Strategies to Improve

Access to the
General Education
Curriculum

1
Table of Contents
Strategies to Improve Access to the General Education Curriculum ........................ 2
Instructional Strategies .................................................................................................. 4
Differentiated Instruction................................................................................................. 4
Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) ............................................................................. 5
Concrete, Representations (Semi concrete), and Abstract Sequence of Mathematics
Instruction (CRA or CSA) .................................................................................................. 6
Grouping Strategies ......................................................................................................... 7
Grouping Strategies - Peer Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS) ................. 8
Direct Instruction.............................................................................................................. 9
Learning Strategies ...................................................................................................... 10
Learning Strategies ........................................................................................................ 10
Mnemonics ...................................................................................................................... 11
Materials and Media...................................................................................................... 12
Adapted Books/Texts..................................................................................................... 12
Literacy Rich Environments .......................................................................................... 13
Professional Collaboration............................................................................................ 14
Assessment................................................................................................................... 15
Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM)....................................................................... 15
Functional Behavior Assessments (FBA).................................................................... 16
References..................................................................................................................... 17
Differentiated Instruction............................................................................................... 17
Computer Assisted Instruction ..................................................................................... 17
Concrete, Representations (Semiconcrete), and Abstract Sequence of Mathematics
Instruction (CRA or CSA)............................................................................................... 18
Grouping Strategies ....................................................................................................... 18
Peer Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS) .................................................................. 19
Professional Collaboration............................................................................................ 19
Learning Strategies ........................................................................................................ 20
Mnemonics ...................................................................................................................... 20
Adapted Books and Text ............................................................................................... 21
Literacy Rich Environments .......................................................................................... 21
Curriculum-Based Measurement .................................................................................. 22
Functional Behavior Assessments............................................................................... 22

1
 Strategies to Improve Access to the
General Education Curriculum
Education professionals increasingly focus on identifying programs, practices, and
strategies that are research based. To be considered as the highest (“gold”) standard of
research based, educational practices must have evidence (a) that is supported by
rigorous and scientific data (high quality) and (b) that has a body of studies that
demonstrate positive outcomes (high quantity). The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act
passed in 2001 (www.nclb.gov) and many federal grant programs call on educators to
use scientifically-based research to drive their decisions about educational interventions.

To be considered scientifically based, research should be objective, empirical,

replicable, have valid and reliable data, use particular research designs, and use
rigorous data analysis (See Identifying and Implementing Educational Practices
Supported by Rigorous Evidence: A User-Friendly Guide. Available at:
www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/rigorousevid/guide_pg3.html).
In general, more research needs to be conducted that uses the “gold standard” of
scientific rigor. In addition, more careful review of existing research needs to occur in
order to evaluate and synthesize evidence relating to programs and practices. As an
example, the U.S. Department of Education has funded the What Works Clearinghouse
(www.w-w-c.org) to serve as an independent source of scientific evidence of what works
in education. However, such careful and systematic reviews take an enormous amount
of time and manpower.

In the meantime, a body of research does suggest that specific programs and practices
are effective with particular students. Increasing exposure to such research-supported
instructional methods and practices, materials and media, and supports and
accommodations will help students with disabilities effectively engage in learning general
education curriculum content.

The strategies that appear in this chart have varying levels of research support. The
Access Center classifies strategies on a continuum depending on their research base.
“Green light” strategies are evidenced based practices while “yellow light” strategies are
promising practices but require further validation and thus should be used with caution.
Analysts at the Access Center use several approaches for classifying the level of
research that supports each strategy. For some strategies we borrowed guidelines used
for the Current Practice Alerts developed by the Division of Learning Disabilities and the
Division of Research of the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC). Where we highlight
strategies that were not included in CEC’s Current Practice Alerts, we rely on the
research continuum developed by the Access Center to classify practices and on
experts who bring their knowledge of research-based practices.
(http://www.k8accesscenter.org/training_resources/reasearchapproach.asp)
The Access Center identifies the approach used for classifying each strategy in the
chart.

To assist state and local technical assistance providers and administrators in selecting
research-supported practices, the professionals at the Access Center compiled
information on strategies in the following areas: Instructional Methods and Practices,
Media and Materials, Supports and Accommodations, and Assessment. The following
information is provided for each research-supported practice:

• Student Characteristics Addressed: specifies the types of challenges the strategy

targets
• Practice Description: gives specific information regarding the use of the strategy
2
 • How It Improves Access: explains how effective implementation can improve
access to the general education curriculum for students with disabilities
• Supporting Research: identifies sources of findings on the practice
• Implications for Practice: outlines considerations for implementation, including
costs
• Sources of Additional Information: lists additional websites and resources for
more information about the practice

In addition, several of the research-supported practices include links to content-area

“applications.” These applications expand on the practice and provide an explanation of
how it can be used within a particular content area.

The Access Center will continue to expand this list and provide additional information
about these and other research-supported interventions on our website
(www.k8accesscenter.org/) as they become available. Check back frequently for more
resources and information about effective practices to improve access to the general
education curriculum for students with disabilities.

3
 Instructional Strategies
Instructional Strategies – Methods that can be used to deliver a variety of content objectives. How a course of study/curriculum
should be taught.
Differentiated Instruction
Student
Practice How It Improves
Research-Supported Practice Characteristics Implications for Practice
Description Access
Addressed
Differentiated Teachers Enables students Requires time for planning and
instruction – diagnose student to access implementation.
readiness, information using
ƒ addresses
interest, and modalities that May require support from
student
learning profile. best meet their administration and co-teachers.
readiness,
needs.
which includes
Instruction May require a high level of
prior
incorporates Information is student investment.
knowledge and
specific strategies presented at
skills
that meet the students’
ƒ addresses needs of students individual
Access Center Research Continuum student interest and are based on readiness levels.
the curriculum
ƒ addresses a being presented.
Application to - student’s
learning profile, On-going
ƒ Math which includes assessment
learning style, allows teachers to
ƒ Reading environmental adjust instruction
factors that
ƒ Writing in response to
affect the student needs.
ƒ Science student’s
learning, and
the student’s
grouping
preferences

Supporting Research

Qualitative and meta-analysis research indicate:

That students in differentiated classrooms achieve better outcomes than students in classrooms without differentiation
(Csikszentmihalyi, Rathunde, & Whalen, 1993; Tomlinson, Brighton, Hertberg, Callahan, Moon, Brimijoin, et al., 2003)
When instructional materials are differentiated to meet student needs, interests, and readiness, academic gains increase (Kulik & Kulik,
1991; Lou, Abrami, Spence, Poulsen, Chambers, & d’Apollonia, 1996).

4
 Instructional Strategies
Instructional Strategies – Methods that can be used to deliver a variety of content objectives. How a course of study/curriculum
should be taught.
Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI)
Student
Practice How It Improves
Research-Supported Practice Characteristics Implications for Practice
Description Access
Addressed
Computer Allows multiple Allows great flexibility in use
Children with –
programs or means of because it is not subject specific
high-tech interacting with
Fine motor
equipment curricular Requires professional
challenges
provide content materials development for use in
instruction to classrooms
Attention deficit
students to Allows teachers
enable them to to individualize Requires purchase of
Minimal
meet standards lessons to meet technology and software if not
organizational
and goals. children’s currently available
Access Center Research Continuum strategies
specific goals
Sample while helping Requires that individuals with
Application to - Difficulty
features– them meet state expertise be available for
decoding and
and local trouble shooting
ƒ Math comprehending
Independent standards
text
instruction for Requires time for teacher
ƒ Reading student planning and instructing
Communication
ƒ Writing delays
students to use software
May measure
ƒ Science student skill and
Weak problem-
progress
solving skills
Interactive
Difficulty with
abstract
Immediate
concepts
feedback
Supporting Research

CAI may be an academic motivator for students with disabilities (Hitchcock & Noonan, 2000).

CAI increases wait time and builds on mastered skills (Hitchcock & Noonan, 2000; Zimmerman, 1998).

Effectiveness is attributed to the higher interaction required for responses and active learning (Lahm, 1996).

Varying results of effectiveness from research (Kroesbergen & Van Luit, 2003)

5
 Instructional Strategies
Instructional Strategies – Methods that can be used to deliver a variety of content objectives. How a course of study/curriculum
should be taught.
Concrete, Representations (Semi concrete), and Abstract Sequence of Mathematics Instruction (CRA or CSA)

Student
Research-Supported Practice How It Improves
Characteristics Implications for Practice
Practice Description Access
Addressed
Students who are Three phases— Enables children to— May require purchase of
in general • Concrete phase • retrieve background commercial materials (e.g.,
education, at risk of mathematical knowledge and number cubes, fraction bars,
and/or in special concept uses • become confident geometric figures)
education hands-on with an approach to
manipulatives reason May require time to practice
Students with • Representations repetition of sequence to
difficulties in these Provides a path for establish understanding of
phase uses
areas– more complex problem- concept
pictorial display
solving situations
• Abstract phase
Access Center Research Continuum • using symbols uses numerical Addresses student May require professional
and abstract symbols or learning styles by development for teachers to
Application to - mathematical algebraic letters providing visual, tactile, learn to model concrete and
concepts of abstract and kinesthetic visual materials establishing
mathematical links to abstract concepts
ƒ Math experiences
• processing concepts
information Allows group or
Repetition of individual instruction
• sustaining different types of Allows students to move
attention to manipulatives or in a structured way from
task representations of concrete to abstract
same concept concepts through
• monitoring and pictorial representations
self-regulating Graduated and such as charts, graphs,
conceptually symbols, and diagrams
• performing supported Facilitates abstract
basic math framework for reasoning with
skills creating numerical symbols
connection
• reasoning and between C–R–A
levels of
• using problem- understanding
solving skills

Supporting Research

Builds a foundation with structured concrete materials for developing concepts in number sense, geometry, statistics, story problems, and
measurement (Bruni & Silverman, 1986; NCTM, 2000)

Develops more precise and comprehensive mental representations (Suydam & Higgins, 1977)

Allows students to understand numerical symbols and abstract equations at a concrete level (Devlin, 2000; Maccini & Gagnon, 2000)

Facilitates learning place value (Peterson, Mercer, O’Shea, 1988)

Facilitates development of computation skills (Mastropieri, Scruggs, & Shiah, 1991)

Promotes acquisition and retention of arithmetic facts and mathematics concepts (Miller & Mercer, 1993)

6
 Instructional Strategies
Instructional Strategies – Methods that can be used to deliver a variety of content objectives. How a course of study/curriculum
should be taught.
Grouping Strategies
Student
Research-Supported Practice How It Improves
Characteristics Implications for Practice
Practice Description Access
Addressed
Children with – After assessing Enables teachers Requires sophisticated classroom
students’ needs, to use various management skills
Communication teachers plan types of groups to
delays activities using ensure that Requires time to plan and evaluate
various types of children have with other team members (who may be
Delays in groups to ensure appropriate working with groups or individuals)
mathematical that students’ models and
concepts needs and individual
interests are attention to
Difficulty targeted facilitate access
decoding and
comprehending Example Teaches children
Access Center Research text groupings appropriate social
Continuum include pairing, skills
Weak problem- smaller teacher-
solving skills led groups, and Fosters student
multiple grouping independence and
Difficulty with (vary the collaboration skills
abstract grouping from
concepts day to day) Allows
formats. . individualization
Lack of by teacher
organizational
skills

Lack of attention
Supporting Research

Flexible grouping allows teachers to meet the needs of specific children while targeting interests (NCREL)

Groups provide opportunities for improved social and academic interaction (Johnson & Johnson, 2000; Vaughn et al., 2001)

In comparison studies, students in alternative groupings (compared with traditional whole class grouping) for reading
demonstrated higher success rates for students with disabilities (Elbaum et al., 2000)

7
 Instructional Strategies
Instructional Strategies – Methods that can be used to deliver a variety of content objectives. How a course of study/curriculum
should be taught.
Grouping Strategies - Peer Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS)
Research- Student
Practice How It Improves
Supported Characteristics Implications for Practice
Description Access
Practice Addressed
Children with – Students interact Groups students Provides a complement to current reading
through “coach/ with and without and mathematics curricula
Difficulty player” pairings in disabilities to
decoding and structured assist with Requires a set period of time for
comprehending cooperative- comprehension implementation: 25–35 mins/2 or3 times a
text learning activities. of general week
education
Communication Students support content Requires professional development
delays each other (workshop training and teacher manual)
through frequent Promotes
Access Center Delays in oral interaction, meaningful social
Research Continuum mathematical feedback, and interaction
and expert
recommendations concepts reinforcement. between peers
with and without
Difficulty with Programs are disabilities
abstract available in
concepts reading for
grades
Noncompliant preschool–6 and
behaviors mathematics for
grades K–6.
Aggressive
behaviors

Lack of attention

Lack of
organizational
skills
Supporting Research

PALS is approved by the U.S. Department of Education’s Program Effectiveness Panel for Inclusion in the National Diffusion
Network on effective educational practices (John F. Kennedy Center for Research on Human Development, 1999).

Improves student test performance on a number of reading measures (Fuchs, Fuchs, Mathes, & Simmons, 1997; Fuchs, &
Fuchs, 1998).

PALS enables students to make connections with abstract mathematical concepts (Fuchs, Fuchs,
001; Fuchs et al., 1997).

8
 Instructional Strategies
Instructional Strategies – Methods that can be used to deliver a variety of content objectives. How a course of study/curriculum
should be taught.
Direct Instruction
Student How It
Practice
Research-Supported Practice Characteristics Improves Implications for Practice
Description
Addressed Access
At risk students An explicit, teacher- Access to the Will require the purchase of a
including those directed instructional general commercial program and materials
students with model. education based on this instructional model.
disadvantaging curriculum is of
conditions, The focus of DI is little value unless Will require professional
including students curriculum design and ALL students development and implementation
with disabilities instructional delivery have the supports to insure fidelity of
and those from opportunity to implementation.
various social and Major program features gain the skills
economic levels. include: necessary for Teachers and support personnel
• research tested academic must be prepared for the program’s
Access Center Research Struggling curriculum success. fast pace and the structured,
Continuum and expert readers who have • systematic and repetitive nature of the program.
recommendations difficulty decoding explicit instruction Direct Instruction
and • coaches/facilitators has been proven Must have teacher buy-in.
ƒ Math comprehending • rapid pace to be an effective Teachers must be fully informed of
ƒ Reading text • achievement strategy in the research that supports Direct
ƒ Spelling grouping improving the Instruction as being a proven
ƒ Language Arts • scripted class reading skills of effective instructional model.
Primarily a pre-K- sessions struggling
6 program, • intense, constant readers, May require in-class coaches for
however also student interaction regardless of implementation support.
proven effective • teaching to reason. Since
with secondary, mastery reading is the
adult special • frequent foundational skill
education and assessments for all learning,
remedial students the ability to read
well is essential
for ALL students’
success in the
general
education
curriculum.

Direct instruction
has been proven
to be an effective
instructional
strategy in
reading,
language arts,
spelling and
math; all
fundamental
skills required for
success in the
general
curriculum.
Supporting Research
Adams, G. & Engleman S. (1996). Research on Direct Instruction: 25 Years Beyond Distar. Seattle: Educational Achievement Systems.

American Federation of Teachers (1997). Raising Student Achievement: A Resource Guide for Improving Low Performing Schools. Washington: AFT.

American Federations of Teachers (1998). Building on the Best: Learning from What Works. Washington: AFT.

9
 Learning Strategies
Learning Strategies – Techniques, principles, or rules that facilitate the acquisition, manipulation, integration, storage, and
retrieval of information across situations and settings. (Alley, G.R., & Deshler,D.D. Teaching the learning disabled adolescent:
Strategies and Methods. Denver: Love, 1979).
Students do this.
Learning Strategies
Student
Practice How It Improves
Research-Supported Practice Characteristics Implications for Practice
Description Access
Addressed
Children with – Techniques, Enables students Requires professional
principles, or to learn and development (e.g.,
Difficulty rules help remember key different learning strategies,
decoding and students acquire, concepts, thus their benefits and uses)
comprehending store, use, and enabling
text retrieve students to Requires teachers to plan time
information in actively engage to teach these learning
Communication various settings. in curriculum strategies
delays content
According to Several models for teaching
Lack of NICHCY (1997a), Helps students learning strategies are
organizational learning learn how to discussed in the literature (e.g.,
Access Center Research Continuum skills strategies learn and allows SIM, self-regulated learners,
and expert recommendations generally fall into them to become and cognitive instruction)
Weak problem- two categories– independent
Application to - solving skills learners
– Cognitive (i.e.,
ƒ Math Difficulty with task-specific, Increases
abstract such as taking students’
concepts notes, making an confidence in
outline, and their academic
Delays in asking questions abilities
mathematical
concepts – Metacognitive
(i.e., self-
Short- and long- regulation, such
term memory as goal-setting,
problems self-monitoring,
and self-
questioning).
Supporting Research

Students show improved independence in completing tasks, including improved reading comprehension (Alley & Deshler,
1979).

Students better understand individual learning process (NICHCY, 1997a)

Students give more attention to learning (NICHCY, 1997a)

10
 Learning Strategies
Learning Strategies – Techniques, principles, or rules that facilitate the acquisition, manipulation, integration, storage, and
retrieval of information across situations and settings. (Alley, G.R., & Deshler,D.D. Teaching the learning disabled adolescent:
Strategies and Methods. Denver: Love, 1979).
Mnemonics
Student
Practice How It Improves
Research-Supported Practice Characteristics Implications for Practice
Description Access
Addressed
Children with – Mnemonics Gives students Requires minimal professional
improves tools to encode development for teachers and
Short- and long- memory by information so minimal additional resources
term memory linking new they can retrieve beyond initially learning the
problems information to it later mnemonic strategies
current
Difficulty with knowledge Allows better Use can be across multiple
abstract through visual understanding of content areas (language arts,
problems and verbal cues. subject-area mathematics, science, foreign
content language, etc.)
CEC Guidelines Difficulty with Includes three
decoding methods–

Lack of Keyword (linking

organizational new information
skills to known words)

Pegword (using
rhyming word to
represent
number or order)

Letter strategies
(using acronyms
and acrostics)
Supporting Research

Strategy is effective for increasing comprehension test scores (Mastropieri, Sweda, & Scruggs, 2000; Uberti, Scruggs, &
Mastropieri, 2003).

Gains have been shown on criterion-referenced tests and criterion-referenced measures (Swanson, 1999; Forness, Kavale,
Blum, & Lloyd, 1997).

11
 Materials and Media
Adapted Books/Texts
Student
Research-Supported Practice How It Improves
Characteristics Implications for Practice
Practice Description Access
Addressed
Children with – Texts and Students spend Requires teachers and
general a large amount specialists to identify specific
Difficulty education of time goals and add adaptations to
decoding and materials are interacting with books or create adapted books
comprehending modified. text, much of to accommodate and
text which is develop- individualize for students in
Low-technology mentally classrooms
Communication materials (e.g., inappropriate or
delays stickers, fabric, inaccessible to Requires time to create and
glue, different types of collaborate on books
Lack of highlighting) learners.
Access Center Research Continuum organizational Can be expensive depending
skills High-technology Adapted texts on the quantity and level of
materials (e.g., and books are technology involved
Gross/fine motor talking switches, used in the
deficiencies communication general Requires time to teach children
devices, talking education how to use adapted books and
Cognitive delays books software, curriculum to may need one-on-one or small-
textbooks on allow the group support while learning
Visual tape) participation of
impairments students with
disabilities
Lack of attention
Supporting Research

Student differences significantly affect how they perceive and process information (Curry, 2003).

Adapted texts allow more individuals to participate in the curriculum (Higgins, Boone, & Lovitt, 2002; Robinson, 2000).

12
 Materials and Media
Literacy Rich Environments
Student
Practice How It Improves
Research-Supported Practice Characteristics Implications for Practice
Description Access
Addressed
Children with – Classroom Provides Requires that teachers have
environment students access time to set up the
Difficulty ensures to literacy by environment, such as
decoding and accessible immersing them labeling everything with
comprehending literacy in an pictures and words
text experiences environment of
through– print Requires resources to
Communication purchase materials, such as
delays Labels (pictorial Provides books and magazines
and word) students multiple
Lack of literacy- opportunities for
rich environment Large supplies of interaction with
Access Center Research Continuum outside of school books literacy (through
words and
Multiple writing books), which
opportunities enables them to
(pencils/paper, interact with the
computer, general
typewriter, etc.) education
curriculum
Reading
opportunities
during school
day

Teachers
engage in
language and
literacy activities
throughout
instruction.

Students actively
engage in
reading and
writing projects
throughout the
curriculum.
Supporting Research

Opportunities to engage in reading and writing activities increase literacy skills when connected to the real-world experiences of
students with disabilities (Katims & Pierce, 1995).

Opportunities to explore literature and intentional instruction facilitate development (Gunn, Simmons, & Kameenui, 1995; Snow,
Burns, & Griffin, 1999; Whitehurst, 2003).

13
 Supports and Accommodations
Professional Collaboration
Student
Practice How It Improves
Research-Supported Practice Characteristics Implications for Practice
Description Access
Addressed
Children with – Teachers and Creates Requires that teachers and
related service communication related service providers
Needs for related providers meet and support communicate and send one
services on a regular among multiple message to parents and child
provided by more basis to problem service providers
than one solve, plan, and Builds on partner strengths to
specialist implement Enhances and ensure that lessons are
strategies to builds on the accessible to students with
Needs for ensure that each student’s access disabilities
paraprofessional student is able to to the general
Access Center Research Continuum support participate in the education Requires that time be built into
general curriculum the schedule for collaborative
Issues needing education planning, implementation, and
the expertise of curriculum. Ensures that all evaluation
more than one providers
individual Collaboration integrate their Requires that teachers be willing
partners vary services with one to share their space and
depending on another welcome other professionals into
student need. their teaching

Sample Requires time and effort to build

collaborators— trust

• Regular and
special
educators

Regular, special,
and speech
educators,
occupational
therapists,
physical
therapists,
nurses, and
psychologists
Supporting Research

Collaboration streamlines instruction, prevents removal of students from general education classrooms, and ensures the
integration of goals and standards to create success within the curriculum (Flemming & Monda-Amaya, 2001; Friend & Cook,
2000).

Academic growth for students with severe emotional disabilities is attributed to more teacher attention, reduced teacher-pupil
ratios, and more individual assistance provided through collaboration (Carter, 2000).

14
 Assessment
Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM)
Student
Research-Supported Practice How It Improves
Characteristics Implications for Practice
Practice Description Access
Addressed
Children with – CBM is a valid Assesses Allows teachers to easily track
and reliable form students’ progress over time
Communication of curriculum- progress toward
delays based year-end Allows teachers to evaluate effects of
assessment. academic goal interventions
Delays in
mathematical CBM monitors Monitors Requires minimal time for teachers to
concepts academic students on an learn CBM method
progress in basic ongoing basis,
Difficulty skills with short provides Requires time to develop assessment
decoding and (1–3 minute) information about probes and measures
comprehending probes of students’
Access Center Research text reading, spelling strengths and Computerized versions available
Continuum mathematics, areas for
Weak problem- and writing improvement
solving skills fluency.
Allows teachers
Difficulty with The student’s to recognize
abstract progress is learning
concepts measured difficulties and
against self and make immediate
Lack of class. instructional
organizational changes that
skills CBM allows for meet students’
data-based needs
Lack of attention decision making
through a
multiple-step
process involving
testing, analysis,
and planning.
Supporting Research

Students with disabilities demonstrated increased academic growth rates in reading with use of CBM assessments (Deno,
Fuchs, Marston, & Shinn, 2001).

Students worked more quickly and accurately and became more active learners (Phillips, Fuchs, & Fuchs, 1994).

15
 Assessment
Functional Behavior Assessments (FBA)
Student
Practice How It Improves Implications for
Research-Supported Practice Characteristics
Description Access Practice
Addressed
Children with – Teachers and Allows teachers Requires time to watch
specialists select to examine the and analyze behaviors
Noncompliant a target behavior environment and
behaviors then record the its effect on Requires consistency in
antecedent students, adapt implementing functional
Aggressive (incidents their teaching behavior analysis (all
behaviors immediately behaviors and observers must be
before the the environment active participants)
Communication targeted to meet student
delays behavior), the needs
behavior, and the
Weak problem- consequence Provides
Access Center Research Continuum solving skills that occurs when students with
the targeted greater
Lack of attention behavior is opportunities to
demonstrated. participate in the
general
Information education
collected from curriculum
observations is
used to create a
positive
behavioral
support plan and
environment.
.
Supporting Research

The OSEP 22nd annual report to Congress recommended its use as a means to individualizing to meet specific students’
needs (OSEP, 2000; Miller, Tansy, & Hughes, 1998; Miller, 2001).

Functional Behavior Assessments (FBAs) are effective in reducing problem behaviors because they are aligned with the IEP
process in monitoring the accomplishment of student goals (Shippen, Simpson, & Crites, 2003).

16
 References

Differentiated Instruction

Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of
success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kulik, J., & Kulik, C. (1991). Research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary
perspectives. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the
Gifted and Talented. (RIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 777).

Lou, Y., Abrami, P., Spence, J., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d’Apollonia, S, (1996). Within-class
grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 423-458.

Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., et al.
(2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning
profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal of the
Education of the Gifted, 27, 119-145.

Web Resources

The Access Center. (2004). Enhancing Your Instructional Skills Through Differentiation.
Washington, DC: The Access Center. Available at
http://www.k8accesscenter.org/training_resources/Presentations.asp#differentiation

Hottlinx was developed by the University of Virginia. It provides strategies, lesson plans, unit
plans, and assessments to support differentiated instruction. Available at http://www.hottlinx.org/

Computer Assisted Instruction

Hauser, J., & Malouf, D.B. (1996). A federal perspective on special education technology. Journal
of Learning Disabilities, 29(5), 504–512.

Hitchcock C.H., & Noonan, M.J. (2000). Computer-assisted instruction of early academic skills.
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(3), 145–159.

Hutinger, P.L. (1996). Computer applications in programs for young children with disabilities:
Recurring themes. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 11(2) 105–
115.

Kroesbergen, E.H., & Van Luit, J.E.H. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special
educational needs: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 97–115.

Lahm, E. (1996). Software that engages young children with disabilities: A study of design
features. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 11(2), 115–125.

Office of U.S. Special Education Programs (2000). Twenty-second annual report to Congress,
(Chapter 3, pp. 37–48). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education

Zimmerman, S.O. (1998). Problem-solving tasks on the microcomputer: A look at the

performance of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(10),
637–641.

Web Resources
The Access Center: Improving Outcomes for All Students K – 8. Available at
http://www.k8accesscenter.org. Go to Resource, then Universal Design.

CAST. Available at http://www.cast.org/

17
Concrete, Representations (Semiconcrete), and Abstract Sequence of Mathematics
Instruction (CRA or CSA)

Bruni, J.V., & Silverman, H.J. (1986). Developing concepts in probability and statistics - and much
more. Arithmetic Teacher 33,34-37.

Devlin, K. (2000). Finding your inner mathematician. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 46, B5.

Maccini, P., & Gagnon, J. C. (2000). Best practices for teaching mathematics to secondary
students with special needs. Focus on Exceptional Children, 32, 1–22.

Maccini, P., McNaughton, E., & Ruhl, K. L. (2000). Algebra instruction for students with learning
disabilities: Implications from a research review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 113–
126.

Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Shiah, S. (1991). Mathematics instruction for learning
disabled students: A review of research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 6,
89–98.

Miller, S. P., & Mercer, C. D. (1993). Using data to learn about concrete-semiconcrete-abstract
instruction for students with math disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,
8(2), 89-96.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School
Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM, Inc.

Peterson, S. K., Mercer, C. D., & O'Shea, L. (1988). Teaching learning disabled students
place value using the concrete to abstract sequence. Learning Disabilities Research, 4
(1), 52-56.

Suydam, M.N.; Higgins, J.L. 1977. Activity-based learning in elementary school mathematics:
recommendations from research. Columbus, OH, ERIC Center for Science, Mathematics,
and Environmental Education.

Grouping Strategies

Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, F.P. (2000). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (7th ed.).
Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Shinn, M.R., Walker, H.M., & Stoner, G. (Eds.). (2000). Interventions for academic and behavior
problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches. Bethesda, MD: National Association
of School Psychologists.

Web Resources
Davenport, L.R. (1993). The effects of homogeneous groupings in mathematics. Columbus, OH:
ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education. (ERIC
Document Reproduction Service No. ED359065). Available at
www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed359065.html
Elbaum, B., Moody, S.W., Vaughn, S., Schumm, J.S., & Hughes, M. (2002). The effect of
instructional grouping format on the reading outcomes of students with disabilities: A
meta-analytic review. New York: National Center for Learning Disabilities. Available at
http://www.ncld.org/research/osep_reading.cfm
Johnson, D.T. (2000). Teaching mathematics to gifted students in a mixed-ability classroom.

18
 Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education (ERIC Document
Reproduction Service No. ED441302). Available at
www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed441302.html
North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL). Available at http://www.ncrel.org/
Vaughn, S., Hughes, M.T., Moody, S.W., & Elbaum, B. (2001). Instructional grouping for reading
for students with LD: Implications for practice. Intervention in School and Clinic, 36(3),
131–137. Available at www.ldonline.org/ld_indepth/reading/instructional_grouping.html

Peer Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS)

Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (1998). Researchers and teachers working closely together to adapt
instruction for diverse learners. Learning Disability Research and Practice, 13(3), 126–
137.

Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Karns, K. (2001). Enhancing kindergartners’ mathematical
development: Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies. Elementary School Journal,
101(5), 495–510.

Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Mathes, P.G., & Simmons, D.C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies:
Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research
Journal, 34(1), 174–206.

Mathes, P.G., Howard, J.K., Allen, S.H., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Peer-assisted learning strategies for
first-grade readers: Responding to the needs of diverse learners. Reading Research
Quarterly, 33(1), 62–94.

Web Resources

PALS (Vanderbilt University) http://kc.vanderbilt.edu/kennedy/pals

Peer Assisted Learning Strategies in Reading

http://www.ldonline.org/ld_indepth/reading/peer_assisted.html

Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (2002). Learning accommodations for individuals with special needs.
Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University, John F. Kennedy Center for Research on Human
Development. Available at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/kennedy/programs/lai_main.html.

Professional Collaboration

Carter, B. (2000). The use of team teaching as a means to integrate students with special needs
into the general education classrooms. Huntsville: University of Alabama, Curriculum
Development/ED606.

Coker, D.R. (1994). Collaboration in the classroom: Joint responsibilities of teachers for specified
instruction. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 21(1) 3–7.

Flemming, J.L., & Monda-Amaya, L.E. (2001). Process variable critical for team effectiveness: A
Delphi study of wraparound team members. Remedial and Special Education, 22(3),
158–171.

Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2000). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (3rd ed.).
New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Snell, M.E., & Janney, R. (2000). Teacher's guide to inclusive practices: Collaborative teaching.
Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Walther-Thomas, C., Korinek, L., McLaughlin, V.L., & Williams, B.T. (1999). Collaboration for

19
 inclusive education: Developing successful programs. Boston: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.

Learning Strategies

Alley, G.R., & Deshler, D.D. (1979). Teaching the learning disabled adolescent: Strategies and
methods. Denver, CO: Love.

Graham, S., Harris, K.R., & Reid, R. (1992). Developing self-regulated learners. Focus on
Exceptional Children, 24, 1-16.

Reid, D.K., Hresko, W.P., & Swanson, H.L. (1996). Cognitive approaches to learning disabilities
(3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

Web Resources

Boudah, D.J., & O’Neill, K.J. (1999). Learning strategies. Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on
Disabilities and Gifted Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No.
ED433669) Available at http://searcheric.org/digests/ed433669.html

Muskingum College, Center for Advancement of Learning, (1998). Bibliography of learning

strategies resources. New Concord, OH: Author. Available at
http://muskingum.edu/~cal/database/bibliography.html

NICHCY. (1997a). Interventions for students with learning disabilities (News Digest 25).
Washington, DC: National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities. Available
at http://www.nichcy.org/pubs/newsdig/nd25txt.htm

NICHCY. (1997b). Learning strategies for students with learning disabilities (Resource List 14).
Washington, DC: National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities. Available
at http://www.nichcy.org/pubs/bibliog/bib14txt.htm

University of Kansas, Center for Research on Learning. Available at

http://www.ku-crl.org/publications/index.html

Mnemonics

Forness, S.R., Kavale, K.A., Blum, I.M., & Lloyd, J.W. (1997). Mega-analysis of meta-analysis:
What works in special education and related services. Teaching Exceptional Children,
29(6), 4–9.

Mastropieri, M.A., Sweda, J., & Scruggs, T.E. (2000). Teacher use of mnemonic strategy
instruction. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 69–74.

Swanson, H.L. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of
treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford Press.

Uberti, H.Z., Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (2003). Keywords make the difference: Mnemonic
instruction in inclusive classrooms. Teaching Exceptional Children, 10(3), 56–61.

Web Resources

The Access Center. (2003). Using mnemonics to facilitate access to the general education
curriculum. Washington, DC: The Access Center. Available at
http://www.k8accesscenter.org/training_resources/Mnemonics.asp

Current Practice Alerts: A focus on mnemonic instruction. Available at

http://www.teachingld.org/ld_resources/alerts/5.htm

20
Tutorial on Mnemonics by Division of Learning Disabilities of CEC (Member’s only section of
website) Available at www.teachingld.org

Also see references for Learning Strategies section.

Adapted Books and Text

Beck, J. (2002). Emerging literacy through assistive technology. Teaching Exceptional Children,
35(2), 44–48.

Curry, C. (2003). Universal design: Accessibility for all learners. Educational Leadership,

Higgins, K., Boone, R., & Lovitt, T.C. (2002). Adapting challenging textbooks to improve content
area learning. In M.A. Shinn, H.M. Walker, & G. Stoner, (Eds.), Interventions for
academic and behavioral problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches, (pp.755–
790), Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

Lewis, S., & Tolla, J. (2003) Creating and using tactile experience books for young children with
visual impairments. Teaching Exceptional Children 35(3), 22–28.

Technology specialists in your district

Web Resources

CAST. Available at http://www.cast.org/

Products for Special Needs & Education. Mayer Johnson, Inc. Available at
http://www.mayerjohnson.com/

Robinson, L. (2000). Adapting literacy activities for young children. Macomb, IL: Center for Best
Practices in Early Childhood. Available at
www.wiu.edu/users/mimacp/wiu/articles/adaptlit.html

Literacy Rich Environments

Higgins, K., Boone, R., & Lovitt, T.C. (2002). Adapting challenging textbooks to improve content
area learning. In M.A. Shinn, H.M. Walker, & G. Stoner, (Eds.), Interventions for
academic and behavioral problems II: Preventive and remedial Approaches, (pp 755–
790), Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

Katims, D., & Pierce, P. (1995). Literacy-rich environments and the transition of young children
with special needs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 15(2), 219–234.

Web Resources

Gunn, B.K., Simmons, D.C., & Kameenui, E.J. (1995). Emergent literacy: A synthesis of the
research. Eugene, OR: National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators. Available at
http://idea.uoregon.edu:16080/~ncite/documents/techrep/tech19.html

Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (1999) Language and literacy environments in preschool.
Champaign, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education.
Available at http://ericece.org/pubs/digests/ed426818.html

Whitehurst, G.J. (2003) Classroom Literacy Environment Checklist. New York: National Center
for Learning Disabilities. Available at
http://www.getreadytoread.org/pdfs/School_Environ_Scan.pdf

21
Curriculum-Based Measurement

Deno, S.L., Fuchs, L.S., Marston, D., & Shinn, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to
establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology
Review, 30, 507-524.

Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Karns, K., Hamlett, C.L., Dutka, S., & Katzaroff, M. (2000). The Good III,
importance of providing background information on the structure and scoring of
performance assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 13(1), 83–121.

R.H., & Kaminski, R.A. (1996). Assessment for instructional decisions: Toward a
proactive/prevention model of decision-making for early literacy skills. School Psychology
Quarterly, (7), 326–336.

Howell, K.W., & Nolet, V. (2000). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making
(3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.

Phillips, N.B., Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1994). Effects of classwide curriculum-based
measurement and peer-tutoring: A collaborative researcher-practitioner interview study.
Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(7), 420–434.

Shinn, M.R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New
York: The Guilford Press.

Web Resources

Roberts, M., Marshall, J., Nelson, R., & Albers, C. (2001) Curriculum-based assessment
procedures embedded within functional behavioral assessments. School Psychology
Review, 30, 264–277. Available at
http://www.ldonline.org/ld_indepth/research_digest/fba.html

Wright, J. (n.d.).Curriculum-based measurement: A manual for teachers. Syracuse, NY: Author.

Available at http://www.jimwrightonline.com/pdfdocs/cbaManual.pdf

Functional Behavior Assessments

Horner, R.H., & Carr, E.G. (1997). Behavioral support for students with severe disabilities:
Functional assessment and comprehensive intervention. Journal of Special Education,
31(1), 84–109.

Shippen, M.E., Simpson, R.G., & Crites, S.A. (2003). A practical guide to functional behavioral
assessment. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(5), 36–44.

Snell, M. and Janney, R. (2000). Behavioral supports (Teacher’s guides to inclusive practices
series). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Web Resources

Miller, J.A. (2001). Multimodal Functional Behavioral Assessment. Bethesda, MD: National
Association of School Psychologists. Available at
http://www.naspcenter.org/teachers/idea_multimodal.html

Miller, J.A., Tansy, M., & Hughes, T.L. (1998). Functional behavioral assessment: The link
between problem behavior and effective intervention in schools. Current Issues in
Education, 1(5). Available at http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume1/number5/

Office of Special Education Programs Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral

Interventions & Supports. Available at http://www.pbis.org/

Office of Special Education Programs. (2000). Twenty-second annual report to Congress.

22
 Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Available at
http://www.ed.gov/offices/OSERS/OSEP/Products/OSEP2000AnlRpt/index.html

For additional information on this or other topics, please contact The

Access Center at [email protected].

The Access Center: Improving Outcomes for All Students K-8

The Access Center is a cooperative agreement (H326K020003)
funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special
Education Programs, awarded to the American Institutes for Research
1000 Thomas Jefferson St. NW, Washington, DC 20007
Ph: 202-403-5000 TTY: 877-334-3499 Fax: 202-403-5001
e-mail: [email protected] website: www.k8accesscenter.org

This report was produced under U.S. Department of Education Grant # H326K020003 with the
American Institutes for Research. Jane Hauser served as the project officer. The views expressed herein do not
necessarily represent the positions or policies of the Department of Education. No official endorsement by the
U.S. Department of Education of any product, commodity, service or enterprise mentioned in this publication
is intended or should be inferred.

23