publications

Article
Competence-Based Management Research in the Web
of Science and Scopus Databases: Scientific
Production, Collaboration, and Impact
Vítor Vasata Macchi Silva 1, * , José Luis Duarte Ribeiro 1 , Gonzalo Rubén Alvarez 2 and
Sonia Elisa Caregnato 2
1 Industrial Engineering Graduate Program, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Osvaldo Aranha Av., 99,
5th Floor, Porto Alegre 90.035-190, RS, Brazil; [email protected]
2 Communication and Information Graduate Program, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul,
Ramiro Barcelos St., 2705, 214, Porto Alegre 90.035-007, RS, Brazil; [email protected] (G.R.A.);
[email protected] (S.E.C.)
* Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +55-51-33083720




Received: 15 July 2019; Accepted: 20 September 2019; Published: 24 September 2019


Abstract: This paper presents a bibliometric study, which seeks to characterize papers that address
competence-based management and that are indexed in the Web of Science and Scopus databases in
terms of scientific production, collaboration, and impact. All the papers published in journals or in
conference proceedings that contained the terms “competenc* management” or “compentenc* based
management” in their titles, abstracts, or keywords were analyzed. The results show that computational
sciences, human resources management, strategic management, and industrial relations and labor
correspond to the macro-categories that characterize competence-based management. This paper
also indicates that collaborations between authors do not establish strong co-authorship networks.
It also shows that the most cited papers were published in journals of different areas. It concludes that
studies conducted in the area of competence-based management can be developed in a more assertive
way if they take into consideration the context of the current state of research in this area.

Keywords: competence-based management; scientific communication; bibliometrics; bibliometric

indicators

1. Introduction
Competence-based management is the way companies manage organizational competencies
of groups and individuals [1]. As a method of management, its primary objective is to define the
competencies that are needed for the organization to obtain and continuously sustain success according
to organizational goals. Therefore, competence-based management is considered important for the
achievement of the organization’s goals, to improve business processes, and customer services [2,3].
It is also believed that, for an organization, adopting competence-based management means to assume
a strategic posture aligned with the established organizational goals, whatever they might be. This
aspect allows us to infer that this management method can be used in different contexts and that there
are benefits that can be obtained from the use of the explicit process of strategic formulation.
In the field of studies about scientific production it is perceived that the growth of the literature
does not depend on the area being investigated, but it seems to be a consequence of the intensity of
research and the amount of researchers that work in a specific area [4]. Bibliometrics, in this context,
can support the study of scientific production. It consists of a set of statistical methods for studying
the structure and process of scholarly communication [5], including characteristics of documents’ use
and creation, such as the amount of papers in a determined field, primary authors, citations received,

Publications 2019, 7, 60; doi:10.3390/publications7040060 www.mdpi.com/journal/publications

Publications 2019, 7, 60 2 of 21

among other aspects. Therefore, bibliometric analysis is thought to contribute to the elucidation of
what are the main ideas, schools of thought, and the relations that exist between them in a given field
of research [6].
In the context of competence-based management it is assumed that a bibliometric study can
contribute to a better understanding of this area, by presenting its structures and analyzing its
development [7]. Furthermore, Prévot et al. [7] highlights that, from bibliometric studies, the
researchers in the field can position their investigations and identify new areas of research for practical
and theoretical investigations. In addition, these authors emphasize that, for those who are less
familiarized with the topic, such studies can contribute to the identification of the main challenges in
the field and their developments.
Considering the aspects presented above, the general aim of this paper is to characterize papers
that address competence-based management, which are indexed in the databases Web of Science and
Scopus in terms of scientific production, collaboration, and impact. These databases were chosen
for being the main ones used in metrics analysis, and also, for allowing the evaluation of indexed
papers in terms of productivity and citations received [8,9]. Therefore, the specific objectives are to:
(i) identify the profile of the research addressing competence-based management indexed in the Web
of Science and Scopus databases, concerning document type, year of publication, language, and the
journal or proceedings in which the paper was published; (ii) indicate the most productive country,
institution, and authors in the field of competence-based management; (iii) indicate the main issues
being researched in the field of competence-based management; (iv) identify the existing collaborations
in these indexed papers in the selected databases; and (v) characterize the impact of the papers that
address competence-based management indexed in the Web of Science and Scopus databases.

1.1. Competence-Based Management

Organizations are under sustained pressure to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the
human resources function. To do so, approaches for managing employees are being rethought [10].
According to Guillaume, Houé and Grabot [11], an efficient management of the operational performance
of human resources requires being able to allocate the right person to a task or role within a business
process. In this context, competence-based management has arisen as an alternative management
model, since it translates strategic organizational goals into essential organizational (personnel)
requirements necessary for any particular function [12]. This approach to human resource management
is based on identifying, defining, and measuring individual differences in terms of specific work-related
constructs, especially the abilities that are critical to successful job performance [13]. Therefore,
competence management should address all processes involved in the production, implementation,
and development of specific competencies [14]. Palacios-Marqués et al. [15] also highlight that, when
successfully implemented, competence-based management can measure and improve employees’
competences and value such competences to develop employees’ careers.
A competence-based approach has one key feature that fundamentally differentiates it from
traditional methods of analyzing human capital requirements of organizations [16]. This is the
effective desired characteristics that are described in broader terms—competencies—that themselves
represent aggregates of individual knowledge, skills, and personality characteristics [16]. To Özçelik and
Ferman [17], by focusing on competence applications, organizations are using competencies to integrate
selection, training, performance appraisal, career development and compensation. In performance
appraisal, e.g., competencies are used to identify factors relevant to performance in the job and compare
how a job is done to the results achieved [17].
Nevertheless, the adoption of a competence-based approach to human resource management
raises a number of questions concerning how competencies can be elicited, described, and assessed,
and how to develop managerial systems to map competence profiles, evaluate them, and manage their
development [18]. In this context, Leme Fleury and Correa Fleury [19] point out that, in order for
competence-based management to reach its potential, the development of individual competencies
Publications 2019, 7, 60 3 of 21

must be in line with the organizational strategy. However, this activity is not a simple task, since
the value of individual competencies differs according to the characteristics of the organization in
which the workers act [19]. Belkadi et al. [14], complementary, emphasized that an important task
of competence management is the characterization that consists of formalizing the competence and
determining its key components as well as the situation features that link a particular competence with
the actor’s activity. According to Colomo-Palacios et al. [20] and Sanchez [21], the identification of
competences that match job requirements is a major issue in human resource development.
For Berio and Harzallah [22], four macro-processes are included in competence-based management:
competence identification, competence assessment, competence acquisition, and competence usage.
The identification of competencies, in this scenario, should be responsible for highlighting when and
how to identify the competencies required to perform tasks, strategies, and missions. Competence
assessment, in turn, should be responsible for defining when and how to evaluate the individual
competencies acquired and/or define when and how an organization can assess whether its employees
have acquired specific competencies. The acquisition of competencies, in a complementary manner,
should be responsible for deciding when to acquire competencies, and finally, competence usage
should be responsible for using the information and knowledge acquired, and based on that, identify
gaps between the required competencies and the existing competencies in an organization [22].
In the context of competence-based management and knowledge management, Flöck and
Mekhilef [23] suggest that the detailed analysis of scientific production in this area helps to demonstrate
that these management models have become a topic of interest in most fields of sciences and techniques.
The evidence for such interest, according to these authors, is the existence of a great number of actors
(universities, consultants, industries), the abundance of publications, the different contact networks,
and the increasing offer of specialized training. Moreover, Flöck and Mekhilef [23] establish that the
great variety of viewpoints and interpretations that permeate these management models invite an
understanding of the attributed meanings of these models.

1.2. Bibliometrics and Bibliometric Indicators

Bibliometrics correspond to a technique that seeks to describe the characteristics of documents’ use
and development [24]. The potential of bibliometric studies is related to their capacity of organizing
sociological patterns of explicit recognition among individual documents and of analyzing the changes
operated in scientific fields or domains over time [25,26]. Furthermore, the indicators based on a
bibliometric methodology can promote the comprehension of the researchers’ position in the context of
international research in terms of influence and specialization, and also, the understanding of scientific
patterns and processes of knowledge dissemination [27]. Moreover, as highlighted by García-Lillo
et al. [28], the fascination to know the “state-of-the-art” often grows among scholars and investigators
as a “discipline” advances and reaches a certain level of development. This occurs because these
researchers seek to comprehend, through analysis of research carried out by a great amount of authors
on a given topic, which contributions have had a higher influence on its evolution or have managed to
capture the greatest attention of the researchers [28].
Regarding the uses of bibliometrics, Hjørland [26] and Köseoğlu et al. [29] highlight that this has
become popular as an instrument of viewing scientific areas by the analysis of citations, co-citations,
and also through the development of bibliometric maps. Van Raan [27] emphasizes that, to monitor the
development of science, the technique of bibliometric mapping, also known as bibliometric cartography,
provides an instrument for the development of a context where cognitive structures of a scientific field
of research can be identified.
Van Eck and Waltman [30] suggest that bibliographic maps can be based on distance or, in some
cases, on graphs. In maps based on distance, small distances represent stronger links between the
items—an aspect that facilitates the process of identifying clusters but makes the process of item
labeling more difficult, as some points might overlap with others [30]. On the other hand, on maps
based on graphs, the distance between the nodes does not represent the relationship between the items,
Publications 2019, 7, 60 4 of 21

since the strength of the relations is represented through lines, which are thicker according to the
intensity of the identified relation [30]. This aspect, according to Van Eck and Waltman [30], decreases
the possibility of overlapping the labels, but it makes it difficult to identify clusters and to analyze the
intensity of the relations that already exist.
Spinak [24], when discussing metric studies, also stresses the relevance of productionindicators,
which measure productivity aspects; and the citation indicators, which measure the amount and the
impact of the relations between current scientific publications. Okubo [31], however, classifies the
bibliometric indicators as indicators of scientific and technological activity (production indicators) and
relational indicators (collaboration indicators), which measure the links and the interactions between
the actors that play a role in sciences and technology.

1.3. Bibliometric Studies in Competence-Based Management

Each scientific discipline stems from a collection of relevant studies that start to be acknowledged
as the basis for future investigations. In the field of human resources management investigations,
Fernandez-Alles and Ramos-Rodríguez [32] show interest in analyzing the most influential studies
and authors in the area in order to identify how the area has developed and what the current research
topics are. Fernandez-Alles and Ramos-Rodríguez [32] also claim that there is a paradoxical contrast
between the weakness of studies with a quantitative approach in human resources management and
the strength of these investigations in other fields of management, where several studies have already
used this technique.
From the first books dedicated to competence-based management, dated from the 1990s, to the
more recent publications, the area of competence-based management has experienced significant
development [7]. In order to prove this and analyze how the area has developed through time, Prévot
et al. [7] have deemed it sufficient to characterize the scientific production about this theme published
in the journal Research in Competence-Based Management, and also in a series of books published
after several editions of the international conference on competence-based management. Based on
these materials, the authors have identified three issues of the journal and 12 books that cover a total of
185 papers written by 213 authors published between the years of 1994 and 2005.
The results of the study conducted by Prévot et al. [7] reveals that 77% of the authors published
only one paper about the topic and that nine authors during the period analyzed were responsible for
30% of all the papers produced in the field of competence-based management. In addition, this study
has identified that the authors’ affiliations were distributed in 21 different countries, while the first five
countries (United States, Netherlands, Belgium, United Kingdom, and France) represented 57% of the
authors. Taking into consideration the authors’ institution of origin, Prévot et al. [7] identified that
there is not one institution leading the investigations in competence-based management, and also, that
there is not a group of authors coming from a single institution writing about this topic.
Finally, Prévot et al. [7] highlighted that papers about competence-based management tend to be
organized around references directly related to the topic. This, according to the authors, shows that
this field of research has achieved a level of maturity and that it has defined its differences in relation
to other fields of research.

2. Materials and Methods

Traditionally, bibliometric analyses were conducted based on information about publications and
citations provided by Web of Science (WoS) [8,33]. Nevertheless, the launching of the Scopus database
by Elsevier, in 2004, has created an alternative capable of competing with the monopoly established by
WoS [33]. Nowadays, WoS and Scopus are the most frequently used citation databases to evaluate
journals in terms of productivity and citations received [9].
This study grouped the results of the bibliographic search about competence-based management
obtained in these two databases. This is justified, as the addition of the citations obtained in the Scopus
Publications 2019, 7, 60 5 of 21

database to the results obtained in the WoS database can significantly alter aspects like the ranking of
the most productive authors [34].

2.1. Search Strategies Used for the Data Collection

Bibliometric studies rely on the establishment of an adequate search strategy in order to obtain
the records regarding the publication of relevant investigations [35]. Hence, a search strategy was
developed that considers the terminological variations for the terms “competence management” and
“competence based-management”, using the omission represented by the character “*” (see Table 1).
This way, the results encompass papers that use the terms “competency management”, “competencies
management”, as well as “competency based-management”.
The search strategy was implemented in title, abstract, and keywords fields, as a way to filter only
papers about this topic published in journals and in conference proceedings, from the beginning of
the indexation in the two databases to the end of 2015. This is justified, as the omission of conference
proceedings in bibliometric studies might result in a breach in the analysis, especially when single
entities, such as authors and institutions, are analyzed [36]. Moreover, as is pointed out by Hofer
et al. [37], the addition of papers published in conference proceedings allows the researcher to obtain a
detailed and holistic perspective of the research that is being developed.
Table 1 presents the databases in which the terms were searched, the type of research that was
conducted in each database and, also, the fields and search phrase used.

Table 1. Strategies for the identification of papers about competence-based management.

Types of Stipulated Type of

Databases Search Fields Search Phrase
Research Period Document
TS = Topic (title, summary, “competenc* management” Article OR
Web of
Basic search author’s keywords and OR “competenc* based 1945–2015 Conference
Science
keyword plus) management” Paper
“competenc* management” Article OR
Document TITLE-ABS-KEY (Article All years to
Scopus OR “competenc* based Conference
search title, Abstract, Keywords) 2015
management” Paper

2.2. Bibliometric Indicators

In order to characterize the production, collaboration, and impact of the scientific production
in competence-based management indexed in the WoS and Scopus databases, several analyses were
conducted, as listed in Table 2. The table presents, also, the relations between the steps of analysis and
the objectives of this paper, furthermore, it also presents the types of indicators identified.

Table 2. Specific objectives, databases fields, and analysis conducted.

Necessary Fields Fields Types of

Specific Objectives Conducted Analysis
Information WoS Scopus Indicators

To identify the profile of the Amount of papers

Document
research addressing DT M3 per document type
type
competence-based Amount of papers
management and that are per document type
indexed in the Web of Science Production
Publication Amount of paper per indicators
and Scopus databases, in PY PY
Year publication year
relation to the document type,
year of publication, language Languages of Amount of papers
LA LA
and journal or conference the Journals per language
proceedings in which the Journals or Amount of papers
studies were published. SO T2
conferences per source type
Publications 2019, 7, 60 6 of 21

Table 2. Cont.

Necessary Fields Fields Types of

Specific Objectives Conducted Analysis
Information WoS Scopus Indicators
Amount of papers
To indicate the countries, the Addresses C1 AD per country
institutions, and the authors
Amount of papers
that are most productive in
per institution
competence-based
management. Amount of papers
Authors AU AU
per author
To indicate the main topics in
Most used keywords
the scope of
Keywords DE+ID KW to represent the
competence-based
papers
management.
Collaboration
Addresses C1 AD between countries Indicators of
To identify collaborations in
the papers indexed in the Collaboration collaboration
databases selected to the between institutions
analysis. Collaborations
Authors AU AU
between authors

To characterize the impact of Amount of citations

the papers that address the Citations TC TC per paper
competence-based Impact
management and that are Characterization of indicators
indexed in WoS and in the most cited papers
Scopus.

2.3. Characterization of the Paper Methodology

In order to achieve all the objectives proposed for this study, different procedures were executed.
The first step was to collect the information of the papers indexed in the WoS and Scopus databases
that are related to competence-based management. This procedure was conducted on 19 August 2016.
Table 3 presents the amount of papers retrieved and the search strategies employed in each database.

Table 3. Strategies of search conducted, and the results obtained in Web of Science and Scopus databases.

Databases Search Strategies Executed Total

(TS = (“competenc* management” OR “competenc* based management”))
AND DOCUMENT TYPES: (Article OR Proceedings Paper)
Web of Science 264
Indexes = SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A&HCI, CPCI-S, CPCI-SSH, ESCI
Timespan = 1945–2015
TITLE-ABS-KEY (“competenc* management” OR “competenc* based
Scopus management”) AND PUBYEAR < 2016 AND (LIMIT-TO (DOCTYPE, 522
“cp”) OR LIMIT-TO (DOCTYPE, “ar”))

Table 3 shows that the amount of papers that address the topic of competence-based management
retrieved in Scopus corresponds to almost double the amount of papers retrieved at WoS. This result is
aligned to the Bartol et al. [38] claim, who highlighted that the Scopus database contains more results
in the total amount of documents, when compared to the WoS database, due to the fact that it has a
greater coverage of journals indexed.
After the data collection, the documents that contained expressions such as “[...] competence,
management [...]”, “[...] competence. Management [...]” and “[...] competence: management [...]”
in their titles, summaries, or keywords were removed. By doing this, the analysis of papers that do
not represent the exact expressions of research (“competenc* management” or “competenc* based
Publications 2019, 7, 60 7 of 21

management”) was avoided. Later, duplicate papers were identified. Table 4 presents the results
obtained after this preliminary data treatment.

Table 4. Amount of records retrieved at the databases Web of Science and Scopus.

WoS Scopus Both

Stage Total
Only Only Databases
After the initial search 264 522 - -
After the preliminary cleaning of the documents 260 509 - -
After identifying the duplicates 62 311 198 571
Percentage over total 10.9% 54.5% 34.7% 100%

The corpus of the study was composed of 571 papers. These papers address competence-based
management and are indexed in the WoS and Scopus databases. The amount of papers available at
Scopus, in relation to the total (509 in 571), indicates that this database indexes almost 90% of the
papers that address competence-based management and that are available in one of these databases.
After identifying the papers that composed the corpus of research, the data was further cleaned.
This was necessary since the data collected at the databases usually contain mistakes in the name of
the authors, journal titles, and reference lists [39], which would make it difficult for the mapping of
the scientific production directly related to the bibliographic sources. In addition to these mistakes,
the format of the bibliographic register differed in the two databases used, which had to be taken
into account.
The cleaning of the data collected in the databases was conducted in two stages. In the first one,
the fields that identified the information provided by the databases were standardized. Thus, the
records obtained in WoS which used “DT” to represent the field document type were replaced by “M3”,
which is used by Scopus to represent the same information. In the second stage of data treatment, the
manual standardization of the information related to journals, conferences, countries, institutions, and
authors was conducted. This standardization was necessary as some of the journal and conference
titles were not included exactly in the same way in the WoS and Scopus databases [40].
The data analysis, conducted after the cleaning of the records, was divided into indicators of
production, collaboration, and impact. In order to generate these indicators, the software BibExcel
and Excel were used. BibExcel was chosen for the data analysis since it makes possible the reading
of records collected in the WoS and Scopus databases. Furthermore, it has the great advantage of its
flexibility of integration with other tools of bibliometric analysis. For the elaboration of bibliometric
maps, the software UCINET was used, which is one of the most important software for network
analysis [41].
Finally, the results of data analyses were interpreted. This interpretation was used to identify the
publication trends about the topic of competence-based management. As a result, this stage presented
an overview of the scientific production in competence-based management indexed in the investigated
databases, and it has fulfilled the general goals established for this paper.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Production Indicators

The first aspect analyzed was the document typology from the files retrieved in the WoS and
Scopus databases. This analysis showed that 295 (51.66%) from the 571 records retrieved were published
in Proceedings and 276 (48.34%) were published in Journals. This result shows that Conferences are
important channels for sharing investigations on competence-based management. This result also
reinforces Glänzel et al.’s [42] argument that the publication in conference proceedings is of great
relevance for the studies in engineering and applied sciences, because these fields are not appropriately
covered in journals of the area.
Publications 2019, 7, 60 8 of 21

Figure
Publications 1 presents
2019, the amount
7, x FOR PEER REVIEW of documents retrieved per year. 8 of 21

Figure 1.
Figure Occurrence of
1. Occurrence of document
document types
types per
per year
year of
of publication.
publication.

Most of the occurrences of papers that address competence-based management were published
Most of the occurrences of papers that address competence-based management were published
between
between the
the years
years of
of 2010
2010 and
and 2011. It is
2011. It is worth
worth noticing
noticing that,
that, in
in Figure
Figure 1,
1, competencies
competencies have have become
become
a recurrent theme
a recurrent theme inin the
theliterature
literaturetotoaasignificant
significantextent
extentsince
sincethe the year
year of of 2005—until
2005—until 2004,
2004, onlyonly
87
87
papers, 15.24% of the total, had already been published. To a certain extent, this increase in the
papers, 15.24% of the total, had already been published. To a certain extent, this increase in the
amount
amount ofof papers published in
papers published in the
the year
year ofof 2005
2005 isis due
due to
to the
the publication
publication ofof issue 83 of
issue 83 of the
the journal
journal
Public
Public Administration,
Administration, as as it
it was
was dedicated
dedicated to to the
the topics
topics of
of “competencies”
“competencies” and and competence-based
competence-based
management.
management. The The oldest
oldest paper
paper on on this
this subject
subject corresponds
corresponds to to aa paper
paper by
by Albanese
Albanese [43],
[43], published
published in in
the
the Journal
Journalof of
Management
Management Development
Developmentin 1989,
in entitled Competency-based
1989, entitled Management
Competency-based Education.
Management
This paper highlights the premises of education in competence-based management
Education. This paper highlights the premises of education in competence-based management and and presents its
emergence in the educational context. Regarding the languages of these studies, 519
presents its emergence in the educational context. Regarding the languages of these studies, 519 of of them, or 90.89%
of the papers
them, or 90.89%retrieved were published
of the papers retrievedin English.
were published in English.
Table
Table 5 presents the publisher, the country of
5 presents the publisher, the country of origin,
origin, and
and thethe impact
impact factor
factor (IF)
(IF) of
of the
the 14 journals
14 journals
that have published the most articles about the theme studied
that have published the most articles about the theme studied here. here.

Table 5. Journals with the highest number of publications related to competence-based management.
Table 5. Journals with the highest number of publications related to competence-based management.
P
Rank
Rank Journal
Journal Occurrences % %
Occurrences ∑%% Publisher
Publisher Country
Country IFIF
(2018)
(2018)
Research in in
Research
Emerald
Emerald Group
11 Competence-Based
Competence-Based 9 9 3.26
3.26 3.26
3.26 England
England N/A
N/A
Publishing
Publishing Ltd.
Management
Management
Journal
Journal of Universal
of Universal
22 Computer Science 7 7 2.54
2.54 5.80
5.80 Springer
Springer Verlag
Verlag Austria
Austria 0.910
0.910
Computer Science
Emerald
Emerald Group
Group
33 Personnel
Personnel Review
Review 5 5 1.81
1.81 7.61
7.61 Publishing Ltd.
England
England 1.362
1.362
Publishing Ltd.
4 Computers in Industry 5 1.81 9.42 Elsevier BV Netherlands 4.769
4 Computers in Industry 5 1.81 9.42 Elsevier BV Netherlands 4.769
International Journal of Inderscience
5 International Journal of 5 1.81 11.23 Switzerland 1.160
Technology Management Publishers
Inderscience
5 Technology 5 1.81 11.23 Switzerland 1.160
6 Public Administration 4 1.45 12.68 Wiley-Blackwell
Publishers England 2.600
Management
Knowledge Management University of
67 Publicand
Administration
E-Learning 4 4 1.45
1.45 14.13
12.68 Wiley-Blackwell
Hong Kong
China
England N/A
2.600
Knowledge Institute of
University of Hong
7 Management and on
IEEE Transactions 4 1.45 14.13 Electrical China N/A
8 3 1.09 15.22 Kong and United 1.867
E-Learning
Engineering Management Electronics States
Engineers
Institute of
IEEE Transactions on
Electrical and United
8 Engineering 3 1.09 15.22 1.867
Electronics States
Management
Engineers
Emerald Group
9 Management Decision 3 1.09 16.30 England 1.963
Publishing Ltd.
Publications 2019, 7, 60 9 of 21

Table 5. Cont.
P
Rank Journal Occurrences % % Publisher Country IF (2018)
Emerald Group
9 Management Decision 3 1.09 16.30 England 1.963
Publishing Ltd.
International Journal of
10 3 1.09 17.39 Elsevier BV Netherlands 4.998
Production Economics
SAGE
11 Management Learning 3 1.09 18.48 England 1.935
Publications
International Journal of
12 3 1.09 19.57 Elsevier BV England 4.694
Project Management
International Journal of
Emerald Group
13 Public Sector 3 1.09 20.65 England N/A
Publishing Ltd.
Management
Journal of Management Emerald Group
14 3 1.09 21.74 England N/A
Development Publishing Ltd.
Other 216 78.26 - - - -
Total 276 100 - - - -

A total of 276 papers have been published in 200 distinct journals, while only 21.74% of this total has
been published in journals that accepted three or more papers about competence-based management.
The Research in Competence-Based Management is the journal that has published the most papers
about this topic, which seems natural, considering that its main concern is competence-based
management followed by some peripheral subjects such as entrepreneurship, innovation, and
organization diversification. This indicates that the Prévot et al. [7] study, which analyzed all
the papers published in this journal between the years of 1994 and 2005, has taken into consideration
competence-based management, and also themes that are related to it.
Table 6 presents the title of the conferences that have published the most papers addressing
competence-based management.

Table 6. Conferences that most accepted papers addressing competence-based management.

Rank Event Occurrences %

1 European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM 13 4.41
2 International Conference on Rail Human Factors 8 2.71
IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in
3 6 2.03
Manufacturing, INCOM
IFIP WG 5.5 Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises,
4 6 2.03
PRO-VE
Portland International Conference on Management of
5 5 1.69
Engineering and Technology, PICMET
IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning
6 5 1.69
Technologies, ICALT
7 Conference on Professional Knowledge Management 5 1.69
8 IET International Conference on System Safety 5 1.69
Other 242 82.03
Total 295 100

The European conference on knowledge management (ECKM) was the main conference for the
publication of papers related to this area. This performance showcases the direct relation between
competence-based management and knowledge management, as the former is part of the latter. This
occurs because competence-based management seeks to plan, capture, develop, and assess, at the
different levels of the organization, the necessary competences to the accomplishment of its goals.
Knowledge management, in turn, acts in a complementary way, identifying the knowledge that people
have and providing the means for the development, transfer, and use of this knowledge.
Publications 2019, 7, 60 10 of 21

The analysis of which countries are most productive in competence-based management took into
account the institutional address of the authors, as is shown in Table 7. To analyze such information, it
is important to highlight that we count when multiples authors from the same country appeared as
authors in a paper only once.

Table 7. Occurrences of most productive countries in the scope of competence-based management.

Rank Country Occurrences %

1 Germany 63 9.91
2 France 63 9.91
3 United Kingdom 56 8.81
4 United States 38 5.97
5 Italy 36 5.66
6 Brazil 35 5.50
7 Finland 30 4.72
8 Netherlands 23 3.62
9 Sweden 21 3.30
10 Spain 20 3.14
Other 251 39.47
Total 636 100

Germany, France, United Kingdom, and the United States are the countries that have published the
most articles about this theme. In a similar way, Prévot et al. [7] have identified the United States, United
Kingdom, and France as three of the five most productive countries in the scope of competence-based
management and its related fields. Nevertheless, while Prévot et al.’s [7] research has identified 21
different countries associated with this topic of research, this study has identified 65 countries. Based
on this dispersion, it is possible to infer that the scientific production in competence-based management
is expanding, mainly in countries that do not have research tradition on this area.
Table 8 presents the results of the analysis of institutions associated with these papers.

Table 8. Occurrences of most productive institutions in competence-based management.

Rank Institution Country Occurrences %

1 Ecole Centrale Paris France 9 1.07
2 University of Salerno Italy 9 1.07
3 University of São Paulo Brazil 9 1.07
4 West Pomeranian University of Technology Poland 9 1.07
5 University of Amsterdam Netherlands 8 0.95
6 Lappeenranta University of Technology Finland 7 0.83
7 University of Nantes France 7 0.83
8 Vienna University of Technology Austria 7 0.83
Others 777 92.28
Total 842 100

The results indicate that there is no single institution leading the research on this topic, similarly
to what Prévot et al. [7] had found. Nevertheless, Europe is the continent where the institutions that
publish the most about competence-based management are based, as 7 out of the 8 most productive
institutions are located in this continent.
In order to identify the most productive authors in competence-based management, it was
necessary, initially, to manually standardize the data, as the information related to authorship was
presented in distinct forms in the two databases. At WoS, for instance, Marinita Schumacher is
presented as “Schumacher M”, while at Scopus the author is indicated as “Schumacher, M.”. Table 9
presents the results obtained.
Publications 2019, 7, 60 11 of 21

Table 9. Most productive authors in the field of competence-based management.

Rank Author Occurrences Country Institution Department h-Index

Laboratoire Genie
1 Cardinal, J.S.-L. 8 France Ecole Centrale Paris 6
Industriel
Department of
2 Orciuoli, F. 8 Italy Universita di Salerno Management and 16
Innovation Systems
West Pomeranian
Faculty of Computer
3 Rózewski, P. 8 Poland University of 8
Science
Technology
University of
4 Afsarmanesh, H. 7 Netherlands Faculty of Science 25
Amsterdam
Dipartimento di
5 Gaeta, M. 6 Italy Universita di Salerno Ingegneria 21
dell’Informazione
Laboratoire
6 Harzallah, M. 6 France Université de Nantes d’Informatique de 9
Nantes-Atlantique
West Pomeranian
Faculty of Computer
7 Malachowski, B. 6 Poland University of 5
Science
Technology
Department of
8 Schumacher, M. 6 France Ecole Centrale Paris Industrial 4
Engineering
Other 1513 - - -
Total 1568 - - -

The eight most productive authors work in European institutions. They are connected to
universities and research institutes related to different specialties, and each of them have published six
or more papers. On the other hand, 82.82% of the authors have published only one paper. Table 9
also shows that all the most productive authors have h-index 4 or higher (according Scopus, at
September, 2019). This metric measures the researcher productivity and also the citation impact of
their publications. So, if the researcher has h-index 4, this means that the scientist has published at
least four papers that have each been cited at least four times.
The identification of the subjects that are most addressed in the papers that compose this research
corpus was conducted using the keywords that the authors have attributed to the papers, and also
the keywords that the databases have attributed to the papers. Table 10 presents the occurrences of
frequent keywords and the percentage of its presence in relation to the total amount of papers (n = 571).

Table 10. Most frequently used terms to describe the papers.

P
Rank Term 1989–1995 1996–2000 2001–2005 2006–2010 2011–2015 Occurrences %
Competence
1 1 4 23 92 125 245 42.91
management
Knowledge
2 0 2 9 48 44 103 18.04
management
3 Management 4 1 3 32 32 72 12.61
Competency
4 0 1 6 27 27 61 10.68
management
5 Ontology 0 0 2 29 24 55 9.63
Human resource
6 0 1 2 12 31 46 8.06
management
Personnel
7 0 0 2 16 20 38 6.65
training
Project
8 0 1 8 9 20 38 6.65
management
Societies and
9 0 0 10 14 13 37 6.48
institutions
10 Competences 0 3 5 21 7 36 6.30
11 Semantic web 0 0 2 16 16 34 5.95
Industrial
12 2 3 11 14 2 32 5.60
management
Publications 2019, 7, 60 12 of 21

Table 10. Cont.

P
Rank Term 1989–1995 1996–2000 2001–2005 2006–2010 2011–2015 Occurrences %
13 Competence 0 1 2 18 10 31 5.43
14 E-learning 0 0 1 18 11 30 5.25
15 Industry 0 0 0 13 16 29 5.08
16 Innovation 0 1 0 14 12 27 4.73
Knowledge
17 0 2 2 11 12 27 4.73
based systems
Information
18 0 1 1 9 14 25 4.38
management
19 Research 1 0 3 10 10 24 4.20
Information
20 0 1 4 9 9 23 4.03
technology
21 Decision making 0 2 3 10 8 23 4.03
Competency
22 0 0 1 2 20 23 4.03
managements
Core
23 0 5 5 8 5 23 4.03
competence
24 Personnel 1 0 5 11 5 22 3.85
25 Competition 0 2 4 11 5 22 3.85
Strategic
26 0 2 7 10 2 21 3.68
planning
27 Managers 1 0 3 9 8 21 3.68
Information 3.68
28 0 0 1 11 9 21
systems

Competence management is the most often-used term to describe the papers, followed by
knowledge management, which reinforces the existing bond between competence-based management
and knowledge management, as previously discussed. Management and competency management
also appear in the top positions, and they highlight the managerial character of competence-based
management, as well as one of its terminological variations. About this variations, Moghabghab
et al. [44] highlights that “competence” can be understand as a capability for consistently integrating
the required knowledge, skill, and judgments, while “competency” can be understood as a component
of knowledge, skill, and/or judgment demonstrated by an individual. Table 10 also highlights that
the search phrase “competenc* management” was most frequently associated with computer sciences
and informational systems terms, such as ontology, semantic web, e-learning, and knowledge-based
systems, after 2006. This reinforces the connection that was established between these research topics,
and also the technology evolution that enabled the utilization of these applications.
Based on the bibliometric mapping of the keywords that were used 20 times or more in the papers
represented in the corpus, a network of 28 terms was generated. In this network, the strength of
the relationship between the words is presented by the thickness of the lines. Figure 2 presents the
network developed.
Competence management is the term that has a stronger relation with the other terms in the
diagram and, together with the terms knowledge management and management, compose the core of
this research area. Complementarily, the relations that competence-based management establish with
human resource management, personnel training, project management, industry, and ontology can be
highlighted, as these associations emphasize different contexts of use of this management method.
In addition to the core of competence-based management, composed by the terms knowledge
management, competence management, and management, it was also possible to identify four
other macro-categories by the grouping of the other keywords. Those are: computer sciences and
informational systems; human resources management; strategic management, which is highly related
to the core; and industrial relations and labor.
of the relationship between the words is presented by the thickness of the lines. Figure 2 presents the
network developed.

Publications 2019, 7, 60 13 of 21

Figure 2. Macro-categories that characterize competence-based management.

3.2. Collaboration Indicators

Collaboration between countries was identified based on the professional addresses of the authors
of each paper in international co-authorship. Table 11 presents the results observed in 541 papers,
Figure 2. Macro-categories that characterize competence-based management.
as the address information was not available in thirty papers that composed the corpus.
Competence management is the term that has a stronger relation with the other terms in the
Table 11. Occurrences and amount of countries associated to each paper.
diagram and, together with the terms knowledge management and management, compose the core
of this research area. Complementarily, the relations
Amount of Countries that competence-based
Occurrences % management establish
with human resource management, personnel training, project management, industry, and ontology
1 461 85.21
can be highlighted, as these associations
2 emphasize different
67 contexts
12.38of use of this management
method. 3 11 2.03
4 2 0.37
Total 541 100

It is possible to notice that the most papers (85.21%) were written by authors established
in one country, which indicates that international collaboration is not a widely spread practice.
Figure 3 represents the interaction between the countries of the authors who have conducted studies
in collaboration.
Figure 3 shows that the United States and France are the countries that have the most papers
in collaboration with other countries—24 papers were elaborated in collaboration with at least one
American or French author. On the other hand, the most productive countries (Germany and France)
did not establish international partnerships that address competence-based management.
The collaboration between institutions has also been identified based on the professional addresses
available on the papers.
Table 12 shows that 39.56% of the papers had interinstitutional collaboration, which makes
this type of collaboration more widespread than international collaborations. The collaborations
between institutions that have published one or more papers addressing competence-based
management is shown in Figure 4, which presents the bibliographic map generated based on
interinstitutional collaborations.
 Total 541 100

It is possible to notice that the most papers (85.21%) were written by authors established in one
country, which indicates that international collaboration is not a widely spread practice. Figure 3
represents the interaction between the countries of the authors who have conducted studies in
Publications 2019, 7, 60 14 of 21
collaboration.

Publications 2019, 7, x FOR PEER REVIEW 14 of 21

Table 12 shows that 39.56% of the papers had interinstitutional collaboration, which makes this
type of collaboration more widespread than international collaborations. The collaborations between
institutions that have published one or more papers addressing competence-based management is
shown in Figure 4, which presents the bibliographic map generated based on interinstitutional
collaborations.
Figure 3. International collaboration in studies related to the field of competence-based management.
Figure 3. International collaboration
Table 12. Amountin studies related to
of institutions the field ofincompetence-based
associated the papers. management.
Table 12. Amount of institutions associated in the papers.
Figure 3 shows that theAmount
United of Institutions
States and FranceOccurrences
are the countries%that have the most papers in
Amount of
collaboration with other countries—24 Institutions Occurrences
1 papers were elaborated
327 %
in 60.44
collaboration with at least one
American or French author. On the 1 2other hand, the most153 productive
327 28.28
60.44countries (Germany and
2 3partnerships that address
France) did not establish international 153
48 28.28
8.87
competence-based management.
3 48 8.87
4
The collaboration between institutions has also been 7 identified
1.29 based on the professional
4 7 1.29
addresses available on the papers. 5 5 33 0.55
0.55
6 6 00 0.00
0.00
7 7 22 0.37
0.37
8 8 11 0.18
0.18
Total
Total 541
541 100
100

Interinstitutional collaboration in studies related to competence-based management.

Figure 4. Interinstitutional

Collaborations between institutions do not configure a dense collaboration network. This

characteristic can be justified by the fact that there is not a leading research institution in this
area—an aspect that decentralizes the studies and minimizes the possibilities of experiences’
exchanges. It is important to note, in Figure 4, the high incidence of papers in collaboration with the
Publications 2019, 7, 60 15 of 21

Collaborations between institutions do not configure a dense collaboration network. This

characteristic can be justified by the fact that there is not a leading research institution in this area—an
aspect that decentralizes the studies and minimizes the possibilities of experiences’ exchanges. It is
important to note, in Figure 4, the high incidence of papers in collaboration with the European space
agency (ESA) and the companies Terma GmbH (Darmstadt, Germany) and Serco GmbH (Darmstadt,
Germany), which are specialized in aerospace products and services management, respectively, which
reinforces these collaborations.
Table2019,
Publications 13 presents the amount
7, x FOR PEER REVIEWof authors per paper, except for six registers, in which the authorship
15 of 21
information was not available.
Table 13. Amount of authors associated per paper.
Table 13. Amount of authors associated per paper.
Amount of Authors Occurrence %
Amount of 1Authors Occurrence
120 %
21.24
12 120 197 21.24
34.87
23 197 141 34.87
24.96
3 141 24.96
4
4 57
57 10.09
10.09
5 5 31 31 5.49
5.49
66 10 10 1.77
1.77
77 7 7 1.24
1.24
1111 1 1 0.18
0.18
128 1 0.18
128 1 0.18
Total 565 100
Total 565 100

The majority of papers (78.76%) contain two or more authors, which supports what is argued by
Glänzel and Schubert [45], that there is a tendency in all areas for publications
publications to
to have
have co-authorship.
co-authorship.
From these papers, 34.87% were elaborated by two authors. authors. Besides, it stands out that the mean of
authors per article is 2.55 (with a standard deviation of 1.34), not taking into consideration the study
that had 128 members of a life
life sciences
sciences committee
committee asas authors.
authors.
In order to identify these networks of co-authorship,
order to identify these networks of co-authorship, the the
collaborations made
collaborations between
made thosethose
between who
have published
who have threethree
published or more papers
or more about
papers the the
about same subject
same of research
subject were
of research wereidentified. Figure
identified. 5
Figure
represents the
5 represents bibliometric
the mapping
bibliometric mapping made
made based onon
based this analysis.
this analysis.

Figure 5. Collaboration between authors in studies that address competence-based management.

The graph in Figure 5 shows that the network between the authors of studies that address
competence-based management does not represent a dense network of collaboration. The strongest
connections established are between the authors Gaeta, Ritrovato, Fenza, Orciuoli, and Mangione,
related to the University of Salerno, and Dow, Pallaschke, Bernardino, Argamasilla, and Guerrucci,
Publications 2019, 7, 60 16 of 21

The graph in Figure 5 shows that the network between the authors of studies that address
competence-based management does not represent a dense network of collaboration. The strongest
connections established are between the authors Gaeta, Ritrovato, Fenza, Orciuoli, and Mangione,
related to the University of Salerno, and Dow, Pallaschke, Bernardino, Argamasilla, and Guerrucci,
related to ESA. These networks contribute for these institutions to be seen as the ones that have the
greatest numbers of authors interested in the issue of competence-based management. In addition
to these aspects, it is possible to note the high incidence of collaborations between Rozewski and
Malachowski, from the West Pomeranian university of technology (Poland). Besides this, the graph
presents all top eight most productive authors cited in Table 9.

3.3. Impact Indicators

For the analysis of citations, the information provided in the fields times cited (TC) in the databases
was used. Table 14 presents the 10 most cited papers and their main characteristics.

Table 14. Most cited papers that address competence-based management.

Citations Paper Titles Authors Sources Titles

MIS Quarterly: Management
325 Action Design Research Sein et al. [46]
Information Systems
Managing radical innovation: An McDermott and Journal of Product Innovation
279
overview of emergent strategy issues O’Connor [47] Management
Design principles for competence
MIS Quarterly: Management
143 management systems: A synthesis of an Lindgren et al. [48]
Information Systems
action research study
Critical success factors from IT Gottschalk and Industrial Management and
102
outsourcing theories: An empirical study Solli-Sæther [49] Data Systems
Understanding competence-based
98 management—Identifying and managing Sanchez [21] Journal of Business Research
five modes of competence
The contribution of technology selection Torkkeli and International Journal of
76
to core competencies Tuominen [50] Production Economics
IT-based competency modeling and
Harzallah and
55 management: From theory to practice in Computers in Industry
Vernadat [51]
enterprise engineering and operations
IEEE International Workshops
Knowledge sharing: Agile methods vs. on Enabling Technologies:
41 Chau et al. [52]
Tayloristic methods Infrastructure for Collaborative
Enterprises, WETICE
Modeling and management of profiles Ermilova and Journal of Intelligent
40
and competencies in VBEs Afsarmanesh [53] Manufacturing
1606 Other - -
2765 Total - -

The paper entitled “action design research” is the most cited paper among those that compose the
corpus of this study. In this paper, Sein et al. [46] presented the action design research (ADR), research
methodology that integrates information technology and organizational contexts, exemplifying its
application in the Volvo automobile manufacturer. As a benefit of using ADR, Sein et al. [46] mentioned
knowledge creation, which occurs from the development of information technology that takes into
consideration the existent organizational contexts.
Considering Table 14, only two authors, Afsarmanesh (Amsterdam University) and Harzallah
(Nantes University), are in the group of authors considered the most productive in the area (according
to Table 9). Therefore, author productivity is not, necessarily, related to the amount of citations
that a paper receives. Considering the other authors cited, these have in common the fact that they
developed investigations related to information technology and for the modeling of competence-based
management in virtual environments.
Publications 2019, 7, 60 17 of 21

Considering the journals that were published the most cited papers, it is possible to observe that
they are distributed in areas, such as Information Systems Science (MIS Quarterly and Computers
in Industry), Production and Operations Management (Journal of Product Innovation, Industrial
Management and Data Systems, International Journal of Production Economics and Journal of
Intelligent Manufacturing), and Business (Journal of Business Research)—an aspect that reinforces the
interdisciplinary character of competence-based management.
Finally, the papers that compose the corpus of this research have received a total of 2877
citations—performance that indicates an average of 5.04 citations per work (standard deviation of
21.24). Furthermore, it is possible to perceive that 301 papers (52.71% of the total) had not been cited
by the literature in the field until the data collection.

3.4. Interpretation of the Analysis

The results of this study show the general characteristics of papers published in journals and
conference proceedings indexed in the databases WoS and Scopus. Table 15 highlights the types of
indicators used, the analysis conducted, the main results found, and the preliminary conclusions of
this study.

Table 15. Characteristics of the papers that address competence-based management.

Types of
Analysis Carried Out Main Results Preliminary Conclusions
Indicators
48.34% of the papers were Conferences have a significant
Amount of papers per
published in journals and 51.66% importance for research in the field of
document type
in conference proceedings competence-based management
Amount of papers per The topic was consolidated in the
document type and literature after the year of 2005 The topic is consolidated in the literature
year of publication and it has reached its peak in 2010
Amount of papers per 2005 was the year that presented a Special Issues of journals can boost the
year of publication greater positive percentual variety amount of papers published
Amount of papers per 90.89% of the papers were English corresponds to the main language
language published in English of publication of these studies
Specialized journals or conferences
Amount of papers per Paper dispersion in journals and
address subjects adjacent to
journals or conferences. conference proceedings
Production competence-based management
indicators Germany, France and United Different countries present the same
Amount of papers per
Kingdom represent the most productivity in competence-based
country
productive countries management
There is not a leading institution
Amount of papers per Europe concentrates the majority of the
in research on competence-based
institution most productive institutions on the theme
management
The papers are distributed among Competence-based management is
Amount of papers per
authors associated to universities studied by authors of universities and
author
and research institutes institutions with different emphasis
Keywords showcase the links Four macro-categories characterize
between competence-based competence-based management:
Keywords most used management and knowledge computer sciences and information
to represent the papers management and, also, system; human resources management;
macro-categories that characterize strategic management; and industrial and
competence-based management work relations
France and Germany are the most The United States and France correspond
Collaboration between
productive countries, they do not to the countries that have more
countries
have papers in collaboration collaborations with other countries
Collaboration Collaboration between institutions Interinstitutional collaboration does not
Collaboration between
indicators do not constitute a thick network correspond to a widely spread alternative
institutions
of collaborations between researchers in the area
There is evidence of studies published in
Collaborations 78.76% of the papers have two or
the co-authorship in the field of
between authors more authors
competence-based management
Publications 2019, 7, 60 18 of 21

Table 15. Cont.

Types of
Analysis Carried Out Main Results Preliminary Conclusions
Indicators
Only two authors of the most
Amount of citations The most productive authors are not
cited authors are among the most
per paper necessarily the most cited ones
productive ones
Impact Information Systems Science, Production
indicators The most cited papers are spread and Operations Management, and
Characterization of the
in specialized journals in Business correspond to the concentration
most cited papers
different areas fields of Journals in which the most cited
papers were published

Table 15 shows that conferences are an important communication channel for researchers in the
field of competence-based management. This aspect was highlighted from the identification that more
than 50% of the works that deal with competence-based management, and are indexed in the WoS and
Scopus databases, were published in conferences proceedings. In addition, it was also identified that
competence-based management corresponds to a consolidated topic in the literature. This aspect was
evidenced by Figure 1, which showed that the apex of publications on the topic was reached in 2010.
In addition, it is noteworthy that the drop in the number of publications on competence-based
management in recent years may indicate that authors interested in the subject may have migrated to
adjacent themes. The identification of the number of papers published per year also showed that 2005
corresponded to the year with the highest positive percentage variation in relation to the previous year.
The analysis of this year’s publications, in turn, showed the presence of a special volume of the Public
Administration journal, which concentrated different publications on competence-based management.
This aspect contributed to the conclusion that special journal editions can leverage the publication rate
of works and contribute to the consolidation of different topics in the literature.
The analysis of the number of works per language, in turn, contributed to the confirmation that
English corresponds to the main language of scientific communication. This aspect was reinforced by
the fact that over 90% of the works were published in this language. Regarding the works published in
journals or conferences, it was highlighted that there is a low concentration of papers in them. This
feature reinforces that competence-based management is a topic that is presented alongside adjacent
subject in journals and conferences in the area.
Regarding the analysis of the amount of papers published by countries and institutions, it is
noteworthy that there is no country or institution that leads the research in the area of competence-based
management. The performance achieved by Germany, France, and the United Kingdom, and by
universities and institutions linked to these countries, in turn, has contributed to Europe being seen as
the continent that concentrates most of the most productive institutions on the subject.
The analysis of the amount of papers published by author, complementarily, pointed out that there is
not one author that stands out in the scope of research in competence-based management. The subsequent
analysis, which observed the affiliation of such authors, evidenced that competence-based management
corresponds to a topic that is the subject of study in universities and research institutions. This
characteristic contributes to the inference that cooperation agreements can be signed between universities
and organizations from different sectors so that experiences can be shared.
The analysis of the most used keywords to represent the papers reinforced, in turn, the existing
link between competence-based management and knowledge management. This aspect was observed,
as these terms were the most used to represent the works. In addition, such analysis also highlighted the
macro-categories that characterize competence-based management. They are: Computer Science and
Information Systems; Human Resource Management; Strategic Management; and Industrial Relations
and Labor. These categories were those that encompassed the 28 most used terms to represent the works.
Collaboration indicators have shown that cross-country collaborations do not correspond to a
widespread practice in the area of competence-based management. In this context, it was emphasized
that France and Germany, the most productive countries in the subject, did not present any collaborative
Publications 2019, 7, 60 19 of 21

work among themselves. This aspect contributed to the inference that research conducted in these
countries has different approaches. It was also noted that the United States and France are the countries
that have the most work in collaboration with other countries. This characteristic indicates that
such countries should have international cooperation agreements that facilitate the development of
collaborative research.
The collaborative network between institutions, in a complementary way, highlighted that
interinstitutional collaboration does not correspond to a widespread alternative among researchers
in the area. This aspect was justified by the fact that no institution leads the research—a feature that
decentralizes studies and minimizes the possibility of exchange of experiences. The collaboration
network between authors, in turn, highlighted that 78.76% of the works have two or more authors.
Such performance reinforced the tendency to publish co-authored studies.
Finally, the impact indicators showed that only two authors of the most cited papers are among
the most productive, which suggests that the most productive authors are not necessarily the most
cited. In addition, it was highlighted that the most cited papers are distributed in journals specialized
in areas, such as Information Systems Science, Production and Operations Management, and Business.
This characteristic, in turn, reinforces the interdisciplinary character of competence-based management.

4. Conclusions
The main contribution of this paper is the use of bibliometric tools in the competence-based
management research context to produce the results, which highlights, among other things, the existing
link between competence-based management and knowledge management. Such a link reinforces the
connection that exists among the knowledge that people have and the necessary competences that must
be complied with for an organization to achieve its goals. Besides this, the identification of bibliometric
characteristics of works that address competence-based management can improve research in the
field, and consequently, benefit organization and individuals with its results. This is justified, as it is
considered that this identification can boost the development of research and contribute to increase
the credibility of these studies. Finally, it is possible to notice that papers about competence-based
management can be developed in a more assertive way, considering the current state of research in
this area. Furthermore, future studies can explore the research topics of the papers that compose the
corpus created for this study in more depth. To this, would be interesting to do a systematic review to
deeply identify the main approaches, results, and contributions of the studies that address this topic.
This way, it would be possible to determine the issues that are getting more attention in this area, and
any gaps in the research about competence-based management.

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, V.V.M.S. and G.R.A.; methodology, V.V.M.S., G.R.A., and S.E.C.;
software, V.V.M.S., and G.R.A.; validation, S.E.C., and J.L.D.R.; formal analysis, V.V.M.S.; investigation, V.V.M.S.;
data curation, V.V.M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, V.V.M.S.; writing—review and editing, G.R.A., S.E.C.,
and J.L.D.R.; supervision, S.E.C., and J.L.D.R.
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
1. Hamel, G.; Prahalad, C.K. Competing for the Future; Harvard Business School Press: Cambridge, MA, USA,
1996; ISBN 978-0875847160.
2. Kaplan, R.S.; Norton, D.P. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action; Harvard Business Review
Press: Boston, USA, 1996; ISBN 9780875846514.
3. Boyett, I.; Currie, G. The failure of competence-based management education in the public sector—A problem
of generic transfer or implementation? Pers. Rev. 2001, 30, 42–60. [CrossRef]
4. Urbizagastegui, R. Crescimento da literatura e dos autores sobre a Lei de Lotka. Ciência da Inf. 2009, 38,
111–129. [CrossRef]
Publications 2019, 7, 60 20 of 21

5. Borgman, C.L.; Furner, J. Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2005, 36,
2–72. [CrossRef]
6. Nerur, S.P.; Rasheed, A.A.; Natarajan, V. The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An
author co-citation analysis. Strat. Manag. J. 2008, 29, 319–336. [CrossRef]
7. Prévot, F.; Branchet, B.; Boissin, J.-P.; Castagnos, J.-C.; Guieu, G. The intellectual structure of the competence-based
management field: A bibliometric analysis. In Research in Competence-Based Management; Sanchez, R., Heene, A.,
Zimmermann, T.E., Eds.; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2010; pp. 231–258.
8. Archambault, É.; Campbell, D.; Gingras, Y.; Larivière, V. Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the
Web of Science and Scopus. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2009, 60, 1320–1326. [CrossRef]
9. Abrizah, A.; Zainab, A.N.; Kiran, K.; Raj, R.G. LIS journals scientific impact and subject categorization:
A comparison between Web of Science and Scopus. Scientometrics 2013, 94, 721–740. [CrossRef]
10. Bainbridge, H. Devolving people management to the line. Pers. Rev. 2015, 44, 847–865. [CrossRef]
11. Guillaume, R.; Houé, R.; Grabot, B. Robust competence assessment for job assignment. Eur. J. Oper. Res.
2014, 238, 630–644. [CrossRef]
12. van der Meer, F.M.; Toonen, T.A.J. Competency management and civil service professionalism in Dutch
central government. Public Adm. 2005, 83, 839–852. [CrossRef]
13. Vakola, M.; Eric Soderquist, K.; Prastacos, G.P. Competency management in support of organisational change.
Int. J. Manpow. 2007, 28, 260–275. [CrossRef]
14. Belkadi, F.; Bonjour, E.; Dulmet, M. Competency characterisation by means of work situation modelling.
Comput. Ind. 2007, 58, 164–178. [CrossRef]
15. Palacios-Marqués, D.; Peris-Ortiz, M.; Merigó, J.M. The effect of knowledge transfer on firm performance.
Manag. Decis. 2013, 51, 973–985. [CrossRef]
16. Hayton, J.C.; Kelley, D.J. A competency-based framework for promoting corporate entrepreneurship.
Hum. Resour. Manag. 2006, 45, 407–427. [CrossRef]
17. Özçelik, G.; Ferman, M. Competency approach to human resources management: Outcomes and contributions
in a Turkish Cultural Context. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2006, 5, 72–91. [CrossRef]
18. Capaldo, G.; Iandoli, L.; Zollo, G. A situationalist perspective to competency management. Hum. Resour.
Manag. 2006, 45, 429–448. [CrossRef]
19. Leme Fleury, M.T.; Correa Fleury, A.C. In search of competence: Aligning strategy and competences in the
telecommunications industry. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2005, 16, 1640–1655. [CrossRef]
20. Colomo-Palacios, R.; Casado-Lumbreras, C.; Soto-Acosta, P.; García-Peñalvo, F.J.; Tovar-Caro, E. Competence
gaps in software personnel: A multi-organizational study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2013, 29, 456–461. [CrossRef]
21. Sanchez, R. Understanding competence-based management. J. Bus. Res. 2004, 57, 518–532. [CrossRef]
22. Berio, G.; Harzallah, M. Towards an integrating architecture for competence management. Comput. Ind.
2007, 58, 199–209. [CrossRef]
23. Flöck, C.; Mekhilef, M. Knowledge management in design: A multidisciplinary survey. In Proceedings of
the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design, Paris, France, 28–31 August 2007.
24. Spinak, E. Indicadores cienciometricos. Ciência Da Inf. 1998, 27, 141–148. [CrossRef]
25. García-Lillo, F.; Claver-Cortés, E.; Marco-Lajara, B.; Úbeda-García, M. Identifying the ‘knowledge base’ or
‘intellectual structure’ of research on international business, 2000–2015: A citation/co-citation analysis of JIBS.
Int. Bus. Rev. 2019, 28, 713–726. [CrossRef]
26. Hjørland, B. Domain analysis in information science. J. Doc. 2002, 58, 422–462. [CrossRef]
27. van Raan, A.F.J. Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and
foresight exercises. Scientometrics 1996, 36, 397–420. [CrossRef]
28. García-Lillo, F.; Claver-Cortés, E.; Úbeda-García, M.; Marco-Lajara, B.; Zaragoza-Sáez, P.C. Mapping the
“intellectual structure” of research on human resources in the “tourism and hospitality management scientific
domain”. Int. J. Contemp. Hospitality Manag. 2018, 30, 1741–1768. [CrossRef]
29. Köseoğlu, M.A.; Yildiz, M.; Okumus, F.; Barca, M. The intellectual structure of coopetition: Past, present and
future. J. Strategy Manag. 2019, 12, 2–29. [CrossRef]
30. van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping.
Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. Okubo, Y. Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems: Methods and Examples; OCDE: Paris,
France, 1997.
Publications 2019, 7, 60 21 of 21

32. Fernandez-Alles, M.; Ramos-Rodríguez, A. Intellectual structure of human resources management research:
A bibliometric analysis of the journal Human Resource Management, 1985–2005. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol.
2009, 60, 161–175. [CrossRef]
33. Torres-Salinas, D.; Lopez-Cózar, E.D.; Jiménez-Contreras, E. Ranking of departments and researchers within
a university using two different databases: Web of science versus scopus. Scientometrics 2009, 80, 761–774.
[CrossRef]
34. Meho, L.I.; Yang, K. Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science
versus scopus and google scholar. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2007, 58, 2105–2125. [CrossRef]
35. Huang, Y.; Schuehle, J.; Porter, A.L.; Youtie, J. A systematic method to create search strategies for emerging
technologies based on the Web of Science: Illustrated for ‘Big Data’. Scientometrics 2015, 105, 2005–2022.
[CrossRef]
36. Michels, C.; Fu, J.Y. Systematic analysis of coverage and usage of conference proceedings in web of science.
Scientometrics 2014, 100, 307–327. [CrossRef]
37. Hofer, K.M.; Smejkal, A.E.; Bilgin, F.Z.; Wuehrer, G.A. Conference proceedings as a matter of bibliometric
studies: The Academy of International Business 2006–2008. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 845–862. [CrossRef]
38. Bartol, T.; Budimir, G.; Dekleva-Smrekar, D.; Pusnik, M.; Juznic, P. Assessment of research fields in Scopus
and Web of Science in the view of national research evaluation in Slovenia. Scientometrics 2014, 98, 1491–1504.
[CrossRef]
39. Cobo, M.J.; López-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. Science mapping software tools: Review,
analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2011, 62, 1382–1402. [CrossRef]
40. Meho, L.I.; Sugimoto, C.R. Assessing the scholarly impact of information studies: A tale of two citation
databases—Scopus and Web of Science. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2009, 60, 2499–2508. [CrossRef]
41. Scott, J. Social Network Analysis, 4th ed.; Sage Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2017; ISBN 9781473952119.
42. Glänzel, W.; Schlemmer, B.; Schubert, A.; Thijs, B. Proceedings literature as additional data source for
bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 2006, 68, 457–473. [CrossRef]
43. Albanese, R. Competency-based management education. J. Manag. Dev. 1989, 8, 66–76. [CrossRef]
44. Moghabghab, R.; Tong, A.; Hallaran, A.; Anderson, J. The Difference Between Competency and Competence:
A Regulatory Perspective. J. Nurs. Regul. 2018, 9, 54–59. [CrossRef]
45. Glänzel, W.; Schubert, A. Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In Handbook of Quantitative
Science and Technology Research; Moed, H.F., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht,
The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 257–276. ISBN 1-4020-2702-8.
46. Sein, M.K.; Henfridsson, O.; Purao, S.; Rossi, M.; Lindgren, R. Action Design Research. MIS Q. 2011, 35,
37–56. [CrossRef]
47. McDermott, C.M.; O’Connor, G.C. Managing radical innovation: An overview of emergent strategy issues.
J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2002, 19, 424–438. [CrossRef]
48. Lindgren, R.; Henfridsson, O.; Schultze, U. Design principles for competence management systems:
A synthesis of an action research study. MIS Q. 2004, 28, 435–472. [CrossRef]
49. Gottschalk, P.; Solli-sæther, H. Critical success factors from IT outsourcing theories: An empirical study.
Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2005, 105, 685–702. [CrossRef]
50. Torkkeli, M.; Tuominen, M. The contribution of technology selection to core competencies. Int. J. Prod. Econ.
2002, 77, 271–284. [CrossRef]
51. Harzallah, M.; Vernadat, F. IT-based competency modeling and management: From theory to practice in
enterprise engineering and operations. Comput. Ind. 2002, 48, 157–179. [CrossRef]
52. Chau, T.; Maurer, F.; Melnik, G. Knowledge Sharing: Agile Methods vs. Tayloristic Methods. In Proceedings
of the IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises
(WETICE’03), Linz, Austria, 11 June 2003; pp. 302–307.
53. Ermilova, E.; Afsarmanesh, H. Modeling and management of profiles and competencies in VBEs. J. Intell.
Manuf. 2007, 18, 561–586. [CrossRef]

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).