TIKATHALI-Protection System Design Reports

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 27

SUMMARY OF PROTECTION SYSTEM DESIGN

Inter storey Maximum


Permissible Grade of Maximum
Inter storey Clea Demand Design
deflection up to Servic deflection Conrete Design Demand Bracing @ 1st Level-1m
Proxi Depth deflection up r Moment Shear
Ist bracing Level ability of infill Moment Shear Peg Peg Excavation
mity of to Top of Pile Cov from Force
Micr Spaci Leng @ 1m below GL limit Protection inside from Force Peg Micro Micro
distan Excav Total er Surcharge from
ZO opil ng of th of deflect system Micropil ETABS from Micro pile pile
ce of ation deflecti from Cantilver ETABS
NE e, Ø, Piles, Pile, ion Servicabilit e and either in Surchar pile, Lengt Spaci
Surch consi on, mm Main action either in
mm , mm m deflec check y limit RCC RCC pile or ge Load Ø, mm h , L, ng , S,
arge, dered deflecti height, height, of Bars Moment RCC Pile Walling
tion, check of bored in Calculat m m Bracing Section
m ,m on, mm mm mm Result Result (mm Calculatio or in Section
mm Pile, fck, Micropile, ion, KN
) 2 n, KNm Micropile,
Span/90 N/mm KNm
KN
1 0.230 3.000 127 0.45 6.0 29.511 26.241 1000 8.894 1000 112.44 OK 50 M20 162.89 84.55 277.13 61.57 127.1 3 6 ISMB200 ISMB250

Note: At the Bracing Support Micropile should be 3m long of Ø165.1m Tw 4.5mm thick having embedd length of 2.5m from Basement bottom Excavation LvL. This Micropile should be @ 6m c/c
GENERAL PHILOSOPHY FOR PROTECTION SYSTEM [ CANTILEVER AND BRACED SYSTEM]

GL GL

h=depth of Excavation
Ist Bracing Support Ps

IInd Bracing Support


Pa
IIIrd Bracing Support
Base of Excavation hs hs

Base of Excavation
=As perr Embedment length As per IS2911

Mp= Moment on Protection pile


due to surcharge and Soil point where, Ps= Point Surcharge load from Adjacent Building Foundation
with FOS adopted = 1.15~1.5

load at base of Excavation Pa= Active Earth Pressure due to Earthquake and Water Table
length of Protection pile

hs= distance of Point Surcharge load from base of Excavation


ha= distance of Point load due to Active earth pressure.
Mp= Ps x hs + Pa x ha Cantilever Moment Formulae

Micropile
RCC Bored Peg Pile
STIFFNESS CALCULATION OF SOIL FROM BOREHOLE-2
SOIL DATA from Bore Hole:- 2
CALCULATION OF YOUNG'S MODULUS BASED ON SOIL TEST DATA
140 𝜎𝑥 + 𝜎𝑦 + 𝜎𝑧 Density of Confined UnConfined Friction Shear Strength
σx = KpxƳsh, σy = KpyƳsh, σz = Ƴsh, Voild 𝐸 = 𝑒𝑥100
S. No. h, m Kpx or py 3 Soil, Ƴs, Pressure Soil, Pressure Soil, angle of of Soil, C,
KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2 Ratio, e
KN/m2 KN/m3 qc, KN/m2 qu, KN/m2 Soil, Ø◦ KN/m2
0 0.00 2.811 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.127 0.000 17.952 1 3.000 20.000 98.067
1 1.50 2.811 75.686 75.69 26.93 0.127 91054.617 17.952 1 3.000 20.000 98.067
2 3.00 2.811 151.371 151.37 53.86 0.127 128770.674 17.952 1 3.000 20.000 98.067
3 4.50 2.811 227.057 227.06 80.79 0.127 157711.222 17.952 1 3.000 20.000 98.067
4 6.00 2.811 302.742 302.74 107.71 0.127 182109.233 17.952 1 3.000 20.000 98.067
5 7.50 2.811 378.428 378.43 134.64 0.127 203604.312 17.952 1 3.000 20.000 98.067
6 9.00 2.811 454.113 454.11 161.57 0.127 223037.349 17.952 1 3.000 20.000 98.067
7 10.50 2.811 529.799 529.80 188.50 0.127 240907.871 17.952 1 3.000 20.000 98.067
8 12.00 2.811 605.484 605.48 215.43 0.127 257541.347 17.952 1 3.000 20.000 98.067
9 13.50 2.811 681.170 681.17 242.36 0.127 273163.850 17.952 1 3.000 20.000 98.067
10 15.00 2.811 756.855 756.86 269.28 0.127 287939.980 17.952 1 3.000 20.000 98.067
11 16.50 2.811 832.541 832.54 296.21 0.127 301993.999 17.952 1 3.000 20.000 98.067
12 18.00 2.811 908.226 908.23 323.14 0.127 315422.444 17.952 1 3.000 20.000 98.067
13 20.00 2.811 1009.140 1009.14 359.05 0.127 332484.450 17.952 1 3.000 20.000 98.067
14 0.00 2.811 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.127 0.000 17.952 1 3.000 20.000 98.067
15 0.00 2.811 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.127 0.000 17.952 1 3.000 20.000 98.067

Coulomb's theory of passive earth pressure coeff. At wall at static condition (Kpx or py) =
𝑆𝑖𝑛2 𝛼 − ∅
𝐾𝑝𝑥 𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑦 = 2 2.811
𝑠𝑖𝑛 ∅ + 𝛿 𝑠𝑖𝑛 ∅ + 𝛽
𝑆𝑖𝑛2 𝛼𝑆𝑖𝑛 𝛼 + 𝛿 1−
𝑠𝑖𝑛 𝛼 + 𝛿 𝑠𝑖𝑛 𝛼 + 𝛽


STIFFNESS, SUBGRADE CALCULATION OF PILES FOR SOIL BH2 AS PER IS2911

Unconfine Subgrad Stiffness Factor for Lateral


SPT, Upp Subgrade
d Lowe Lower Upper Lower Upper e Piles in Sand, Normally Spring/Stiff
er Low Upp Modulus of
Layer N - r Limit Limit Limit- Limit- Modulus Loaded and Preloaded ness of
S. Depth, Compress Soil Limi er er Soil
thickn Value Soil Type Limit Subgr Subgra Subgr Subgr of Soil Clays Piles in
N m ion Condition t N- Limit- Limi average
ess from Strength, N-
valu
ade de
Qu t-Qu
ade ade As per IS 5 𝐸𝐼
value, ηb, T= η or R= η
4 5𝐸𝐼 ETABS
BH-2 Q , KN/m2 value value value value value 2911, ηb, 𝑏 𝑏 Stick Model,
u e KN/m3
MN/m3 KN/m3
1 0.00 0.00 0 98.067 Dry Very loose sand 0 4 0 400 50 100 9000 18000 0.000 0
2 1.50 1.50 12 98.067 Dry Loose sand 10 35 2500 7500 50 100 9000 18000 2.900 2900 2504.116 2504
3 3.00 1.50 12 98.067 Dry Medium sand 10 35 2500 7500 50 100 9000 18000 2.900 2504.116 2504
4 4.50 1.50 12 98.067 Dry Medium sand 10 35 2500 7500 50 100 9000 18000 2.900 2504.116 2504
5 6.00 1.50 9 98.067 Dry Medium sand 4 10 400 2500 50 100 9000 18000 2.150 2517 2658.559 2504
6 7.50 1.50 10 98.067 Dry Medium sand 10 35 2500 7500 50 100 9000 18000 2.500 2579.562 2504
7 9.00 1.50 10 98.067 Submerged Medium to Stiff Cohesive Soil4 10 200 1400 50 100 9000 18000 17.652 10027.419 10027
8 10.50 1.50 15 98.067 Submerged Medium to Stiff Cohesive Soil
10 35 1400 5000 50 100 9000 18000 17.652 10027.419 10027
17652
9 12.00 1.50 15 98.067 Submerged Medium to Stiff Cohesive Soil
10 35 1400 5000 50 100 9000 18000 17.652 10027.419 10027
10 13.50 1.50 17 98.067 Submerged Medium to Stiff Cohesive Soil
10 35 1400 5000 50 100 9000 18000 17.652 10027.419 10027
11 15.00 1.50 21 98.067 Submerged Medium to Stiff Cohesive Soil
10 35 1400 5000 50 100 9000 18000 17.652 10027.419 10027
12 16.50 1.50 25 98.067 Submerged Medium to Stiff Cohesive Soil4 10 200 1400 50 100 9000 18000 17.652 10027.419 10027
17652
13 18.00 1.50 23 98.067 Submerged Medium to Stiff Cohesive Soil
10 35 1400 5000 50 100 9000 18000 17.652 10027.419 10027
14 20.00 2.00 20 98.067 Submerged Medium to Stiff Cohesive Soil4 10 200 1400 50 100 9000 18000 17.652 10027.419 10027
ZONE-I SURCHARGE LOAD CALCULATION, SOIL PRESSURE DUE TO
WATER TABLE AND EARTHQUAKE CONDITIONS
COMPARISON OF BORELOG SOIL PROFILE DATA FROM SOIL TEST REPORT

Depth BH1 BH2


below Soil Description-BH1 Soil Description-BH12
N- N-
EGL.
Valu Value
1.5 Brownish to Greyish Colour Silty Clay 7 Brownish to Greyish Colour Silty Clay 12
3.0 Brownish to Greyish Colour Silty Clay 8 Brownish to Greyish Colour Silty Clay 12
4.5 Brownish to Greyish Colour Silty Clay 6 Brownish to Greyish Colour Silty Clay 12
6.0 Greyish Colour Silty Clay with Sand and Gravels. 6 Brownish to Greyish Colour Silty Clay 9
7.5 Greyish Colour Silty Clay with Sand and Gravels. 24 Brownish to Greyish Colour Silty Clay with Sand. 10
9.0 Greyish Colour Silty Clay with Sand and Gravels. 27 Greyish Colour Silty Clay. 10
10.5 Greyish Colour Sand with Silt and Gravels. 34 Greyish Colour Silty Clay. 15
12.0 Greyish Colour Sand with Silt and Gravels. 34 Greyish Colour Silty Clay. 15
13.5 Greyish Colour Sand with Silt and Gravels. 36 Greyish Colour Silty Clay. 17
15.0 Greyish Colour Sand with Silt and Gravels. 50 Greyish Colour Silty Clay. 21
16.5 Greyish Colour Silty Clay. 25
18.0 Greyish Colour Silty Clay. 23
20.0 Greyish Colour Silty Clay. 20

COMBINED DIAGRAM SHOWING, COMPARISON OF BORELOG DATA AND COMBINED


PRESSURE DIAGRAM INCLUDING SOIL, BUILDING, EARTHQUAKE AND WATER PRESSURE
1 10 100 1000 10000
[ZONE-I]
0.0

1.0 3.91

7 12

2.0 21.37

3.0 3.35 8 12 37.68

4.0 2.40 BH1


6 12
BH2
5.0 2.67
Z-1-Ex-3m;Ø[email protected] c/c

Excavation Line
6.0 6 9
ZONE-I STAGE-I :- SURCHARGE CALCULATION FOR BUILDING
A Input Data :-
Height of Micropile from Top ground level to Top (h1) = Assume 0.000 m
Height of Micropile from Formation Level to Top ground level (h2) = 3.000 m
Height of Micropile from Formation Level (h3)= h2= 2.000 m
Stiffnes factor in normally loaded clays = = 0.088 m
Embedment length required for Short rigid Pile in Normal clay = d 0 0.176 m
Total Length of Micropile required = H1 =h2+d0 3.176 m
Total height of Micropile provided, H = h1+h2+h3 = 5.000 m
Calculated Factor of Safety for Root penetration depth = H/H 1 1.57 OK
Height for holding soil mass= 3.000 m
Grade of Steel/Rebar, fy = Fe250
Grade of Concrete fck = M20
3
Subgrade Modulus of Soil As per IS 2911 or calculation Soft clay ηb= 600 KN/m
LL limit Unconfined Strength of Soil= 4
UL limit Unconfined Strength of Soil= 10
Critical Unconfined value from Bore logs for root penetration/Embed length= 6 MPa
Critical Soil Condition = Submerged
RCC curtain wall height for holding soil mass= 5.000 m
Outer Diameter of Micropile(ØD) = 0.127 m
Adopt Wall Thickness of Micropile Tw= 4.5 mm
Inner Diameter of Micropile(Ød) = 0.118 m
Spacing of Micropile, S,m = 0.450 m
Surcharge load from Vehicle Considered = No
Surcharge load from adjacent building Considered = Yes
Length of adjacent Building ┴r to the Micropile Array, L, m = 21.430 m
Breadth of adjacent Building // to the Micropile Array, B,m = 14.900 m
Number of Floors of adjacent Building, nf = 3.500 Nos
Adjacent Building has Strip, Mat or Isolated Footing = Isolated Footing
Numbers of Columns ┴r the direction of Micropile, n1 = 4.000 Nos
Numbers of Columns // to the direction of Micropile, n2 = 6.000 Nos
Spacing of Column ┴r between 1st & 2nd array of Columns, s1,m = 3.725 m
Spacing of Columns ┴r between 2nd & 3rd array of Columns, s2,m = 3.725 m
Spacing of Columns ┴r between 3rd & 4th array of Columns, s3,m = 3.725 m
Spacing of Columns ┴r between 4th & 5th array of Columns, s4,m = 0.000 m
Spacing of Rows of Columns 1 & 2 along Micropiles = 3.600 m
Spacing of Rows of Columns 2 & 3 along Micropiles = 3.600 m
Spacing of Rows of Columns 3 & 4 along Micropiles = 1st G 2nd G 3rd G 3.600 m
Length of Isolated Footing, l,m = 1.500 1.800 1.500 m
Breadth of Isolated Footing, l,m = 1.500 1.800 1.500 m
2
Total Footing Area, At = 54.000 m
Total Number of walls/Columns, Tc= 24.000 Nos
dist. of Micropile to Nearest Coln or pt. load of adj. bldg d1 ,m= 0.230 m
depth of footing z,m= 1.500 m
Unit weight of soil (ϒs) = 26.095 KN/m3
BH-2 data of Soil test
Soil parameters from

Water Table, wT= 6.000 m


Φ = internal friction angle of soil 20.000 º
KN/m2
report

Cohesion of soil C = 6.000


back fill of soil inclination, β = 0.000 º
Friction coefficient between Soil and Structure, μ = 0.500
Frinction angle between soil and structure, δ = 26.565 º
Back face inclination of Micropile, α = 90.000 º
Building Plinth Area, Ab = L x B = 21.43 m x 14.9 m 319.307 m2
Assumed Thumb Rule for weight of Building , w= 1.600 ton/m2
Total weight of Structure , WT, KN = 17541 KN
2
Surcharge Load q1, KN/m2 on each Footing = 32.70 KN/m at distance of 0.23m 0.23
2
Surcharge Load q1, KN/m2 on each Footing = 32.70 KN/m at distance of 3.83m
2
Surcharge Load q1, KN/m2 on each Footing = 32.70 KN/m at distance of 7.43m

0.000 0 0.000 0 0 2
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.000 0

0.000 -1 0.000 -1
0.000 -1

12.202 -2 0.429 -2
0.108 -2
DEPTH, M

DEPTH, M

DEPTH, M
4.162 -3 1.075 -3
0.305 -3

1.435 -4 1.305 -4 0.455 -4

+ +
0.617 -5 1.230 -5 0.545 -5

SURCHARGE LOAD DUE TO 1ST COLUMN SURCHARGE LOAD DUE TO 3rd


SURCHARGE LOAD DUE TO 2nD COLUMN/ COLUMN/ WALL -6
/WALL -6 WALL -6
KN/M2 KN/M2 KN/M2

Line of Action of Surcharge Load due to adjacent building


𝐴1 𝑋1 + 𝐴2 𝑋2 + 𝐴3 𝑋3 hs= 1.411 m from bottom of
𝑋ത = Excavation depth or dredge line
σ𝑛1 𝐴𝑛
𝐴1 = 0.000 KN/m 𝑋1 = 3.000 m 0.000 0
𝐴2 = -6.369 KN/m 𝑋2 = 2.000 m 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0
𝐴3 = -9.140 KN/m 𝑋3 = 1.000 m
Ps= 𝐴 = -15.509 KN/m
𝑛
0.000 -1

5.732 -2
DEPTH, M

0.704 2.493 -3

0.406 -4

0.675 -5

COMBINED SURCHARGE LOAD DUE TO FOOTINGS


-6
KN/M2
1
L 𝐴1 = 𝐿1 𝑎
2
a 1
L 𝐴2 = 𝐿2 (𝑎 + 𝑏)
b 2
1
L 𝐴𝑛 = 𝐿𝑛 (𝑏 + 𝑐)
c
12
L4/3 𝐴4 = 𝐿4 (0.7 ・𝑐)
(L4=15m-8.7m=6.3m) L 2

Sketches of Point load Calculation from Surcharge Pressure


ZONE-I STAGE- II:- EQ ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE CALCULATION
A Geometry Data :-
Height of RCC pile from Ground level to Top (h1) = 0.000 m
Height of RCC pile from Foundation Level to Top ground level (h2) = 3.000 m
Total height of RCC pile, H = h1+h2+h3 = 3.000 m
distance from base of Excavation to the point of action of active earth pressure (h4)= 1.000 m
Spacing of Pile = 0.450 m
Initial Void Ratio of Soil, e0= 0.802

Soil parameters from BH-2 data of Soil


Water Table wT= 6.000 m
Moisture water content of soil w = 95.38 % 0.9538
Unit weight of Water, ϒw= 9.810 KN/m3
Specific Gravity of Soil, Gs= 2.660
3

test report
Unit weight of soil (ϒ) = 26.095 KN/m
1+𝜔 ∗𝐺𝑠 ∗𝛾𝑤
Saturated Unit weight of Soil = 𝛾𝑆𝑎𝑡 = = 28.293 KN/m3
n (1+𝑒0 )
Φ = angle bet resultant force and normal to failure plane/friction angle of soil 20.000 º
3
Cohesion of soil at base C'2 6.000 KN/m
Frictional coefficient μ = 0.500
Maximum Existing back slope of Existing Ground with horizontal = α = 0.000 º
Angle between back face of Micropile with horizontal = β 90.000 º
Angle of friction betn the soil & wall = δ = betn ⅟₂φ to ⅔φ 0.50 10.000 º
Include Earthquake effect in soil= Yes
Maxm Peak ground acceln PGA 3 Sec in horiz. Dir. for EQ amax= k h x g 0.350 g from NBC105-2020
Assume vert. comp. of PGA for EQ = k v x g 0.000 % of kh 0.000 g
= 19.290 º
CALCULATION OF ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE+WATER PORE WATER PRESSURE
Excavation Side Passive Earth Pressure Protected Side Net Pa Earth Pressure Calculation
Pa of water Pa of Saturated Pa of water Pa of Saturated
Z, m Z, m AEP -Ex AEP-P Net EP
Pressure Soil Pressure Soil
0 0.00 0.00 0.000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000
1 -1.00 0.00 0.000 1 -1.00 2.62 6.07 8.69 0.00 8.69 8.689
2 -2.00 0.00 0.000 2 -2.00 10.49 24.26 34.75 0.00 34.75 34.755
3 -3.00 0.00 0.000 3 -3.00 23.61 54.59 78.20 0.00 78.20 78.198
4 -3.00 0.00 0.000 4 -3.00 23.61 54.59 78.20 0.00 78.20 5.886
5 -4.00 -2.62 -6.066 4 -4.00 41.97 97.05 130.33 -8.69 139.02 4.442
6 -5.00 -10.49 -24.263 5 -5.00 65.57 151.64 182.46 -34.75 217.22 4.442

Coulomb's theory of active earth pressure coeff. At wall at static condition (K A) =


𝑆𝑖𝑛2 ∅ + 𝛽
𝐾𝑎 = 2
sin ∅ + 𝛿 sin ∅ − 𝛼
0.447
𝑆𝑖𝑛2 𝛽𝑆𝑖𝑛 𝛽 − 𝛿 1+
sin 𝛽 + 𝛿 sin 𝛼 − 𝛽

Equivalent AEP, Ø127/450= 0.28 = -15.738 KN/m -4.442 #REF!


Active earth pressure at wall in Static Condition = 23.607 KN/m

Coulomb's theory for total static and dynamic Active earth pressure coeff. at wall caused by earthquake (K AE ) =

1.033

Equivalent AEP, Ø118/450= 0.26 = -20.984 KN/m -5.502 #REF!


Active earth pressure at wall in Static Condition = 121.314 KN/m

Line of Action due to Total Static and dynamic Earthquake effect and Active earth Pressure=
𝐴1 𝑋1 + 𝐴2 𝑋2 + 𝐴3 𝑋3 ha= 1.368 m from
𝑋ത =
σ𝑛1 𝐴𝑛 bottom of
𝐴1 = 3.033 KN/m 𝑋1 = 3.000 m Protection
𝐴2 = 15.164 KN/m 𝑋2 = 2.000 m Pile
𝐴3 = 39.427 KN/m 𝑋3 = 1.000 m

Pa= 𝐴𝑛 = 121.31 KN/m

1
L1 𝐴1 = 𝐿1 𝑎
a 2
1
L2 𝐴2 = 𝐿2 (𝑎 + 𝑏)
b 2
1
L3 𝐴3 = 𝐿3 (𝑏 + 𝑐)
c 2
Sketches of Point load Calculation from Active Earth Pressure of Soil

Excavation Side AEP with Water Table Protected Side Dynamic AEP with Water Table
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000
-40.00 -30.00 -20.00 -10.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00

0.00 -1.00
-1.00 8.689

0.00 -2.00

-2.00 34.755

0.00 -3.00

-3.00 78.198

-8.69 -4.00

-4.00 139.019
-34.75 -5.00

-6.00 -5.00 217.217

Net Dynamic AEP Diagram with Water Table on Piles


0.00 0.000
0.000 10.000 20.000 30.000 40.000 50.000 60.000 70.000 80.000 90.000

-1.00 8.689

-2.00 34.755

-3.00 5.886 78.198


-3.00 5.886 78.198

-4.00 4.442

-5.00 4.442

-6.00

Combined Pressure
Depth Soil-ActiveSurchargeCombined Combined Pressure Diagram
m kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2
0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 [Surcharge from Building +
-1.00 3.910 0.000 3.910 Earthquake+Water Table]
-2.00 15.640 5.732 21.372
0.00 0.000
-3.00 35.189 2.493 37.683
0

25

50
-3.00 2.649 0.704 3.352
-4.00 1.999 0.406 2.404
-5.00 1.999 0.675 2.674 -1.00 3.910

-2.00 21.372

-3.00 3.352 37.683

-4.00 2.404

-5.00 2.674

-6.00
ETABS 18.1.1 License #*1VHQUC7UK2NRLHB

ETABS Steel Frame Design at Critical Bracing Support ISMB250


IS 800:2007 Steel Section Check (Strength Summary)

Element Details (Part 1 of 2)


Level Element Unique Name Location (mm) Combo Design Type
0m D4 103 0 Total Combined Soil+Surcharge Pressure load Brace

Element Details (Part 2 of 2)


Element Type Section Classification Rolled
Special Moment Frame ISMB250 Class 1 Yes

Design Code Parameters


ɣM0 ɣM1 An /Ag LLRF PLLF Stress ratio Limit
1.1 1.25 1 1 0.75 1

Section Properties
A (cm²) Izz (cm⁴) rzz (mm) Ze,zz (cm³) Av,z (cm²) Zp,zz (cm³) Iyz (cm⁴) It (cm⁴)
47.6 5131.6 103.9 410.5 31.3 410.5 0 18.7

J (cm⁴) Iyy (cm⁴) ryy (mm) Ze,yy (cm³) Av,y (cm²) Zp,yy (cm³) Iw (cm⁶) h (mm)
18.7 334.5 26.5 53.5 17.3 53.5 57379.4 250

Material Properties
J (cm⁴) Iyy (cm⁴) ryy (mm)
18.7 334.5 26.5

E (MPa) fy (MPa) fu (MPa)


210000 250 410

Stress Check Forces and Moments


Location (mm) N (kN) Mzz (kN-m) Myy (kN-m) Vy (kN) Vz (kN) To (kN-m)
0 -54.2629 -16.4306 0.8786 -4.0822 0.275 0.004

PMM Demand/Capacity (D/C) Ratio 9.3.2.2(a)


Z1 Micropile Design 6m long Ø[email protected] cc.EDB Page 1 of 3
ETABS 18.1.1 License #*1VHQUC7UK2NRLHB

D/C Ratio = P / Pdy + Ky * Cmy * (My,span / Mdy; ) + KLT *


(Mz,span / Mdz; )
0.443 = 0.184 + 0.04 + 0.219

Basic Factors
Buckling Mode K Factor L Factor L Length (mm) KL/r
Major (z-z) 1 1 4152.9 39.976
Major Braced 1 1 4152.9 39.976
Minor (y-y) 1 1 4152.9 156.579
Minor Braced 1 1 4152.9 156.579
LTB 1 1 4152.9 156.579

Axial Force Design


N Force Td Capacity Nd Capacity Pdy Capacity Pz Capacity Pd Capacity
kN kN kN kN kN kN
Axial -54.2629 1080.6818 1080.6818 294.6554 1018.2222 294.6554

Tdg Tdn Ncr,T Ncr,TF An /Ag N /Nd


kN kN kN kN Unitless Unitless
1080.6818 1403.676 1916.537 1916.537 1 0.05

Design Parameters for Axial Design


Curve α fcc (MPa) λ Φ χ fcd (MPa)
Major (z-z) a 0.21 1296.91 0.439 0.621 0.942 214.14
MajorB (z-z) a 0.21 1296.91 0.439 0.621 0.942 214.14
Minor (y-y) b 0.34 84.54 1.72 2.237 0.273 61.97
MinorB (y-y) b 0.34 84.54 1.72 2.237 0.273 61.97
Torsional TF b 0.34 403.06 0.788 0.91 0.732 166.39

Moment Designs
M Moment Mspan Moment Md(yield) Capacity Mdv Capacity Mnd Capacity Md(LTB) Capacity
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major (z-z) -16.4306 -16.4306 93.2955 93.2955 93.2955 73.1823
Minor (y-y) 0.8786 0.8786 12.1591 12.1591 12.1591

Curve αLT λLT ΦLT χLT C1 Mcr (kN-m)


LTB a 0.21 0.819 0.901 0.784 1.624 152.8389

Cmy Cmz CmLT kz ky KLT My / Mdy Mz / Mdz α1 α2


Factors 0.48 0.9 0.9 1.013 1.147 0.977 0.072 -0.176 1 2

Shear Design
V Force (kN) Vd Capacity (kN) To Capacity (kN-m) Stress Ratio Status Check
Major (y) 4.0822 226.3474 0.004 0.018 OK
Minor (z) 0.275 410.0497 0.004 0.001 OK

Shear Design
Vp (kN) kv (Unitless) ΛW (Unitless) Τb (MPa)
Reduction 226.3474 0 0 1

End Reaction Axial Forces (Part 1 of 2)


Z1 Micropile Design 6m long Ø[email protected] cc.EDB Page 2 of 3
ETABS 18.1.1 License #*1VHQUC7UK2NRLHB

Left End Reaction (kN) Load Combo Right End Reaction (kN)
-54.2629 Total Combined Soil+Surcharge Pressure load -53.7871

End Reaction Axial Forces (Part 2 of 2)


Load Combo
Total Combined Soil+Surcharge Pressure load

Z1 Micropile Design 6m long Ø[email protected] cc.EDB Page 3 of 3


ETABS 18.1.1 License #*1VHQUC7UK2NRLHB

ETABS Steel Frame Design at Critical Walling section ISMB200TBWPL10 at


Bracing Support
IS 800:2007 Steel Section Check (Strength Summary)

Element Details (Part 1 of 2)


Level Element Unique Name Location (mm) Combo Design Type
0m B16 94 386.5 Total Combined Soil+Surcharge Pressure load Beam

Element Details (Part 2 of 2)


Element Type Section Classification Rolled
Special Moment Frame ISMB200TBWPL10 Class 3 No

Design Code Parameters


ɣM0 ɣM1 An /Ag LLRF PLLF Stress ratio Limit
1.1 1.25 1 1 0.75 1

Section Properties
A (cm²) Izz (cm⁴) rzz (mm) Ze,zz (cm³) Av,z (cm²) Zp,zz (cm³) Iyz (cm⁴) It (cm⁴)
75.8 4312 75.4 392 56.1 509.2 0 49.8

J (cm⁴) Iyy (cm⁴) ryy (mm) Ze,yy (cm³) Av,y (cm²) Zp,yy (cm³) Iw (cm⁶) h (mm)
49.8 262.9 18.6 52.6 39.2 106.2 220

Material Properties
J (cm⁴) Iyy (cm⁴) ryy (mm)
49.8 262.9 18.6

E (MPa) fy (MPa) fu (MPa)


210000 250 410

Stress Check Forces and Moments


Location (mm) N (kN) Mzz (kN-m) Myy (kN-m) Vy (kN) Vz (kN) To (kN-m)
386.5 -10.6201 -2.0487 4.5502 -11.2838 17.5658 0.0112

Z1 Micropile Design 6m long Ø[email protected] cc.EDB Page 1 of 3


ETABS 18.1.1 License #*1VHQUC7UK2NRLHB

ETABS Steel Frame Design at Critical Walling section ISMB200 without


bracing Support
IS 800:2007 Steel Section Check (Strength Summary)

Element Details (Part 1 of 2)


Level Element Unique Name Location (mm) Combo Design Type
0m B19 97 386.5 Total Combined Soil+Surcharge Pressure load Beam

Element Details (Part 2 of 2)


Element Type Section Classification Rolled
Special Moment Frame ISMB200 Class 1 Yes

Design Code Parameters


ɣM0 ɣM1 An /Ag LLRF PLLF Stress ratio Limit
1.1 1.25 1 1 0.75 1

Section Properties
A (cm²) Izz (cm⁴) rzz (mm) Ze,zz (cm³) Av,z (cm²) Zp,zz (cm³) Iyz (cm⁴) It (cm⁴)
32.3 2235.4 83.2 223.5 21.6 223.5 0 9.5

J (cm⁴) Iyy (cm⁴) ryy (mm) Ze,yy (cm³) Av,y (cm²) Zp,yy (cm³) Iw (cm⁶) h (mm)
9.5 150 21.5 30 11.4 30 16108.5 200

Material Properties
J (cm⁴) Iyy (cm⁴) ryy (mm)
9.5 150 21.5

E (MPa) fy (MPa) fu (MPa)


210000 250 410

Stress Check Forces and Moments


Location (mm) N (kN) Mzz (kN-m) Myy (kN-m) Vy (kN) Vz (kN) To (kN-m)
386.5 -11.0612 1.6605 -4.4267 -0.1539 0.3603 0.0036

Z1 Micropile Design 6m long Ø[email protected] cc.EDB Page 1 of 3


ETABS 18.1.1 License #*1VHQUC7UK2NRLHB

PMM Demand/Capacity (D/C) Ratio 9.3.2.2(a)


D/C Ratio = P / Pdy + Ky * Cmy * (My,span / Mdy; ) + KLT *
(Mz,span / Mdz; )
0.765 = 0.046 + 0.673 + 0.046

Basic Factors
Buckling Mode K Factor L Factor L Length (mm) KL/r
Major (z-z) 1 0.718 323 3.884
Major Braced 1 0.718 323 3.884
Minor (y-y) 1 6.718 3023 140.344
Minor Braced 1 6.718 3023 140.344
LTB 1 6.718 3023 140.344

Axial Force Design


N Force Td Capacity Nd Capacity Pdy Capacity Pz Capacity Pd Capacity
kN kN kN kN kN kN
Axial -11.0612 734.7727 734.7727 240.5999 734.7727 240.5999

Tdg Tdn Ncr,T Ncr,TF An /Ag N /Nd


kN kN kN kN Unitless Unitless
734.7727 954.3816 1535.04 1535.0398 1 0.015

Design Parameters for Axial Design


Curve α fcc (MPa) λ Φ χ fcd (MPa)
Major (z-z) a 0.21 137361.01 0.043 0.484 1 227.27
MajorB (z-z) a 0.21 137361.01 0.043 0.484 1 227.27
Minor (y-y) b 0.34 105.23 1.541 1.916 0.327 74.42
MinorB (y-y) b 0.34 105.23 1.541 1.916 0.327 74.42
Torsional TF b 0.34 474.8 0.726 0.853 0.769 174.78

Moment Designs
M Moment Mspan Moment Md(yield) Capacity Mdv Capacity Mnd Capacity Md(LTB) Capacity
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major (z-z) 1.6605 1.6605 50.7955 50.7955 50.7955 35.8305
Minor (y-y) -4.4267 -4.4267 6.8182 6.8182 6.8182

Curve αLT λLT ΦLT χLT C1 Mcr (kN-m)


LTB a 0.21 0.943 1.022 0.705 1.013 62.8955

Cmy Cmz CmLT kz ky KLT My / Mdy Mz / Mdz α1 α2


Factors 1 0.986 1 0.998 1.037 0.994 -0.649 0.033 1 2

Shear Design
V Force (kN) Vd Capacity (kN) To Capacity (kN-m) Stress Ratio Status Check
Major (y) 0.1539 149.5861 0.0036 0.001 OK
Minor (z) 0.3603 283.4264 0.0036 0.001 OK

Shear Design
Vp (kN) kv (Unitless) ΛW (Unitless) Τb (MPa)
Reduction 149.5861 0 0 1

Z1 Micropile Design 6m long Ø[email protected] cc.EDB Page 2 of 3


ETABS 18.1.1 License #*1VHQUC7UK2NRLHB

End Reaction Major Shear Forces (Part 1 of 2)


Left End Reaction (kN) Load Combo Right End Reaction (kN)
0.2062 Total Combined Soil+Surcharge Pressure load 0.1539

End Reaction Major Shear Forces (Part 2 of 2)


Load Combo
Total Combined Soil+Surcharge Pressure load

Z1 Micropile Design 6m long Ø[email protected] cc.EDB Page 3 of 3


ETABS 18.1.1 License #*1VHQUC7UK2NRLHB

PMM Demand/Capacity (D/C) Ratio 9.3.2.2(a)


D/C Ratio = P / Pdy + Ky * Cmy * (My,span / Mdy; ) + KLT *
(Mz,span / Mdz; )
0.985 = 0.026 + 0.873 + 0.086

Basic Factors
Buckling Mode K Factor L Factor L Length (mm) KL/r
Major (z-z) 1 0.718 323 4.282
Major Braced 1 0.718 323 4.282
Minor (y-y) 1 6.718 3023 162.285
Minor Braced 1 6.718 3023 162.285
LTB 1 6.718 3023 162.285

Axial Force Design


N Force Td Capacity Nd Capacity Pdy Capacity Pz Capacity Pd Capacity
kN kN kN kN kN kN
Axial -10.6201 1722.0182 1722.0182 410.5165 1722.0182 410.5165

Tdg Tdn Ncr,T Ncr,TF An /Ag N /Nd


kN kN kN kN Unitless Unitless
1722.0182 2236.695 6659.3814 596.2811 1 0.006

Design Parameters for Axial Design


Curve α fcc (MPa) λ Φ χ fcd (MPa)
Major (z-z) c 0.49 113057.83 0.047 0.464 1 227.27
MajorB (z-z) c 0.49 113057.83 0.047 0.464 1 227.27
Minor (y-y) c 0.49 78.7 1.782 2.476 0.238 54.18
MinorB (y-y) c 0.49 78.7 1.782 2.476 0.238 54.18
Torsional TF c 0.49 78.7 1.782 2.476 0.238 54.18

Moment Designs
M Moment Mspan Moment Md(yield) Capacity Mdv Capacity Mnd Capacity Md(LTB) Capacity
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major (z-z) -2.0487 -5.7131 89.0906 89.0906 89.0906 66.6533
Minor (y-y) 4.5502 10.224 11.9505 11.9505 11.9505

Curve αLT λLT ΦLT χLT C1 Mcr (kN-m)


LTB c 0.49 0.662 0.832 0.748 1.445 223.7207

Cmy Cmz CmLT kz ky KLT My / Mdy Mz / Mdz α1 α2


Factors 1 0.743 1 0.999 1.021 0.998 0.381 -0.023 2 2

Shear Design
V Force (kN) Vd Capacity (kN) To Capacity (kN-m) Stress Ratio Status Check
Major (y) 11.2838 514.3075 0.0112 0.022 OK
Minor (z) 17.5658 735.9365 0.0112 0.024 OK

Shear Design
Vp (kN) kv (Unitless) ΛW (Unitless) Τb (MPa)
Reduction 514.3075 0 0 1

Z1 Micropile Design 6m long Ø[email protected] cc.EDB Page 2 of 3


ETABS 18.1.1 License #*1VHQUC7UK2NRLHB

End Reaction Major Shear Forces (Part 1 of 2)


Left End Reaction (kN) Load Combo Right End Reaction (kN)
11.4062 Total Combined Soil+Surcharge Pressure load 11.2838

End Reaction Major Shear Forces (Part 2 of 2)


Load Combo
Total Combined Soil+Surcharge Pressure load

Z1 Micropile Design 6m long Ø[email protected] cc.EDB Page 3 of 3


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

F F

E E
·

·
Ø

D D

C C
Ø

Ø B
B

Ø
A A
Ø

Sheet Number
NOTES : PROJECT : MRS GITA THAPA RESIDENCE Scale :-1:
DRAWING TITLE :
TIKATHALI
Date :-

PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR BASEMENT Drawn By:-


Sheet

Design By:-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

F F

11' 18'-7" 17'

E E

14'-2"
D D

21'

C C
33' LIFT
PROVISION

B B
14'-2"

A A

BASEMENT PLAN
FLOOR AREA: 2734.00 SQ.FT.

Sheet Number
NOTES : PROJECT : MRS GITA THAPA RESIDENCE Scale :-1:
DRAWING TITLE :
TIKATHALI
Date :-

PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR BASEMENT Drawn By:-


Sheet

Design By:-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

F F

1
E 1
E

D D

C
4 C

B B

2
2

A A

Sheet Number
NOTES : PROJECT : MRS GITA THAPA RESIDENCE Scale :-1:
DRAWING TITLE :
TIKATHALI
Date :-

PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR BASEMENT Drawn By:-


Sheet

Design By:-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

F F

E E

D D

C C
4
3

B B

A A

Sheet Number
NOTES : PROJECT : MRS GITA THAPA RESIDENCE Scale :-1:
DRAWING TITLE :
TIKATHALI
Date :-

PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR BASEMENT Drawn By:-


Sheet

Design By:-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

You might also like