Design of Pillars in Shrinkage Stoping
Design of Pillars in Shrinkage Stoping
Design of Pillars in Shrinkage Stoping
R.W.O. Kersten
Anglovaal Limited
Johannesburg, South Africa
1 . INTRODUCTION
P r e s e n t l y s i l l p i l l a r s a r e f a i l i n g n o t o n l y on t h e c u r r e n t p r o d u c t i o n
l e v e l s , b u t a l s o i n s h a l l o w e r o l d worked-out a r e a s . The i n c i d e n c e of
f a i l u r e raises t h e q u e s t i o n a s t o whether t h e p i l l a r dimensions a r e
a d e q u a t e a t t h e c u r r e n t working d e p t h s and what t h e i r s i z e s h o u l d b e
a t g r e a t e r depths. The e f f e c t of p i l l a r dimensions on t h e economics
of t h e mining o p e r a t i o n i s of paramount importance because of t h e
amount of o r e t h a t c a n b e l e f t unmined.
i n t e n s i v e l y l a m i n a t e d , metamorphosed s h a l e .
Sulphide M i n e r a l i s a t i o n o c c u r s i n 1 t o 2 metres wide s t r a t a bound
zones, t h e s e b e i n g t h e economic gold h o r i z o n s . Two of t h e s e "shoots"
a r e p r e s e n t l y b e i n g mined v i z . t h e Woodbine and t h e G i l e s . The e x t e n t
on s t r i k e i s shown i n f i g u r e 1 and they a r e open ended a t d e p t h .
There b e i n g no evidence t o t h e c o n t r a r y , t h e v e r t i c a l p r i m i t i v e s t r e s s
i s assumed t o b e a f u n c t i o n of t h e d e p t h of overburden, w h i l e t h e
h o r i z o n t a l v i r g i n s t r e s s a t r i g h t a n g l e s t o t h e orebody, i s 0 , 8 5 of
the v e r t i c a l primitive stress. (This r a t i o was determined employing
t h e h y d r o - f r a c t u r i n g method).
MINING GEOMETRY
F i g u r e 1, a l o n g i t u d i n a l s e c t i o n , g i v e s t h e e x t e n t of mining on t h e
G i l e s and Woodbine s h o o t s t o d a t e . Figure 2 i s a generalised
t r a n s v e r s e s e c t i o n of t h e s e two s h o o t s showing t h e i r s p a t i a l r e l a t i o n s h i 1
Included i n f i g u r e 2 i s t h e s t a n d a r d l a y o u t f o r s i l l and crown p i l l a r s
used t o d a t e .
various l e v e l s .
I n o r d e r t o b e a b l e t o c a l c u l a t e t h e r e g i o n a l i n f l u e n c e of mining i t
w a s n e c e s s a r y t o t r e a t t h e crown and s i l l p i l l a r s as a "combined
pillar".
By s e l e c t i n g t h e l e v e l s where f a i l u r e of p i l l a r s had o c c u r r e d , t h e
s t r e s s l e v e l s f o r t h e combined p i l l a r s was e s t a b l i s h e d . Visible signs
of i n s t a b i l i t y i n s i l l p i l l a r s a r e a p p a r e n t a t 70 MPa, w i t h t h e r e e f
d r i v e becoming i n a c c e s s i b l e , due t o t o t a l p i l l a r f a i l u r e , a t 120 MPa.
5. PILLAR DESIGN
I n p r e v i o u s y e a r s p i l l a r d e s i g n was l a r g e l y a s u b j e c t i v e o p i n i o n of
t h e l i n e s t a f f b u t i n more r e c e n t times t h e importance of p i l l a r
s t r e n g t h and p i l l a r l o a d have been r e c o g n i s e d a s t h e d e s i g n c r i t e r i a .
5.1 P i l l a r strength
P i l l a r s t r e n g t h depends on:-
a) t h e s t r e n g t h of t h e r o c k mass.
c) t h e w i d t h t o h e i g h t r a t i o of t h e p i l l a r s .
0,46
P i l l a r strength = k / H k~/,'
~ ~ ~ ~
where w = p i l l a r width i n metres
H = p i l l a r h e i g h t i n metres
3
k = s t r e n g t h of Im of c o a l a s measured i n
the laboratory.
E f f e c t i v e width = 4 A / ~
where A = . p i l l a r area
C = p i l l a r circumference.
0,5 h 0,75
P i l l a r Strength = ( 1 /(=) c
where w = p i l l a r width
wo = specimen width
h = p i l l a r height
ho = specimen h e i g h t
c = u n i a x i a l compressive s t r e n g t h .
The r e a s o n f o r t h e g r e a t e r s t r e n g t h of t h e crown p i l l a r s i s t h a t t h e
e f f e c t i v e width was used a s d e f i n e d above, w i t h t h e crown p i l l a r
extending f o r 50 metres on s t r i k e .
5.2 P i l l a r load
I n o r d e r t o c a l c u l a t e t h e s t r e s s l e v e l s on t h e combined p i l l a r width<
6. DISCUSSION
6.1 C a l c u l a t i o n of p i l l a r s i z e s
I n o r d e r t o determine t h e s a f e p i l l a r l o a d a s a f e t y f a c t o r i s
introduced.
The u s e of t h e g r a p h i c a l r e p r e s e n t a t i o n f i g u r e 3 i s i l l u s t r a t e d when
c o n s i d e r i n g 20 l e v e l . The s t r e s s a c t i n g on t h e p i l l a r s on 20 l e v e l ,
w i t h combined p i l l a r width of 6 m e t r e s , i s 90 MPa. The s t r e n g t h of a
3 metre crown p i l l a r and 3 m e t r e s i l l p i l l a r i s g i v e n a s 75 m a and
105 MPa r e s p e c t i v e l y . Therefore, t h e s a f e t y f a c t o r f o r t h e s i l l
pillar i s
and f o r t h e crown p i l l a r
These v a l u e s b e a r o u t t h e o b s e r v a t i o n t h a t s i l l p i l l a r s f a i l p r i o r t o
t h e crown p i l l a r s o r 20 Level a t Agnes Gold Mine.
6.2 Comparison of r e s u l t s
A s d e p i c t e d i n f i g u r e 3 , t h r e e m e t r e s i l l p i l l a r s on 20 l e v e l s h o u l d
commence t o f a i l a t a stress l e v e l of 60 t o 70 MPa, and crown p i l l a r s
a t 90 ?Pa.
A s t h e back-analysis and p i l l a r d e s i g n f o r m u l a b o t h i n d i c a t e t h a t
p i l l a r f a i l u r e commences a t a b o u t 70 MPa a measure o f c o n f i d e n c e c a n
be p l a c e d i n t h e l a t t e r method of p r e d i c t i n g p i l l a r f a i l u r e a t g r e a t e r
depths.
C a l c u l a t i o n of p i l l a r s i z e s f o r v a r i o u s l e v e l s
The s t r e s s l e v e l s of v a r i o u s s i z e d combined p i l l a r s a t v a r i o u s d e p t h s
can now be determined from t h e c u r v e s on f i g u r e 3. The dimensions of
i n d i v i d u a l crown and s i l l p i l l a r s can t h e n b e c a l c u l a t e d (combined
p i l l a r w i d t h x 0,55 = s i l l p i l l a r w i d t h ) and t h e s a f e t y f a c t o r
determined f o r t h e i n d i c a t e d p i l l a r w i d t h s f o r g i v e n l e v e l s of stress.
By s e l e c t i n g a s a f e t y f a c t o r of 1 , 5 f o r d e s i g n p u r p o s e s , t h e f o l l o w i n g
i s a summary of p i l l a r dimensions and t h e o r e t i c a l o r e e x t r a c t i o n of
d e p t h i n c r e m e n t s o f 50 m e t r e s .
The s t r e s s l e v e l s on v a r i o u s s i z e d combined p i l l a r s on t h e v a r i o u s
l e v e l s a r e read off f i g u r e 3 . The s i z e of t h e crown and s i l l p i l l a r
i s t h e n determined (combined p i l l a r w i d t h x 0,551 = S i l l p i l l a r w i d t h )
and t h e s a f e t y f a c t o r c a l c u l a t e d f o r t h e s e w i d t h s f o r t h e g i v e n s t r e s s
levels.
S e l e c t i n g a s a f e t y f a c t o r of l , 5 f o r d e s i g n p u r p o s e s , t h e f o l l o w i n g
summary can be made f o r l e v e l i n t e r v a l s of 50 m e t r e s .
Combined P i l l a r Crown P i l l a r Sill Pillar % Extraction
width - m
X
Level width mX m
v a l u e s g i v e n a r e approximate v a l u e s because of t h e
assumption of average r a t i o between crown and s i l l p i l l a r
width of 0,55, a s w e l l a s c u t t i n g p i l l a r s t o f r a c t i o n s of a
m e t r e would b e i m p r a c t i c a l .
7. CONCLUSION
The p e r c e n t a g e e x t r a c t i o n reduces s u b s t a n t i a l l y w i t h i n c r e a s e i n
, . d e p t h , and management h a s t o d e c i d e whether t h i s i s a c c e p t a b l e o r
whether a l t e r n a t i v e methods of mining, such a s c u t - a n d - f i l l , would n o t
b e a more economic p r o p o s i t i o n .
I n a d d i t i o n , i t must b e remembered t h a t t h e s q u a r e c o n f i g u r a t i o n
r e q u i r e d f o r s i l l p i l l a r l e n g t h e n s t h e d i s t a n c e between draw p o i n t s up
t o 13 metres a p a r t , r e s u l t i n g i n widely spaced draw p o i n t s . This i n
t u r n r e s u l t s i n a l o s s of broken o r e which c o l l e c t s on top of t h e s e
p i l l a r s when drawing t h e s h r i n k a g e .
Adequately s i z e d p i l l a r s t o p r e v e n t c o l l a p s e of t h e working i s n o t t h e
only c r i t e r i o n . D i l u t i o n w i l l a l s o i n c r e a s e w i t h depth. This a s p e c t
has n o t been d i s c u s s e d i n t h i s a r t i c l e b u t t h i s does n o t mean t h a t it
should n o t a l s o b e considered a s a major problem a r e a when c o n s i d e r i n g
stope support design.
Unless a d e q u a t e l y designed p i l l a r s a r e l e f t t h e s t r e s s l e v e l on t h e
r e e f d r i v e i t s e l f i n c r e a s e s s u b s t a n t i a l l y and s i d e w a l l s c a l i n g and
unstable conditions r e s u l t , requiring c o s t l y support.
+
I n summary, s h r i n k a g e s t o p i n g t o d e p t h s below 25 l e v e l (- 650 m below
s u r f a c e ) on t h e Agnes Mine, does n o t appear t o b e s a f e and economical.
A l t e r n a t i v e methods of s t o p i n g a r e , t h e r e f o r e , b e i n g d e s i g n e d t o
a m e l i o r a t e t h e e f f e c t s of h i g h e r s t r e s s i m p o s i t i o n s on t h e economics
of t h e mining o p e r a t i o n .
8. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
DIAGRAMMATIC SECTION
100
I t 1
metres
M i N E D OUT
17 LEVEL
18 LEVEL
$1
0
*
r
m
W
19LEVEL
-
J
(3
1 I 1 I
METRES
I I
20 LEVEL
22 LEVEL
24 LEVEL
JRE 2
5 10 15 20 I
COMBINED PILLAR WIDTH-metres
FIGURE 3 EXPECTED STRESS LEVELS AND PILLAR STRDJGTH
FOR VARIOUS LEVELS AND PILLAR SIZES. I
5 10 15 20