HISTORY
(Cavite Mutiny)
Introduction of the Controversy:
History is the study and the
documentation of the past.
Learning and studying history
plays a big role to us because
studying history helps us
understand and grapple with
complex questions and
dilemmas by examining how the
past has shaped (and continues
to shape) global, national, and
local relationships between
societies and people. It also
helps us to have a knowledge on what really happens on the past for example the two
major events that happens in year 1872 that occurs in Cavite. The First Major event was
called Cavite Mutiny, The Cavite mutiny of 1872 was an uprising of Filipino military
personnel of Fort San Felipe, the Spanish arsenal in Cavite, Philippine Islands on 20
January 1872. Around 200 locally recruited colonial troops and laborers rose up in the
belief that it would elevate to a national uprising. The second major event was the
martyrdom of the three martyr priests, Father Mariano Gomez, Jose Burgos and Jacinto
Zamora (GOMBURZA). The Cavite Mutiny has two versions first is the Filipino version
in the account of Dr. Trinidad H. Pardo de Tavera and the second version is Spanish
version in the account of Jose Montero y Vida.
Sides and/or Evidence of the Controversy:

Filipino Version of Cavite Mutiny


According to Dr. Trinidad H. Pardo de Tavera, this was
nothing more than a rebellion by local Filipino soldiers
and workers from the Cavite Arsenal against the harsh
policies of the tyrant and Captain General Rafael de
Izquierdo. From the provision of forced labor (polo).
Filipinos had high hopes for an improvement in the
situation in their country. Loss of privileges denied by
soldiers and workers was a major cause of the rebellion.
Dissatisfaction and dissatisfaction with the government
spread everywhere. General Izquierdo revealed that
there would be no change in the government and that he
intended to rule the people with a cross in one hand and
a sword in the other. He also established a national
school of arts and crafts. Those who supported former
Governor de la Torre were classified as persona sospejosas (suspects), a term used for
refusing to follow the whims and whims of the authorities. Colonial peace was broken,
leading to the overthrow of Spanish sovereignty in the Philippines. Riots and
assassinations throughout Cavite's garrison were frustrated. The Cavite Soldiers'
Uprising was used as a powerful platform by the Spanish inhabitants and friars.

Spanish Version of Cavite Mutiny


Jose Montero y Vidal is a Spanish historian who wrote the
Historia General de Filipinas, a Spanish version of the 1872
Cavite Rebellion. Montero's account focused on how the event
was an attempt to overthrow the Spanish government in the
Philippines. His portrayal of the rebellion has been criticized as
shockingly biased. Carlos Maria de la Torre was removed from
his post with the installation of a less radical government in
Spain. Rafael de Izquierdo took over the government. The
cause of the uprising was the abolition of the exemption from
tribute privileges enjoyed by the workers of the Cavite Arsenal.
Cavite, He emphasizes the abolition of privileges enjoyed by
Arsenal workers, such as exemption from tribute and
employment in Polls Y Servicios (forced labor). The presence of local clerics who
plotted against the Spanish monks and supported the rebels.
The Stand

Positive Stand
The Cavite Mutiny is known as the military and workers uprising and revolution in
Cavite where Filipino workers fought Spanish forces due to Spanish repression. As
current Filipino citizens, the significance of Cavite in modern times lies in our own
nationalism. These uprisings and movements were among the first Filipino uprisings
against Spanish oppression. Despite knowing that Spain had more troops, they fought
to the end, resulting in the deaths of three priests: Burgos, Gómez, and Zamora. Their
execution was unfair because the Spanish side of the whole story is wrong. It has been
used as a source of inspiration and warning for us Filipinos who want to voice their
opinions to the organization. You need to know when to speak your mind safely. In
conclusion, The Cavite rebellion is relevant to modern society as it affects our beliefs,
morals, and rights. Gomburza's execution had a great impact on many Filipinos in the
late 19th century, and inspired Jose Rizal's novel El filibusterismo.

Negative Stand
I disagree to the perspective of Jose Montero y Vidal because he interpreted the
Cavite mutiny as an attempt to eliminate and overthrow the Spanish colonists in the
Philippines without any proof and investigation on what Filipino really aiming to on their
Mutiny.

Final Stand
My stand about this is that even though GOMBURZA died because of the Cavite
Mutiny, they gave reason to inspire Dr. Jose Rizal, who gave his works to the executed
priests. Dedicated to El Filibusterismo. Many scholars believe that the 1872 Cavite
Mutiny was the beginning of Filipino nationalism, which eventually led to the 1896
Philippine Revolution.
Reference

The Two Faces of the 1872 Cavite Mutiny. 2012, September 5.


https://nhcp.gov.ph/the-two-faces-of-the-1872-cavite-mutiny/
Western colonialism https://www.britannica.com/topic/Western-
colonialism/Spains-American-empire

You might also like