Very High Efficiency Solar Cells Presentation

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 20

Towards a 55% Efficient Solar

Cell

Vernie Everett, Andrew Blakers,


Klaus Weber, Evan Franklin

Centre for Sustainable Energy Systems


Outline
‰ Purpose of the work
‰ Background to the Project
‰ Approaches to Ultra-high Efficiency
‰ Architecture – Integrated cells and optics
‰ ANU Work – report to date
‰ Outlook
‰ Conclusion
Purpose of the work
‰ Ultra-high efficiency devices are a major
step forward in the development of low-
cost solar PV technology
‰ Commercial applications, energy security,
GHG abatement, industry development
‰ Military applications, pollution reduction
‰ Potential trigger to revolutionise global
electricity generation
Background
‰ Six basic approaches to Ultra-high efficiency:

ƒ Multiple junction
ƒ Multiple spectrum
ƒ Multiple absorption
ƒ Multiple energy level
ƒ Multiple temperature
ƒ AC solar cells
Background
‰ Solar cell efficiencies are approaching their
practical efficiency limits

Single junction: 25% eff. in Si or GaAs


Tandem: 38% for 3-stack under concentration

‰ For single junction cells these efficiencies


correspond to about 85%, and for concentrator
and tandem cells about 70%, of practical (or
material-imposed) efficiency limits
Background
100

90 Thermodynamic Limit
80

70
Ultra-high efficiency devices
Efficiency (%)

60

50

40 Tandems

30

20
Conventional Silicon
10
0
2007 Time
Background

Excess energy of absorbed photons


over and above the bandgap is lost
Intensity

Band gap energy

Low energy photons lost


Maximum
harvestable
energy

Wavelength
Background

Excess energy of absorbed photons


over and above the bandgap is lost
Intensity

Band gap energy

Low energy photons lost

Maximum
Harvestable tandem energy

Wavelength
Background
Clearly, no single approach will succeed.
‰ VHESC approach integrates optics,
interconnects, and cell designs.
‰ Benefits:
ƒ Increased “design space”
ƒ Increased theoretical efficiency
ƒ Introduces options for new architectures
ƒ Greater device design flexibility
ƒ Reduced spectral mismatch losses
ƒ Increased materials choices
Background
‰ Low concentration advantages:

ƒ Logarithmic dependence of eff. on conc.


ƒ Junctions reduced from 9 to 5
ƒ Releases surface area
ƒ Allows integrated optics
ƒ Allows novel cell architectures
ƒ Cells are less sensitive to defects
Background
‰ Lateral Architecture:

ƒ Splits light into spectral components


ƒ Allows spectral optimisation of devices
ƒ Avoids many materials constraints
ƒ Eliminates lattice matching requirements
ƒ Minimises spectral mismatch losses
Background
‰ Vertical Architecture:

ƒ Independently contactable vertical junctions


ƒ Avoids current-matching issues
ƒ Increases materials choices
ƒ Avoids spectral mismatch losses
Architecture: Optimising band gaps
20 Suns 100 Suns

IEEE Barnett et al 2006


Architecture: Integrating PV and optics

IEEE Barnett et al 2006


Architecture: Cell grouping

IEEE Barnett et al 2006


Architecture: Hybrid lateral/vertical

IEEE Barnett et al 2006


ANU: Vertical multi-junction Si stack

VMJ cell stack IV curve


Stacked 7 Cells (With mask) IV Curve

0
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6
-0.002

-0.004 0.5 sun


1 sun

Isc
-0.006
1.5 sun
2mm thick VMJ cells with high IQE -0.008 2 sun
-0.01

-0.012
Voc
VMJ Silicon cell stack
Outlook
‰ Newly-formed DuPont-University of Delaware
consortium
‰ Substantial funding from DARPA
‰ Team approach: more than 20 members
‰ Multiple pathways for development and
optimisation
‰ Higher concentration/tracking tradeoff for
efficiency and optimisation
‰ ANU recently joined the consortium to develop
the Silicon platform
‰High efficiency modules “could be in
commercial production by 2010”
Thank you!

You might also like