Discuss The Importance of Archaeological Sources in Reconstructing The History of Ancient India.

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Discuss the importance of archaeological sources in reconstructing the history

of ancient India. [10]


Answer- The human history from its beginnings to the present, particularly, of the preliterate past
owes its reconstruction to its material evidences. Substituting and substantiating literary sources,
archaeological records help us develop a balanced understanding of the past.
Colin Renfrew and Paul Bahn argues that archaeology is the ‘past tense of cultural anthropology’.
Clive Gamble asserts that archaeology is the study of the past through material remains. Archaeology is
concerned with the full range of past human experience – how people organized themselves into social
groups and exploited their surroundings; what they ate, made, and believed; how they communicated and
why their societies changed.
An archaeological culture includes the study of ‘artefacts’ i.e. objects used, modified or made by
people such as stone tools, pottery, etc. and non-artifactual organic and environmental remains known as
‘ecofacts’. Similar artefacts comprise an ‘industry’; all industries found at a site form its assemblage and
similar assemblages comprise a culture. These remains are found together on ‘sites’, which are grouped
together into ‘regions’. To reconstruct past human activities on a site, it is important to understand the
‘context’ of the find. A find’s context consists of its immediate ‘matrix’ (material surrounding it),
‘provenience’ (position within the matrix) and its ‘association’ with other finds. Artefacts are studied
through their ‘attributes’.
Traditionally, archaeological excavations are conducted to acquire data. However, the dominant
role of excavation in archaeology has faded away and non-invasive surveys are conducted using remote-
sensing devices like magnetometer, radar etc.
Dating methods are based directly or indirectly on the principle of radioactive decay. They
include Carbon-14, thermoluminescence, potassium-argon, electron spin resonance, uranium series, and
fission-track dating.
Archaeology within a state of flux has developed specialisms and sub-disciplines. Marine
archaeology explores and analyses remains from the sea particularly shipwrecks. Archaeometry uses
scientific techniques to analyze archaeological materials. Palaeontology i.e. the study of the remains of
dead organisms help us understand hominid evolution. Faunal and Trace-element analysis tell us about
the animals hunted and domesticated. Paleo-pathology studies the diseases suffered by early historic
people. Cognitive archaeology deals with ways of thinking, beliefs and religion. Ethno-archaeology
studies human behaviour and practices, filling gaps in history by reflecting women’s role in past societies.
Archaeogenetics, the study of the human past using the techniques of molecular genetics, is a rapidly
expanding field.
Dilip K. Chakrabarti argues that in India, archaeology developed as an adjunct of ancient historical
studies with the bureaucratic machinery of the Archaeological Survey of India. It lacks the scientific
temper of the processual school and the rational subjectivity of the post-processual school.
Inscriptions and coins come under the general umbrella of archaeological sources. An inscription is any
writing that is engraved on something—stone, wood, metal, ivory plaques, bronze statues, bricks, clay,
shells, pottery, etc. Epigraphy includes deciphering the text of inscriptions and analysing the information
they contain. Inscriptions can also be classified based on content and purpose into donative, dedicative,
and commemorative inscriptions. The Lumbini pillar inscription of Ashoka is a royal commemorative
inscription, recording a specific event—the visit of the king to the Buddha’s birth-place. Among donative
inscriptions, royal land grants record grants made by kings to Brahmanas and religious establishments.
Royal inscriptions include prashastis (panegyric) devoted to eulogizing the kings. The Hathigumpha
inscription of Kharavela is an example. Unlike literary sources, inscriptions reflect what people were
actually doing. It reconstructs political structures and administrative and revenue systems. Inscriptions
provide dateable information on the history of religious sects, institutions, and practices. Richard
Solomon cautions historians that these sources lack objectivity and precision and needs critical judgement
in evaluation. Inscriptions must be studied within its structures of power, authority, and social status.
Numismatics studies coins and their historical context. In India advent of coinage coincided with the
barter system. As important royal message-bearing media, coins form a vital source of political history.
The area of circulation of dynastic issues is used to estimate the frontiers of empires. Coins reflect the
political history of India between c. 200 BCE and 300 CE. Coins offer information on the Parthians,
Shakas, Kshatrapas, Kushanas, and Satavahanas. Sometimes, coins provide biographical details. Coins
have helped prove that a Gupta king named Ramagupta ruled between Samudragupta and Chandragupta
II. The depiction of deities on coins provides information about the personal religious preferences of
kings, royal religious policy, and the history of religious cults. For instance, representation of Balarama
and Krishna in Agathocles’ coins.
Archaeological evidences are not sacrosanct. As Ebenhard Sauer argues, archaeology gives us a
selective insight to human past. The limits become obvious if we try to investigate social structures,
individual biographies or the spiritual culture. We need written evidence to understand archaeological
discoveries, and archaeological discoveries to understand the literary sources.

You might also like