Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 538 views

    Design FMEA

    Uploaded by

    Abu Azkha
    This document provides an overview of the linkages between a Design Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (DFMEA) and a Process Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (PFMEA). Potential failures from the DFMEA are transferred to a Characteristics Matrix. This matrix identifies potential causes of failure that are then transferred to the PFMEA. Failure modes in the PFMEA are developed through brainstorming using information like warranty data. The PFMEA identifies potential causes which are developed from sources like corrective action reports. Actions are recommended based on severity and occurrence ratings to reduce failures.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Design FMEA

    Uploaded by

    Abu Azkha
    538 views10 pages
    This document provides an overview of the linkages between a Design Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (DFMEA) and a Process Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (PFMEA). Potential failures from the DFMEA are transferred to a Characteristics Matrix. This matrix identifies potential causes of failure that are then transferred to the PFMEA. Failure modes in the PFMEA are developed through brainstorming using information like warranty data. The PFMEA identifies potential causes which are developed from sources like corrective action reports. Actions are recommended based on severity and occurrence ratings to reduce failures.

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides an overview of the linkages between a Design Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (DFMEA) and a Process Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (PFMEA). Potential failures from the DFMEA are transferred to a Characteristics Matrix. This matrix identifies potential causes of failure that are then transferred to the PFMEA. Failure modes in the PFMEA are developed through brainstorming using information like warranty data. The PFMEA identifies potential causes which are developed from sources like corrective action reports. Actions are recommended based on severity and occurrence ratings to reduce failures.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    538 views10 pages

    Design FMEA

    Uploaded by

    Abu Azkha
    This document provides an overview of the linkages between a Design Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (DFMEA) and a Process Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (PFMEA). Potential failures from the DFMEA are transferred to a Characteristics Matrix. This matrix identifies potential causes of failure that are then transferred to the PFMEA. Failure modes in the PFMEA are developed through brainstorming using information like warranty data. The PFMEA identifies potential causes which are developed from sources like corrective action reports. Actions are recommended based on severity and occurrence ratings to reduce failures.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 10

    Design FMEA Linkage

    Potential Significant Characteristics transferred to Characteristics Matrix


    Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
    (Design FMEA)

    System Sub System Component: Model Year/Vehicle (s): Core Team:

    Process Responsibility: Key Date:

    Item Function Provide adequate Time to amplitude

    Potential Failure Mode Time to amp inadequate

    Potential Effect(s) of Failure Poor handling quality (7)

    C S l e a v s s

    Potential Cause(s)/ Mechanism(s) Failure

    7 CC Inadequate Stiffness of transmission cover assembly

    O c c u r 3

    Current Process Controls Performance Testing FEA Transmission cover stiffness

    Inputs from Requirements & Specifications Inputs from QFD relationships

    Anti function for functional approach full partial intermittent excess function

    Customer focus/experience end user assembler maker regulatory body

    Brainstorm causes man material method machine environment Output to Characteristics Matrix

    Detect Planned tests Transfer to or from DV Plan evaluations builds bucks Note: Must have written instructions. Prevent Reduces Occurrence

    APQP Linkages

    DFMEA Inputs Warranty Data


    2001 - All Models Top Parts & Conditions Part # 60539-94 12052 12066 25416-99A 60567-90A 60543-99 60543-99 60562-99 25414-99 Part Description GASKET, PRIMARY COVER OIL SEAL OIL SEAL SEAL, QUAD PRIMARY COVER GASKET CHROME PRIMARY COVER CHROME PRIMARY COVER PRIMARY COVER, POLISHED POLISHED DERBY COVER Total Total Part Incid Part Cost 69 62 59 33 29 53 53 25 12 $3,513 $9,230 $8,193 $261 $377 $15,227 $15,227 $6,289 $404 Condition Incidents 59 51 45 23 20 19 11 9 7 Condition Cost $2,984 $7,739 $6,306 $186 $184 $5,580 $2,902 $2,234 $231 Condition Code 3207 3207 3207 3207 3207 1203 1201 1203 1203 Condition Description NOT SEALING (NO APPARENT DAMAGE) NOT SEALING (NO APPARENT DAMAGE) NOT SEALING (NO APPARENT DAMAGE) NOT SEALING (NO APPARENT DAMAGE) NOT SEALING (NO APPARENT DAMAGE) 2001 WARRANTY TO DATE SCRATCHED DENTED / DINGED SCRATCHED SCRATCHED

    270 236.25 202.5 INCIDENTS 168.75 135 44% 101.25 67.5 33.75 0
    SC RA TC HE D SC RA TC HE D

    87% 79% 71% 62%

    91%

    95%

    98%

    100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20%

    59

    51 24%

    45 23 20 19 11 9 7 6

    10% 0%

    NO TS EA LIN G

    -G AS KE T,C OV NO ER TS EA LIN G -O IL SE NO AL TS EA LIN GOIL NO SE TS AL EA LIN G -SE NO AL TS ,Q EA UA LIN D G -C OV ER GA SK ET

    APQP Linkages

    DE NT ED /D ING ED

    SC RA TC HE D

    PIT TE D

    DFMEA Linkage to PFMEA Characteristics Matrix Development


    Potential Significant Characteristics Are Typically Transferred from the DFMEA Characteristics are compared with the process steps to Identify potential causes of failure. Causes are transferred to the PFMEA

    APQP Linkages

    Potential Critical and Significant


    SEAL COMPRESSION HEIGHT DOWEL PINS 0.260 TO 0.270 " TO FACE SERATION DAMAGE JACK SHAFT SEAL AGAINST SHOULDER

    BEARING FLUSH TO SNAP RING FACE

    Direction of Improvement

    PRIMARY GASKET SEAL SURFACE FINISH

    1.090 TO 1.110 " FACE OF PRIMARY HOUSING BUSHING TO FACE OF JACK SHAFT SEAL

    Weighted Importance

    Relative Importance 5 Severity Receive Material Material handling Shipping Damage Component Manufacture Vehicle Assembly 9 9 3 9 3 5 0 81

    Special Characteristics Matrix

    81

    72

    0 9

    41

    Op 100 Step 1 PRE -LOAD DOWEL PINS TO FIXTURE Op 100 Step 2 PRE -LOAD JACK SHAFT SEAL TO FIXTURE

    Op 100 Step 3 PRE -LOAD PRIMARY HOUSING BUSHING TO FIXTURE Op 110 Pre- load bearing to fixture #2

    0 27 54 261 3 0 54 81 3 0 0 0 27 0 45 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Potential Significant and Critical Characteristics from DFMEA

    H H F G F F F H H

    Op 120 Pre- load main shaft oil seal to mandrel Op 200 Housing to fixture #1 Op 210 Operate press Op 220 Retaining ring to top groove Op 230 Reload fixture #1 Op 300 Housing to fixture #2

    Characteristics Matrix - Linkage from DFMEA to PFMEA

    APQP Linkages
    F

    Process Steps

    Primary Drive Manufacturing Process Steps

    H H H G G

    H H

    F G

    Op 310 Operate press Op 320 Retaining ring to top groove Op 330 Mandrel to main shaft bore I.D. OP 340 Operate press Op 350 Re- load fixture #2 and mandrel Op 400 Housing to table Op 410 Reserved Op 420 Chain adj sub assy to housing Op 430 Lubricate bushing & seal Op 445 Move or stage for final assy Op 10 O-ring to shifter tube Op 500 Shifter tube to housing Op 510 Clamp to shifter tube Op 20 Assemble shifter lever Op 520 Wave washer to shifter lever Op 530 Shifter lever to shifter tube Op 535 Que for final assy line

    Process Operation from Process Flow

    High/Medium Interactions are causes/failure modes in PFMEA

    Customer Assessment

    Failure Mode Development


    Developed Through Brainstorming PFMEA Team make-up is crucial for accurate Failure Mode Development Internal Failures External Failures Warranty Data All Stakeholders Considered Internal and External

    APQP Linkages

    PFMEA Inputs Warranty Data


    2001 - All Models Top Parts & Conditions Part # 60539-94 12052 12066 25416-99A 60567-90A 60543-99 60543-99 60562-99 25414-99 Part Description GASKET, PRIMARY COVER OIL SEAL OIL SEAL SEAL, QUAD PRIMARY COVER GASKET CHROME PRIMARY COVER CHROME PRIMARY COVER PRIMARY COVER, POLISHED POLISHED DERBY COVER Total Total Part Incid Part Cost 69 62 59 33 29 53 53 25 12 $3,513 $9,230 $8,193 $261 $377 $15,227 $15,227 $6,289 $404 Condition Incidents 59 51 45 23 20 19 11 9 7 Condition Cost $2,984 $7,739 $6,306 $186 $184 $5,580 $2,902 $2,234 $231 Condition Code 3207 3207 3207 3207 3207 1203 1201 1203 1203 Condition Description NOT SEALING (NO APPARENT DAMAGE) NOT SEALING (NO APPARENT DAMAGE) NOT SEALING (NO APPARENT DAMAGE) NOT SEALING (NO APPARENT DAMAGE) NOT SEALING 2001APPARENT DAMAGE) (NO WARRANTY TO DATE SCRATCHED DENTED / DINGED SCRATCHED SCRATCHED

    270 236.25 202.5 INCIDENTS 168.75 135 44% 101.25 67.5 33.75 0
    SC RA TC HE D SC RA TC HE D

    87% 79% 71% 62%

    91%

    95%

    98%

    100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20%

    59

    51 24%

    45 23 20 19 11 9 7 6

    10% 0%

    NO TS EA LIN G

    -G AS KE T,C OV NO ER TS EA LIN G -O IL SE NO AL TS EA LIN GOIL NO SE TS AL EA LIN G -SE NO AL TS ,Q EA UA LIN D G -C OV ER GA SK ET

    APQP Linkages

    DE NT ED /D ING ED

    SC RA TC HE D

    PIT TE D

    Potential Cause Development


    Developed Through Brainstorming Information gathered from surrogate problem resolution activities (Corrective Action Reports) Manufacturing operators provide the best input to Root Cause Analysis A tour of the manufacturing area may identify several possible causes of failure

    APQP Linkages

    Process FMEA Linkage


    ITEM: Primary Drive Housing Assembly Model Year/Vehicle (s): Core Team: Process Responsibility: Key Date:

    Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis


    (Process FMEA)

    Process Function Op 120 Assemble Transmission Cover

    Potential Failure Mode Case not properly assembled - torque inadequate

    Potential Effect(s) of Failure Poor handling quality (7) -T to amp inadequate

    C S l e a v s s

    Potential Cause(s)/ Mechanism(s) Failure

    7 CC Torque tool malfunction

    O c c u r 3

    Current Process Controls Weekly calibration Daily quality audits

    Inputs from process flow

    Anti function Warranty Data From Characteristics Matrix

    Customer focus/experience end user assembler maker regulatory body

    Brainstorm causes man material method machine environment

    APQP Linkages

    10

    Recommended Actions
    Actions are mandatory for ALL failure modes resulting in a Severity of 9 or 10 Actions recommended for any severity of 5 or higher with an occurrence of 4 or higher Actions recommended for any failure modes resulting in a high RPN regardless of Severity X Occurrence combination Actions center around reduction of occurrence Improving detection is only used as a temporary measure

    APQP Linkages

    11

    PFMEA Selection

    S E V E R I T Y

    10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1

    CRITICAL CHARACTERISTICS

    Safety/Regulatory

    SIGNIFICANT CHARACTERISTICS
    Customer Dissatisfaction

    ALL OTHER CHARACTERISTICS


    Appropriate actions / controls already in place

    3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 OCCURRENCE
    APQP Linkages

    12

    You might also like