311 CRPC of The Code of Criminal Procedure in Its Two Ongoing

The
Supreme court momentarily clarified the scope of Section

311 CrPC of the Code of Criminal Procedure in its two ongoing
judgments.
Section 311 arrangements with the power to summon material

witness, or inspect individual present. Any Court may, at any
phase of any request, trial or other continuing under this Code,
summon any individual as a witness, or look at any individual in
participation, however not summoned as a witness, or review and
rethink any individual already inspected; and the Court will
summon and analyze or review and reevaluate any such
individual if his evidence appears to it to be crucial for the only
choice of the case, the provision peruses.
One judgment was delivered by a bench involving Justices Indu

Malhotra and Ajay Rastogi while permitting an allure against
a Karnataka High Court order. The High Court had put to the
side an order of the Trial Court permitting the application
documented by arraignment for summoning the witnesses
alongside getting the relevant records.
The Apex Court bench observed that the article fundamental

Section 311 CrPC is that there may not be disappointment of
equity because of misstep of one or the other party in welcoming
the valuable evidence on record or leaving equivocalness in the
statements of the witnesses analyzed from one or the other side.
The determinative factor is whether it is fundamental for the only

choice of the case. The articulation that happens is “at any phase
of any request or trial or other continuing under this Code”. It is,
however, to be borne as a primary concern that the optional
power presented under Section 311 CrPC must be practiced
sensibly, as it is constantly said “more extensive the power, more
noteworthy is the need of alert while exercise of reasonable
caution…
…The point of every Court is to discover reality. Section 311 CrPC
is one of numerous such provisions which fortify the arms of a
court in its work to uncover reality by procedure endorsed by
law. Simultaneously, the optional power vested under 10 Section
311 CrPC must be practiced prudently for solid and valid reasons
and with alert and caution to meet the finishes of equity.
The bench especially alluded to the observations made in Swapan

Kumar Chatterjee Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation 2019(14)
SCC 328.
The initial segment of this section which is permissive gives

absolutely optional power to the criminal court and empowers it
at any phase of request, trial or different procedures under the
Code to act in one of the three different ways, in particular, (I) to
summon any individual as a witness; or (ii) to look at any
individual in participation, however not summoned as a witness;
or (iii) to review and rethink any individual already analyzed. The
subsequent part, which is mandatory, forces a commitment on
the court (I) to summon and analyze or (ii) to review and rethink
any such individual if his evidence has all the earmarks of being
vital for the only choice of the case.
It is very much settled that the power gave under Section 311
ought to be invoked by the court just to meet the closures of
equity. The power is to be practiced distinctly for solid and valid
reasons and it ought to be practiced with incredible alert and
watchfulness. The court has vide power under this section to
even review witnesses for reevaluation or further assessment,
essential in light of a legitimate concern for equity, however the
equivalent must be practiced subsequent to contemplating
current realities and conditions of each case. The power under
this provision will not be practiced if the court is of the view that
the application has been recorded as a maltreatment of the
interaction of law.”
Permitting the allure, the bench observed that the Trial Court
judge was advocated in summoning the witnesses whose
statements should be recorded to subserve the reason for equity,
with the object of getting the evidence in guide of a fair choice
and to maintain reality.
In another case, the bench including Justices DY Chandrachud

and MR Shah observed that the genuine test for invoking Section
311 CrPC is whether it appears to the Court that the evidence of
such individual who is looked to be reviewed is vital for the only
choice of the case. In this case, the state had moved toward the
Apex Court against dismissal of the application documented by it
looking for reviewing of witnesses.

311 CRPC of The Code of Criminal Procedure in Its Two Ongoing

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

311 CRPC of The Code of Criminal Procedure in Its Two Ongoing

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

311 CRPC of The Code of Criminal Procedure in Its Two Ongoing

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The

Supreme court momentarily clarified the scope of Section

Section 311 arrangements with the power to summon material

One judgment was delivered by a bench involving Justices Indu

The Apex Court bench observed that the article fundamental

The determinative factor is whether it is fundamental for the only

The bench especially alluded to the observations made in Swapan

The initial segment of this section which is permissive gives

In another case, the bench including Justices DY Chandrachud

You might also like