See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/316876669

Classification and assessment of geothermal resources

Chapter · June 1990

CITATIONS READS

75 4,464

1 author:

Manfred P. Hochstein
University of Auckland
159 PUBLICATIONS   1,833 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

NZ tectonic plate View project

Geothermal View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Manfred P. Hochstein on 12 May 2017.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Classification assessment

Geophysics: Resistivity traversing (DC-methods) different depth penetration; DC-resistivitv

soundings (one station per km2); temperature logging in 10 to 30 m deep holes (one per km1) ASSESSMENT GEOTIIERMAL RESOURCES DRILLING)
over areas with low apparent resistivity; simple structural investigations (gravity survey for
example); complete delineation of suspected outflows. There is not much information in the literature that discusses how many exploration wells
should be drilled to explore a geothermal prospect. For small plant development the number of
High Temperature Prospects these wells has to be kept to a minimum to maintain economic viability and to reduce "sunken"
The foregoing studies listed in the above paragraph can also be used to explore high costs.
temperature prospects. The following programmes can be added: For exploration of fracture zone reservoirs spring systems, fracture zone systems
Geology: Analysis of regional. tectoni.cs �u. sing satel�te imagery); geohydrological studies; with narrow fracture zone reservoir and fracture zone systems with high temperatures at
collection of data related to reg10nal se1snuc1ty, volcanic hazards, slope stability. sweep base) at least two deeper wells (usually about 0.5 km depth) are required. For
exploration of wider fracture zones (fracture zone syst.em wide fracture �o� and
Geochemistry: Gas sampling of all steam vents; Hg, As and gases in soils. larger systems interme�iate temperatures) and of high temperature reservo!rs m flat
terrain, at least three non-aligned (commonly about 1 to 1.5 km depth) exploration wells
Geophysics: Complete heat loss survey; investigation of resistivity structure near suspected are required. Less ex�nsive, small diameter wells of about 0.5. km dept� h.av� been used
boundaries. in the past to explore high temperature prospects; however, their productivity 1s often not
sufficient for later utilization. Because of this, exploration wells now have the same
specifications as production wells. In mountainous terr.ain the top of .the h?t fluids can
Many o.ther geophysical methods �i. e. seismic surveys micro-earthquake studies, airborne lie a few hundred meters beneath the surface; exploration wells m this setting are now
magnetic surveys, magnetoteUunc and controlled source magnetotelluric surveys, etc.) drilled to at least 2 km depth. Exploration of inferred outflows might require only two
have been used to explo!e the stru�ture of geothermal reservoirs (see Goldstein, 1989); wells if they can be sited along the axis of the concealed outflow; since thickness of the
most of these are expensive or reqmre contractors. They can be used in follow-up studies outflow is limited, depth of exploration wells is determined by the thickness of the
if expansion of any small scale utilization is to be considered. outflow.
When exploration studies are completed a pre-feasibility study of the whole prospect is Spacing between exploratory wells should be such that a significant portion of t�e
�ttempted. If the �pe of system and its hydrological setting has been properly recognized, an inferred reservoir is covered; on the other hand, the distance should be not so large that fluid
mtegrated exploration model can be constructed that explains the main findings of all earth transmission costs are too high if any productive exploration well were tied into the fluid­
science studies. Using inferred physical properties of the reservoir rocks, an assessment of the gathering network of the plant. A distance of 1 to 1.5 km between adjacent exploration wells
power. potential of the exploration model could be attempted (see Fig. 2.5, steps 3a,b). appears to be a good compromise.
Expenence has shown, however, that there are too many uncertainties; it is now common
practice to defer such an assessment until results from exploration wells become available. The
pre-feasibility study should also contain a cost analysis of any possible utilization scheme using
th� ·:ene!gy replacement. c�st". concept, and clear recommendations a� to whether exploration
dnllmg 1s feasible. If drillmg 1s recommended the study should contain information about the Once an exploration well has been drilled and produces thermal fluids (discovery well),
sites of . these wells, details related to site preparation, the casing programme, and suggested the exploration model is reviewed to incorporate all important reservoir characteristics as
completion tests. indicated by the discovery well. If there ar� any uncertainties �n the explor�tion model as �o the
type of system, the discovery well solves this problem. The revised exploration model constitutes
Development of an adequate exploration model at the pre-feasibility stage has always the first conceptual reservoir model (see step 5 in Fig. 2.5). Important features of adequate
been a difficult task. Many examples show that inadequate exploration models have been used conceptual models have been summarized by Grant et al. (1982) and Grant (1983). The first
in the past to locate expensive exploration wells. Two major sources of error leading to conceptual reservoir model is commonly used to assess a minimum potential of the prospect.
inadequate exploration models are: Two methods have often been used in the past, namely, the recovery method and the planar
(a) misidentification of reservoir type (often due to incorrect estimates of likely reservoir fracture method.
temperature); and The inferred recovery method (volume n:iethod) has been discussed in de�l by �uffler
(b) misinterpretation of discharge features and of geophysical anomalies over outflow and Cataldi (1978) and Muffler (1981). For this method, the stored energy estimate 1s used,
structures. together with assumptions about the efficiency (recovery factor) with which heat stored in the
fluids and in the reservoir rocks can be extracted. The efficiency is controlled by the average
A detailed discussion of both types of error has been given by Hochstein (1988) together permeability structure inside and outside the reservoir.
with recommendations as to how these errors can be avoided.
,,
, I
I'
1,
I
I • I
48 49 i '
 M. P. Hochstein

Table 2.1 Assessment of minimum power and mass flow potential of two geothermal
reservoirs
Fuzhou (China) Wairakei (NZ)

Reservoir type: low temperature, high temperature,

fracture zone reservoir hot water reservoir
Surface characteristics:
Manifestations minor warm springs boiling springs,
fumaroles
steaming ground
Onat(MWJ/T0( ° C) = 5/22 = 300/12
Nat. upflow rate (kg/s)
at bottom of prod. reservoir = 18 = 270
Parameters ofproductive reservoir (conservative estimates):
Area (km2)/volume (km3) 2.251>/0.18 � 102>1� 5
Bottom depth (m)/initial T ( ° C) 500 / 90 800 / = 255
Top depth (m) /initial T ( ° C) 50 I 65 300 / = 235
Porosity/recovery factor � 0.1 / 0.75 = 0.25 I 0.5
Utilization characteristics:
Utilization industrial heat/baths electricity plant
Endpoint Tt ( ° C) 45 180
Minimum thermal power potential (relative to TJ:
Fracture method (MWJ 7 � 3003>
Recovery method (MWJ 14 � 5004>
Av. produced (MWJ = 25 1500-2000
Indicated mass flow potential:
Fracture method (kg/s) 75 n.a.
Recovery method (kg/s) 150 n.a.
Av. produced (kg/s)/period (yr) = 200/12 1500-20Q05>/30
Note: the following parameters are common to both reservoirs: matrix density
of reservoir rocks: 2600 kg/m3 ; heat capacity: 0.9 kJ/kg K; assumed life
of plant 30 yr.
l) given area relates to that of vertical fracture zone (80 m width) between 0.05 and 0.5 km depth
2) inferred horizontal extent of productive aquifer (Waiora Formation);
3) four stacked aquifers assumed (125 m each), intergranula flow model;
4) includes ""'50 MW, from naturally transferred heat;
5) two-phase mixture.

52
View publication stats