Rights of Detained Persons (Provisions)
Rights of Detained Persons (Provisions)
Rights of Detained Persons (Provisions)
Introduction
According to the Persons Deprived of Liberty Act, a detained person is an individual who is
deprived of his or her freedom under an authority of law. The measure is enacted by a law
enforcement official for purposes of investigation of a crime or for purposes of being charged
with an offence. One might also be deprived of liberty by an order of a judicial body or for
administrative action2.
To the extent that it is the deprivation of an individual liberty and freedom outside the legal
parameters of conviction it affects an individual human rights and freedoms. This deprivation
affects the main pillars of human rights not limited but including human dignity which gives
human rights their essential elements and substantial aspects.
Any form of detention should strictly follow the provisions of the law and be carried out by not
only authorised officials but competent as well. Detained persons should be treated in a humane
manner, ensuring protection of their inherent dignity as well their basic human rights. There
should be no discrimination based on race, gender, ethnicity religion or social status and every
individual should be treated with respect.
Lord Nicholas of Birkhead ,in his ruling on 16 december 2004, British Gutamano AFC v
Secretary of state for Home Department paragraph 74 of the ruling, “He describes
imprisonment without trial as an anathema in any country that observers the rule of law”.3
1
The body of rules for the protection of all the persons under any form of detention or imprisonment section 2.
2
Interpretation in Persons Deprived of Liberty Act, No 23 of 2014.
3
A De Zaya, Human Rights and Indefinite Detention, Volume 83, pg 1 (March 2005)
The international human rights respect the aspect of human dignity and abhors the rule of law the
international rights are applicable in all times whenever a state exercise it jurisdiction, not only in
peace time but also in times of conflicts as it compliments humanitarian law. Arbitral
depravation of liberty is subject to some limitation and conditions.
Different laws including municipal laws and international laws have stepped in to control this
aspect of deprivation of liberty by either states or non-state armed organisation and groups. The
third aspect of international humanitarian law is applicable in this situation, not even fight of
terror nor any restriction to control immigration can justify indefinite detention.
In the Kenyan context the constitution appreciates and guarantees these salient aspects individual
liberty and rights of an individual to observed. The constitution adopts an activism posturer and
poses to address the aspect of detention. Different provisions act as a yardstick towards the
safeguard and guarantee of this individual freedom. Inspired by the horrors of the past regimes,
the constitutional drafters adopted this articles from different international convection and made
the applicable to Kenya.
All individuals including the state and non-state armed groups have a duty and obligation to
ensure that individual’s liberty is respected and more so through the laws governing detention are
followed to the end.
Deprivation of liberty is a legitimate way in which the state can exercise control over people.
However, the rights of detained persons act as substantive guarantees that the procedures taken
are lawful as provided for by the state laws. The Constitution of Kenya ,2010 provide for
protection of the rights of detained persons. These rights are regarded as substantive rights
because they are fundamental to each individual and affect aspects of their physical freedom.
Article 19 (2) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, states that the sole purpose of recognising and
protecting human rights and fundamental freedoms is to preserve the dignity of individuals and
communities and to promote social justice and the realisation of the potential of all human
beings4
Article 51(1) provides for rights of a person who is detained and states that they retain all the
rights and fundamental freedoms in the Bill of Rights. Even when in a state of detention, an
individual has the right to be treated just like any other human being with only certain limitations
being enforced but only in accordance to the provisions of the Constitution 5 Any person who is
detained has a right to petition an order of habeas corpus, which allows a person to report an
unlawful detention and requests that they be taken to court to determine if it is in accordance
with the law6
Article 29 of the Constitution of Kenya, states that all have the freedom and security of person
which includes the right not to have their freedom taken away without a just cause, being
detained without a trial, subjected to torture whether physical or psychological and being treated
in a cruel or inhumane or degrading manner7
Parliament also has the obligation to enact legislation that provides for humane treatment of
detained persons. The Persons Deprived of Liberty Act, 2014, was established to give effect to
Article 29(f) and Article 51 of the Constitution. It clearly states the rights that a detained
individual has and the duties of persons in charge 8 . Section 3 of the Act, illustrates that an
institution that facilities lawful detention shall ensure that information on reasons for the
detention are recorded as well as the procedure of due process of the law is followed.
The Act provides for other rights such as, right to communicate, right to restrictions on searches,
right to reasonable accommodation, right to a nutritional diet, decent sleeping accommodation,
right to proper health care, rights to visitation among others.
4
Article 19 (2) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010
5
Article 51(1) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010
6
Article 51(2) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010.
7
Article 29 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010.
8
Persons Deprived of Liberty, No. 23 of 2014.
Section 4 of the Persons Deprived of Liberty Act, 2014, illustrates that the right to privacy
provided for in Article 31 of the Constitution may be limited in respect to detained persons. It
lists situations where this right might be lawfully limited and they include9;
a) If it is necessary to protect the national security to the extended provided for by the
Constitution.
b) If it is for the purpose of the safety and security of law enforcement officials and the
detainees under their care.
c) Where the enjoyment of the right would be prejudicial to the enjoyment of Rights and
fundamental freedoms of others.
d) When there’s need for humanitarian assistance for migrants, refugees, undocumented
persons.
e) When there is need for psychiatric treatment with mental or sensory disability.
f) When it is for purposes for protection and security of children, elderly persons.
Article 51(2b) of the Constitution stares that Parliament shall take into account relevant
International human rights instruments on rights of detained persons. Under the supremacy of
the Constitution, Article 1 (5) states that general rules if International Law shall form part of the
laws of Kenya. Subsection 6 further states that any treaty or convention ratified by Kenya shall
form part of the law of Kenya under the Constitution, 2010.
Article 9 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, states that no one shall be subjected to
arbitrary detention. However this short provisions has been elaborated further by other
international law instruments on human rights10
The United Nations in December 1988, adopted by general assembly resolution, a body of
principles for protection of all persons from any form of detention. The resolution described a
detained person as one who is, deprived of personal liberty except as a result of a conviction of
an offence11
9
Section 4 of the Persons Deprived of Liberty, No. 23 of 2014.
10
Article 9 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights.
11
www oh hr.org United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner
The principles provided that all persons under any form of detention shall be treated in a humane
manner and with respect if their human dignity. Detention should be carried out strictly in
accordance to the law provided. There should be no restrictions or derogation of the human
rights owed to detained persons. The detention should be ordered by a judicial body or authority.
All principles apply to everyone who belongs to any State without any prejudice based on one’s
race, gender, ethnicity, social and economic background.12
Article 9 of the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights also states that no one
should be subjected to arbitrary detention and no one should be deprived of their liberty except in
accordance to the laws provided13 Article 10(1) of the ICCPR, further states that persons who’s
liberty had been Deprived should be treated with humanity and their inherent dignity respected.
Detained persons have a right to be protected from torture or cruel and inhumane or degrading
treatment. Therefore, no circumstance or action should be used as justification for torture or cruel
and inhumane punishment.
STATE OBLIGATIONS
Under the Vienna conference 1993 from 14th to 25th June on human rights on which Kenya was
part of it was held that states have a duty and an obligation towards attainment and realization of
human rights including rights of an arrested or detained person. These obligations include a duty
to promote, protect, fulfil and respect the individual freedoms and rights of detained persons.
12
www oh hr.org United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner
13
Article 9 of the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights
Under the section of the Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under any Form of
Detention or Imprisonment section 1 call for the treatment of all persons under detention in a humane
manner that upholds human dignity14. The state is called to respect the human dignity of every individual
who has been detained. In the case of MVK & another V AG &2 others 15 the accused had been arrested
and detained in a police station where they were subjected to indecent searches and torture the court held
that the detention was unlawful due to the manner that it was done and conducted which violated human
dignity.
Article 51 of the constitution states that any person held in custody retains his rights and fundamental
freedom and the state should respect this rights to the extent that they are compatible with the fact that he
is detained.
A person deprived of liberty shall at all times be treated in a humane manner and with respect for their
inherent human dignity16.
Any person who subjects a person deprived of liberty to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment commits
an offence and shall be liable upon conviction to a fine not exceeding five hundred thousand shillings or
imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or both. 17
14
https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/body-principles-protection-all-persons-under-
any-form-detention
15
(2017) eKLR
16
United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights; see also African Charter on Human Rights; see
also section 5, Persons Deprived of Liberty Act.
17
Section 12, Prisons Act.
18
Section 7, Persons Deprived of Liberty Act.
the threshold of justice administration from the right to an arrested person to the right to a fair trial. These
safeguards ensure the effective dispensation of justice and upholding of the rule of law.
5. Right to vote.
This was established in the case Kituo cha SheriavIEBC&AG20, the petitioners were seeking clarification
on whether prisoners had right to vote and whether the first respondent had violated this right in failing to
register them as voters prior to the 2013 general election. The court found that under article 83(1) of the
constitution prisoners were entitled to be registered as voters and under article 38 (3)(a)(b) had a right to
vote.
Every detained, imprisoned or person held in custody has the right to be produced before the court upon
application of an order of habeas corpus, this is pursuant to article 51 (2) .in LSK ,Brian Nzenze and
Erickson Aluda v AG, DPP &Inspector general of police (2018)eklr, the second and third petitioner
were arrested while riding on a motorcycle one being the rider the other a passenger and were bundled in
a car belonging to kawangware chiefs camp. Enquiries were made in all police stations in that locality but
they were not found. The police officers alleged to have arrested the petitioners denied the claims. the
first petitioner was applying for an order of habeas corpus to compel the respondents to produce the
second and third petitioners. However, they were unable to prove that indeed the second and third
petitioners were in the hands of the respondent. However, the third respondent was ordered to carry out
his function of investigating crime
asfoundunderarticle145oftheconstitution.Theapplicationofhabeascorpuswasdenied pending the report of
the investigating officer allocated that case and report from the third respondent.
19
Section 19, Persons Deprived of Liberty Act.
20
2012 eKLR
DUTY TO PTOTECT.
The state shall protect the rights of any person detained through applications made to courts
pursuant to article 23 of the constitution of Kenya.
The state also has a duty to ensure that there is no civil detention conducted by private
institutions either after the breach of a contractual duty these private institutions include hotels,
hospitals, non-state armed organisations such as radical groups and etc.
In the case of Gideon Kilondu & another v Nairobi women Hospital 21the defendant had been
detained by the hospital for not paying hospital bills. The court intervened and declared that it is
a violation of a fundamental freedom to detain someone just because of the breach of a
contractual obligation to pay bills.
21
(2018) eKLR
22
Section 8, Persons Deprived of Liberty Act.
23
Section 12, Persons Deprived of Liberty Act.
charged with or convicted of criminal offences, and Persons deprived of liberty on account of a civil debt
are held separately from persons charged with or convicted of criminal offences.
So far as it is practically reasonable, the education of children detained in prison shall be integrated with
the current system of education
26
Section 20, Persons Deprived of Liberty Act.
27
Section 21, Persons Deprived of Liberty Act.
7. Care of infants by mothers
A mother deprived of liberty is entitled to take personal care of the child until such a child attains the age
of four years.28
A mother and child held in detention are entitled to diet, clothing, healthcare and facilities necessary for
the development needs of the child.
28
Section 22, Persons Deprived of Liberty Act.
11. Family days
The competent authorities in charge of the premises of which persons deprived of liberty are
accommodated shall designate certain days as family days during which such persons may be visited by
and interact with their family members at least once every 3 months. 29
29
Section 25, Persons Deprived of Liberty Act.