Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 37 views

    COL724 Assignment1

    Uploaded by

    pawan s kumar
    This document provides instructions for an assignment to implement and compare TCP and QUIC models using the ns-3 network simulator. Students are asked to simulate TCP Reno, SACK, Vegas and QUIC and compare their performance under different conditions like long vs short haul connections with varying round trip times and packet loss. Plots must be generated comparing metrics like throughput, buffer size, losses, latency and RTT estimates between the different TCP models and between TCP and QUIC. The submission should include the simulation code and results in a PDF report.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    COL724 Assignment1

    Uploaded by

    pawan s kumar
    37 views2 pages
    This document provides instructions for an assignment to implement and compare TCP and QUIC models using the ns-3 network simulator. Students are asked to simulate TCP Reno, SACK, Vegas and QUIC and compare their performance under different conditions like long vs short haul connections with varying round trip times and packet loss. Plots must be generated comparing metrics like throughput, buffer size, losses, latency and RTT estimates between the different TCP models and between TCP and QUIC. The submission should include the simulation code and results in a PDF report.

    Original Description:

    ASSIGNMENT

    Original Title

    COL724_Assignment1

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides instructions for an assignment to implement and compare TCP and QUIC models using the ns-3 network simulator. Students are asked to simulate TCP Reno, SACK, Vegas and QUIC and compare their performance under different conditions like long vs short haul connections with varying round trip times and packet loss. Plots must be generated comparing metrics like throughput, buffer size, losses, latency and RTT estimates between the different TCP models and between TCP and QUIC. The submission should include the simulation code and results in a PDF report.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    37 views2 pages

    COL724 Assignment1

    Uploaded by

    pawan s kumar
    This document provides instructions for an assignment to implement and compare TCP and QUIC models using the ns-3 network simulator. Students are asked to simulate TCP Reno, SACK, Vegas and QUIC and compare their performance under different conditions like long vs short haul connections with varying round trip times and packet loss. Plots must be generated comparing metrics like throughput, buffer size, losses, latency and RTT estimates between the different TCP models and between TCP and QUIC. The submission should include the simulation code and results in a PDF report.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    COL 724 - Advanced Computer Networks

    Assignment-1

    Notes:
     This assignment has two parts –
    (1) Implementation of different models of TCP and their comparison with one another.
    (2) Comparison over a server on a long haul.
     Use ns-3 to implement this assignment.
     Your answers have to be a PDF submission and a tar file containing the NS3 code. Do not
    submit handwritten or scanned sheets.
     Due date: 31st August 2022

    ns-3 Introduction:
    ns-3 is a discrete-event network simulator for Internet systems, targeted primarily for research and
    educational use. It’s official documentation (available here) can be used to get started with the simulator.
    Other tutorial options are- geeksforgeeks, video tutorials.

    1. Implementation of TCP models in ns-3

    In this exercise, you are required to study and compare the behavior of TCP Reno/SACK/Vegas
    (check here) and QUIC in terms of throughput and delay.

    TCP Protocol Theory guide Implementation Guide


    TCP Reno http://intronetworks.cs.luc.edu/ https://www.nsnam.org/docs/
    current/html/reno.html release/3.19/doxygen/tcp-
    reno_8cc_source.html
    TCP SACK https://wiki.geant.org/display/ https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?
    public/EK/ id=3067666
    SelectiveAcknowledgements#:~:text=
    Selective%20Acknowledgements
    %20are%20a%20refinement,the
    %20receiver%EF%BF%BDs%20end.
    TCP Vegas https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/ https://github.com/shushantkumar/
    document/464716 Validating-the-TCP-Vegas-
    implementation-in-ns3
    QUIC https://peering.google.com/#/learn- https://github.com/signetlabdei/quic
    more/quic
    Note: You can follow your own links to simulate these protocols over ns-3. These are just sample
    links to help you get started.

    1.1 Compare long & short haul. Plot the observations using gnuplot.
    Compare the scenario when the server is over a long haul link with an RTT of 80ms VS a server
    not far away RTT of 12ms.

    Create plots for-

     TCP window evolution


     Buffer evolution at bottleneck link
     Losses
     Effective throughput
     End-to-end latency
     RTT estimates

    After simulating QUIC, plot graphs for-

     TCP throughput vs QUIC throughput under added delay


     TCP throughput vs QUIC throughput under added packet loss
     QUIC and TCP flows share a bottleneck link to study the fairness between TCP and QUIC
    flows.
     TCP throughput vs QUIC throughput under RTT.

    You might also like