Report in Historiography
Report in Historiography
Report in Historiography
Early modern[edit]
During the Renaissance in Europe, history was written about states or nations. The study of history
changed during the Enlightenment and Romanticism. Voltaire described the history of certain ages
that he considered important, rather than describing events in chronological order. History became
an independent discipline. It was not called Philosophia Historiae anymore, but merely history
(Historia). Voltaire, in the 18th century, attempted to revolutionize the study of world history. First,
Voltaire concluded that the traditional study of history was flawed. The Christian Church, one of the
most powerful entities in his time, had presented a framework for studying history. Voltaire, when
writing History of Charles XII (1731) and The Age of Louis XIV (1751), instead choose to focus on
economics, politics, and culture. [15] These aspects of history were mostly unexplored by his
contemporaries and would each develop into their sections of world history. Above all else, Voltaire
regarded truth as the most essential part of recording world history. Nationalism and religion only
subtracted from objective truth, so Voltaire freed himself for their influence when he recorded history.
[16]
Contemporary[edit]
World history became a popular genre in the 20th century with universal history. In the 1920s,
several best-sellers dealt with the history of the world, including surveys The Story of
Mankind (1921) by Hendrik Willem van Loon and The Outline of History (1918) by H. G. Wells.
Influential writers who have reached wide audiences include H. G. Wells, Oswald Spengler, Arnold
J. Toynbee, Pitirim Sorokin, Carroll Quigley, Christopher Dawson,[34] and Lewis Mumford. Scholars
working the field include Eric Voegelin,[35] William Hardy McNeill and Michael Mann.[36] With evolving
technologies such as dating methods and surveying laser technology called LiDAR, contemporary
historians have access to new information which changes how past civilizations are studied.
Spengler's Decline of the West (2 vol 1919–1922) compared nine organic cultures: Egyptian (3400–
1200 BC), Indian (1500–1100 BC), Chinese (1300 BC–AD 200), Classical (1100–400 BC),
Byzantine (AD 300–1100), Aztec (AD 1300–1500), Arabian (AD 300–1250), Mayan (AD 600–960),
and Western (AD 900–1900). His book was a success among intellectuals worldwide as it predicted
the disintegration of European and American civilization after a violent "age of Caesarism," arguing
by detailed analogies with other civilizations. It deepened the post-World War I pessimism in Europe,
and was warmly received by intellectuals in China, India, and Latin America who hoped his
predictions of the collapse of European empires would soon come true. [37]
In 1936–1954, Toynbee's ten-volume A Study of History came out in three separate installments. He
followed Spengler in taking a comparative topical approach to independent civilizations. Toynbee
said they displayed striking parallels in their origin, growth, and decay. Toynbee rejected Spengler's
biological model of civilizations as organisms with a typical life span of 1,000 years. Like Sima Qian,
Toynbee explained decline as due to their moral failure. Many readers rejoiced in his implication (in
vols. 1–6) that only a return to some form of Catholicism could halt the breakdown of western
civilization which began with the Reformation. Volumes 7–10, published in 1954, abandoned the
religious message, and his popular audience shrunk while scholars picked apart his mistakes. [38]
McNeill wrote The Rise of the West (1963) to improve upon Toynbee by showing how the separate
civilizations of Eurasia interacted from the very beginning of their history, borrowing critical skills
from one another, and thus precipitating still further change as adjustment between traditional old
and borrowed new knowledge and practice became necessary. McNeill took a broad approach
organized around the interactions of peoples across the Earth. Such interactions have become both
more numerous and more continual and substantial in recent times. Before about 1500, the network
of communication between cultures was that of Eurasia. The term for these areas of interaction differ
from one world historian to another and include world-system and ecumene. The importance of
these intercultural contacts has begun to be recognized by many scholars. [39]
History education[edit]
United States[edit]
As early as 1884, the American Historical Association advocated the study of the past on a world
scale.[40] T. Walter Wallbank and Alastair M. Taylor co-authored Civilization Past & Present, the first
world-history textbook published in the United States (1942). With additional authors, this very
successful work went through numerous editions up to the first decade of the twenty-first century.
According to the Golden Anniversary edition of 1992, the ongoing objective of Civilization Past &
Present "was to present a survey of world cultural history, treating the development and growth of
civilization not as a unique European experience but as a global one through which all the great
culture systems have interacted to produce the present-day world. It attempted to include all the
elements of history – social, economic, political, religious, aesthetic, legal, and technological." [41] Just
as World War I strongly encouraged American historians to expand the study of Europe than to
courses on Western civilization, World War II enhanced the global perspectives, especially regarding
Asia and Africa. Louis Gottschalk, William H. McNeill, and Leften S. Stavrianos became leaders in
the integration of world history to the American College curriculum. Gottschalk began work on the
UNESCO 'History of Mankind: Cultural and Scientific Development' in 1951. McNeill, influenced by
Toynbee, broadened his work on the 20th century to new topics. Since 1982 the World History
Association at several regional associations began a program to help history professors broaden
their coverage in freshman courses; world history became a popular replacement for courses
on Western civilization. Professors Patrick Manning, at the University of Pittsburgh's World History
Center; and Ross E. Dunn at San Diego State are leaders in promoting innovative teaching
methods.[42]
In related disciplines, such as art history and architectural history, global perspectives have been
promoted as well. In schools of architecture in the U.S., the National Architectural Accrediting
Board now requires that schools teach history that includes a non-west or global perspective. This
reflects a decade-long effort to move past the standard Euro-centric approach that had dominated
the field.[43]
Recent themes[edit]
In recent years, the relationship between African and world history has shifted rapidly from one of
antipathy to one of engagement and synthesis. Reynolds (2007) surveys the relationship between
African and world histories, with an emphasis on the tension between the area studies paradigm and
the growing world-history emphasis on connections and exchange across regional boundaries. A
closer examination of recent exchanges and debates over the merits of this exchange is also
featured. Reynolds sees the relationship between African and world history as a measure of the
changing nature of historical inquiry over the past century. [44]