Show Cause Order
Show Cause Order
Show Cause Order
THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte for case management purposes. On July
13, 2022, Plaintiff Richard’s Disposal, Inc. filed this action seeking payment from Defendant
City of Jackson, Mississippi (“the City”) for solid waste collection services provided by Plaintiff.
See Complaint [1]. According to Plaintiff, on February 17, 2022, it entered into an Emergency
Agreement with the City wherein the City contracted with Plaintiff to collect solid waste for a
one-year period for a specified fee. On April 1, 2022, however, the City Council refused to
approve the Emergency Agreement. That same day, the Mayor of the City delivered to the City
Council his written objection or “veto” of the City Council’s disapproval of the Emergency
Agreement.
Plaintiff alleges that it began solid waste collection on April 1, 2022, and continued to
provide this service through the date of the filing of its Complaint [1].1 In this action, Plaintiff
seeks payment from the City based on the claims of quantum meruit and unjust enrichment.
On May 11, 2022, the City Council filed an action against the Mayor in the Chancery
Court of Hinds County, Mississippi, First Judicial District, asking that court to rule that “the
Mayor’s attempt to veto the City Council’s negative vote is illegal and that the Mayor’s veto
1
The parties have informed the Court that Plaintiff has continued to provide this service through
the date of this Order.
1
Case 3:22-cv-00396-KHJ-MTP Document 18 Filed 10/04/22 Page 2 of 2
does nothing to constitute effectuation of any proposed contract with was never approved by the
Council.” See [1-9]. On July 15, 2022, the chancery court ruled that Mississippi law does not
permit the Mayor to veto a matter not adopted by the City Council and held that the Mayor’s
The parties have informed that Court that the Mayor has appealed the chancery court
order to the Mississippi Supreme Court, which has granted a motion for an expedited decision.
Following a conference with the parties, and given that the issue of the validity of the Emergency
Agreement and the actions taken are before the Mississippi Supreme Court and the supreme
court’s decision may affect the issues pending before this Court, the Court finds that the parties
should show cause why this action should not be stayed pending a ruling from the Mississippi
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that on or before October 18, 2022, the parties shall
show cause why this action should not be stayed pending a ruling from the Mississippi Supreme
s/Michael T. Parker
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE