Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 17 views

    Carlo Ban Tenieza, Civil Case No. CEB-20068

    Uploaded by

    queen
    Legal Form

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Carlo Ban Tenieza, Civil Case No. CEB-20068

    Uploaded by

    queen
    17 views3 pages
    Legal Form

    Original Title

    AMISTAD - Answer

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Legal Form

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
    17 views3 pages

    Carlo Ban Tenieza, Civil Case No. CEB-20068

    Uploaded by

    queen
    Legal Form

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Republic of the Philippines

    7th Judicial Region


    MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT in the CITIES
    Branch 1, Cebu City

    CARLO BAN TENIEZA,


    Plaintiff,

    Civil Case No. CEB-20068


    For: COLLECTION FOR SUM OF
    MONEY
    - versus –

    TEMY CALE SUPETER,


    Defendants.
    X----------------------------------/

    ANSWER

    COMES NOW, defendant TEMY CALE SUPETER, through the


    undersigned counsel, unto this Honorable Court most respectfully
    state THAT:

    1. The allegations made under paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and


    6 are admitted;

    2. The allegations made in paragraph 7 with regard to the


    repeated calls are denied. Plaintiff only texted me on June 2, 2022,
    and after June 10, 2022, I did not receive phone calls from the
    Plaintiff.

    3. The allegations made in paragraph 8 are denied the truth


    being that, I did not receive the first summon on June 10, 2022. In
    addition, there was no service of summon made to me by the
    authorized official of Barangay Sambag 1 on June 14, 2022. Lastly, I
    did not also receive the summon for the third hearing. Thus, being the
    case, I truthfully did not have a personal knowledge that there was a
    summon served to me in order for me to appear in the hearing held in
    Barangay Sambag 1.

    4. The allegation in paragraph 9 with regard to the obligation of


    TWENTY THOUSAND PESOS (Php 20,000.00) that is due and
    demandable is admitted. But the legal interest is not stipulated in the
    agreement, hence, denied.
    WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed of this Honorable
    Court that judgment be rendered DISMISSING plaintiff’s complaint for
    failure to state a cause of action.

    Other reliefs and remedies that are just and equitable in this
    instant case are likewise prayed for.

    Respectfully submitted, June 9, 2014. Cebu City, Philippines.

    GODINEZ & AMISTAD PARTNERS LAW OFFICES


    Counsel for the Defendant
    UNIT 22, 3rd floor, Bo Commercial Center,
    Colon Street, Cebu City

    By:

    QUEENCY B. AMISTAD

    Counsel for the Defendant

    Roll No. 100123


    IBP No. 654123, December 14, 2021
    \PTR No. 20304033, December 17, 2021
    Admitted to the Philippine Bar on May 3, 2021

    Copy furnished:

    Atty. Theresa T. Godinez-Ginoo


    Counsel for the Plaintiff
    Unit 3, Bo Bldg., Jones Ave.
    Cebu City
    (Across Sun Life Grepa)

    EXPLANATION
    Pursuant to Sec. 11, Rule 13 of the Rules of Court, a copy of

    defendants’ answer is being served to the opposing counsel by

    registered mail due to lack of office personnel to effect personal

    service.

    QUEENCY B. AMISTAD

    You might also like