Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 25 views

    Kostenko Anna Pactice 08.04.2022

    Uploaded by

    Anna Kostenko
    1. Robotic weapons that can target and destroy without human supervision threaten civilians and could revolutionize war in the same way as the invention of gunpowder or the atomic bomb. 2. A ban on killer robots similar to bans on chemical and biological weapons is urgently needed, but some major military powers oppose such a ban. 3. While military planners argue that autonomous weapons could increase accuracy and reduce troop losses, their algorithms may become uncontrollable, and it is unclear who would be responsible if they commit murder.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Kostenko Anna Pactice 08.04.2022

    Uploaded by

    Anna Kostenko
    25 views2 pages
    1. Robotic weapons that can target and destroy without human supervision threaten civilians and could revolutionize war in the same way as the invention of gunpowder or the atomic bomb. 2. A ban on killer robots similar to bans on chemical and biological weapons is urgently needed, but some major military powers oppose such a ban. 3. While military planners argue that autonomous weapons could increase accuracy and reduce troop losses, their algorithms may become uncontrollable, and it is unclear who would be responsible if they commit murder.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. Robotic weapons that can target and destroy without human supervision threaten civilians and could revolutionize war in the same way as the invention of gunpowder or the atomic bomb. 2. A ban on killer robots similar to bans on chemical and biological weapons is urgently needed, but some major military powers oppose such a ban. 3. While military planners argue that autonomous weapons could increase accuracy and reduce troop losses, their algorithms may become uncontrollable, and it is unclear who would be responsible if they commit murder.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    25 views2 pages

    Kostenko Anna Pactice 08.04.2022

    Uploaded by

    Anna Kostenko
    1. Robotic weapons that can target and destroy without human supervision threaten civilians and could revolutionize war in the same way as the invention of gunpowder or the atomic bomb. 2. A ban on killer robots similar to bans on chemical and biological weapons is urgently needed, but some major military powers oppose such a ban. 3. While military planners argue that autonomous weapons could increase accuracy and reduce troop losses, their algorithms may become uncontrollable, and it is unclear who would be responsible if they commit murder.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Упр.4 ст.

    22
    Do not allow the robots to pull the trigger
    Weapons, which in themselves kill enemies, threaten civilians and soldiers. Slaughter
    machines are approaching. Robotic weapons that target and
    destroyed without human supervision, ready to start a revolution in war, which can be
    compared with the invention of gunpowder or atomic bomb. The prospect is a terrible threat
    to civilians and could lead to some of the gloomiest scenarios in which artificial intelligence
    is amok. A ban on the use of killer robots, similar to the ban on chemical and biological
    weapons, is urgently needed. But some major military powers oppose it.
    The work is not a technophobic fantasy. In July 2017, for example, the Russian Kalashnikov
    Group announced the launch of a 7.62-millimeter machine gun equipped with a camera that
    uses a neural network to make "shoot / not shoot" decisions. A whole generation of self-
    controlled weapons, including drones, ships and tanks The United States appears to be
    leading the R&D in autonomous systems with $ 18 billion in autonomous systems planned
    for investment from 2016 to 2020. But other countries with significant arms industries are
    also making their own investments.
    Military planners argue that "deadly autonomous weapons systems" - more than a term -
    Theoretically can bring some accuracy in military combat. Such submachine guns can reduce
    the need for troops and reduce losses by leaving vehicles to fight them. However, algorithm
    control can potentially become "uncontrollable".
    "The existing AI cannot infer the intentions of others or make critical decisions based on past
    chaos of war. , whether a killer robot would be a trained assassin, unlike Arnold
    Schwarzenegger in Terminator.Once the battle is done, more than who will be responsible
    when the machine commits the murder? robot? its creator?
    With all these shortcomings, a completely autonomous robot created from
    using short-term technologies, may pose a new threat to small countries or terrorists with
    little experience or financial resources. Swarms of tiny weapon drones, perhaps even made
    with three-dimensional printers, can damage densely populated areas. Prototypes are already
    being tested: in 2016, the US Department of Defense demonstrated an unrelated swarm of
    more than 100 micro-drones. Stuart Russell of the University of California, Berkeley, a
    prominent AI researcher, suggested that "anti-personnel micro-robots" deployed by a single
    person could kill many thousands and be a potential weapon of mass destruction.
    Since 2013, the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CFO), which
    regulates incendiary devices, blinding lasers and other weapons that are considered
    excessively harmful, has been discussing what to do about deadly autonomous weapons
    systems. Due to opposition from the United States, Russia and some other countries,
    discussions have not progressed stages of developing a formal wording for the ban. The
    United States, for example, has argued that its policies already provide that military personnel
    retain control of autonomous weapons and that premature regulation may undermine the
    importance of AI research.
    The ban should not be overly restrictive. Campaign to Stop Killer Robots, a coalition of 89
    NGOs from 50 countries
    insisting on such a ban, emphasizes that it will be limited to offensive weapons and will not
    apply to anti-missile and other defense systems that automatically fire in response to
    information coming into the warhead.
    The current stalemate has prompted the campaign to consider rallying, first and foremost,
    some countries to agree to a ban outside the forum provided by the CIS, an option previously
    used to push for multinational agreements banning landmines and cluster munitions. . A
    precautionary ban on autonomous killing machines, with clear technology requirements,
    would help keep killer robots from military arsenals.
    Since it was first presented at the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence in
    Stockholm in July, 244 organizations and 3,187 people have signed a pledge "not to
    participate in or support the development, production, trade or use of deadly autonomous
    weapons." The reason for this promise was that the laws had not yet been passed on to the
    killer robots. Without such a legal framework, the day may soon come when the algorithm
    makes a fateful decision to accept human life.

    Упр 1 ст 25
    4, 8, 10, 1, 5, 9, 6, 2, 7, 3

    Упр 2 ст 25
    1. How do young people call the time in which we live?
    2. How do computers help students and teachers?
    3. What can we do with the phone ?
    4. What information is kept by computers in banks?
    5. What do bank customers enter instead of an electronic signature?
    6. How can customers easily pay bills without leaving their homes?
    7. What role do computers play in the lives of pilots and travel agencies?

    Упр 3 ст 25
    1. Perform - виконувати
    2. Word processor - текстовий редактор
    3. Online - дистанційно
    4. Download - завантажувати
    5. Build-in - вбудований
    6. Digital - цифровий
    7. Store - зберігати (у комп’ютері)
    8. Financial - фінансові (операції)
    9. Monitor - моніторинг
    10. Data - дані

    You might also like