4 Energy Control Procedures
4 Energy Control Procedures
4 Energy Control Procedures
The configuration for an HDR blowdown experiment with a downcomer, lower plenum, core,
and upper plenum is very similar to the geometry of a large pressurized water reactor (PWR).
The size of the HDR vessel, 11m high and 3 m in diameter, is also similar to a typical PWR. The
simplified vessel internals produce a less complex blowdown response than would occur in a
typical PWR configuration so that the calculational results and experimental data can be more
easily interpreted. The core barrel was carefully machined for uniform thickness and fabricated
with a flat, rigid upper ring which is clamped between the head and the vessel. This rigid ring
provides a well-defined boundary condition for the structural response calculations. These
features make the HDR blowdown experiment an excellent test of coupled fluid-structure
computational techniques for PWR blowdown calculations.
The initial conditions for an HDR experiment were adjusted by filling the system with water,
pressurizing the system to the desired initial pressure, and circulating hot and cold water through
the piping system until the desired initial pressure and initial hot and cold region distribution was
achieved. Each blowdown experiment was initiated by rupturing a double diaphragm on the
blowdown nozzle. During this blowdown, fluid pressure and temperature were measured
throughout the vessel and blowdown nozzle while strain and displacement were measured on the
core barrel. Vessel displacements near the blowdown nozzle were also recorded.
The initial fluid conditions for Tests V31.1 and V32 are tabulated in table 1. The fluid in the
downcomer in Test V32 had a 70% higher degree of subcooling than in Test V31.1. Thus,
greater hydrodynamic loads and transient responses of the fluid and structure occurred in Test
V32.
Table 1. Initial fluid conditions