Capitulo de Libro Global Citizenship
Capitulo de Libro Global Citizenship
Capitulo de Libro Global Citizenship
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this article was to characterize the pedagogical practices of global
citizenship education implemented within an educational institution of higher education in
eastern Colombia. According to the United Nations High Academic Impact Program (2021)
Global citizenship is a term that encompasses social, political, environmental, and economic
actions on the part of individuals and communities with global thinking, on a worldwide scale.
The term can also refer to the belief that individuals are members of multiple, diverse, local
and non-local networks, rather than lone actors impacting isolated societies. Promoting
global citizenship in sustainable development will enable individuals to embrace their social
responsibility to act for the benefit of all societies, not just their own.
For her part, the former President of Chile and United Nations High Commissioner
for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet points out that the concept of global citizenship has
antecedents since the creation of the United Nations Organization in 1945 and the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights of 1948, with the adoption of the Sustainable Development
Goals and the Paris Agreement on Climate Change in 2015. It is precisely a period of
learning, tragedies and progress, where the idea and institutions that appeal to an intrinsic,
universal dignity of the human person have been maturing. (Bachelet, 2017)
Similarly, Bachelet (2017) indicates that for more than 70 years the United Nations
has been the key for the concept to mature, adapting to the reality of globalization in its
different facets. And today we understand it as a type of citizenship that transcends the
space of the national, subtracts itself from a specific identity and/or territorial scope, and
embraces a global ethic in constant development.
Likewise, global citizenship, according to UNESCO (2016), is a multidimensional
concept. some have called global citizenship a ‘citizenship without borders, or a citizenship
beyond the nation-state. Others have pointed out that cosmopolitanism, as a term, may
METHODOLOGY
The methodology implemented was of an analytical, non-experimental, qualitative
nature, which allowed the development of a deliberation on the subject of study. To this
end, the literature was inspected, as well as approaches to perceptions on the subject of
global citizenship. In order to fulfill the stated objective, the exploration, classification and
analysis of scientific articles on the area of analysis and consultation of secondary sources
were carried out. Theoretical references, categories, and trends about the research problem
were also identified. Based on the arguments and theoretical postures, the appraisals and
interpretations of the present article emerged.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Globalization, citizenship and development are key facts in the current debate, and
education must reflect this and help to understand the impact of globalization in the local
context. The need to incorporate these issues was already officially raised in 1974, when an
international body such as UNESCO urged to think of education as a means to contribute to
solving the problems that condition the survival and welfare of humanity, inequality, injustice,
global relations based on the use of force and to walk towards international cooperation
measures that facilitate their solution (UNESCO, 2016).
From this objective, framed in Development Education (DE), progress has been made
in the last two decades and several authors, in these years, have created a gateway from
this to Global Citizenship Education (GCED). Authors such as Ortega (2007) and Aguado
• Embrace our role in protecting our planet for a more sustainable future.
• Be aware of how our actions at the local level impact the world.
DISCUSSION
Competencies for the purpose of building global citizenship can be classified into
soft skills and professional competencies. Within the soft skills and according to the revised
proposals of the general profiles of a global professional, the following stand out: i) teamwork,
ii) emotional intelligence, iii) working in diverse contexts, iv) intercultural sensitivity, v) global
citizenship, vi) ethical behavior.
As for international competitions they suggest that they should be:
Table No 1 Soft skills and professional competencies in the construction of global citizenship
Own elaboration
The promotion for the development of global citizenship, is contemplated in the 2030
Agenda for Sustainable Development, in Sustainable Development Goal 4 and, specifically,
in target 4.7, and is called Education for Global Citizenship -ECM-. An important source of
information for GCED is UNESCO, which proposes the following competencies to teach
students:
• Offering of cultural and artistic workshops/song, dance, arts and literature fes-
tivals.
RESULTS
Global citizenship within the International Business Administration program is built
through various academic activities. The first of these is through the contextualization of the
curriculum, which is achieved through the integration of the training processes to the cultural,
social, economic, political, historical, scientific and technical spaces of the city, the country
and the world. The International Business Administration program has achieved regional
positioning in the internationalization and regional logistics working groups and through its
institutional agreements has been inserted in the participation of regional development in
the field of internationalization and business consulting.
Currently, the program is a regional leader in the participation of learning practices
based on the simulation of professional environments such as the Diplomatic Models
(WMOAS and NMUN), which allow future professionals to develop the ability to evaluate and
assess the decisions of international business managers in their professional performance.
Another activity where global citizenship is built is through the linkage of students of the
program in companies, within the framework of business practices, which has allowed the
program to be recognized in the productive sector and to characterize its professionals in
the humanistic and professional training.
Similarly, flexibility as “the possibility for the curriculum to be modified and adapted
to respond to the conditions, interests, needs and aspirations of the students”. In search of
such flexibility, a wide range of formative experiences known as elective courses, optional
subjects, free curricular activities, which give students the opportunity to deepen their
knowledge in areas of professional knowledge according to their interests and motivations,
come into contact with disciplines and professions different from their own and complement
Competencies Activities
Collective Identity • Comparison of the teaching of disciplines in different countries.
• Study of the history of the country and other countries of the world.
• Conversation on issues such as diversity and discrimination
World Problems • Study of the Sustainable Development Goals.
• (SDGs) Identification of the SDGs that can be addressed from the discipline.
• Competition to propose solutions to global problems.
• Building a world scenario after COVID-19
Systemic and • Development of interdisciplinary academic or research projects.
Critical Thinking • Development of inter-institutional academic or research projects.
• Making critical and respectful judgments on national and international social
and environmental policies.
Interculturality • Participation in an international learning community. Learning other
languages.
• Role-playing for the solution of world problems assuming the perspectives of
different cultures and geopolitical interests.
• Offer of mirror classes with professors from foreign universities.
• Discussion on the different theoretical approaches to global citizenship.
• Presentations by incoming international mobility students.
Collaborative • Formation of study groups with collaborative work rules.
Work • Elaboration of a coexistence manual.
• UN and OAS Multicampus Model
• OAS UPB Model
Table No. 3 Global citizenship building activities in the School of International Business Administration of
the Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana
Own elaboration
REFERENCES
Arango, A. M., & Pérez, M. M. B. (2011). Citizenship education in higher education. Uni-pluriversidad,
11(1), 85-96.
Harkavy, I. (2006). The Role of Universities in Advancing Citizenship and Social Justice. In: The 21st
Century in Education. Citizenship and Social Justice, 1 pp. 15- 37.
Reimers, F. M. (2020). Global education to improve the world: How to boost global citizenship from
school (Vol. 42). Ediciones SM Spain
Scott, P. (2006). Internationalizing Higher Education - A Global Perspective. In: The Internationalization
of Higher Education in South Africa. Ed: Kishun R 2006, pp. 13-29.
OECD, 2018, Preparing our youth for an inclusive and sustainable world. The OECD PISA global
competence framework.
UNESCO (2015). Global citizenship education. Themes and learning objectives. http://unesdoc.unesco.
org/ images/0023/002338/233876S.pdf.
UNESCO. (2016). Global Citizenship Education. Preparing learners for the challenges of the 21st
century.