Group 4: DIGITAL PCR
Group 4: DIGITAL PCR
Group 4: DIGITAL PCR
Members:
● Macapallag, Maria Amor
● Maninding, Jerez Xean
● Mendoza, Andrea
● Musico, Van
● Ng, Anjannette
● Pagsanghan, Allaine
● Peralta, Ivan
● Ramones, Haywee Angelie Ericka
I. INTRODUCTION
(1. What was the paper all about? - RAMONES)
First, Digital PCR enables us to produce more accurate, precise, and highly
sensitive quantification results of the test of the nucleic acids in a sample. Second, this
makes the process of the test also quicker than it usually is. Moreover, as the name
suggests – “digital”, it will allow researchers to examine complicated genomic
landscapes, detect and verify disease connections, and bring about a new epoch of
clinical techniques. As stated in the paper, digital PCR can withstand wide differences in
amplification efficiencies without compromising DNA copy number estimation because it
uses a binary end-point threshold to classify each replicate reaction as either positive or
negative (one or zero, respectively). Digital PCR by limiting dilution in microwell plates is
still utilized today, despite its low throughput and limited dynamic range. A practical and
low-cost embodiment will unlock the promise of digital PCR and establish the third
generation of PCR users and applications.
II. METHODOLOGY
(5. What were the methodologies employed by the authors to achieve the objectives?
NG)
The researchers provided 6 steps to know and describe the workflow of the
high-throughput droplet digital PCR system which is also known as ddPCR.
II. A. EXPERIMENTAL
The restricted DNA was then directly added to the ddPCR Mastermix
● Purified DNA (20 ng) from normal and tumorous breast tissue samples such as
D8235086-1, Biochain was digested for 1 hour at 37 o C in a 10 L using 0.2 units
of Nlalll.
● At a rate of 8.8 ng (4.4 L) per 20 L of ddPCR reaction, the ERBB2 (Hs02803918
cn) and GRB7 (Hs02139994 cn) assays (Applied Biosystems) were purchased
as 20 premixes of primers and FAM-MGBNFQ probe and duplexed with the
RPP30 reference assay described above.
● The thermal cycling conditions were 95oC for 10 minutes which is equivalent for 1
cycle, 94oC for 30 seconds and 60oC for 60 seconds which is equivalent for 40
cycles, 98oC for 10 minutes which is equivalent for 1 cycle, and 12oC hold.
● Collecting of whole blood (3x10mL) from healthy pregnant donors was done
between 10-20weeks of gestational age via venipuncture into cell-free DNA BCT
tubes (Streck) basing it w/ the instructions of the manufacturer.
● Within 6 weeks of collecting the sample, the gender of the fetus is identified
through the use of an ultrasound.
● Sample tubes were stored for 48 hrs at room temperature and transferred
overnight at 4°C to Bio-Rad, where processing began once received.
● The whole blood was centrifuged for 10 minutes at 1 600g, the supernatant was
removed and transferred to a new tube, and the cell-free plasma was kept at 80 o
C.
● Cell-free plasma (5 mL) was thawed and cell-free DNA was isolated using the
QIAmp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufactuerʼs
protocol and before being eluted in AVE buffer (150 μL).
● Parts of the eluate (99 μL) were subjected to a single-tube digest which has HhaI
(30 U), HpaII (60 U), and BstUI (30 U) in 1× NEB buffer 4 in 120 μL total volume.
● A second portion of the eluate (33 μL) was utilized in a no-digest control mixture
where restriction enzymes were substituted for water.
● The mixtures were then incubated for 37 °C for 2 h, 60 °C for 2 h, then 65 °C for
20 min.
● The restriction enzyme digested mixture was split and subjected to three ddPCR
duplexed assays namely SRY/TERT, RASSF1/RNaseP, and RASSF1/β-actin.
● Unmethylated RASSF1 and β-actin TaqMan templates but not SRY, RNaseP, or
TERT, were then cut by the restriction enzyme mixture.
● The no-digest control mixture was split and subjected to two ddPCR duplexed
assays of RASSF1/RNaseP and RASSF1/β-actin.
● β-Actin is hypomethylated in both fetal and maternal DNA, and the enzyme
cocktail completely digests it. RASSF1 and SRY assays have previously been
reported.
● Commercially obtainable RNaseP and TERT copy number reference assays
were used (Applied Biosystems).
● 1 GC-Rich Solution (Roche) was used as a component of the assembled ddPCR
reaction mixtures for RASSF1/RNaseP and RASSF1/-actin duplexes. The
thermal cycling conditions were 95 °C for 10 minutes (1 cycle), 95 °C for 30
seconds and 60 °C for 60 seconds (45 cycles), and 4 °C hold.
● One TERT, one-actin, two RASSF1, and two RNaseP assays were used to mix
independent total DNA concentration (G.E/mL) in determination for each sample.
Seven replicate ddPCR wells were used in each assay measurement.
● The droplet counts were combined (positive and negative) from all seven
replicate wells to yield a single “metawell”.
● Each of the 6 measurement metawells’s concentration and confidence intervals
were computed.
● The confidence interval was scaled appropriately after using the necessary
dilution factors to get total cell-free DNA concentration (G.E./mL).
● The six total measurements’s weighted mean was calculated, with the weights
equal to inverses of confidence interval variances of these measurements.
● There are two independent assay measurements for digested RASSF1, which
are also combined in the same way.
● For SRY, one measurement was used directly, with haploidy being accounted for
by scaling by a factor of two.
● The fetal load is then calculated as a ratio with Poisson 95% confidence
intervals.
A copy number variation (CNV) is when the number of copies of a particular gene
varies from one individual to the next that have been linked to a variety of human
diseases. Three target genes were examined for CNVs in seven HapMap samples.
Duplex TaqMan test reagents for the target and reference genes were included in each
ddPCR run. From the results of a single well for each sample, the copy number states
from 1 to 6 were entirely resolved for MRGPRX1 (Figure 2a). As indicated, lower CNV
states for CYP2D6 and Chromosome X were easily resolved.
Second, the researchers calculated the copy number of CCL3L1, a gene linked
to HIV/AIDS risk, for 13 HapMap samples (Figure 2b). For next-generation sequencing,
it predicted the CCL3L1 copy number to be 5.725 for DNA sample NA18507, but the
ddPCR technique estimated 6.05. The next-generation sequencing estimate of 5.7 is
likely due to under-sampling because it only has an average read-depth of only 30x but
for ddPCR, it easily obtained an increased accuracy since the number of reads can be
adjusted practically. From a single well, the current ddPCR method can obtain read
depths of up to 20 000 for two genes.
The results show that the ddPCR technology is particularly suited for CNV
population research, as it allows large numbers of samples to be evaluated against
smaller sets of gene with high accuracy, sensitivity, and precision. Although microarray
technologies are useful for CNV identification, their dynamic range is limited, and
scaling to large numbers of samples for population investigations is costly. Additionally,
real-time PCR techniques have reported technical difficulties in achieving reliable copy
number estimations. Copy number estimations can fluctuate between cases and
controls because of the imprecision of real-time PCR measurements, thereby further
increasing the need for a high-throughput, low cost approach ddPCR to making precise
CNV measurements with increased dynamic range for validation for CNV population
studies. The results also shows that ddPCR method provides the ability to scale the
number of partitions by combining replicate wells to resolve fine copy number
differences in heterogeneous mixtures and could be a better alternative diagnosing
amplifications and deletions since other methods like the fluorescent in situ hybridization
(FISH) method is costly and low-throughput only.
Figure 3. Detection of the BRAF V600E rare mutant allele in the presence of
homologous wildtype DNA by droplet digital PCR.
The successive dilutions of the mutant cell line DNA were generated in a
continuous background of wildtype human genomic DNA, as shown in the results.
Droplet partitioning eliminates some competitive amplification effects, which allows the
determination of mutant fractions as low as 0.001%, which is 1,000 times lower than
real-time PCR. BRAF V600E is present in 35% of the mutant cell line, as determined by
ddPCR.
For the second application, it exhibits how competitive PCR processes can be
greatly reduced in the face of a relatively homogeneous wild-type DNA background,
resulting in enhanced detection of uncommon mutant alleles. Real-time PCR methods
can detect down to the 1% mutant fraction with careful tuning. While, ddPCR divides the
competitive background away from the mutant using the same assays, substantially
boosting the mutant-to-wild-type ratio by 20,000 times. The number of sample partitions
employed is proportional to the effective enrichment of mutant molecules per PCR
experiment. Droplet partitioning finds 0.001% mutant fraction, 1,000 times lower than
real-time PCR, in a duplex TaqMan assay targeting the BRAF V600E mutation29. Due
to the reliance on the amount of DNA retrieved from clinical samples, more DNA can be
put into the ddPCR system, allowing detection limits to be lowered even further. This
method allows researchers to detect extremely low amounts of mutation, potentially
leading to better diagnosis of minor residual disease and less invasive diagnostics.
Figure 4. Absolute quantitation of circulating fetal and maternal DNA from cell-free
plasma for male and female fetuses.
The absolute quantification of circulating fetal and maternal DNA from cell-free
plasma for male and female fetuses can be separated into three graphs. (a)
Quantification of the fetal concentration using SRY and hypermethylated RASSF1. This
resulted in leaving the hypermethylated fetal DNA being quantified whereas the
hypomethylated fraction, maternal DNA, was selectively digested away through the use
of methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes. (b) Quantification of the total amount of
DNA concentration acquired represented as the weighted average from six independent
assay measurements which includes undigested RASSF1, β-actin, RnaseP, and TERT
(c) The ratio of SRY to the total of male fetuses and RASSF1 to the total of both male
and female fetuses was used to determine fetal loads. The correlation of fetal load
between SRY and RASSF1 was 97.3% for male fetuses. This indicates that the fetal
DNA is not completely hypermethylated. Hence, the RASSF1 fetal load measure for
some samples is lower compared to those determined using SRY.
This portion of the experiment entails evaluating the ability of the ddPCR to
quantify DNA in clinical samples. The cell-free DNA located in the plasma is known to
be highly fragmented, therefore, presents at low levels which can be a challenge for
quantification. In the experiment, the fetal and total DNA in maternal cell-free plasma
were enumerated. As shown in Figure 4a, 19 maternal plasma samples were taken
between 10 and 20 weeks of gestational age. Figure 4b depicts the total DNA that was
measured for both male and female fetuses. As aforementioned, a selective
methylation-sensitive digest enabled the low levels of hypermethylated RASSF1 fetal
DNA to be accurately quantified. Through the absolute measure of SRY, RASSF1, and
total DNA concentrations, the fetal load (Figure 4c) was calculated. As seen in the
results, for male fetuses, there was a correlation of 93.7% between the hypermethylated
RASSF1 fetal DNA and SRY fetal loads which provided confidence in the estimation for
female fetuses. Moreover, the use of this technique or system would increase the
capability of absolute quantification of low-level highly fragmented cell-free DNA found
in clinical samples.
IV. Conclusion
- The data presented by the authors for CNV determination show that
their ddPCR system is well suited for CNV population studies because it
allows large numbers of samples to be tested against smaller sets of genes.
Overall, the data that the authors presented show that ddPCR is a practical solution for
achieving precise estimates of DNA copy number with high throughput. The researchers
hope that this system will enable more researchers to harness the inherent power of
digital PCR for a variety of applications.
Recommendations
(7. Are there any research gaps that may be addressed by the future researchers? -
Macapallag)
Based on the paper, ddPCR is more advantageous and more practical for quantification
results for DNA copies over real-time PCR since the ddPCR showed more accurate,
precise, and high sensitivity results. As students of Medical Laboratory Science, this
paper is also significant in the field of Medical Laboratory because with the help of
ddPCR, it allows researchers to explore complex genetic landscapes, discover and
validate new disease associations that will alow us to further study and improve
molecular diagnostics without doubting if the results are valid or not since ddPCR
showed accurate, precise, and high sensitivity results. This paper also shows how
significant ddPCR to the community is and not just to medical field workers only
because trough ddPCR, as the paper showed promising results, maybe in the future the
ddPCR can help us to prevent or much better, find cure to certain diseases that is
incurable for now. Additionally with the existence of ddPCR, hospital bills can be greatly
reduced since ddPCR can be an alternative for high-cost methods such as FISH
method.