Grade Estimation Using Surpac
Grade Estimation Using Surpac
Grade Estimation Using Surpac
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
IN
MINING ENGINEERING
By
May, 2014
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
IN
MINING ENGINEERING
By
Prof. H. K. Naik
May, 2014
ROURKELA
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the thesis entitled “Ore Body Modelling and Comparison of Different
Reserve Estimation Techniques” submitted by Mr. Manasa Chandra Moharaj and Miss.
Yeshi Wangmo in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of Bachelors of
To my best knowledge, the matter embodied in the thesis has not been submitted to any other
First of all, we express our profound gratitude and obligation to Dr. H. K. Naik, Professor of
Department of Mining Engineering for permitting us to carry on the topic "Ore Body Modelling
and Comparison of Different Reserve Estimation Techniques" and later on for his
motivational guidance, useful feedback and significant proposals all around this undertaking
work. We are truly grateful to him for his capable direction and torment requiring exertion in
enhancing our understanding of this project.
All the demonstrating and dissection done in this project might not have been conceivable
without the assistance of Mr. Agamdas Goswami, Research Scholar, Dept. of Mining
Engineering. We stretch out our sincere thanks to him.
We are additionally grateful to Dr. S. Chatterjee for directing and guiding us in learning
SURPAC software.
A gathering of this nature could never have been endeavored without reference to and motivation
from the works of others whose points of interest are specified in reference area we acknowledge
our obligation to every one of them.
At the last, sincere thanks to all our friends who have patiently extended all sorts of helps for
accomplishing this project.
Yeshi Wangmo
2.1 Geostatistical Ore Reserve Estimation (By: MICHEL DAVID and ROGER A. BLAIST): 5
2.2 Three-Dimensional Model of Cangshang Gold Mine Based on Surpac (Ping Huang, Peng
Yang, Yizhou Chen and Chengjun Liu): ..................................................................................... 6
2.5 Comparison of Polygonal and Block Model Reserving Techniques in Gemcom ................ 8
A case study on a Thin Reef Deposit (pieter-Jan Grabe1 and Warren P. Johnstone2): .............. 8
2.7 Determining the Best Search Neighborhood in Reserve Estimation, using Geostatistical
Method: A Case Study Anomaly No 12A Iron Deposit in Central Iran ..................................... 9
4.5 Reserve estimation using Inverse Distance method (power 2 & 3) .................................... 30
5.2 Conclusion........................................................................................................................... 46
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 47
Generally, size of the database is too bulky to manage studies with hand effort. Thus, numerical
computational time and processes. Currently, many computer aided systems and software serve
for geological modeling. The accuracy and speed of computers enable evaluation of various
scenarios within reasonably short times. Computer systems have proved very essential for
In this project, SURPAC software has been used for ore reserve estimation. The estimation has
been done using three different methods i.e. inverse distance method (power2 and power 3);
Keeping all other parameters same, the computational time for all the above techniques were
found to be nearly same. Thus, the efficiency of reserve estimation using nearest neighbor and
inverse distance methods were compared with the ordinary krigging method as it is known as the
Figure 4.5 Block model after applying the solid model as constraint .......................................... 28
Figure 4.6 Block model after adding both solid model constraint and iron grade constraint (iron
grade>50) ...................................................................................................................................... 29
Figure 4.7 Constrained block model colored according to iron grade (blocks partially under
Figure 4.13 Block model after applying the solid model as constraint ........................................ 34
Figure 4.14 Block model after adding both solid model constraint and iron grade constraint (iron
grade>50) ...................................................................................................................................... 34
Figure 4.15 Constrained block model colored according to iron grade (blocks partially under
Figure 4.16 Block model after applying the solid model as constraint ........................................ 36
Figure 4.17 Block model after adding both solid model constraint and iron grade constraint (iron
grade>50) ...................................................................................................................................... 36
Figure 4.23 Constrained block model colored according to iron grade (Ordinary Krigging) ...... 44
Table 4.3 Comparison of different lag values to determine the suitable variogram ..................... 42
INTRODUCTION
such that dumping of the waste within the pit is not possible. Stratified vein-type deposits with
an inclination steeper than the natural angle of repose of the material so that waste cannot be
tipped inside the pit; and Relatively horizontal stratified reserves with a thin/thick covering of
overburden.
Open cast mine planning is done by developing the block models and then dividing the deposit
into smaller pits which contain both ore and waste blocks which are to be mined in order to reach
the pit limit and these operations are done keeping in the mind the overall optimization of the pit
Geological block models are used to generate economical block models by using unit costs and
income. With known volume of a block, thickness and grade of ore at each particular block, it
becomes possible to convert this information to economical aspect. (Volume *tonnage factor *
grade = block reserve.) Economical block models have visual and numerical results; 3D
appearances of them give an idea if and where an ore body is rich and how quality changes.
Basically, the project is carried out to determine the best method for reserve estimation using
SURPAC software. Here, how the advancement in technologies has helped mankind with
computational time and processes. Currently, many computer aided systems and software serve
for geological modeling. The accuracy and speed of computers enable evaluation of various
Computer programs are ready for ore body modeling after building a healthy database structure.
Visual appearance of geological body is supported by numerical data such as ore reserve amount
and quality composition, which are vital parameters for mine design and scheduling. Thus,
computer systems are very important for mining and geological studies.
1.4 Objective:
Mine planning and designing manually is a tedious work to the planning team, i.e. to define ore
boundaries, define mine configurations in sections based on available economic and technical
information. This method was found to be labor intensive, prone to excess errors and time taking.
Mostly, it was found that it cannot be applied to large mines with many (millions) blocks. So
proper planning of mine reserve using mathematical analysis of available data is the need in
today‟s world.
the mining industry is blessed in terms of analysis of data using these software to plan the mine,
The main objective of this work is to find out the most appropriate method for reserve estimation
by block modeling using SURPAC. It aims at estimating the ores using different methods i.e.
ordinary krigging; inverse distance (power2 and 3); and nearest distance method. The
comparison between the above methods is carried out (if any method underestimates or
Triangulate
Edit triangles
NO
Validate
YES
Set to solid
Save
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Geostatistical Ore Reserve Estimation (By: MICHEL DAVID and ROGER A.
BLAIST):
Matheron's geostatistical method (the estimation of ore reserves) has been developed to the
point at which real-life problems may be handled effectively. The steps involved in the method
are as follows:
All three steps are a bit difficult, and any user may need a deep understanding of the theory to
avoid any failure. Geological considerations must guide the entire ore appraisal. In the four cases
discussed in this paper, the ore structures vary enormously. In the porphyry coppers studied
(deposits A and B) the structural controls are extraordinarily complicated with billions of
mineralized fractures, whereas in the flat iron formation (deposit C) the structure is very simple,
and in the folded and metamorphosed iron formation (deposit D) it is more complex. Yet, the
The properties of the ore are relatively constant along strike or along dip with some particular
geological direction. When ore boundary problems are dealt with and automatic krigging is used
then the geologist's advice is very essential. In a krigging program, unless a digitizer is available,
a simple matter to compute the grade-tonnage curve by drawing the cumulative distribution of
the estimated block grades. Thus, as knowledge of a deposit improves, so does the grade-tonnage
curve.
Huang, Peng Yang, Yizhou Chen and Chengjun Liu): The three-dimensional geological
model of Cangshang Gold Mine, including the geological database, ore body model and block
model, was established by mining software Surpac, which simplified the complicated hand-
drawing and reserve calculation. The three-Dimensional development system visualization was
also studied on the basis of conducting the vectorization of the whole development system design
geological model simplified the complicated hand-drawing and reserve calculation. The
calculation results are accurate, which can be used in the resource estimation, reserve calculation
The three-dimensional model of ore body was established by using of Surpac software.
Company): The author in this book describes everything in chapters (mainly 1, 3, 9, 10, 12,
In chapter 1, the author alludes to spatial dependence between ordered data but ignores the
limits for metal contents and grades of ore reserves as a measure for risk.
In chapter 10, the author makes it perfectly clear that the distance-weighted average at a selected
On the same page the author pontificates, “Writing all the necessary co-variances for that system
of equations is a good test to find out whether one really understands geostatistics!”
In chapter 12, the author confirms, “There is an infinite set of simulated values”, and ponders
how to, “make that infinite set smaller and get the model closer to reality”.
In chapter 13, the author recalls Gy‟s lifetime preoccupation with “the variance of sampling
errors” but in Bias Generation, he proffers the bizarre claim that high variances generate bias.
David‟s textbook proves beyond reasonable doubt that geostatistics is an invalid variant of
2.4 Erarslan, 2001: Geological Block Models: used to generate economical block models by
using unit costs and income. As volume of a block, thickness and grade of ore at each particular
block is known, then it becomes possible to convert this information to economical aspect.
Multiplication of volume, tonnage factor and grade give block reserve. Economical block models
have visual and numerical results. 3D appearances of them give an idea where ore body is rich
2. The block model method applied to the thin reef deposit in this case, proved to be valid and
accurate.
3. Polygonal reserving can be an effective way to validate primary reserving through block
modeling.
4. Spatial trends relevant at the scale of mining can be distinguished from the block model plots.
To summarize, the tonnage and grade estimates are remarkably similar suggesting that the
assumptions reveals that the block model technique is more comprehensive. This finding is
complimented by the speed, ease-of-use and downstream applicability of the block model
module in Gemcom.
They concluded that ore body modeling is a reflection of geological and geometrical reality of an
ore deposit. Geologists and mining engineers can benefit from such an integrated modeling
approach by honoring the deposit geology, understanding the statistical distribution and
emphasizing the spatial continuity studies. The model can act as principal guides for
Ordinary krigging and non-linear geostatistical estimators are now well accepted methods in
mining grade control and mine reserve estimation. In krigging, the search volume or „krigging
neighborhood‟ is defined by the user. The definition of the search space can have a significant
impact on the outcome of the krigging estimate. In particular, too restrictive neighborhood can
estimator‟ but this is only true when the neighborhood is properly selected. Arbitrary decisions
about search space are highly risky. The criteria to consider when evaluating a particular
krigging neighborhood are the slope of the regression of the „true‟ and „estimated‟ block grades,
the number of krigging negative weights and the krigging variance. Search radius is one of the
most important parameters of search volume which often is determined on the basis of influence
of the variogram. In this paper the above-mentioned parameters are used to determine optimal
search radius.
Krigging is commonly described as a „minimum variance estimator‟ but this is only true when
the neighborhood is properly defined. Read phonetica Search radius is one of the most important
parameters of search volume which often is determined on the basis of influence of the
variogram. Usually the variogram range is used as a criterion for determining the radius search
and depending on the condition the optimized radius may be different. In this paper an attempt
krigging neighborhood i.e. the slope of the regression of the „true‟ and „estimated‟ block grades,
the number of krigging negative weights and the krigging variance. Therefore, these statistics for
15 ellipsoids were summarized, graphed and the optimal search radius was found by determining
where increasing the size of it does not significantly improve the estimate. The obtained search
radius through the cross validation was compared with search radius suggested by others which
were determined on the basis of variogram search. The results show that the suggested search
METHODOLOGY
Block models are used in Surpac for reserve estimation and valuation. To generate a block
model, Solid model and surface topography are required. Most importantly, cut-off grade is
The starting point of all mining projects is the drill-hole data. It continues the bases on which
feasibility studies and ore reserve estimation is done. A number of tables are included in a
geological database, containing different data. Each table contains a number of fields, having
many records and with each record containing the data fields.
Surpac uses a relational database model and supports several different types of database, i.e.
1. Collar; and
2. Survey.
The information in this table describes the location of the drill-hole collar, the maximum depth of
the hole and whether to calculate a linear or curved hole trace when retrieving the hole. For each
drill-hole, an optional collar data may also be stored. For instance, data drilled, type or drill-hole
or project name.
1. Hole_id
2. Y
3. X
4. Z
5. Max_depth
6. Hole_path
Survey table:
It stores the drill-hole survey information, used for calculating the drill hole terrace co-ordinates.
2. Dip, and
In case of a vertical hole which has not been surveyed, the depth would be the same as the
max_depth field in the collar table; the dip would be -90 and azimuth would be zero.
orientation.
Apart from the mandatory tables, the optional tables include: geology and assay.
1. Interval
2. Point
3. Discrete.
Interval table:
Point table:
This table requires the depth_to field (the depth where the sample was taken). The Y, X and Z
fields are used to store the calculated co-ordinates of the sample depths.
Discrete table:
This table requires the unique samp_id and its position in space, i.e. its Y, X and Z co-ordinates.
This table is basically suited for storing and later processing geochemical soil.
Row sequence is important while creating a database in surpac. The row sequence should be
same in all the tables as a little change may lead to misleading values.
Column sequence is not important because surpac is so designed that it asks for the column
- .pdx folder
- .not file (text file of the report generated after the database is created)
In order to use the database in other system three files are mandatory to copy given as “.ddb”
While importing data two things are important to pay attention to, such as
The name of format file should be same as database name for simplicity as both files are
Overlapping of data may occur between the assay and lithology data as they refer to same
interval of a bore hole. The process of lithology and assay sampling is elaborated in fig2.
Bore Hole
For example: a solid object formed by wrapping a DTM (digital terrain models) around strings
Visualization;
Volume calculation;
DTM: It is used to define a surface, its creation is automatic. Triangles are formed by connecting
groups of 3 data points together by taking their spatial location in the X-Y plane into
consideration.
It has drawbacks, i.e. it cannot model a str that may have fold backs or overhangs. For instance:
Geological structure
Stopes
With a set of triangles from the points contained in the string, a solid model is created. In a plane
view, the triangles created my overlap but when a third dimension is considered, it does not
Solid model: It is made up of a set of triangles (non-overlapping). The triangles form objects that
may have a numerical identifier between 1 and 32000. In a solid model, objects represent
discrete features.
A trisolation is a discrete part of an object and is a positive integer. Object and trisolation number
gives reference to all the objects contained in a solid model. An object trisolation maybe open or
closed. It is open when there is a gap in the set of triangles that makeup the trisolation. An object
1. It can have its volume determined directly by summing the volumes of each of the
1. It can‟t provide the same capabilities; when sliced by a plane the strings it produces
Block models are a form of spatially referenced database that provides a means for modeling a
3D body from point and interval data like drill-hole sample data.
The geometric dimensions in each axis are defined by the centroid of each block, i.e. its co-
ordinates (Y, X and Z). For each of the properties to be modeled, each block contains attributes.
The attributes/properties may contain character/ numeric string values. User defines the block
Constraints:
It is a logical combination of one or more spatial objects on selected blocks. With it, all block
model functions are performed. Objects used in constraints are plane surfaces, DTMs, solids,
closed strings and block attribute values. It is saved to a file for rapid re-use and maybe used as
3.1.4 Estimation:
After a block model is created and all attributes defined, the model is filled by the required
estimation.
Nearest neighbor interpolation which is also known as proximal interpolation or point sampling
Interpolation is the method of approximation of the value of a function for a given point in some
space. The nearest neighbor method selects the value of the nearest point in the predefined space
The inverse-distance weighted procedure is versatile, easy to program and understand, and is
fairly accurate under a wide range of conditions (Lam, 1983). Using this method, the property at
∑
Pi =
∑
Where Pi is the property at location i; Pj is the property at sampled location j; Dij is the distance
from i to j; G is the number of sampled locations; and n is the inverse-distance weighting power.
The value of n, in effect, controls the region of influence of each of the sampled locations. As n
increases, the region of influence decreases until, in the limit, it becomes the area which is closer
to point I than to any other. When n is set equal to zero, the method is identical to simply
averaging the sampled values. As n gets larger, the method approximates the Voronoi
tessellation procedure (Watson and Philip, 1985). Usually, the value of n is set arbitrarily.
Watson and Philip (1985) listed some of the limitations of the inverse-distance weighted
procedure. The major limitation is that estimates are bounded by the extrema in the sampled
values. Additionally, the radial symmetry which this procedure imparts to the data obscures the
effect of linear features such as ridges or valleys. For n £ 1, the derivative of the interpolated
surface is discontinuous at the sampled locations, while for n >1, the surface is flat at these
sampled locations.
The main venture in ordinary kriging is to build a variogram from the dissipate point set to be
variogram is found by figuring the variance (g) of each one point in the set as for each of other
points and plotting the variances versus separation (h) between the points. A few equations might
be utilized to figure the variance, yet it is ordinarily calculated as half the difference in f squared.
Once the experimental variogram is figured, the following step is followed o characterize a
model variogram. A model variogram is a straightforward function that models the pattern in the
experimental variogram.
At small partition distances, the variance in f is small. As it were, points that are near one another
have comparable f values. After a certain level of partition, the variance in the f qualities gets to
be arbitrary to some degree and the model variogram levels out to a value corresponding to the
average variance.
When the model variogram is built, it is used to compute the weights used as a part of kriging.
where n is the amount of scatter points in the set, fi are the qualities of the scatter points, and wi
are weights alloted to each one disperse point. This comparison is basically the same as the
mathematical statement utilized for inverse distance weighted interpolation aside from that
instead of utilizing weights based on an arbitary function of distance, the weights utilized as a
where S(dij) is the model variogram assessed at a separation equivalent to the separation between
points i and j. For example, S(d1p) is the model variogram assessed at a separation equivalent to
the separation of points P1 and P. Since it is essential that the weights add up to result unity, a
Since there are currently four mathematical statements and three unknowns, a slack variable, l, is
added to the equation set. The last set of equations is as takes after:
By utilizing the variogram as a part of this style to figure the weights, the normal estimation error
is minimized in a least squares sense. Hence, kriging is once in a while said to generate the best
linear unbiased estimate. Nonetheless, minimizing the normal error in a least squared sense is not
generally the most imperative criteria and in a few cases, other introduction plans give more
A vital characteristic of kriging is that the variogram might be utilized to ascertain the normal
error of estimation at every interpolation point since the estimation error is a function of the
separation to neighboring scatter points. The estimation variance might be ascertained as:
While interpolating to an object using the kriging method, an estimation variance data set is
always produced along with the interpolated data set. So that, an iso-surface plot of estimation
X X Depth to Depth to
Z Z Iron lithology
Depth Depth
Azimuth
After creating the database the borehole data were imported. Total 39 boreholes had been used in
this project for reserve estimation. Cut-off grade is assumed to be 50 (because on reality there is
hardly any iron mine whose cut-off grade is below 50). The figure below shows the display of
represents waste.
the drill holes according to the ore percentage. Then we have to do sectioning of the bore holes.
Sectioning means to divide the entire span of drill holes to different parallel planes equally spaced and
along any particular direction (which can be set by the user). Each section contains some drill holes (there
Then digitising was done, one by one, in all the sections. In this process we take the ore which
has the ore percentage of our interest. Thus segments are created in all the sections. Then we
combined all the segments to one string file. After that the string file was checked for any spikes
The generated solid model report contains the trisolation extents, surface area and volume of the
Trisolation Extents
Volume : 13290520
Step distance in x, y, z directions are taken as 50, 50, 10 respectively and the block model is
created.
Now we can have the view of constrained block model by adding different graphical constraints.
After adding the created solid model as a constraint to the block model it took a new look which
is shown below.
Next task was to estimate the ore reserve for each block. It was achieved using three different
methods (Nearest Neighbor, Inverse Distance with power 2 & 3 and Ordinary krigging).
Then appropriate constraints were applied and the resultant blocks were taken into account for
ore reserve estimation. The figures of constrained block models are provided below.
Figure 4.5 Block model after applying the solid model as constraint
Figure 4.7 Constrained block model colored according to iron grade (blocks partially
under constraints are included)
4.5 Reserve estimation using Inverse Distance method (power 2 & 3):
For the reserve estimation using this method first we need to select the proper composite file.
Large composite lengths may lead to easier calculation but result good estimation if the
distribution of the mineral is continuous throughout the explored area. But if the distribution is
not continuous then large composite lengths can result in erroneous estimation. It is because a
large amount of mineral body is left and is not included in the estimation in case of large
composite length. So, to overcome this drawback, in this project down the hole composites were
created with different composite lengths and all were compared. The distribution of iron for
Comparison:
among all the composite lengths. With larger composite lengths mean reduces continuously and
it is also less with smaller composite length. Thus, composite length was taken to be 10.
Then appropriate constraints were applied (which is same as of the previous case, i.e. nearest
neighbor method) and the resultant blocks were considered for ore reserve estimation. The
figures of constrained block models are presented below (both for ID with power 2 & 3
respectively).
Figure 4.13 Block model after applying the solid model as constraint
Figure 4.14 Block model after adding both solid model constraint and iron grade constraint
(iron grade>50)
Estimation report
Constraints Used
a. Inside 3dm ore 2, where ore 2 is the solid model that we have created first
Figure 4.16 Block model after applying the solid model as constraint
Figure 4.17 Block model after adding both solid model constraint and iron grade constraint
(iron grade>50)
Estimation report:
Constraints Used
a. Inside 3dm ore 2, where ore 2 is the solid model that we have created first
b. Iron grade of block > 50
parameters which are essential because a change in search parameter can result in misguided
estimation. And for this first we need to design the variogram. Hence proper selection of
The variogram characterizes the spatial continuity or roughness of a data set. Ordinary
onedimensional statistics for two data sets may be nearly identical, but the spatial continuity may
Variogram analysis consists of the experimental variogram calculated from the data and the
variogram model fitted to the data. The experimental variogram is calculated by averaging
onehalf the difference squared of the z-values over all pairs of observations with the specified
The variogram model is chosen from a set of mathematical functions that describe spatial
relationships. The appropriate model is chosen by matching the shape of the curve of the
Mathematical function is defined as the variance of the difference between field values at two
where itself is called the semivariogram. In the case of a stationary process, the
If the process is furthermore isotropic, then the variogram and semivariogram can be represented
Variogram calculation
The maximum lag distance is initially taken as the full span of the boreholes (i.e. 700 meters).
Then from the experimental variogram the effect of the lag distance on the number of pairs of
boreholes is studied. It is observed that with lag distance greater than 450 meter the number of
borehole pairs are either zero or comparatively much less. Hence the maximum lag distance is
set to 450m.
It should be smooth
Now whichever set of lag; bearing, azimuth and dip of search ellipsoid satisfies the above three
In this project different lag values (5, 8, 10, 15) are used to construct the variogram. The
generated variogram files are presented through the following figures respectively.
5 71.804 41.898
8 73.886 41.898
10 78.048 41.898
15 65.561 41.898
Table 4.3 Comparison of different lag values to determine the suitable variogram
The set of values which is observed to satisfy all the above criteria is given below:
1. Lag = 10
2. Bearing = 0
3. Azimuth = 0
4. Dip = 0
1. Nugget = 2.67
2. Sill = 32
3. Range = 78
The important search parameters are max. search radius, max. vertical distance, bearing,
azimuth, dip and anisotropy ratios. And these are decided based on the parameters of modeled
variogram.
3. Bearing = 0
4. Azimuth = 0
5. Dip = 0
7. Major/semi-major axis = 1
The above parameters are set to the search ellipsoid and ordinary krigging of the block
containing the mineral is performed for interpolation of iron grade. Then the appropriate
Estimation report:
Constraints Used
a. Inside 3dm ore 2, where ore 2 is the solid model that we have created first
5.1 Comparison:
Here we have assumed ordinary krigging to be the best estima834tor which is also concluded in
section 2. Now the comparison of reserve estimation of other estimators is carried out following
1. The variogram that has been used in the ordinary krigging estimation was cross validated.
2. Then the results of other estimators were compared with the result of ordinary krigging.
Cross validation allows us to compare estimated and true values using only the information available in
the sample data set. Thus it gives the statistics of krigging errors. The cross validation of the concerned
5.2 Conclusion:
The error in estimation in case of Ordinary Krigging was computed and the efficiency of
reserve estimation using Nearest Neighbor and Inverse Distance (with power 2 & 3) method was
compared with Ordinary Krigging method assuming it to be the best linear unbiased method.
From the obtained estimation results it was concluded that Nearest Neighbor method
overestimates the iron percentage and underestimates the volume of the reserve while Inverse
distance (with power 2 & 3) method overestimates both attributes in comparison to Ordinary
Krigging.
1. Michel David and Roger A. Blais, Geostatistical Ore Reserve Estimation, 1977
2. Ping Huang, Peng Yang, Yizhou Chen and Chengjun Liu , Three-Dimensional Model of
Cangshang Gold Mine Based on Surpac, International Journal of Advancements in
Computing Technology, Volume3,Number11, December 2011
4. Pieter-Jan Grabe1 and Warren P. Johnstone2, Comparison of Polygonal and Block Model
Reserving Techniques in Gemcom
5. Roy Indranil and Sarkar B. C., Ore body Modeling : An Integrated Geological-
Geostatistical, Approach, Department of Applied Geology, Indian School of Mines,
Dhanbad
7. Barnes, M.P., Case study - ore-body modeling at Sacaton Mine, Arizona. In: Computer
Methods in the 80's (A. Weiss, editor), 1979: pp. 268-275
8. Parker, H.M. and R.L. Sandefur, A review of recent developments in geostatistics, AIME
Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, 1976
9. David, M., Geostatistical Ore Reserve Estimation, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1977: pp. 283
11. Hughes, W.E., and R.K. Davey, Drill hole interpolation: Mineralized interpolation
techniques. In: Open Pit Mine Planning and Design (J. Crawford and W. Hustrulid,
editors), New York, Society of Mining Engineers of the AIME, 1979: pp. 51-64
13. Lam, N. S., Spatial interpolation methods review. The American Cartographer 10, 1983:
pp. 129-149
14. Watson, D.F. and G.M. Philip, A refinement of inverse distance weighted interpolation.
Geo-Processing 2, 1985: pp. 315- 327
15. Cressie, N., Statistics for spatial data, Wiley Interscience, 1993
16. W. Hustrulid, M. Kuchta and R. Martin, Open Pit Mine Planning & Design- Volume 1,
3rd Edition, CRC Press, 1995.