RJR Nabisco - Case Questions
RJR Nabisco - Case Questions
RJR Nabisco - Case Questions
1. Consider the sources of value creation in LBOs. Is RJR Nabisco a good target for an LBO?
2. Utilizing information on estimated betas and capital structure from Exhibits 2 and 3 for 1986
and 1987, provide an estimate for the expected return on the firm’s assets. (If your answer is
seven and a half percent, enter your answer as 7.5)
3. Using APV and the return on assets estimated above, what is the total value of RJR Nabisco
under the pre-bid operating strategy? (Enter your answers in millions of dollars)
In class we will also discuss the questions below. Read them, discuss them (in groups, whenever
possible) and, if you are in the mood for a big LBO, do the math. When doing your valuations,
please first read the hints contained in the next page.
What accounts for differences in the values under these three scenarios?
Be careful when calculating the FCF: The line item “Cash flow available for capital
payments” is the total cash flows that are available for shareholders. We must think
carefully about how to get the total cash flows to investors and how to take into account
the debt tax shields. Our APV valuation technique is much easier and flexible to use here.
Exhibit 5 does not provide information on EBIT. To calculate FCF, recall that:
Thus,
To estimate the cost of capital, calculate the beta from figures in Exhibit 2 and 3 by
averaging the appropriate betas in the last two years. You can use book value of debt as a
proxy for market value.
You can assume that the risk free rate is 9%, the risk premium is 8%, and the tax rate is
34%.
A reasonable estimate of terminal growth rate is 2-4%.
Consider how to appropriately discount the debt tax shield cash flows—the firm runs with
a given leverage ratio, but we use APV as our valuation technique.
VFirm, CCF = ∑ ∑