Wall Slab

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 43

WALL SLAB

A CONVENTIONAL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

ARCH 3104 GROUP 01


ROLL 17090 01 - 09
Conventional Structural Systems

1. WALL – SLAB 2. POST – SLAB 3. POST – LINTEL


Wall-Slab

1. Definition
2. Load Distribution Technique
3. Under Ground/Foundation
4. Materials
5. Pre-Casting Wall
6. Pros & Cons
7. Comparison to Other Structures
01
Definitions Of Wall-Slab
Continuous or linear support system to distribute loads to
the ground by using only load bearing wall and slabs.
A load bearing wall is a type of wall which bears load given
on top of it without the help of column. This system acts by
conducting the given weight to a foundation structure.
02
Load Transferring System:
Load transfer method :
• Liv e Load & Dead Load

• Slab

• Wall

• Footing

• Ground
Load distribution :

Square type plan Rectangular type plan


Structural Members
1. Vertical load bearing member – WALL

Types of arrangements :
• Cellular wall arrangements : This whole system
works actively when the external wall is connected
to the internal walls by creating a cellular wall
arrangements.

• Simple cross wall arrangements : when


the construction of the building requires to build
identical rooms similar to typical hostel rooms,
this arrangement is used.
• Double cross arrangements : Keeping the same
layout parallelly across each other
with a cross wall connections.

• Complex wall arrangement :


Example of Cellular Wall arrangement with Two way slab

Sham laal house, New Delhi. Ground floor plan


Example of Double cross arrangement with one way slab

Municipal housing development


MIES VAN DER ROHE
Example of Complex wall arrangement with one way slab

Bhatshala house,
Bashirul Haque.
Structural Members
2. Horizontal load bearing member – SLAB
Types of arrangements :
• One way slab : Length or width should be more than or equal to 2
• Two way slab : Length or width should be less than or equal to 2
• Waffle : Suitable for large span

One Way Slab Two Way Slab Waffle


Openning in Wall Slab :

• Opening should not be more than 30% of the load bearing wall.
• Lintel or arch frame is used
• Floor to wall opening can be made
• Continuous horizontal opening must be avoided
• Small opening is preferred.
• For large openings ,arches are provided.
• Opening is of trabeated or arcuate system.
Position of Stair

• Landing should be supported by load bearing wall


• Wall in both sides is the main structural members
• Parallel wall in two sides can also provide support
• Arch can also provide support to stairs

Load
Parallel
bearing
walls
walls
Span
• Economic span: 15 ft

• Maximum span: 20ft

• Wall thickness: 10-15 in

• Large span of roof is problematic but it can


be solved by waffle slab
Punch Making Method
• Generally punch cannot be possible
• Only a punch can appear on first floor with respect to four walls around it
• Punch cannot be done 1/3 of the area of the roof

One Way Slab Two Way Slab


Sham Laal House, New Delhi.

Ground floor plan First floor plan


Rewal House, Rajrewal

Ground floor plan First floor plan


Wall Position, Height & Thickness

• Primarily 12” at six storey level and increases 4” at every one storey down.
• For buildings not more than 3 stories or 35’ in height, masonry walls may be 12” thick.
• One storied solid masonry walls not more than 9’ high may be 10” thick.
• Position of walls are same.
• Plans follow no grid pattern , it can be any desired shape.
• Unusually small punches are provided in elevation
• For large openings arches are provided
• For hot dry climate this type of structure gives extra benefit.
• Screen wall can be added.
Other Design Considerations
• Large ,unbroken plans could be expressed
• Arch, dome, and vaults can be constructed in this type of structure
• Solid void relation is boldly represented
• Slab thickness generally 8”
Cantilever
Generally no cantilever is used.

Materials
Reinforced concrete slab with wooden , brick or stone walls.

Cost and time


Low rise buildings – This system represents economy, generally low cost construction
Foundation – More shallow than other systems.
Construction period – Larger than other systems.
Wall Footing
• It consists of several courses of bricks, the lowest course being usually twice the breadth of the
wall above.
• The increased base width of the wall is archived by providing 5cm offset on either side of the
wall.
• The depth of the each course is usually 10cm, in some cases 20cm.
• The depth of lean concrete bed is normally less than 15cm.
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
• Load bearing masonry is durable • Slow process

• It is fire resistant • Requires skilled masons

• High compressive strength • Low tensile

• Aesthetically attractive strength, can fail


during earthquakes
• Low cost
• High self-weight
• Environment friendly
• Poor thermal insulation
• Easy construction
properties
• True expression of brick

• This type of structure lasted for thousand years

• For hot dry climate this type of structure gives


extra benefit.
CASE STUDY-01
FALLING WATER, MILL RUN, PENNSYLVANIA
ARCHITECT FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT
CONCEPT
• Organic Architecture
• Close relationship to the glen,
the trees, the foliage and wild
flowers
• The glory of the natural
surrounding is brought in as
part of the daily life.
• Spaces are designed to bring
nature into the four walls.

FORM
GENERATION
Horizontal & vertical
lines are distinctive
features of the building
* Load bearing area
* Natural zone
* Here in projects for 50 % and 70 %
cantilever double slab used
PARGOLA AS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT
Wall position on slab
CASE STUDY-02
THE FRIENDSHIP CENTRE,GAIBANDHA,BANGLADESH
•The Friendship Center near the district town
of gaibandha Bangladesh, is for an NGO which works
ARCHITECT Kashef Mahboob Chowdhury/URBANA with some of the poorest in the country and who live
Area: 2897.0 sqm mainly in riverine islands (chars) with very limited
MaterialsSpecialized bricks access and opportunities.
CONCEPT

As in construction, so in conception - the complex of the centre rise and exist as echo of ruins, alive with the
memory of the remains of Mahasthan (3rd century BC), some sixty kilometers away. Constructed and finished
primarily of one material - local hand- made bricks - the spaces arc woven out of pavilions, courtyards, pools
and greens; corridors and shadows.

Simplicity is the intent, monastic is the fee


THE PLAN IS DEVIDED IN TWO FUNCTIONAL CIRCULATION:
PARTS-
• No grid pattern and freedom of planning.
KA BLOCK – Public activities • Inter connection between spaces, joy of exploring.
• Corridor system- Short span corridor in public zone ( 2’6”)
KHA BLOCK – More private spaces and long span corridor(5’) in private zone.
• Large courtyard in public zone and small courtyard and
Pools and service room pathway in residential zone.
SPATIAL PROPERTIES:
More open spaces – Pavillions, Courtyards,
Pools and Greens.
Open places help in ventilation and cooling.
Image of a Buddhist Monastary.
Inter Woven Mat of Volumes.
• Mostly one way slab
• Small openings
• Span 12’6”
• Stair has parallel load bearing wall on
both sides.
• Openings comperatively more than in
wall slab system.
• Extensive network of septic tank
• Made of brick, Environmental friendly.
CASE STUDY-03
RAMKRISHNA HOUSE
ARCHITECT CHARLES CORREA
Area: 2897.0 sqm
MaterialsSpecialized bricks
Load Transfer System Wall Slab and stair
and Orientation position
CASE STUDY-04
National archives, Agargaon

Name of the Architect: Muzharul Islam


Structural system: Wall-slab
CASE STUDY-05
Architect’s own residence, Indira road
Name of the Architect: Bashirul Haq
Structural system: Wall-slab
CASE STUDY-06
Casa Bianchi

Architect: Mario Botta


Structural system: Wall-slab
CASE STUDY-07
House in Pregassona
ARCHITECT: Mario Botta
CASE STUDY-08
Casa Rotonda
ARCHITECT Mario Botta
THANK YOU

You might also like