Reviewer - Intacc
Reviewer - Intacc
Reviewer - Intacc
Lesson: Investment
Investment
is essentially an asset that is created with the intention of allowing money to
grow. The wealth created can be used for a variety of objectives such as
meeting shortages in income, saving up for retirement, or fulfilling certain
specific obligations such as repayment of loans, payment of tuition fees, or
purchase of other assets.
One, if you invest in a saleable asset, you may earn income by way of profit.
Second, if Investment is made in a return generating plan, then you will earn an
income via accumulation of gains.
Examples of investments
1. Ownership Investments, as the name clearly suggests, are assets that
are purchased and owned by the investor.
2. Lending Investments, invest in lending instruments, you’re essentially
behaving like the bank. Corporate bonds, government bonds, and even
savings accounts
3. Cash Equivalents, investments that are highly liquid and can easily be
converted into cash.
2. Equity Security
An equity security is a financial instrument that represents an
ownership share in a corporation.
The typical equity security is common stock, which also gives its
owner the right to a share of the residual value of the issuing entity,
in the event of a liquidation.
3. Debt Security
type of financial asset that is created when one party lends money to
another. For example, corporate bonds are debt securities issued by
corporations and sold to investors.
The investee reported the following net income and cash dividend:
Net Cash
income Dividend
2021 5,000,000 3,500,000
2022 6,000,000 4,000,000
Journal Entries (2021)
Financial Asset - FVOCI 3,000,000
Cash 3,000,000
Cash (10% x 3,500,000) 350,000
Dividend Income 350,000
Financial Asset FVOCI 1,000,000
Unrealized Gain - OCI 1,000,000
Fair Value - Dec. 31, 2021 4,000,000
Carrying Amount 3,000,000
Unrealized Gain - other comp. Inc. 1,000,000
Impairment
is a permanent reduction in the value of a company asset. It may be
a fixed asset or an intangible asset.
most commonly used to describe a drastic reduction in the recoverable
value of a fixed asset. The impairment may be caused by a change in the
company's legal or economic circumstances or by a casualty loss from an
unforeseeable disaster.
Special assessments
Are additional capital contribution of the shareholders. On the part of the
shareholders, special assessments are recorded as additional cost of the
instrument.
Stock rights
Is a legal right granted to shareholders to subscribe for new shares issued
by a corporation at a specified price during a define period.
Investment in associate
Intercorporate share investment
Is the purchase of the equity shares of one entity by another entity.
Government grant shall not be recognized on a cash basis as this is not consistent with generally
accepted accounting practice. In other words, the government grant shall be recognized on the accrual
basis when received or receivable.
In other words, the grant is taken to income over one or more periods in which the related cost is
incurred.
Government Assistance
Government assistance is action by government designed to provide an economic benefit specific to an
entity or range of entities qualifying under certain criteria.
The essence of government assistance is that no value can reasonably be placed upon it. Examples of
government assistance are:
a. Free technical or marketing advice
b. Provision of guarantee
c. Government procurement policy that is responsible for a portion of the entity's sales.
Government assistance does not include the following indirect benefits or benefits not specific to an
entity:
a. Infrastructure in development areas such as improvement to the general transport and
communication network.
b. Imposition of trading constraints on competitors.
c. Improved facilities such as irrigation for the benefit of an entire local community.
It is not required to disclose the name of the government agency that gave the grant along with the date
of sanction of the grant by such government agency and the date when cash was received in case of
monetary grant.
Machinery
When machinery is purchased, the cost normally includes the following:
a. Purchase price
b. Freight, handling, storage and other cost related to the acquisition
c. Insurance while in transit HATS HD
d. Installation cost, including site preparation and assembling
e. Cost of testing and trial run, and other cost necessary in preparing the machinery for its
intended use.
f. Initial estimate of cost of dismantling and removing the machinery and restoring the site on
which it is located and for which the entity has a present obligation as required by law or
contract.
g. Fee paid to consultants for advice on the acquisition of the machinery.
h. Cost of safety rail and platform surrounding machine. i. Cost of water device to keep
machine cool.
If machinery is removed and retired to make room for the installation of a new one, the removal cost
not previously recognized as a provision is charged to expense. The value added tax or VAT on the
purchase of machinery is not capitalizable but charged to input tax to be offset against output tax.
However, any irrecoverable or nonrefundable purchase tax is capitalized as cost of the machinery.
Tools
Tools are classified as machine tools and hand tools. Machine tools include drills and punches. Hand
tools include hammer and saws. Tools should be segregated from the machinery account.
Patterns and dies
Patterns and dies are used in designing or forging out a particular product. Patterns and dies used for
the regular product are recorded as assets. Patterns and dies are depreciated over the useful life.
However, patterns and dies used for specially ordered product form part of the cost of the special
product.
Equipment
The term "equipment" includes delivery equipment, store equipment, office equipment and furniture
and fixtures. The cost of such equipment includes the purchase price, freight and other handling
charges, insurance while in transit, installation costs and other costs necessary in preparing them for the
intended use.
Delivery equipment includes cars, trucks and other vehicles used in business operations. Motor vehicle
registration fees should be expensed and not be included as part of the cost of the delivery equipment.
Store and office equipment include computers, typewriters, adding machines, cash register and
calculator.
Assets identified with the selling function are classified as store equipment. Otherwise, the assets are
charged to office equipment. Furniture and fixtures include showcases, counters, shelves, display
fixtures, cabinets, partitions, safes, desks and tables. In a broad sense, furniture and fixtures may
include store and office equipment.
Returnable containers
Returnable containers include bottles, boxes, tanks, drums and barrels which are returned to the seller
by the buyer when the contents are consumed or used. Containers in big units or of great bulk as in the
case of tanks, drums and barrels are classified as property, plant and equipment.
On the other hand, containers that are small and individually involve small amount as in the case of
bottles and boxes are classified as other non-current assets. Needless to say, containers that are not
returnable are charged outright to expense.
Capital expenditure and revenue expenditure
An expenditure that benefits only the current period is a revenue expenditure and therefore reported as
an expense. An expenditure that benefits the current period and future periods is a capital expenditure
and therefore reported as an asset.
Recognition of subsequent cost
The recognition of subsequent cost is subject to the same recognition criteria for the initial cost of
property, plant and equipment.
Accordingly, the subsequent cost incurred for property, plant and equipment shall be recognized as an
asset when:
a. It is probable that future economic benefits associated with the subsequent cost will flow to
the entity.
b. The subsequent cost can be measured reliably.
In other words, if the subsequent cost will increase the future service potential of the asset, the cost
should be capitalized. If the subsequent cost merely maintains the existing level of standard
performance, the cost should be expensed when incurred.
Future economic benefit
In general, a subsequent cost on an item of property, plant and equipment will benefit future periods or
increase the future service potential of an asset when:
a. The expenditure extends the life of the property.
b. The expenditure increases the capacity of the property and quality of output, for example, by
upgrading machine parts.
c. The expenditure improves the efficiency and safety of the property, for example, by adopting
a new production process leading to large reduction in operating cost.
Subsequent cost
Generally, the following expenditures are incurred during ownership of existing property, plant and
equipment.
a. Additions
b. Improvements or betterments
c. Replacements
d. Repairs e. Rearrangement cost
Additions
Additions are modifications or alterations which increase the physical size or capacity of the asset.
Such expenditures are of two types, namely:
a. An entirely new unit
b. An expansion, enlargement or extension of the old asset
The construction of a new building is an addition of the first type but the addition of a wing to a
building or the construction of a third storey on a two-storey building is an addition of the second type.
In either case, the cost is capitalized in the usual manner. The cost of an addition which is a new unit is
depreciated over the useful life. But the cost of an expansion should be depreciated over the useful life
of the expansion or remaining useful life of the asset of which it is part, whichever is shorter.
Improvements or betterments
Improvements or betterments are modifications or alternations which increase the service life or the
capacity of the asset. Improvements may represent replacement of an asset or part thereof with one of a
better or superior quality. Such expenditures are normally capitalized. The improvements that do not
involve replacement of parts are simply added to the cost of the existing asset.
Examples of improvements are:
a. A tile roof is substituted for wooden shingles
b. A shatter proof glass is substituted for ordinary glass
c. An old motor in a machine is replaced by a new and powerful one
d. Galvanized iron roofing is substituted for nipa roofing
e. Replacement of wooden floor by concrete flooring
Replacements
Replacements also involve substitution but the new asset is not better than the old asset when acquired.
The basic difference between an improvement and replacement is that an improvement is a substitution
of a better or superior quality whereas a replacement is a substitution of an equal or lesser quality.
Replacements may be classified into three:
a. Replacement of the old asset by a new one. This is the replacement contemplated.
b. Replacement of major parts or extraordinary repairs.
c. Replacement of minor parts or ordinary repairs.
Repairs
Repairs are those expenditures used to restore assets to good operating condition upon their breakdown
or replacement of broken parts. Repairs may be classified as extraordinary repairs and ordinary repairs.
Extraordinary repairs are material replacement of parts, involving large sums and normally extend the
useful life of the asset. Extraordinary repairs are usually capitalized.
Ordinary repairs are minor replacement of parts, involving small sums and are frequently encountered.
Ordinary repairs are normally charged to expense when incurred. Accordingly, an entity does not
include in the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment the cost of day-to-day servicing of the
property. Rather, such cost of day-to-day servicing is recognized as expense when incurred.
Repair and maintenance
Repair is different from maintenance in that repair restores the asset in good operating condition while
maintenance keeps the asset in good condition. Thus, repair is or curative while maintenance is
preventive. The theoretical distinction is difficult to maintain in practice, hence the two are combined
in a single account "repair and maintenance."
Rearrangement cost
Rearrangement cost is the relocation or redeployment of an existing property, plant and equipment.
PAS 16, paragraph 20, provides that recognition of costs in the carrying amount of property, plant and
equipment ceases when the asset is in the location and condition for the intended use.
In other words, IFRS expressly mandates that the costs of relocating existing property, plant and
equipment or costs of reorganizing part or all of an entity's operations are not capitalized but expensed
as incurred. The rearrangement merely maintains the existing level of standard performance of the
asset.
Accounting for major replacement
An important consideration in determining the appropriate accounting treatment for a replacement is
whether the original part of an existing asset is separately identifiable. If separate identification is
practicable, the major replacement is debited to the asset account. The cost of the part eliminated and
the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the remaining carrying
amount of the old part is treated as a loss.
If it is not practicable for an entity to determine the carrying amount of the replaced part, it may use the
cost of the replacement as an indication of the "likely original cost of the replaced part at the time it
was acquired or constructed. However, the current replacement cost shall be discounted.
Depreciation
Introduction
Property, plant and equipment, except land, normally are usable for a number of years after which the
assets have relatively little value either for service or for sale. The difference between the original cost
of a property and any remaining value when it is retired or worn out is an expense that should be
distributed to the periods during which the asset is used. The portion that is allocated to expense in a
particular period is referred to by three different terms namely:
a. Depreciation
b. Depletion
c. Amortization
The three terms are similar in meaning. The only difference lies in the type of asset involved.
Technically, depreciation refers to property, plant and equipment, depletion to wasting assets and
amortization to intangible assets.
CONCEPT OF DEPRECIATION
Depreciation is defined as the systematic allocation of the depreciable amount of an asset over the
useful life. Depreciation is not so much a matter of valuation. Depreciation is a matter of cost allocation
in recognition of the exhaustion of the useful life of an item of property, plant and equipment. The
objective of depreciation is to have each period benefiting from the use of the asset bear an equitable
share of the asset cost.
Depreciation in the financial statements
Depreciation is an expense. It may be a part of the cost of goods manufactured or an operating expense.
The depreciation charge for each period shall be recognized as expense unless it is included in the
carrying amount of another asset. Except for non-exhaustible land, all property shall be depreciated on
a systematic basis over the useful life of the asset irrespective of the earnings of the entity. The
financial statements would be misstated if depreciation is omitted when the entity has a loss and
recognized when the entity has a gain. The omission of depreciation may somehow impair legal capital
if and when dividends are declared out of earnings before provision for depreciation.
Depreciation period
Depreciation of an asset begins when it is available for use, meaning, when the asset is in the location
and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management.
Depreciation ceases when the asset is derecognized. Therefore, depreciation does not cease when the
asset becomes idle temporarily. Temporary idle activity does not preclude depreciating the asset as
future economic benefits are consumed not only through usage but also through wear and tear and
obsolescence.
PFRS 5, paragraph 25, provides that if the asset is classified as held for sale depreciation shall be
discontinued.
Kinds of depreciation
There are two kinds of depreciation, namely physical depreciation and functional or economic
depreciation. Physical depreciation is related to the depreciable asset's wear and tear and deterioration
over a period.
Physical depreciation may be caused by:
a. Wear and tear due to frequent use
b. Passage of time due to non-use
c. Action of the elements such as wind, sunshine, rain or dust natural disaster animals and
wooden buildings.
d. Casualty or accident such as fire, flood, earthquake and other
e. Disease or decay - This physical cause is applicable to animals and wooden buildings.
Accordingly, physical depreciation results to the ultimate retirement of the property or termination of
the service life of the asset. Functional or economic depreciation arises from inadequacy, supersession
and obsolescence. Inadequacy arises when the asset is no longer useful to the entity because of an
increase in the volume of operations. Supersession arises when a new asset becomes available and the
new asset can perform the same function more efficiently and economically or for substantially less
cost. Obsolescence is the catchall for economic or functional depreciation. Obsolescence encompasses
inadequacy and supersession. An asset becomes obsolete if it is inadequate or superseded.
Factors of depreciation
In order to properly compute the amount of depreciation, three factors are necessary, namely
depreciable amount, residual value and useful life.
Depreciable amount
Depreciable amount or depreciable cost is the cost of an asset or other amount substituted for cost, less
the residual value.
Each part of an item of property, plant and equipment with a cost that is significant in relation to the
total cost of the item shall be depreciated separately. The entity also depreciates separately the
remainder of the item and the remainder consists of the parts of the item that are individually not
significant.
Residual value
Residual value is the estimated net amount currently obtainable if the asset is at the end of the useful
life. The residual value of an asset shall be reviewed at least at each financial year-end and if
expectation differs from previous estimate, the change shall be accounted for as a change in an
accounting estimate. In practice, the residual value of an asset is often insignificant and therefore
immaterial in the calculation of the depreciable amount. The residual value of an asset may increase to
an amount equal to or greater than the carrying amount. If it does, the depreciation charge is zero
unless and until the residual value subsequently decreases to an amount below the carrying amount.
Depreciation is recognized even if the fair value of the asset exceeds the carrying amount as long as the
residual value does not exceed the carrying amount.
Useful life
Useful life is either the period over which an asset is expected to be available for use by the entity, or
the number of production or similar units expected to be obtained from the asset by the entity.
Accordingly, the useful life of an asset is expressed as:
a. Time periods as in years
b. Units of output or production
c. Service hours or working hours
Factors in determining useful life
a. Expected usage of the asset - Usage is assessed by reference to the asset's expected capacity
or physical output.
b. Expected physical wear and tear depends on the operational factors such as the number of
shifts the asset is used, the repair and maintenance program, and the care and maintenance of
the asset while idle.
c. Technical or commercial obsolescence arises from changes or improvements in production,
or change in the market demand for the product output of the asset.
d. Legal limits for the use of the asset, such as the expiry date of the related lease.
Incidentally, the service life of an asset should be distinguished from physical life. Service life is the
period of time an asset shall be used by an entity. The service life is the equivalent of useful life.
Physical life refers to how long the asset shall last.
Depreciation method
The depreciation method shall reflect the pattern in which the future economic benefits from the asset
are expected to be consumed by the entity. The depreciation method shall be reviewed at least at every
year-end. The method shall be changed if there is a significant change in the expected pattern of future
economic benefits. Such change in depreciation method shall be accounted for as change in accounting
estimate.
Methods of depreciation
1. Equal or uniform charge methods
a) Straight line
b) Composite method
c) Group method
2. Variable charge or use-factor or activity methods
a) Working hours or service hours
b) Output or production method
3. Decreasing charge or accelerated or diminishing balance methods
a) Sum of years' digits
b) Declining balance method
c) Double declining balance
4. Other methods
a) Inventory or appraisal
b) Retirement method
c) Replacement method
Straight line method
Under the straight line method, the annual depreciation charge is calculated by allocating the
depreciable amount equally over the number of years of estimated useful life. In other words, straight
line depreciation is a constant charge over the useful life of the asset. The formula for the computation
of the annual depreciation following the straight line method is as follows:
Annual depreciation =Cost minus residual value/Useful life in years
Cost minus residual value equals depreciable amount.
Straight line rate
Depreciable amount multiplied by the straight line rate of depreciation also gives the amount of annual
depreciation. The straight line rate is determined by dividing 100% by the life of the asset in years.
Rationale for straight line
The straight line method is adopted when the principal cause of depreciation is passage of time. The
straight line approach considers depreciation as a function of time rather than as a function of usage.
Although use and obsolescence contribute to the depreciation of such assets, such causes are
insignificant compared to the effects of time. The straight line method is widely used in practice
because of simplicity.
Composite and group method
Large entities own various individual depreciable assets. For these entities, making detailed
depreciation computation for each individual asset referred to as unit depreciation is time consuming
and costly. Therefore, large entities find it more practical to compute depreciation by treating many
individual assets as though they were a single asset. The two methods of depreciating various
individual assets as a single asset are composite method and group method.
Under the composite method, assets that are dissimilar in nature or assets that have different physical
characteristics and vary widely in useful life, are grouped and treated as a single unit.
Under the group method all assets that are similar in nature and in estimated useful life are grouped and
treated as a single unit. The accounting procedure and the method of computation for the composite
and group method are essentially the same.
In other words, the average useful life and the composite or group rate are computed, and the assets in
the group are depreciated on that basis.
Accounting procedures
a. Depreciation is reported in a single accumulated depreciation account. Thus, the
accumulated depreciation account is not related to any specific asset account.
b. The composite or group rate is multiplied by the total cost of the assets in the group to get
the periodic depreciation.
c. When an asset in the group is retired, no gain or loss is reported. The asset account is
credited for the cost of the asset retired and the accumulated depreciation account is debited
for the cost minus salvage proceeds.
d. When the asset retired is replaced by a similar asset, the replacement is recorded by debiting
the asset account and crediting cash or other appropriate account. Subsequently, the
composite or group rate is multiplied by the balance of the asset account to get the periodic
depreciation.
Variable charge or activity methods
The variable or activity methods assume that depreciation is more a function of use rather than passage
of time. The useful life of the asset is considered in terms of the output it produces or the number of
hours it works. Thus, depreciation is related to the estimated production capability of the asset and is
expressed in a rate per unit of output or per hour of use.
There are two variable methods, namely:
a. Working hours method
b. Output or production method
Rationale for variable depreciation
The variable methods are adopted if the principal cause of depreciation is usage.
The use of these methods is based on the following:
a. Assets depreciate more rapidly if they are used full time or overtime.
b. There is a direct relationship between utilization of assets and realization of revenue. If
assets are used more intensively in production, greater revenue is expected.
The variable methods are found to be appropriate for assets such as machineries. The major objection
to these methods is that the units of output or service hours which serve as the basis of depreciation
may be difficult to estimate.
Decreasing Charge or Accelerated Methods
The decreasing charge or accelerated methods provide higher depreciation in the earlier years and
lower depreciation in the later years of the useful life of the asset. Thus, these methods result in a
decreasing depreciation charge over the useful life.
Rationale for accelerated depreciation
The accelerated depreciation is on the philosophy that new assets are generally capable of producing
more revenue in the earlier years than in the later years.
Another argument for the use of decreasing charge method is that the cost of using an asset includes
not only depreciation but also repairs on such assets. Such repair cost should be allocated over the
useful life of the asset on a systematic and uniform basis. It has been observed that repairs tend to
increase with the age of the asset, hence repairs are small in the earlier years and large during the later
years.
Therefore, following the decreasing charge method, the overall effect would be a uniform charge
because the decreasing amount of depreciation and the increasing repairs will tend to equalize each
other.
There are three decreasing charge methods, namely:
a. Sum of years' digits
b. Declining balance
c. Double declining balance
Sum of years' digits
The sum of years' digits method provides for depreciation that is computed by multiplying the
depreciable amount by a series of fractions whose numerator is the digit in the useful life of the asset
and whose denominator is the sum of the digits in the useful life of the asset. The fractions are
developed by getting the sum of the digits in the useful life of the asset.
sum of years' digit (SYD) as follows:
SYD = Life (Life +1 / 2)
Sum of half years' digits
If the useful life of the asset is 2 1/2 years, the procedure is to multiply the useful life by 2 in order to
get the useful life of the asset in half years. Thus, the useful life of the asset in half years would be 5 (2
1/2 years x 2). The sum of half years' digits would then be 15 or 1+2+3+4+5.
First year Two fractions: 5/15 and 4/15 (each fraction pertaining to half year or six months)
Depletion
IFRS 6
The objective of this standard is to specify the financial reporting for the exploration and evaluation of
mineral resources. Mineral resources include minerals, oil, natural gas and similar non-regenerative
resources.
Exploration and Evaluation
The term exploration and evaluation of mineral resources is defined as the search for mineral resources
after the entity has legal right to explore in a specific area as well as the determination of the technical
feasibility and commercial viability of extracting the mineral resources. The expenditures incurred by
an entity in connection with the exploration and evaluation of mineral resources before the technical
feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource are known as exploration and
evaluation expenditures. Accordingly, exploration and evaluation expenditures do not include
expenditures incurred:
a. Before an entity has obtained the legal right to explore a specific area.
b. After the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource are
demonstrable.
This pertains to development expenditure.
Expenditures related to development of mineral resources, for example, preparation for commercial
production, such as building roads and tunnels, cannot be recognized as exploration and evaluation
expenditures.
Exploration and evaluation expenditures
a. Acquisition of rights to explore
b. Topographical, geological, geochemical and geophysical studies
c. Exploratory drilling
d. Trenching
e. Sampling
f. Activities in relation to evaluating the technical feasibility and commercial viability of
extracting a mineral resource.
g. General and administrative costs directly attributable to exploration and evaluation activities.
Exploration and evaluation asset
The exploration and evaluation expenditures may qualify as exploration and evaluation asset. However,
the standard does not provide a clearcut guidance for the recognition of exploration and evaluation
asset. Accordingly, an entity must develop its own accounting policy for the recognition of such asset.
As a matter of fact, IFRS 6 permits an entity to continue to apply its previous accounting policy
provided that the resulting information is relevant and reliable.
Measurement and classification
Exploration and evaluation asset shall be measured initially at cost. After initial recognition, an entity
shall apply either the cost model or the revaluation model. Exploration and evaluation asset is classified
either as tangible asset or an intangible asset.
Wasting Assets
Wasting assets are material objects of economic value and utility to man produced by nature. Actually,
wasting assets are natural resources. Natural resources usually include coal, oil, ore, precious metals
like gold and silver, and timber. Wasting assets are so called because these are physically consumed
and once consumed, the assets cannot be replaced anymore. If ever, the wasting assets can be replaced
only by the process of nature. Natural resources cannot be produced by man.
Thus, wasting assets are characterized by two main features:
a. The wasting assets are physically consumed.
b. The wasting assets are irreplaceable.
Cost of wasting asset
Entities follow a wide variety of practices in accounting for an extractive industry. At present, IFRS
does not address wasting assets. There is no comprehensive standard that is applicable to the extractive
or mining industry. The only standard related to the mining industry is IFRS 6 on the reporting of
exploration and evaluation expenditures. In general, the cost of wasting asset can be divided into four
categories, namely:
a. Acquisition cost
b. Exploration cost
c. Development cost
d. Estimated restoration cost
Acquisition cost
Acquisition cost is the price paid to obtain the property containing the natural resource.
Unquestionably, this is the initial cost of the wasting asset. Generally, the acquisition cost is charged to
any descriptive natural resource account. If there is a residual land value after the extraction of the
natural resource, the portion of the acquisition cost applicable to the land may be included in the
natural resource account. The land may be set up in a separate account and the remaining cost should
be charged to the natural resource account. Actually, the land value is the residual value of a wasting
asset for purposes of computing depletion. Thus, the land value should be deducted from the total
acquisition cost to get the depletable amount.
Exploration cost
Exploration cost is the expenditure incurred before the technical feasibility and commercial viability of
extracting a mineral resource are demonstrated. Simply stated, the exploration cost is the cost incurred
in an attempt to locate the natural resource that can economically be extracted or exploited. Exploration
cost includes acquisition of right to explore, geological study, exploratory drilling, trenching and
sampling. The exploration may result in either success or failure.
Two methods of accounting for exploration cost
1. Successful effort method
The exploration cost directly related to the discovery of commercially producible natural
resource is capitalized as cost of the resource property. The exploration cost related to "dry holes"
or unsuccessful discovery is expensed in the period incurred.
2. Full cost method
All exploration costs, whether successful or unsuccessful, are capitalized as cost of the
successful resource discovery. This is on the theory that any exploration cost is a "wild goose
chase" and therefore necessary before any commercially producible and profitable resource can be
found. The cost of drilling dry holes is part of the cost of locating productive holes.
Both methods are used in practice. Most large and successful oil entities follow the successful effort
method. The full cost method is popular among small oil entities.
Development cost
Development cost is the cost incurred to exploit or extract the natural resource that has been located
through successful exploration. Development cost may be in the form of tangible equipment and
intangible development cost. Tangible equipment includes transportation equipment, heavy machinery,
tunnels, bunker and mine shaft. The cost of tangible equipment is not capitalized as cost of natural
resource but set up in a separate account and depreciated in accordance with normal depreciation
policies. Intangible development cost is capitalized as cost of the natural resource. Such cost includes
drilling, sinking mine shaft and construction of wells.
Restoration cost
Estimated restoration cost is the cost to be incurred in order to bring the property to its original
condition. Such restoration cost may be added to the cost of resource property or "netted" against the
expected residual value of the resource property.
PAS 16, paragraph 16, provides that the estimated cost of restoring the property to its original
condition is capitalized only when the entity incurs the obligation when the asset is acquired. In other
words, the estimated restoration cost must be an existing present obligation required by law or contract.
The estimated restoration cost must be "discounted".
Depletion
The removal, extraction or exhaustion of a natural resource is called depletion. Depletion is the
systematic allocation of the depletable amount of a wasting asset over the period the natural resource is
extracted or produced. In essence, however, depletion is recognized as the cost of the material used in
production and thus becomes the finished product of the extractive entity since the wasting asset is
conceived as the total cost of the materials available for production.
Depletion method
Normally, depletion is computed using the output or production method. The depletable amount of the
wasting asset is divided by the units estimated to be extracted to obtain a depletion rate per unit. The
depletion rate per unit is then multiplied by the units extracted during the year to arrive at the depletion
for the period.
Revision of depletion rate
Not frequently, the original estimate of the resource deposit has to be changed either because new
information is available or because production processes have become more sophisticated. The revision
of the original estimate of recoverable resource deposit gives rise to the same problem faced in
accounting for change in estimate concerning the useful life of property, plant and equipment. Changes
in estimate are to be handled currently and prospectively, if necessary. Accordingly, the procedure is to
revise the depletion rate on a prospective basis, that is, by dividing the remaining depletable cost of the
wasting asset by the revised estimate of the productive output.
Depreciation of mining property
Tangible equipment such as transportation equipment, heavy machinery, mine shaft and other
equipment used in mining operations shall be reported in separate accounts and depreciated following
normal depreciation policies.
Generally, the depreciation of equipment used in mining operations is based on the useful life of the
equipment or the useful life of the wasting asset, whichever is shorter. If the useful life of the
equipment is shorter, the straight line method of depreciation is normally used. But if the useful life of
the wasting asset is shorter, the output method of depreciation is frequently used.
However, if the mining equipment is movable and can be used in future extractive project, the
equipment is depreciated over its useful life using the straight line method.
Shutdown
When the output method is used in depreciating mining property, in the event of shutdown, such
method cannot be used. In this case, the depreciation in the year of shutdown is based on the remaining
life of the equipment following the straight line method.
The remaining carrying amount of the equipment is divided by the remaining life of the equipment to
arrive at the depreciation in the year of shutdown.
Trust fund doctrine
Under the trust fund doctrine, the share capital of a corporation is conceived as a trust fund for the
protection of creditors. Consequently, such capital cannot be returned to shareholders during the
lifetime of the corporation. However, the corporation can pay dividends to shareholders but limited
only to the balance of retained earnings. Accordingly, the corporation cannot pay dividends if it has a
deficit because this would be tantamount to a return of capital to shareholders.
Wasting asset doctrine
Under the wasting asset doctrine, a wasting asset corporation or an entity engaged in the extraction of a
natural resource, can legally return capital to shareholders during the lifetime of the corporation.
Accordingly, a wasting asset corporation can pay dividend not only to the extent of retained earnings
but also to the extent of accumulated depletion. The amount paid in excess of retained earnings is
accounted for as a liquidating dividend or return of capital.
Philosophy of the wasting asset doctrine
The wasting asset doctrine authorizes the declaration of dividends in excess of the retained earnings of
the corporation. This is based on the legal philosophy that to limit dividend declaration to the retained
earnings balance would have the effect of retaining in the business funds which are not needed because
the wasting asset is irreplaceable.
The funds then would only be given to the shareholders when the corporation is finally dissolved and
liquidated. The unnecessary and undue retention of funds is unfair to shareholders because such funds
actually represent costs already recovered. Moreover, the creditors are aware of the decreasing capital
requirements which are peculiar to corporations engaged in the exploitation or extraction of natural
resources.
Revaluation
Measurement Of Property, Plant And Equipment
Initially, an item of property, plant and equipment that qualifies for recognition shall be measured at
cost. After recognition, an entity shall choose either the cost model or revaluation model as an
accounting policy and shall apply that policy to an entire class of property, plant and equipment.
Cost model
An item of property, plant and equipment shall be carried at cost less any accumulated depreciation and
any accumulated impairment losses.
Revaluation model
After recognition as an asset, an item of property, plant and equipment whose fair value can be
measured reliably can be carried at a revalued amount. The revalued amount is the fair value at the date
of the revaluation less any subsequent accumulated depreciation and subsequent accumulated
impairment losses.
Frequency of revaluation
Under IFRS, there is no clearcut rule on the frequency of revaluation. The frequency of revaluation
depends upon the changes in the fair value of property, plant and equipment being revalued. When the
fair value of a revalued asset differs materially from the carrying amount, a further revaluation is
necessary. Some property, plant and equipment may experience significant and volatile changes in fair
value thus necessitating annual revaluation. Such frequent or annual revaluations are unnecessary for
property, plant and equipment with only insignificant changes in fair value. Revaluation every three to
five years may be sufficient. IFRS does not mandate that revaluation must be done every three to five
years.
Revaluation of all items in an entire class
When property, plant and equipment are revalued, the entire class of property, plant and equipment
should be revalued. A class of property, plant and equipment is a grouping of assets of a similar nature
and use in an entity's operations.
Examples of separate classes are:
a. Land
b. Aircraft
c. Land and buildings
d. Machinery
e. Motor vehicles
f. Furniture and fixtures
g. Office equipment
h. Ships
The assets within a class of property, plant and equipment are revalued simultaneously in order to
avoid selective revaluation of assets and the reporting of amounts which are a mixture of cost and value
at different dates. However, a class of assets may be revalued on a rolling basis provided revaluation of
the class of assets is completed within a short period of time and provided the revaluations are kept up
to date.
Basis of revaluation
The revalued amount of property, plant and equipment is based on the following:
a. Fair value - The fair value is determined by appraisal normally undertaken by professional
qualified valuers. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
b. Depreciated replacement cost - Where market value is not available, depreciated
replacement cost shall be used.
Depreciated replacement cost is the replacement cost or current purchase price of the asset minus the
corresponding accumulated depreciation. The depreciated replacement cost is actually the sound value
of the asset.
Two approaches in recording the revaluation
a. Proportional approach - The accumulated depreciation at the date of revaluation is restated
proportionately with the change in the gross carrying amount of the asset so that the carrying
amount of the asset after revaluation equals the revalued amount.
b. Elimination approach - The accumulated depreciation is eliminated against the gross
carrying amount of the asset and the net amount restated to the revalued amount of the asset.
Carrying amount
is equal to historical cost minus the corresponding accumulated depreciation.
Appreciation or revaluation
increase is the excess of the replacement cost over the historical cost.
Net appreciation
is equal to appreciation minus corresponding accumulated depreciation
Revaluation surplus
is equal to the fair value or depreciated replacement cost or sound value minus the carrying amount of
the property, plant and equipment. The revaluation surplus is also known as the revaluation increment.
Proportional approach
is the preferable method because it preserves the gross and net amounts after revaluation. Moreover,
this will prove useful in providing subsequent annual depreciation on cost and on the revaluation
increase and the consequent piecemeal realization of the revaluation surplus.
Elimination approach
The accumulated depreciation is eliminated or offset against the gross carrying amount of the
machinery.
Query
What is the treatment of the revaluation surplus?
When an asset's carrying amount is increased as a result of the revaluation, the increase shall be
credited to revaluation surplus as a component of other comprehensive income. The revaluation surplus
may be transferred directly to retained earnings when the surplus is realized.
The whole surplus may be realized on the retirement or disposal of the asset. However, if the revalued
asset is being depreciated, part of the surplus is being realized as the asset is used. The revaluation
surplus is allocated or realized over the remaining useful life of the asset and reclassified through
retained earnings
Reversal of a revaluation surplus
A revaluation decrease shall be charged directly against any revaluation surplus to the extent that the
decrease is a reversal of a previous revaluation and the balance is charged to expense.
Sale of revalued asset
When a revalued asset is sold, all accounts relating thereto shall be closed. The difference between the
sale price and the carrying amount of the revalued asset is recognized as gain or loss on the sale.
Disclosures related to revaluation
a. The effective date of revaluation.
b. Whether an independent valuer was involved.
c. Method and assumptions applied in estimating fair value.
d. Whether the fair value was determined directly by reference to observable prices in an active
market or recent market transactions using other valuation technique.
e. Historical cost and carrying amount of each class of revalued property, plant and equipment.
f. Revaluation surplus, indicating the movement for the period and any restrictions on the
distribution of the balance to shareholders.
Impairment
Impairment is a fall in the market value of an asset so that the recoverable amount is now less than the
carrying amount in the statement of financial position. The carrying amount is the amount at which an
asset is recognized in the statement of financial position after deducting accumulated depreciation and
accumulated impairment loss.
Basic principle
The basic principle underlying impairment of asset is relatively straightforward. There is an established
principle that an asset shall not be carried at above the recoverable amount. An entity shall write down
the carrying amount of an asset to the recoverable amount if the carrying amount is not recoverable in
full. If the carrying amount is higher than the recoverable amount, the asset is judged to have suffered
an impairment loss. The asset shall therefore be reduced by the amount of the impairment loss.
Accounting for impairment
In this regard, there are three main accounting issues to consider, namely:
a. Indication of possible impairment
b. Measurement of the recoverable amount
c. Recognition of impairment loss
Indication of impairment
An entity shall assess at each reporting date whether there is any indication that an asset may be
impaired. If any such indication exists, the entity shall estimate the recoverable amount of the asset.
However, irrespective of whether there is any indication of impairment, a an entity shall test an
intangible asset with an indefinite useful life or an intangible asset not yet available for use for
impairment annually by comparing the carrying amount with the recoverable amount.
The events and changes in circumstances that lead to an impairment of assets may be classified as
external and internal sources of information.
External sources
a. Significant decrease or decline in the market value of the asset as a result of passage of time
or normal use or a new competitor the market.
b. Significant change in the technological, market, legal or economic environment of the
business in which the asset is employed.
This could be as simple as a change in customer taste.
c. An increase in the interest rate or market rate of return on investment which will likely affect
the discount rate used in calculating the value in use.
d. The carrying amount of net assets of the entity is more than the "market capitalization." In
other words, the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the net assets. The market
capitalization simply means the fair value of the net assets of the entity.
Internal sources
a. Evidence of obsolescence or physical damage of an asset.
b. Significant change in the manner or extent in which the is used an adverse effect on the
entity.
c. Evidence that the economic performance of a asset will be worse than expected.
The external and internal sources of information are not exhaustive. An entity may identify other
indications that an asset may be impaired.
Measurement of recoverable amount
After establishing evidence that an asset has been impaired, the next step is to determine the
recoverable amount preparatory to the recognition of an impairment loss. The recoverable amount of an
asset is the fair value less cost of disposal or value in use, whichever is higher.
Fair value less cost of disposal
Fair value of an asset is the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date. Cost of disposal is an incremental cost directly
attributable to the disposal of an asset or cash generating unit, excluding finance cost and income tax
expense. In simple terms, fair value less cost of disposal is equal to the exit price or selling price of an
asset minus cost of disposal.
Value in use
Value in use is measured as the present value or discounted value of future net cash flows (inflows
minus outflows) expected to be derived from an asset. The cash flows are pretax cash flows and pretax
discount rate is applied in determining the present value.
Calculation of value in use
The following should be considered in determining value in use:
a. Cash flow projections shall be based on reasonable and supportable assumptions.
b. Cash flow projections shall be based on the most recent budgets on financial forecasts,
usually up to a maximum period of 5 years, unless a longer period can be justified.
c. Cash flow projections beyond the 5-year period shall be estimated by extrapolating the 5-
year projections using a steady or declining growth rate each subsequent year, unless an
increasing rate can be justified.
Composition of estimates of future cash flows
Estimates of future cash flows include:
a. Projections of cash inflows from the continuing use of the asset.
b. Projections of cash outflows necessarily incurred to generate the cash inflows from the
continuing use of the asset.
c. Net cash flows received on the disposal of the asset at the end of the useful life in an arm's
length transaction.
Estimates of future cash flows do not include:
a. Future cash flows relating to restructuring to which the entity is not yet committed
b. Future costs of improving or enhancing the asset's performance
c. Cash inflows or outflows from financing activities
d. Income tax
Reversal of an impairment loss
PAS 36, paragraph 114, provides that an impairment loss recognized for an asset in prior years shall be
reversed if there has been a change in the estimate of the recoverable amount
In other words, if the recoverable amount of an asset that has previously been impaired turns out to be
higher than the current amount, the carrying amount of the asset shall be increased to new recoverable
amount.
However, PAS 36, paragraph 117, provides that "the increased carrying amount of an asset due to a
reversal of an impairment loss shall not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined
had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset in prior years."
As a simple guide, the increased carrying amount is the carrying amount had no impairment loss been
recognized or the recoverable amount, whichever is lower.
The reversal of the impairment loss shall be recognized immediately as income in the income
statement. But any reversal of an impairment loss on a revalued asset shall be credited to income to the
extent that it reverses a previous revaluation decrease and any excess credited directly to revaluation
surplus.
Cash generating unit (CGU)
A cash generating unit is the smallest identifiable group of assets that generate cash inflows from
continuing use that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or group of assets. In
practice, a cash generating unit may be a department, a product line, or a factory for which the output
of product and the input of raw materials, labor and overhead can be identified.
As a basic rule, the recoverable amount of an asset shall be determined for the asset individually.
However, if it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of the individual asset, an entity shall
determine the recoverable amount of the cash generating unit to which the asset belongs.
The cash generating unit must be the smallest aggregation of assets for which cash flows can be
identified and which are independent of cash flows from other assets or group of assets.
An aggregation that is "too high" is prohibited. If aggregation is done at the "entity level", there would
be no impairment to be recognized.
On the other hand, if the impairment testing is done at the "department or product line level", then
some "loss-producing assets" would be written down to recoverable amount. The "cash generating
assets" would continue to be accounted for at carrying amount.
Allocation of impairment loss
Since there is no goodwill, the impairment loss is allocated across the assets based on carrying amount.
Cash generating unit with goodwill
Goodwill does not generate cash flows independently from other assets or group of assets, and
therefore, the recoverable amount of goodwill as an individual asset cannot be determined.
As a consequence, if there is an indication that goodwill may be impaired, recoverable amount is
determined for the cash generating unit to which goodwill belongs.
Determination of impairment
PAS 36, paragraph 90, provides that a cash generating unit to which goodwill has been allocated shall
be tested for impairment at least annually by comparing the carrying amount of the unit, including the
goodwill, with the recoverable amount.
a. If the recoverable amount of the unit exceeds the carrying amount of the unit, the unit and
the goodwill allocated to that unit shall be regarded as not impaired.
b. If the carrying amount of the unit exceeds the recoverable amount of the unit, the entity must
recognize an impairment loss.
Carrying amount of CGU
Observe that the liabilities of the cash generating unit are ignored in determining carrying amount of
the CGU.
PAS 36, paragraph 76, provides that the carrying amount of a cash generating unit includes the
carrying amount of only those assets that can be attributed directly or allocated on a reasonable and
consistent basis to the cash generating unit and can generate the future cash inflows used in
determining the value in use of the cash generating unit.
Paragraph 76 further provides that the carrying amount of the cash generating unit does not include the
carrying amount of any recognized liability, unless the recoverable amount of the cash generating unit
cannot be determined without consideration of this liability.
The reason is stated in Paragraph 43 of PAS 36 which mandates that to avoid double counting,
estimates of future cash flows do not include cash outflows that relate to obligations that have been
recognized as liabilities by the cash generating unit, such as payables and provisions.
Corporate assets
Corporate assets are assets other than goodwill that contribute to the future cash flows of both the cash
generating unit under review and other cash generating units. Corporate assets are group or divisional
assets such as head office building, EDP, equipment or a research center.
Essentially, corporate assets are assets do not generate cash inflows independently from other assets.
Thus, the recoverable amount of an individual corporate asset cannot be determined unless
management has decided to dispose of the asset.
As a consequence, if there is an indication that a corporate asset may be impaired, the recoverable
amount of the cash generating unit to which the corporate asset belongs is determined and compared
with the carrying amount of the cash generating unit.
Accordingly, there are three essential criteria in the definition of an intangible asset, namely:
a. Identifiability
b. Control
c. Future economic benefits
Identifiability
The definition of an intangible asset requires that an intangible asset must be identifiable in order to
distinguish it clearly from goodwill. With nonphysical items, there may be a problem with
identifiability.
Control
Another element in the definition of an intangible asset is that "it must be under the control of the entity
as a result of a past event." Control is the power of the entity to obtain the future economic benefits
flowing from the intangible asset and restrict the access of others to those benefits.
In other words, the entity must be able to enjoy the future conomic benefits from the asset and prevent
others from enjoying the same benefits. The capacity of an entity to control the future economic
benefits from an intangible asset normally would stem from legal rights that are enforceable in a court
of law.
The capacity to control future economic benefits is much pronounced in the case of trademark,
copyright and patent. In the absence of legal rights, it is more difficult to demonstrate control.
However, legal enforceability of a right is not always a necessary condition for control since an entity
may be able to control the future benefits in some other way.
Judgment is usually exercised in assessing the degree of certainty of the future economic benefits. The
judgment is based on external evidence.
a. Separate acquisition
b. Acquisition as part of a business combination
c. Acquisition by way of a government grant
d. Acquisition by exchange
e. Acquisition by self-creation or internal generation
Separate acquisition
If an intangible asset is acquired separately, the cost of the intangible asset can be, measured reliably,
particularly so if the purchase consideration is in the form of cash or other monetary assets.
Acquisition by exchange
The cost of the intangible asset is measured at fair value of the asset given up plus any cash payment,
unless the exchange transaction lacks commercial substance. If the exchange transaction lacks
commercial substance, the intangible asset is measured at the carrying amount of the asset given up
plus any cash payment. An exchange transaction lacks commercial substance when the cash flows of
the asset received do not differ significantly from the cash flows of the asset transferred.
Recognition as an expense
An expenditure on an intangible item that does not meet the recognition criteria for an intangible asset
shall be expensed when incurred.
Examples of expenditures that are expensed when incurred include:
a. Start up costs
Start up costs may consist of organization costs such as legal and secretarial costs incurred in
establishing a legal entity. Start up costs also include preopening costs or expenditures to open a new
facility or business, and preoperating costs or expenditures for commencing new operation or
launching new product.
b. Training costs
c. Advertising and promotional costs
d. Business relocation or reorganization costs
Subsequent expenditure
As a rule, a subsequent expenditure on an intangible asset shall be recognized as expense. The reason is
that most subsequent expenditures are likely to maintain only the expected future economic benefits
embodied in the intangible asset. However, the subsequent expenditure may be capitalized or added to
the cost of the intangible asset if the following recognition criteria for an intangible asset are met:
a. It is probable that future economic benefits that are attributable specifically to the subsequent
expenditure will flow to the entity.
b. The subsequent expenditure can be measured reliably.
The nature of an intangible asset is such that, in many cases, it is not possible to determine whether
subsequent expenditure is likely to enhance the economic benefits that will flow to the entity from the
intangible asset. Therefore, only rarely will a subsequent expenditure on an intangible asset result to an
addition to the cost of the intangible asset.
Amortization
Amortization is the systematic allocation of the amortizable amount of an intangible, asset over the
useful life. The amortizable amount is the cost of the intangible asset less residual value. The
amortization is recorded by debiting amortization expense and crediting the intangible asset account.
Normally, the intangible asset account is credited directly for the periodic amortization but an
accumulated amortization account may be maintained.
Amortization period
The amortizable amount of an intangible asset shall be amortized on a systematic basis over the useful
life. Amortization shall begin wher the asset is available for use, meaning, when the asset is in the
location and condition for the intended use. Amortization shall cease when the intangible asset is
derecognized or when the asset is classified as "held for sale".
Useful life
The useful life of an intangible asset must be assessed as either indefinite or finite. If finite, the useful
life may be expressed in terms of years or the number of units to be produced. The useful of an
intangible asset is indefinite when there is no foreseeable limit to the period over which the asset is
expected to generate net cash flows.
Amortization method
The method of amortizatio shall reflect the pattern in which the future economic benefits from the asset
are expected to be consumed by the entity. However, if such pattern cannot be determined reliably, the
straight line method of amortization shall be used.
Residual value
The residual value of an intangible asset shall be presumed to be zero, except:
a. When a third party is committed to buy the intangible asset at the end of the useful life.
b. When there is an active market for the intangible asset so that the expected residual value
can be measured and it is probable that there will be a market for the asset at the end of the
useful life.
The residual value is reviewed at each financial year-end. A change in the residual value is accounted
for as a change in accounting estimate. The residual value of an intangible asset may increase to
amount equal to or greater than the carrying amount.
Goodwill
Goodwill is undeniably a unique asset presented in the financial statements. Goodwill is often referred
to as the most intangible of all intangible assets. Goodwill is unique in the sense that goodwill standing
alone cannot be bought and sold. The goodwill can only be identified with the entity as a whole.
Goodwill is an intangible asset that is not specifically identifiable, has an indeterminate life, is inherent
in a continuing business and relates to the entity as a whole.
What is goodwill?
Goodwill arises when earnings exceed normal earnings by reason of good name, capable staff and
personnel, high credit standing. reputation for fair dealings, reputation for superior products, favorable
location and a list of regular customers.
In other words, goodwill is created by a good relationship between an entity and the customers:
a. By building up a reputation by word of mouth for high quality products or high standard of
service.
b. By responding promptly and helpfully to queries and complaints of customers.
c. Through the personality of the staff and their attitude to the customers.
d.
Recognition of goodwill
In recognizing goodwill, distinction should be made between developed goodwill and purchased
goodwill.
Developed goodwill or internal goodwill is that goodwill which is generated internally because of good
name, capable staff and personnel, superior quality of products, favorabie location and high credit
standing.
PAS 38, paragraph 48, provides that internally generated goodwill shall not be recognized as an asset.
Purchased goodwill is the goodwill that has been paid for.
Purchased goodwill arises when a business is purchased. People wishing to set up a business either
would start the business from scratch or buy an existing business. When an enti acquires an existing
business, it will have to pay not only for the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets but also the
goodwill of the business. Purchased goodwill is recognized as an asset because it has been paid for.
Measurement of goodwill
The measurement of goodwill is not really a problem for accountants who will simply record the
goodwill in the accounts of the new business. The value of goodwill is a matter for the purchaser and
seller to agree upon in fixing the purchase price of the business. Two approaches may be followed in
measuring goodwill, namely residual approach and direct approach.
Residual approach
Under the residual approach, goodwill is measured by comparing the purchase price for the entity with
the net tangible and identifiable assets, meaning total assets excluding goodwill minus liabilities
assumed. The net assets acquired must be measured at fair value. The excess of the purchase price over
the fair value of net tangible and identifiable assets is considered as goodwill.
Direct approach
Under this approach, goodwill is measured on the basis of the future earnings of the entity. An attempt
is made to value the anticipated excess earnings which are the essential component of goodwill.
This approach seems to be a systematic and logical way of measuring goodwill because if future
earnings exceed normal earnings, the excess earnings are indicative of the fact that there is an
unidentifiable intangible asset that is causing the excess earnings. Such unidentifiable intangible asset
is called goodwill.
Impairment of goodwill
PAS 38, paragraph 107, mandates that goodwill shall not be amortized because the useful life is
indefinite. However, goodwill shall be tested for impairment at least annually and whenever there is an
indication that it may be impaired.
Moreover, goodwill shall be tested for impairment at the operating segment level or any lower level.
An impairment loss recognized for goodwill shall not be reversed in a subsequent period.
Negative goodwill
If the purchase price or consideration transferred for the entity is less than the net fair value of the
identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, the difference is negative goodwill.
PFRS 3, paragraph 34, provides that such negative goodwill is recognized in profit or loss as "gain on
bargain purchase".