This art icle was downloaded by: [ The Universit y of Manchest er Library]

On: 03 Decem ber 2014, At : 02: 37

Publisher: Rout ledge
I nform a Lt d Regist ered in England and Wales Regist ered Num ber: 1072954 Regist ered office: Mort im er House,
37- 41 Mort im er St reet , London W1T 3JH, UK

Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of

Linguistics
Publicat ion det ails, including inst ruct ions f or aut hors and subscript ion inf ormat ion:
ht t p: / / www. t andf online. com/ loi/ salh20

M. Lynne Murphy. 2003. Semantic relations and the

lexicon: antonymy, synonymy, and other paradigms
a
Maj -Brit t Mosegaard Hansen
a
Depart ment of Romance St udies , Universit y of Copenhagen Nj alsgade , 128, Build. 24,
DK, Copenhagen S. , Denmark E-mail:
Published online: 24 Nov 2011.

To cite this article: Maj -Brit t Mosegaard Hansen (2004) M. Lynne Murphy. 2003. Semant ic relat ions and t he lexicon:
ant onymy, synonymy, and ot her paradigms , Act a Linguist ica Haf niensia: Int ernat ional Journal of Linguist ics, 36: 1, 185-189,
DOI: 10. 1080/ 03740463. 2004. 10415923

To link to this article: ht t p: / / dx. doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 03740463. 2004. 10415923

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTI CLE

Taylor & Francis m akes every effort t o ensure t he accuracy of all t he inform at ion ( t he “ Cont ent ” ) cont ained
in t he publicat ions on our plat form . However, Taylor & Francis, our agent s, and our licensors m ake no
represent at ions or warrant ies what soever as t o t he accuracy, com plet eness, or suit abilit y for any purpose of t he
Cont ent . Any opinions and views expressed in t his publicat ion are t he opinions and views of t he aut hors, and
are not t he views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of t he Cont ent should not be relied upon and
should be independent ly verified wit h prim ary sources of inform at ion. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for
any losses, act ions, claim s, proceedings, dem ands, cost s, expenses, dam ages, and ot her liabilit ies what soever
or howsoever caused arising direct ly or indirect ly in connect ion wit h, in relat ion t o or arising out of t he use of
t he Cont ent .

This art icle m ay be used for research, t eaching, and privat e st udy purposes. Any subst ant ial or syst em at ic
reproduct ion, redist ribut ion, reselling, loan, sub- licensing, syst em at ic supply, or dist ribut ion in any
form t o anyone is expressly forbidden. Term s & Condit ions of access and use can be found at ht t p: / /
www.t andfonline.com / page/ t erm s- and- condit ions
 REVIEW

M. Lvnne Murphy. 2003. Semantic relations and the lexicon:

antonymy, synonymy, and other paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge
U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s . 2 9 2 p p . + ix. I S B N 0 5 2 1 7 8 0 6 7 5 h a r d b a c k .

Reviewed by
Downloaded by [The University of Manchester Library] at 02:37 03 December 2014

MAJ-BRITT MOSEGAARD HANSEN

T h e o v e r a r c h i n g t o p i c o f t h e v o l u m e u n d e r r e v i e w is t h a t o f t h e i n t e r n a l s t r u c -
t u r e - if a n y - o f t h e m e n t a l l e x i c o n . I t is u n c o n t r o v e r s i a l t h a t w e i n t u i t i v e l y p e r -
c e i v e p a r a d i g m a t i c r e l a t i o n s o f m e a n i n g s u c h a s s y n o n y m y ( e . g . hide - conceal),
c o n t r a s t ( e . g . war-peace), i n c l u s i o n ( e . g . dog - schnauzer), a n d part-whole rela-
t i o n s ( e . g . house - roof) between words. But must we then assume that paradig-
m a t i c r e l a t i o n s a r e r e p r e s e n t e d i n t h e l e x i c o n itself, s u c h t h a t t h e l a t t e r is s e -
mantically o r g a n i z e d ? S o m e w h a t differently put, are the relational properties
o f w o r d s a n e s s e n t i a l p a r t o f t h e i r l i n g u i s t i c r e p r e s e n t a t i o n , a n d if s o , t o w h a t
e x t e n t ? N o t o n l y these, b u t also a g r e a t m a n y o t h e r fascinating q u e s t i o n s a b o u t
w o r d m e a n i n g s a n d the n a t u r e of the relations that obtain a m o n g t h e m are ex-
haustively d i s c u s s e d in this i n s p i r i n g n e w m o n o g r a p h .

T h e b o o k f a l l s i n t o t w o p a r t s : I Paradigmatic relations, generally, containing

t h r e e c h a p t e r s ( " W h y l e x i c a l r e l a t i o n s ? " , "A p r a g m a t i c a p p r o a c h to s e m a n t i c
relations", a n d " O t h e r a p p r o a c h e s " ) , a n d II Paradigmatic relations, specifically,
containing four chapters ("Synonymy a n d similarity", "Antonymy and con-
trast", " H y p o n y m y , m e r o n y m y , a n d o t h e r relations", a n d t h e c o n c l u d i n g "Lexi-
c o n a n d m e t a l e x i c o n : i m p l i c a t i o n s a n d e x p l o r a t i o n s " ) . I t is r o u n d e d o f f b y a n
a m p l e References section a n d a very t h o r o u g h Index.
I n c h a p t e r 1, t h e a u t h o r (henceforth MLM) p r e s e n t s t h e issues to b e ex-
p l o r e d a n d lays o u t t h e t h e o r e t i c a l f r a m e w o r k a n d b a s i c a s s u m p t i o n s o f h e r
w o r k . S h e s t a t e s t h a t t h e g o a l o f t h e m o n o g r a p h is t o " p r o v i d e a p s y c h o l o g i c a l -
ly p l a u s i b l e m o d e l o f t h e k n o w l e d g e a n d p r o c e s s e s i n v o l v e d i n s e m a n t i c r e l a -
tions p h e n o m e n a in h u m a n l a n g u a g e b e h a v i o r " (p. 4f). In o t h e r w o r d s , the
p e r s p e c t i v e i n f o r m i n g h e r s t u d y is a p s y c h o l i n g u i s t i c a n d p r a g m a t i c o n e . S h e
 186 M. LYNNE MURPHY

a s s u m e s , a s a w o r k i n g h y p o t h e s i s , t h a t t h e h u m a n m e n t a l l e x i c o n is m o d u l a r i n
n a t u r e , a n d t h a t , a s s u c h , it r e p r e s e n t s o n l y i n f o r m a t i o n t h a t is a r b i t r a r y and
n e c e s s a r y f o r l i n g u i s t i c c o m p t e n c e . T h i s w o r k i n g h y p o t h e s i s o f m o d u l a r i t y is
m a d e p a r t l y f o r m e t h o d o l o g i c a l r e a s o n s , a s it p r o v i d e s t h e " o p p o r t u n i t y t o d i s -
p r o v e t h e e x i s t e n c e o f a m o d u l a r l e x i c o n by s y s t e m a t i c a l l y s h o w i n g t h a t e a c h
p o t e n t i a l p i e c e of lexical i n f o r m a t i o n s h o u l d n o t b e i n c l u d e d " (p. 13), and
Downloaded by [The University of Manchester Library] at 02:37 03 December 2014

partly b e c a u s e of t h e existence of various types of e m p i r i c a l (including psy-

c h o l i n g u i s t i c ) e v i d e n c e t h a t l e x i c a l i n f o r m a t i o n is n o t r e p r e s e n t e d a s p a r t o f
n o n - l e x i c a l , c o n c e p t u a l k n o w l e d g e . Finally, in this i n t r o d u c t o r y c h a p t e r , MLM
m a k e s f o u r b a s i c a s s u m p t i o n s , n a m e l y 1° t h a t w o r d s a r e p o l y s e m o u s ; 2 ° t h a t a
s e n s e is a s e t o f c o n d i t i o n s o n a w o r d ' s d e n o t a t i o n ; 3 ° t h a t full s e n s e s a r e not
represented i n t r a - l e x i c a l l y ; a n d 4 ° t h a t s e n s e s a r e d y n a m i c , i.e. t h e y c a n be
a d a p t e d to t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s of particular c o n t e x t s .
In t h e c e n t r a l s e c o n d c h a p t e r of the b o o k , M L M p r e s e n t s h e r m a i n claims,
n a m e l y t h a t s e m a n t i c r e l a t i o n s o b t a i n a m o n g w o r d s in u s e , a n d a r e n o t in-
tralexically specified. Rather, they constitute - at best - metalinguistic (more
specifically, " m e t a l e x i c a l " ) , a n d h e n c e c o n c e p t u a l , k n o w l e d g e a b o u t w o r d s , as
o p p o s e d t o s p e c i f i c a l l y l i n g u i s t i c k n o w l e d g e o f w o r d s . T h a t is, s h e d e f i n e s the
knowledge of semantic r e l a t i o n s as a s u b t y p e of encyclopedic knowledge,
which involves a c o m b i n a t i o n of w o r d forms a n d their associated concepts. (In
s o m e c a s e s , in facts, o n l y c o n c e p t s a p p e a r to b e i n v o l v e d , a n d t h e k n o w l e d g e o f
s u c h r e l a t i o n s is t h u s n o t e v e n t r u l y m e t a l i n g u i s t i c i n n a t u r e ) . T h e j u s t i f i c a t i o n
f o r t h i s c l a i m is t h r e e - f o l d : 1° s e m a n t i c r e l a t i o n s a r e n o t r e l e v a n t t o l i n g u i s t i c
c o m p e t e n c e ; 2° t h e y a r e c o n t e x t d e p e n d e n t ; a n d 3° t h e y c a n b e p r e d i c t e d by
m e a n s of a single Relation-by-Contrast Principle (henceforth R C P ) , of a cru-
cially p r a g m a t i c n a t u r e .
I n its m o s t g e n e r a l f o r m , t h i s p r i n c i p l e s t a t e s v e r y s i m p l y t h a t l e x i c a l i t e m s
a r e s e m a n t i c a l l y r e l a t e d if t h e y a r e p e r c e i v e d a s m i n i m a l l y d i f f e r e n t i n c o n t e x -
tually a p p r o p r i a t e ways. T h e R C P b e i n g of a n essentially q u a n t i t a t i v e , as o p -
p o s e d to a qualitative n a t u r e , t h e s t i p u l a t e d " m i n i m a l d i f f e r e n c e " c a n b e in-
s t a n t i a t e d i n v a r i o u s w a y s : i n t h e c a s e o f s y n o n y m y , it w i l l b e a d i f f e r e n c e of
f o r m , w h i l e , i n t h e c a s e o f o t h e r t y p e s o f r e l a t i o n s , it w i l l r e f e r t o c o n t e n t p r o p -
erties, for i n s t a n c e a d i f f e r e n c e in polarity o r level of c a t e g o r i z a t i o n . N o t e t h a t
t h e p r i n c i p l e m a k e s n o claims a b o u t t h e n a t u r e of t h e similarities b e t w e e n t h e
lexical i t e m s involved in any given relation. Further, since the difference is
s p e c i f i e d a s " c o n t e x t u a l l y a p p r o p r i a t e " , t h e r e is i n p r i n c i p l e n o requirement
t h a t a n y l e x i c a l i t e m b e p e r c e i v e d as r e l a t e d t o t h e s a m e s e t o f p a r a d i g m a t i c al-
t e r n a t i v e s in d i f f e r e n t c o n t e x t s . T h u s , to take a s i m p l e e x a m p l e , o n e context
m a y p r i v i l e g e sad a s a n a p p r o p r i a t e a n t o n y m o f happy, while a different context
 REVIEW 187

m i g h t r a t h e r e v o k e angry. N e v e r t h e l e s s , in t h e c a s e o f a n t o n y m s in p a r t i c u l a r ,
s p e a k e r s m a y - in the a b s e n c e of a c o n t e x t , a n d d u e to their f r e q u e n t co-oc-
c u r r e n c e - r e c o g n i z e c e r t a i n b i n a r y p a i r i n g s ( e . g . happy : sad) as " c a n o n i c a l " .
T h e R C P is s a i d t o b e c o m p a t i b l e w i t h t h e f o l l o w i n g o b s e r v a b l e p r o p e r t i e s o f
s e m a n t i c r e l a t i o n s : 1° t h e y a r e p r o d u c t i v e ; 2 ° b i n a r y r e l a t i o n s a r e p r i v i l e g e d ; 3 °
t h e y a r e c o n t e x t u a l l y v a r i a b l e ; 4° t h e y e x h i b i t p r o t o t y p i c a l i t y a n d c a n o n i c i t y ; 5 °
Downloaded by [The University of Manchester Library] at 02:37 03 December 2014

t h e y a r e o n l y s e m i - s e m a n t i c , in as m u c h as g r a m m a t i c a l c a t e g o r y a n d a s p e c t s of
f o r m a l s o p l a y a r o l e ; 6 ° t h e n u m b e r o f r e l a t i o n t y p e s is n o t o b j e c t i v e l y s p e c i f i -
a b l e ; 7 ° t h e y a r e p r e d i c t a b l e ; a n d 8 ° t h e r e l a t i o n t y p e s , if n o t t h e s p e c i f i c t o -
k e n s , a r e u n i v e r s a l . All of w h i c h s u g g e s t s t h a t s e m a n t i c r e l a t i o n s a r e n o t s t o r e d
a s fixed, i n t r a - l i n g u i s t i c r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s , b u t a r e r a t h e r s u b j e c t t o d e r i v a t i o n b y
general cognitive principles.

C h a p t e r 3 is M L M ' s Stand-der-Forschung c h a p t e r , in w h i c h s h e critically dis-

cusses past a n d p r e s e n t a p p r o a c h e s to p a r a d i g m a t i c relations, f r o m t h e p o i n t s
of view of p h i l o s o p h y , t h e o r e t i c a l (primarily, b u t n o t exclusively, s t r u c t u r a l ) lin-
guistics, a n t h r o p o l o g y , psychology, a n d c o m p u t e r science. She situates those
a p p r o a c h e s o n a c o n t i n u u m from holist (or associationist) to analytical (or
c o m p o n e n t i a l ) c o n c e p t i o n s of t h e lexicon, the f o r m e r of which m e t a p h o r i c a l -
ly e n v i s a g e s t h e m e n t a l l e x i c o n a s a t h e s a u r u s , w i t h s e m a n t i c r e l a t i o n s a s t h e
p r i m a r y d e t e r m i n a n t s o f w o r d m e a n i n g , w h i l e t h e l a t t e r s e e s it i n t e r m s o f a
d i c t i o n a r y m e t a p h o r , w h e r e b y individual lexical items a r e a s s u m e d to b e e n -
d o w e d with i n h e r e n t semantic substance, analyzable into smaller components
of m e a n i n g , w h i c h t h e n allow for t h e d e r i v a t i o n of their interrelations. T h e au-
t h o r a r g u e s convincingly that n o t only are purely holistic m o d e l s quite u n t e n -
able, b u t even partially associationist a p p r o a c h e s to the lexicon are u n n e c e s -
sary, g i v e n t h a t a p u r e l y c o m p o n e n t i a l m o d e l of t h e l e x i c o n , while n o t in itself
sufficient to a c c o u n t for t h e p a r a d i g m a t i c r e l a t i o n s w e perceive a m o n g lexical
i t e m s , is n e v e r t h e l e s s f u l l y c a p a b l e o f d o i n g s o if s u p p l e m e n t e d b y t h e p r a g -
m a t i c p r i n c i p l e s e m b o d i e d in t h e m e t a l e x i c a l treatment.

C h a p t e r s 4-6 d e a l in d e p t h w i t h t h e p r o p e r t i e s of specific s e m a n t i c r e l a t i o n s
( i n c l u d i n g s u c h issues as c o n t e x t d e p e n d e n c e , logical p r o p e r t i e s , canonicity, bi-
narity, m a r k e d n e s s , a n d lexical g a p s ) , d e m o n s t r a t i n g in detail h o w t h e R e l a t i o n -
o f - C o n t r a s t P r i n c i p l e w o r k s i n e a c h c a s e . P a r t i c u l a r a t t e n t i o n is p a i d t o s y n -
onymy and antonymy/contrast. Hyponymy and meronymy, on the other hand,
a r e a r g u e d to b e r e l a t i o n s a m o n g c o n c e p t s , as o p p o s e d to w o r d - c o n c e p t s , a n d
h e n c e l e s s i n t e r e s t i n g a s o b j e c t s o f a m e t a l e x i c a l t r e a t m e n t . ( I t is p o i n t e d o u t ,
h o w e v e r , t h a t t h i s o b s e r v a t i o n d o e s n o t p r e c l u d e t h e a p p l i c a t i o n o f t h e R C P , giv-
e n t h a t instantiations of any type of c o n c e p t s can e n t e r into relations of con-
trast.) I n all c a s e s , M L M p r o v i d e s a w e a l t h o f e m p i r i c a l a n d e x p e r i m e n t a l d a t a t o
 188 ML L Y N N E MURPHY

s u p p o r t h e r view, s h e b r i n g s u p p o t e n t i a l o b j e c t i o n s t o t h a t view, a n d s h e c a r e -
f u l l y c o n s i d e r s a l t e r n a t i v e c o n c e p t i o n s b e f o r e r e j e c t i n g t h e m . T h e r e a d e r is
t h u s left w i t h a s t r o n g i m p r e s s i o n o f s o l i d i t y a n d i n t e l l e c t u a l h o n e s t y .
The final c h a p t e r restates the most i m p o r t a n t general conclusions of the
s t u d y : t h e m e n t a l l e x i c o n s h o u l d c o n t a i n o n l y i d i o s y n c r a t i c i n f o r m a t i o n t h a t is
n e c e s s a r y f o r l i n g u i s t i c c o m p e t e n c e ; t h e full r e p r e s e n t a t i o n of w o r d meanings
Downloaded by [The University of Manchester Library] at 02:37 03 December 2014

t r a n s c e n d s t h e m e n t a l linguistic faculty; s e m a n t i c r e l a t i o n s a r e derived, a n d in

s o m e c a s e s , s t o r e d , n o t i n t r a l e x i c a l l y , b u t m e t a l e x i c a l l y ; h e n c e , t h e r e is n o r e a -
s o n to c o n c e i v e of t h e l e x i c o n as s e m a n t i c a l l y o r g a n i z e d . F u r t h e r , this c h a p t e r
takes u p t h e issue of m o d u l a r i t y , a n d p o s e s t h e q u e s t i o n w h e t h e r a n d to w h a t
e x t e n t t h e m e t a l e x i c a l t r e a t m e n t o f s e m a n t i c r e l a t i o n s is c o m p a t i b l e w i t h n o n -
m o d u l a r t h e o r i e s o f l i n g u i s t i c s . T h e a n s w e r is t h a t o n l y t h e o r i e s w h i c h p o s e s e -
m a n t i c r e l a t i o n s as a n i n t e g r a l p a r t of a m o d u l a r l e x i c o n a r e in p r i n c i p l e i r r e c -
o n c i l a b l e w i t h M L M ' s m o d e l . A q u e s t i o n l e f t o p e n f o r f u t u r e r e s e a r c h is t h e
possibility of b r i n g i n g t h e r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s of p a r a d i g m a t i c a n d syntagmatic re-
lations closer t o g e t h e r within the f r a m e w o r k s of those r e c e n t linguistic t h e o -
ries w h i c h p r o p o s e t h a t g r a m m a r a n d lexicon exist o n a c o n t i n u u m .
T h e b o o k is i n m a n y w a y s a n i m p r e s s i v e a c h i e v e m e n t : w e l l w r i t t e n a n d c o -
g e n t l y a r g u e d , it d e m o n s t r a t e s s h a r p a n a l y t i c a l s k i l l s , m e t h o d o l o g i c a l aware-
ness a n d stringency, a n d a d e p t h of s c h o l a r s h i p of t h e highest international
s t a n d a r d . A p a r t i c u l a r l y c o m m e n d a b l e f e a t u r e o f t h e s t u d y is t h e w a y t h e a u -
t h o r m a n a g e s to a t t e n d to detail w i t h o u t l o s i n g s i g h t o f t h e b i g p i c t u r e .
T h e m e t a l e x i c a l a p p r o a c h t o p a r a d i g m a t i c r e l a t i o n s is s i m p l e , e l e g a n t , and
w i d e - r a n g i n g . N o t o n l y d o e s it a c h i e v e a s i g n i f i c a n t s i m p l i f i c a t i o n o f t h e l e x i -
c o n , it a l s o d o e s away w i t h t h e e n d l e s s , a n d i n c r e a s i n g l y s u b t l e , d i s t i n c t i o n s b e -
tween s u b t y p e s of s e m a n t i c relations t h a t have b e e n characteristic of m u c h p r e -
v i o u s w o r k , a n d , m o r e i m p o r t a n t l y , it a l l o w s f o r t h e o b s e r v a b l e o p e n - e n d e d n e s s
a n d context d e p e n d e n c e of w o r d senses. N o m a t t e r w h e t h e r senses or relations
are s e e n as p r i m a r y , a n y t h e o r y t h a t r e q u i r e s s e m a n t i c relations to b e listed in
t h e l e x i c o n will h a v e t o c o u n t e n a n c e t h e p o t e n t i a l e x p l o s i o n o f t h e l a t t e r u n -
l e s s s e n s e s a r e d e f i n e d a s fixed o n c e a n d f o r a l l , b e c a u s e f o r a n y p o t e n t i a l n e w
s e n s e , t h e r e is a n e q u a l p o t e n t i a l f o r n e w s e m a n t i c r e l a t i o n s t o b e c o n t r a c t e d ,
a n d h e n c e l i s t e d . T h e m e t a l e x i c a l t r e a t m e n t is t h u s c a p a b l e o f d e a l i n g w i t h
b o t h the synchronic a n d the diachronic dynamicity of word meanings. More-
over, it p r o v i d e s for t h e possibility t h a t l a n g u a g e u s e r s m a y f u n c t i o n adequate-
ly w i t h a v o c a b u l a r y i n w h i c h s o m e l e x i c a l i t e m s d o n o t c o n t r a c t a n y r e l a t i o n s
with o t h e r lexical i t e m s , e i t h e r b e c a u s e n o c o n t r a s t i n g t e r m s exist, o r b e c a u s e
a given l a n g u a g e u s e r possesses a n (as yet only) i m p e r f e c t k n o w l e d g e of t h e
target idiom.
 REVIEW 189

T h e r e is n o d o u b t t h a t t h e R e l a t i o n - b y - C o n t r a s t P r i n c i p l e is a v e r y p o w e r f u l
o n e , a n d it m a y w e l l s t r i k e s o m e r e a d e r s as t o o p o w e r f u l . T h u s , g i v e n a suffi-
ciently favorable context, t h e p r i n c i p l e will s a n c t i o n p a r a d i g m a t i c relations
t h a t w o u l d b e h i g h l y unlikely to b e c o u n t e n a n c e d by a n y d i c t i o n a r y m a k e r . F o r
i n s t a n c e , i n t h e c o n t e x t o f t h e f o l l o w i n g e x c h a n g e : A . I'm so sick of that Kay and
her stupid little doggy that she's always calling her "little baby-waby "... B . Little Baby-
Downloaded by [The University of Manchester Library] at 02:37 03 December 2014

Waby is a kitty, not a doggy. A. 'Doggy', 'kitty', whatever. It's all the same to me. It's a stu-
pid little spoiled beast with a stupid little spoiled mistress, (p. 142), the words doggy
a n d kitty w i l l f u n c t i o n a s s y n o n y m s o n M L M ' s d e f i n i t i o n , g i v e n t h a t t h e i r c o n -
textuaHy relevant c o n t e n t properties (including, prominently, connotations,
affect, a n d r e g i s t e r ) a r e t h e s a m e , r e s u l t i n g in a c o n t e x t u a l l y r e l e v a n t m i n i m a l
difference which is o n e o f f o r m only. T h a t they can hardly be considered
c a n o n i c a l s y n o n y m s is a n o t h e r m a t t e r : t o t h e e x t e n t t h a t a n y c a n o n i c a l r e l a t i o n
o b t a i n s b e t w e e n doggy a n d kitty a t a l l , o n e w o u l d i n t u i t i v e l y t a k e it t o b e o n e o f
c o n t r a s t . G i v e n t h e m a n i f e s t possibility of u s i n g t h e w o r d s as e x e m p l i f i e d , in a
c o n t e x t w h e r e t h e c o r e features of d e n o t a t i o n a l m e a n i n g h a p p e n to b e con-
textually largely irrelevant, this, however, actually p r o v i d e s s u p p o r t for M L M ' s
c o n t e n t i o n that s e m a n t i c relations are n e i t h e r objective, analytic properties of
lexical items, n o r stable across contexts, b u t that they are r a t h e r a m a t t e r of
"language users' idiosyncratic mental representations" (p. 5).

U l t i m a t e l y , r e a d e r s will h a v e t o m a k e u p t h e i r o w n m i n d s a b o u t t h e a c c e p t -
ability of e x a m p l e s s u c h t h e o n e cited a b o v e , b u t w h a t e v e r their feelings in t h e
m a t t e r (I h a s t e n t o a d d t h a t t h e l a r g e m a j o r i t y o f M L M ' s e x a m p l e s a r e o f a f a r
l e s s c o n t r o v e r s i a l n a t u r e ) , t h e r e c a n b e l i t t l e d o u b t t h a t Semantic relations and
the lexicon m a k e s a very significant c o n t r i b u t i o n to c u r r e n t t h i n k i n g a b o u t lexi-
c a l s e m a n t i c s , a n d t h a t f u t u r e s c h o l a r s h i p w i l l find t h e b o o k d i f f i c u l t t o i g n o r e .
I t is h e r e b y w a r m l y recommended.

Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen

Department of Romance Studies
University of Copenhagen
Njalsgade 128, Build. 24
DK-2300 Copenhagen S.
Denmark
e-mail: [email protected]