02 Bridge Construction Method
02 Bridge Construction Method
02 Bridge Construction Method
1
COURSE OUTLINE
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION METHODS
Part I- Introduction
2
I. INTRODUCTION
3
I.1
a) Main Bridge Components
a.1) Superstructure
Horizontal portion of the bridge
which spans the obstacle.
a.2) Substructure
Supports the superstructure and
transmits the dead and live loads to
the foundation. It accommodates
adequate resistance to vertical and
lateral loads.
I.2 4
b. Types of Bridge Foundation
b.1)Spread Footing
A large water tight chamber within which work is done under water, as on the
bridge pier.
I.3 5
Parts of An Abutment
wingwall
backwall
bridge seat
footing
Diaphragm Gravity
7
I.5
Piers
I.6
8
Common Types Of Pier
I.8 10
II. Classification of Bridges
o Temporary Bridge
o Permanent Bridge
II.2
12
Types of Bridge Based on
Materials Used
o Timber Bridge
o Steel Bridge
o Concrete Bridge
II.3
13
Types of Timber Bridge
– Timber Trestle
– Log Bridge
6 meter clear
II.4
14
Types of Concrete Bridge
• CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE
BRIDGE
• PRE-CAST CONCRETE
BRIDGE
II.5
15
Sample of Cast-in-place Concrete
Bridges
II.6
16
Sample Section Of Pre-cast
Concrete Girder Bridges
II.7
17
Types of Bridge Based on System
of Design or according to types of
supporting structure used
• Simple span-Consisting of a separate
beam for each span, supported at one
end by fixed bearing and the other
end by expansion bearing.
II.9
19
Samples of Steel Bridges
– Bailey Bridge
II.10
20
Sample Simply Supported Span
M F M F M F M F
II.11
21
Sample Continuous Span
M F F F F F F M
II.12
22
Sample Cantilever Bridge
II.13
23
Sample Cable-stayed Bridge
II.14
24
Types of Bridge Based on
Roadway Location
Deck Type
Bailey Panels
Through Type
II.15
25
Types of Bridge according to
Form and Structural Stresses
II.16
26
BAMBAN – Nielsen Bridge,
TARLAC
II.17
27
PART III- Construction of Bridge
Foundation
III-A. ACCESSIBILITY
III-A.1
28
III-A.1 Embankment
Craneway
III-A.2
29
III-A.2 Structural Steel
Craneway
30
III-A.3
• A temporary wall installed to exclude water to allow construction work within
the area protected by the cofferdam.
Abut. "A"
III-A.6
33
III-B. BRIDGE FOUNDATION
III-B.1 Pre-cast
Concrete Piles
8 PCS
25 MM RSB
4 PCS
7 WIRE
STRANDS
34
III-B.1a
Fabrication of R. C. /
Prestressed
Concrete Pile
After the result of test pile is reviewed and
evaluated by the Engineer as well as the
issuance of instruction on the fabrication
length of the piles, fabrication and casting of
piles shall commence.
Reinforcing steel bars shall be pre-assembled
at steel fabrication area and shall be installed
using suitable lifting equipment assisted by
manpower.
Concrete to be poured shall be in accordance
with the required specification. Curing of
piles shall be done by continuous watering or
by continuously wet burlap covering the
exposed surface of the piles.
Stockpiling of piles shall be limited to 3 layers
and shall be supported by wood block in
between the piles. Only designated lifting
points shall be used in lifting the piles.
35
III-B.1g
•Forms at but end should be perpendicular to the vertical axis.
•For segmental piles, provision of pipe sleeves for 1st segment and dowels for the 2nd segm
CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS :
A. FABRICATION STAGE
36
CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS :
A. DRIVING STAGE
37
IMPORTANT NOTES :
38
a. Photo showing the
Fabrication of R.C. Piles
39
III-B.1h
Lifting of Piles
40
c. Delivery of Fabricated
Concrete Piles
41
III-B.1j
Driving Equipment
o Drop Hammer
o Single Acting Hammer
o Double Acting Hammer
o Diesel Hammer
o Vibratory Hammer
42
III-B.1b
Drop Hammer
Disadvantages- 1) slow rate of driving
2)Cannot be used underwater,3)danger
of damaging piles,4)heavy vibration
43
III-B.1c
The Importance of Test Piles
TEST PILE DATA
44
III-B.1d
Single acting hammer
Is a freely falling weight
Disadvantages-1)require more
investment
2)More complicated/high
maintenance cost
3)More time to set up/take
down,
4)require large operating crew
45
III-B.1e
Double acting hammer
46
III-B.1f
STAKE OUT SURVEY
a. Establish the alignment of the bridge
structure and the location of
Abutments and Piers based from the
known reference elevation and
coordinates provided in the approved
plans
47
STAKE OUT SURVEY
48
f. Proper Sequence of Driving Each
Pile in Pile Groups
49
III-B.1m
Methods of Splicing Piles
0.40 x 0.40 m.
R.C. Piles
4 meters
o Splice Can
o Build-up
0.40 m.
o Structural Epoxy
Male/Female
0.40 x 0.40 m.
R.C. Piles
50
III-B.1n
g. Importance of Driving Each Pile
Continuously
51
III-B.1o
Equipment: Diesel Hammer
52
III-B.1p
TEST PILE DATA
TEST PILE DATA
53
III-B.1q
Summary of Pile Driving Data
MARK GROUND DATE TOTAL TOTAL AVE. FALL OF COMPUTED FINAL TIP PAY TOP OF
PENETRATION BEARING
OF PENETRATION PENETRATION LENGTH PILE
FOR LAST 20 POWER,
PILE ELEV. (M) DRIVEN (M) BLOWS (mm) (MM/BLOW) RAM (mm) (KN) ELEV. (M) L.M. ELEV.(M)
1-A 1.00 10/25/02 17.47 362 18.08 1,600.00 352.50 -16.47 18.00 1.53
1-B 1.00 10/25/02 17.47 336 16.79 1,500.00 346.40 -16.47 18.00 1.53
1-C 1.00 10/25/02 17.47 336 16.79 1,500.00 346.40 -16.47 18.00 1.53
1-D 1.00 10/25/02 17.47 336 16.79 1,500.00 346.40 -16.47 18.00 1.53
54
III-B.1r
III-B.2 STEEL PILES
Common Types of Steel Piles
• H-Pile
• Monotube Piles
55
III-B.2a
Typical H-Pile Section
Flange
Width =
0.30 m.
56
III-B.2b
Structural Steel H-pile Driving
57
III-B.2c
Driving of Tubular Piles
58
III-B.2d
COMPLETED DRIVING OF
H-PILES
59
III-B.2e
Types of Monotube Piles
Tapering Uniform
Diameter
60
III-B.2f
STAKE OUT SURVEY
a. Establish the alignment of the bridge
structure and the location of
Abutments and Piers based from the
known reference elevation and
coordinates provided in the approved
plans
61
STAKE OUT SURVEY
62
DRIVEN MONOTUBE PILES
63
III-B.2g
III-B.3 COFFERDAM
64
III-B.3a
STEEL COFFERDAM
65
III-B.3b
B.3 Steel Cofferdam
66
III-B.3c
Excavation Works
67
III-B.3d
Shoring/timbering Works
69
III-B.3f
Exercise Number 1
70
III-B.4 Bored Pile
Advantages Over
Driven Piles
o Larger sections
o Can penetrate hard layers
o Adapts to different depths
o Risk of false refusal is
eradicated
o Less vibration and not
noisy
o Fast execution
o More economical
III-B.4a 71
Disadvantages
oRequires specialized
personnel
oRisk of disturbed soil
around the pile
oRisk of poor contact at
the base
oFrequently difficult to
keep site clean
III-B.4b 72
Drilling Rig
III-B.4c 73
Bored Pile Attachments
III-B.4d 74
FABRICATED STEEL
CASING FOR BORED PILES
III-B.4e 75
Steel Casing for Bored Pile
foundation (Calibrated)
III-B.4f 76
Driving of steel casing
with adequate falsework.
III-B.4g 77
Driving of Steel Casing
III-B.4h 78
BAR BENDER FOR SPIRAL
STEEL CAGE BARS FOR
BORED PILE
III-B.4i 79
Assembly of Reinforcing Steel
Cage Bars for Bored Piles
III-B.4j 80
An Auger
III-B.4k 81
A Few Notes About Drilling
III-B.4l 82
III-B.4m 83
Drilling using auger
III-B.4n 84
Sounding Cable to determine
the actual depth of borehole
III-B.4i 85
Soil Penetration Test Is Measured
and No of Blows Counted.
III-B.4j 86
No of Blows Is the N Value
III-B.4k 87
Installation of Rebar Cage
III-B.4l 88
Desanding of Contaminated
Bentonite Suspension
III-B.4m 89
Are Also Used to Secure a Clean
Borehole Bottom
III-B.4n 90
Installation of tremie Set
III-B.4o 91
Concreting Stage
o Cleaning of Borehole Bottom
o Assembly /Installation of
Tremie Set
o Concreting
o Depth Monitoring
o Shortening of Tremie Pipe
o Overpouring of Dirty
Concrete
III-B.4p 92
Concrete Pourin of Bored Pile
III-B.4.q 93
Concrete Pouring
III-B.4.r 94
Shortening of tremie Set
III-B.4.s 95
Concreting During The Night
III-B.4.t 96
Newly Completed Bored Pile
III-B.4.u 97
First Stage
Drilling Works
Drilling
Bucket Temporary/Permanent Steel
Casing, 10mm thk.
Ground Slurry
Level Level
Water
Table 1.50m
pw
ps
III-B.4.v 98
Second Stage
Reinforcement Cage
Ground Slurry
Level Level
Water
Table 1.50m
Cage Bar
0.20 – 0.30m
p
pw
ps
The Bentonite / Super Mud must be checked before the cage is positioned
III-B.4.w 99
Third Stage
Pouring of Concrete
Concrete Funnel
Mud
Ground Slurry
Level Level
Water
Table 1.50m
Tremie Pipe
2.50m minimum
pw
ps
III-B.4.x 100
Methods of Testing Completed Bored
Piles
III-B.4.y 101
By Crosshole Logging Method
III-B.4.z 102
Low Strain Dynamic Testing Requires Only the
Impact Caused by a Small Hand Held
Hammer
III-B.4.x 103
Striking Hammer Lifted and Then
Dropped to the Top of the Pile
III-B.4.y 104
High Strain Dynamic Testing Force and Velocity
Records Are Continuously Viewed From the PDA
Monitor for Each Blow to Evaluate Data Quality, the
Maximum Hammer Energy Delivered to the Pile,
Pile Integrity, Pile Stresses and Other Pertinent
Information.
III-B.4.z 105
III-B.4.aa 106
III-B.4.bb 107
III-B.4.cc 108
III-B.5 CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGE FOOTING,
SHAFT AND COPING
III-B.5.a 109
CONCRETE POURING OF BRIDGE FOOTING
III-B.5.b 110
Installation Reinforcing Steel
Bars for Footing.
• Types of Rebars
• Handling and Storage
III-B.5.c 111
Installation of Forms for Footing
III-B.5.d 112
Concreting of Footing
III-B.5.e 113
Installation of Rebars For Column/
Shaft
III-B.5.f 114
Installation of Rebars for Coping
Beam
III-B.5.g 115
Installation of Forms For Coping
Beam
III-B.5.h 116
Constructed Substructure
III-B.5.i 117
Exercise Number 2
118
III C. BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURE
III-C.1 R.C. Deck Girder
o Girder
o Diaphragm
o Deck Slab
o Bridge Railing and
Sidewalk
III-C.1a 119
III-C BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURES
a. Falsework for the
Construction of
RCDG Bridge
III-C.1b 120
Installation of Bottom Forms for
Girders
III-C.1d 121
Installation of Side Forms
III-C.1e 122
b. Concrete Pouring of Girders
III-C.1c 123
Installation of RSB Deck Slab
III-C.1.f 124
III-C.2 PSC GIRDERS
• Preparation of Casting Bed
III-C.2.a 125
Cleaning/Aligning of Moulds
III-C.2.b 126
Cutting/Bending and
Assembly of Rebars
III-C.2.c 127
Securing a Duct Tube
III-C.2.d 128
Typical Duct Joint Detail
III-C.2.e 129
III-C.2.f 130
Mixing/placing of Concrete
III-C.2.g 131
Introduction to Pre-stressed Concrete
III-C.2.h 132
Placing of Anchorage
Assembly
III-C.2.i 133
Plain Neoprene Bearing
Pads
III-C.2.j 134
Laminated Elastomeric Bearing Pad
Elastomer Layers
III-C.2.k 135
Erection
III-C.2.l 136
Installation of Forms and
Bracings for Deck Slab
III-C.2.m 137
Why Use T-girder Instead of I-
girder?
III-C.2.n 138
Preparation for Deck Slab Pour
III-C.2.o 139
Concrete Pouring of Deck Slab
III-C.2.p 140
Slump and Cylinder Tests
III-C.2.q 141
Concrete Finishing
III-C.2.r 142
Pouring Sequence
III-C.2.s 143
Pouring Sequence
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
STEP 1
ERECTION OF GIRDERS
STEP 2
POURING OF INTERMEDIATE
AND END DIAPHRAMS
STEP 3
POURING OF CONNECTION
DIAPHRAMS
STEP 5
III-C.2.t 144
Pre-cast Bridge Railings
III-C.2.u 145
Types of Concrete Finishing
III-C.2.v 146
III-C.3 Steel Bridges
III-C.3.a 147
Shear Studs for Composite Action
III-C.3.b 148
III-C.3.c 149
Transport
III-C.3.d 150
Splice Plate Used to Splice the
Joints in Steel Girders
III-C.3.e 151
Sample Steel Truss Bridge
III-C.3.f 152
Sample Steel Truss Bridge
III-C.3.g 153
Its Reinforced Concrete Deck
III-C.3.h 154
Concrete Sidewalk
III-C.3.i 155
Bridge Drain
for Steel Girder Bridge
III-C.3.j 156
Expansion Dam
• Strip seal
• Sliding Plate
• Finger Type
III-C.3.k 157
Finger Type
III-C.3.l 158
Strip seal
III-C.3.m 159
Pre Molded Joint Filler
III-C.3.n 160
Bridge Bearings
It provides an allowance in the bridge for all
anticipated movements which will usually be
in the longitudinal direction
III-C.3.o 161
Classification of Bearings
• Fixed
• Expansion
III-C.3.p 162
Types of Bearing
III-C.3.q 163
Neoprene Bearing Pad
III-C.3.q 164
Setting of Anchor Bolts
III-C.3.r 165
Pot Bearings
III-C.3.s 166
Spherical Bearings
III-C.5.t 167
Sliding Plates
III-C.3.u 168
III - C.4 SUSPENSION
BRIDGE/CABLE-
STAYED BRIDGE
• The cable-stayed bridge is optimal
for spans longer than cantilever
bridges, and shorter
than suspension bridges. This is
the range where cantilever bridges
would rapidly grow heavier if the
span were lengthened, and
suspension bridge cabling would
not be more economical if the
span were shortened.
III-C.4.c 169
III-C.4 CABLE-STAYED
BRIDGE
• A cable-stayed bridge has one or
more towers (or pylons), from
which cables support the bridge
deck.
• There are two major classes of
cable-stayed
bridges: harp and fan.
• In the harp design, the cables are
nearly parallel so that the height
of their attachment to the tower
is proportional to the distance
from the tower to their mounting
on the deck.
III-C.4.a 170
III-C.4 CABLE-STAYED
BRIDGE
• In the fan design, the cables all
connect to or pass over the top of the
towers. The fan design is structurally
superior with minimum moment
applied to the towers but for practical
reasons the modified fan is preferred
especially where many cables are
necessary. In the modified fan
arrangement the cables terminate
near to the top of the tower but are
spaced from each other sufficiently to
allow better termination, improved
environmental protection, and good
access to individual cables for
maintenance.
III-C.4.b 171
SUSPENSION BRIDGE
III-C.4.b 172
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE,
FAN DESIGN
III-C.4.c 173
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE
HARP DESIGN
III-C.4.d 174
III - C.5 Arch Bridge
III-C.5.b 176
IV. COMMON PROBLEMS IN
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
YN1
CAUSES
1. INADEQUATE LATERAL SUPPORT
2. SQUARE HOLES NOT ALIGNED VERTICALLY
3. PILE TIP STRIKE A BOULDER
REMEDIAL MEASURE
1. REMOVE AND REPLACE OR CONSULT THE
DESIGNER
IV-1 177
Slide 177
GROUND LINE
IV-2 178
B. BREAKING OF PILE BUTT
DURING DRIVING
CAUSES
REMEDIAL MEASURE
1. REPAIR THE PILE BUTT
IV-3 179
B. BREAKING OF PILE BUTT
DURING DRIVING
CAUSES
REMEDIAL MEASURE
1. REPAIR THE PILE BUTT
IV-4 180
B. BREAKING OF PILE BUTT
DURING DRIVING
GROUND LINE
IV-5 181
C.BREAKING / FRACTURING OF PILES
CAUSES
1. LACK OF LATERAL SUPPORT
2. EXCESSIVE DRIVING
3. OVERWEIGHT HAMMER
4. WEAK CONCRETE
5. IMPROPER LIFTING OF PILES
REMEDIAL MEASURES
1. REMOVE AND REPLACE
IV-6 182
C.BREAKING / FRACTURING OF PILES
GROUND LINE
IV-7 183
D. FAILURE OF PILE TO PENETRATE THE
REQUIRED PENETRATION
CAUSES
1. PRESENCE OF HARD STRATA
2. HAMMER USED IS VERY LIGHT
3. USED OF INAPPROPRIATE TYPE OF PILES
4. USED OF INAPPROPRIATE TYPE DRIVING
EQUIPMENT
POSSIBLE REMEDIAL MEASURES
1. CHANGE THE FOUNDATION DESIGN
2. USED APPROPRIATE TYPE OF PILES AND
EQUIPMENT
IV-8 184
D. FAILURE OF PILE TO PENETRATE THE
REQUIRED PENETRATION
GROUND LINE
HARD STRATA
IV-9 185
E. FAILURE TO PASS THE LOAD TEST
CAUSE
1. UNDERLYING STRATA IS SOFT
REMEDIAL MEASURE
1. SPLICE THE PILES
IV-10 186
E. FAILURE TO PASS THE LOAD TEST
GROUND LINE
SOFT STRATA
IV-11 187
BORED PILE CONSTRUCTION
DRILLING WORKS
CAUSE
1. PRESENCE OF OBSTRUCTION
IV-12 188
PERMANENT STEEL CASING CAN NOT
PENETRATE
VIBRO HAMMER
CRANE
STEEL CASING
GROUND LINE
OBSTRUCTION
IV-13 189
CAVE-IN DURING DRILLING
CAUSES
1. PRESENCE OF COLLAPSIBLE MATERIALS
SUCH AS LOOSE SOIL AND COHESSIONLESS
MATERIALS
2. APPROPRIATE PROPERTIES OF STABILIZING
MUD WAS NOT USED
3. HEAD PRESSURE OF STABILIZING MUD
WAS NOT MAINTAINED DURING DRILLING
4. EARTH MOVEMENT DUE TO TREMOR OR
VIBRATION BY HEAVY EQUIPENTS.
REMEDIAL MEASURE
1. EXTEND THE DEPTH OF PERMANENT STEEL
CASING
IV-14 190
CAVE-IN DURING DRILLING
KELLY BAR
GROUND LINE
STEEL CASING
DRILLING BUCKET
IV-15 191
DRILLING BUCKET CANNOT BE RAISED
UP / REMOVED
CAUSE
1. DEFORMATION OF THE TIP OF THE PERMANENT STEEL CASING
2. LARGE VOLUME OF CAVE-IN MATERIALS OVER THE DRILLING
BUCKET
REMEDIAL MEASURE
1. UNDERWATER CUTING OF STEEL CASING
2. REMOVAL OF CAVE-IN MATERIALS
3. ADJUST THE POSITION OF PILE
IV-16 192
DRILLING BUCKET CANNOT BE RAISED
UP / REMOVED
CAUSE
1. DEFORMATION OF THE TIP OF THE PERMANENT STEEL CASING
2. LARGE VOLUME OF CAVE-IN MATERIALS OVER THE DRILLING
BUCKET
REMEDIAL MEASURE
1. UNDERWATER CUTING OF STEEL CASING
2. REMOVAL OF CAVE-IN MATERIALS
3. ADJUST THE POSITION OF PILE
IV-17 193
DRILLING BUCKET CANNOT BE RAISED
UP / REMOVED
KELLY BAR
GROUND LINE
STEEL CASING
DRILLING BUCKET
IV-18 194
DRILLING BUCKET CANNOT BE RAISED
UP / REMOVED
KELLY BAR
GROUND LINE
STEEL CASING
DRILLING BUCKET
IV-19 195
DRILLING BUCKET CANNOT PENETRATE
CAUSE
1. DEFORMATION OF STEEL CASING
2. PRESENCE OF HARD STRATA OR EXISTING
STRUCTURES
REMEDIAL MEASURES
1. REMOVAL & REINSTALLATION OF STEEL
CASING
2. USE APPROPRIATE DRILLING TOOLS
IV-20 196
DRILLING BUCKET CANNOT PENETRATE
KELLY BAR
GROUND LINE
STEEL CASING
DRILLING BUCKET
HARD STRATA
IV-21 197
BREAKING / CUTTING-OFF OF KELLY
BAR
CAUSE
1. DEFECTIVE OR OVERSTRESSED
REMEDIAL MEASURE
1. OFFSETTING THE POSITION OF PILES
2. RETRIEVE THE CUT PORTION USING DIVERS
IV-22 198
BREAKING / CUTTING-OFF OF
KELLY BAR
KELLY BAR
GROUND LINE
STEEL CASING
DRILLING BUCKET
IV-23 199
REBAR CAGE INSTALLATION
1. REBAR CAGE CANNOT BE LOWERED
AT GRADE ELEVATION CAUSES
2. BOREHOLE IS NOT STRAIGHT
3. REBAR CAGE ARE NOT STRAIGHT &
SPLICING OF REBAR CAGE NOT
VERTICALLY STRAIGHT
4. OCCURRENCE OF CAVE-IN
IV-24 200
REBAR CAGE CANNOT BE
LOWERED AT GRADE ELEVATION
GROUND LINE
STEEL CASING
CAGE BAR
IV-25 201
FALLING-OFF REBAR CAGE
CAUSES
1. WEAK/ABSENCE OF STIFINING RING
SUPPORT
2. INSUFFICIENT WELDING AND TIE WIRE AT
SPLICE SECTION
REMEDIAL MEASURE
1. REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT
IV-26 202
FALLING-OFF REBAR CAGE
GROUND LINE
STEEL CASING
CAGE BAR
IV-27 203
CONCRETE POURING
1. OCCURRENCE OF CAVE-IN
CAUSES
1. HEAD PRESSURE OF STABILIZING MUD NOT MAINTAINED
DURING POURING
2. STRONG EARTH VIBRATION CAUSE BY EARTH TREMOR
AND MOVEMENTS OF HEAVY EQUIPMENTS.
IV-28 204
OCCURRENCE OF CAVE-IN
GROUND LINE
STEEL CASING
TREMIE PIPES
CAGE BAR
1. OCCURENCE OF CAVE-IN
IV-29 205
DISCONTINUITY OF CONCRETE
CAUSE
1. BREAKDOWN OF BATCHING PLANT
IV-23 206
DISCONTINUITY OF CONCRETE
GROUND LINE
STEEL CASING
TREMIE PIPES
CAGE BAR
2. DISCONTINUITY OF CONCRETE
IV-24 207
CLOGGING OF TREMIE PIPES
CAUSES
1. CONSISTENCY OF CONCRETE NOT PROPERLY MONITORED
2. RATE OF DISCHARGE OF CONCRETE IS VERY FAST
3. PRESENCE OF WATER INSIDE THE TREMIE PIPES
4. OVERSIZED AGGREGATES
REMEDIAL MEASURE
1. REMOVAL AND REINSTALLATION OF TREMIE PIPES
IV-25 208
PILE INTEGRITY SHOWS
DISCONTINUITY OR DIRTY CONCRETE
CAUSE
1. PRESENCE OF SEDIMENTS DUE TO
ABSENCE OR INSUFFICIENT
CLEANING OF BOREHOLE
2. CAVING OCCURS DURING CONCRETE
POURING
3. POURING INTERUPTIONS
IV-26 209
PILE BEARING CAPACITY SHOWS
BELOW THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
CAUSE
1. PRESENCE OF SEDIMENTS AT THE
BASE OF PILE DUE TO ABSENCE OR
INSUFFICIENT CLEANING OF
BOREHOLE
2. LOW SOIL BEARING CAPACITY
(FAILURE TO CONDUCT SPT TEST
PRIOR TO POURING OF CONCRETE)
POSSIBLE REMEDIAL MEASURES
1. ADDITIONAL PILES
2. REINFORCE THE EXISTING PILES
IV-27 210
Concluding Remarks
211