CHAPTER 3 Conscience, Law, and Obedience Conscience The Id
CHAPTER 3 Conscience, Law, and Obedience Conscience The Id
CHAPTER 3 Conscience, Law, and Obedience Conscience The Id
“atomized” units of Individual acts are Skills necessary to assess morally relevant
activity are its seen in their factors: Action itself, intention,
object importance as a circumstances, consequences, values, and
part of a larger norms
process or pattern
The competence to consider the entirety of
Past-oriented; primarily Future- oriented: the contention.
concerned with creative; sees the
cleaning up the past as having a
The competence to offer sound reasons for
record with regard future and helping
a moral judgment.
to past acts to structure tis
future as a better
The competence to constitute a decisive will
future
to execute a judgment.
Urge to be punished Sees the need to repair
and thereby earn by structuring the For Kohlberg, moral life is a matter of making
reconciliation future orientation choices on the basis of reason. Moral development
toward the value in is a matter of acquiring the ability to provide
question (which increasingly more principled reasons to justify those
includes making choices.
good past harms)
Rapid transition from A sense of the gradual LAWRENCE KOHLBERG SCALE OF MORAL
severe isolation, process of growth DEVELOPMENT
guilt feelings, etc., which characterizes
to an aspect of self- all dimensions of STAGE Obedience and punishment
value accomplished genuine personal 1 orientation. Egocentric deference
by confessing an development to superior power or prestige, or
authority figure a trouble- avoiding set.
Conscience as Imagination and Christian 4. Why and how? Consequences: what if and
Narrative what else.
Law is an action about actions. From the 4. Human Positive Law - ask and answer
standpoint of the lawmaker, law is an ordinance questions about reality so as to focus on higher
of reason for the common good made by the norms bearing practical life through a
one who has care for the community and prudential determination. Canon and civil law
promulgated. From the standpoint of the depend on practical wisdom (phronesis,
subject, it is a rule and measure of acts. prudential) in establishing common sense
Immanuel Kant defines law in terms of power discretions.
or "heteronomous decision" whereby one
person governs the conduct of another The Purpose of Law
(theteros) by establishing a norm (nomos). A
lawmaker compels by communicating a choice 1. To identify basic values. Laws stems from the
of values and a sanction such as in experience of value. Legalism forgets that.
disobedience. Law, however, is more than Legalism wants to make an end of the law
sheer power Law is power rooted in authority rather than to see the law as pointing to a
whereby is meant the right to decide for value. Laws identify certain values and
another to increase the subject's good. This challenge us to foster them. Laws protect
right spring from God. It could also be values by commanding us to pursue certain
mediated. Law operates on the realm of ones and by forbidding us to jeopardize others.
common sense rather than theory. It considers Because we value freedom or bodily health, for
orthopraxis, doing practical things rightly. Self- example, we enact and accept laws to protect
appropriation of the mental operations in law is these values. Laws support our freedom to
necessary. It is about the experience and speak and to assemble. Laws prohibit smoking
apprehension of data of sense and in certain areas. In approaching laws, we ought
consciousness, verifying of insight through to understand and appropriate the values,
factual judgment, and by assessing the sphere which the laws are trying to protect and
of consciousness where law is situated. promote. Values are primary, laws are
Bernard Lonergan called this the oneralized secondary.
empirical method. It deals about consistency
between knowing and praxis. Civil law is As expressions of the experience of values, laws
oriented toward protecting the freedom and are summation of the accumulative vision of the
upholding public order for the common good. community's experience of what advances or
Ecclesiastical law is the expression to the impedes life together. Laws open us to the wisdom
interior reality of the Church as a community of of the ages. Laws serve as repositories of moral
love empowered by the Spirit. wisdom. Laws function like a road map giving
directions to find our way through the often
Kinds of Law confusing and conflicting pathways of life. Because
of our sinfulness, (individual and social), we need
laws to protect us from our sinful inclinations and instance, homicide, rape, and theft are immoral
to challenge us to foster the good of all actions, which also bear legal sanction Doing bodily
harm to oneself or lying to a friend in a private
Laws never satisfy the full measure of moral conversation does not carry legal sanction. The
responsibility. Laws do identify basic values and former actions undermine the public order whereas
point to corresponding beneficial courses of action, the latter do not.
laws set the lower limits of protecting values. Each
person must choose and act in light of the laws to The Nature of Obedience
gain the fullness of the values at stake. Without
laws cach person would have to discover the best What is the binding power of Law?
course of action in every instance on his/her own.
But no one has the energy, capacity, or vantage 1. The Rationalist
point for such a task. It is necessary to depend on
the wisdom and standpoint of others and those something is commanded because it is good.
who passed away. With laws grounded on the
wisdom of an amplified experience of value, For Thomas Aquinas, as an ordinance of
everyone is freed from the necessity of deciding. By reason, positive laws are specific expressions of
having laws, everyone is freer to go about the natural law and participate in eternal law.
business of living together in an orderly way.
God is the ultimate source of obligation. Human
2. To safeguard the public order by regulating beings must be obedient to him. Good law
relationships within the community, and by intensifies the human person to respond to the
protecting basic rights and freedom. Laws call of God.
exhibit the framework within which individuals
and institutions can exercise their freedom. Law Authority revitalized their capacity to
protects the public order. It includes an order of promulgate good laws which public order
peace to enable individuals to live in harmony, demands, and to offer logical reasons for them.
an order of public morality, which is the
minimum moral consensus necessary to enable For the rationalist's, the binding power of laws
people to live together, and an order of justice are proportionate to the persuasiveness of the
to secure what is due to the people, particularly reasons that are based on natural law. The
their freedom. implications: Illogical laws not beneficial for the
common good must be abandoned. Critical
Law and Morality thinking and evaluation on the promulgated
For Murray laws are necessary
the moral law governs the entire order of
human conduct, personal and social; it extends The basic criterion for good law is logically
even to motivations and interior acts. Law looks sound and beneficial for the common good. The
only to the public order of human society, it rationalist does not advocate blind obedience to
touches only external acts, and regards only the law.
values that are formally social.
For Peter Chirico
2. Voluntaris
o private moral values (what pertains to
personal growth) Something is good because it is commanded.
o public moral values (what benefits
For Francis Suarez, there are two elements:
society as a whole). o Promulgated
The proper realm of legislation
o Competent authority
“The state ought not to legislate morality" is
The will of the legislator assessed what is good.
false.
Blind obedience assessed those subject to
The purpose of law is to foster public order; the authority. By highlighting authority to assessed
states can and does use the law to enforce moral what is good, it follows that voluntarism gives
standards, which involves the public order. For all the power to the legislator and none to the
individual.
It presumes that by birth, election, or is a description of a behavior emerging
appointment such a person is competent of through human agency, but without the
prescribing the conduct that will protect and same knowledge or freedom. They are acts
advance public order. done by man without deliberation or
volition, and simple acts of sensation and
The Virtue of Epikela appetition such as biological, and
physiological movements. For instance,
Roman Catholic tradition of law has dealt with metabolism, respiration, the emotive sphere
inherent restrictions of laws. For instance, it has such as fear, hatred, jealousy, infatuations,
acknowledged situations wherein laws cease to and love.
bind such as invincible Ignorance, physical
impossibility, grave inconvenience, and Kinds of Human Acts (Agapay, 12-13)
The Virtue of Obedience Human acts are either elicited acts or commanded
acts. They are performed by the will and are not
Obedience is deduced from ob-audire meaning to bodily externalized. The compositions of elicited
hear." It denotes a willingness to hear others and acts are:
do their will. It alludes to hearing God and obeying
the divine will manifest in the will of others. The 1. Wish - the inclination of the will towards
virtue of obedience is a disposition to surrender our something attainable or not.
wills to others. It is a consciously willed and free 2. Intention - the inclination of the will to what
choice. It shapes the disposition of the believer to a is possible to occur without commitment of
sensitivity and docility to God's call in a number of gaining it.
situations. It reinforces the person to open up to 3. Consent - the agreement of the will to carry
the fullness of self-realization. It follows that; out an intention.
obedience is selffulfillment and self-sacrifice. The 4. Election - the scrutinizing of the will to opt
virtue of obedience goes beyond discerning God's for something effective in carrying out its
will. The obedient person imitates and follows the goal.
commandments, the beatitudes, and teachings of 5. Use - an act of the will moving a person to
the Scriptures as presenting God's will for everyday opt for the usage of those means necessary in
life. The virtue of obedience reinforces the human carrying its goal.
person to consciously exercise charity and 6. Fruition - enjoyment of the will deduced for
solidarity. Obedience also includes the Word of God the paining of goals intended earlier
and the human hearing of that word as a personal
Moral Distinctions (Agapay, 13]
call. It is our vocation.
Human acts could be in agreement or in
Human Acts and Acts of Man disagreement with the dictates of reason concerned
about the norms of morality wherein actions are
1. Human Acts (actus humanus)
judged. Actions could be moral immoral, or amoral.
is a description of an action performed by
1. Moral actions - actions congruous with the
a human person in a truly authentic
norms of morality. These are good actions.
human manner. They are performed with
2. Immoral actions - actions not congruous
awareness and free choice. Human acts
with the norms of morality. They are evil
are actions performed by a human person
actions necessitating negations.
with human capacities for knowledge and
3. Amoral actions - are neutral actions in
freedom. It is done knowingly, freely (his
connection to the norms of morality. They
own volitions and powers) and voluntarily.
are neither good nor bad.
Hence, it is deliberate, intentional, and
voluntary. Actions and the Norms of Morality [Agapay,
13-14)
2. Acts of Man (actus hominis)
The connections of actions to the norms of morality b. Evaluative knowledge- is the knowledge
are as follows: of art. It deals with quality rather than with
quantity. It deals with goodness or beauty
1. Intrinsic - when it is integral to the nature of of a thing. It is a specific mode of knowing
that thing. i.e., when the nature is defective the individual existing thing and not with
due to the eclipse or absence of certain essences. It is appreciating value and
attributes or qualities. Such actions are attains a sort of ecstasy. It is not
intrinsically evil. subservient to the knower. It is superior to
the knower. The knower serves this
2. Extrinsic - when certain actions or factors knowledge, embrace, accept, and
attached through circumstances establishing appreciate the value he discovered. It
such actions in contradictory to the norms of demands commitment. It is also involving
morality. For instance, direct abortion, Tran’s knowledge. It is a command and intensely
sexuality, and so on are intrinsically evil. personal. It is not subjective in the aspect
Amputation or Therapeutic mutilation is of being fabricated by the knower. The
extrinsically evil when it is the only resort to knower is presented something that
safeguard the life of the person. transcends the self. It is an outcome from
the unique interaction of a unique subject
Elements of a Human Act (These 3 elements and a unique object. It cannot be shared in
must be present) its entirety. The process of sharing
evaluative knowledge is a process of
1. Knowledge - conscious acts are of two general education.
kinds: cognitive and appetitive. Cognitive acts
are acts of knowing Appetitive act is not in itself c. Reflex knowledge - knowledge involved in
cognitive but presupposes some cognitive act human acts. We know the object of our
such as to love one's spouse, to enjoy sunrise. attention. We know that we know. It is
There are two main types of appetitive act: knowledge that is or can be the object of its
first, positive appetite, which motivates toward own reflection within our intellect.
something such as hunger for food, enjoying
the company of a friend, enjoying a symphony. a. Non-reflex knowledge - Our personhood
It is an attraction to something known as could not be reflected upon. It could not be
"liking," second, the negative appetite involves the direct object of our attention. We do
all appetitive acts, which motivate one to evade have certain awareness and aspect of our
certain things. It consist the element of own identity. Such awareness is not
aversion known as "dislike." A properly human available as a direct object of reflection. It is
act is a mixture of appetite with intelligence, the knowledge of our core human person.
There are different ways of knowing: first,
speculative knowledge; second, evaluative 2. Freedom of the Will - is an essential
knowledge. component of an authentic human act.
Fundamental Option is brought about by that
a. Speculative knowledge - is the knowledge fundamental freedom. What sort of freedom?
of science. It is an intellectual knowledge
and has certain objectivity (a certain a. Basic Freedom or Freedom of Self
independence from the knower). It is Determination - it must be freedom of choice
universal in character. In a certain aspect, it whereby the person makes an overall self-
is an essential knowledge. It deals with the determination, not through a specific and
essence of things. It is also fact oriented. conscious discretion on the sphere of reflection,
Like scientific knowledge, it is proveable. It but in a transcendental and athematic mode.
can be taught because it is objective and Fundamental option is a choice that emerges
independent. It is also subservient to the from a personal depth or reinforces the
knower. We respect the facts to attain our fundamental direction of our lives. It must be
goals. rooted in a deep knowledge of self and a
freedom to commit oneself. Through a
fundamental option, we express our basic
freedom of self- determination to commit categories. God confronts it. It is a freedom
ourselves profoundly toward a certain way of that opens up life. It is the freedom of human -
doing in the world. It is a choice by which a as person. It is also the freedom associated
human person directs his entire life either with perduring being.
toward God or in contradictory to God. Specific
moral acts springs from this option only partially 3. Voluntariness - is deduced from the Latin word
articulates a person's basic stance. The "voluntas". Alluding to the will. Besides sense
fundamental option itself remains untouched by perception, sensuous appetency, and
specific moral choice. It is made possible by the intellection, we experience phenomena known
presence of a number of options and multiple as volition, the activity of the will, as a phase of
possibilities. It is the freedom exercised in the our mental life. It is essential to an act. The
selection among those options and possibilities. eclipse of voluntariness makes an act a mere
act of man [Agapay. 15-17). The will is
1) Person's fundamental stance. understood and defined as rational appetency
2) The profound meaning and pertinence of or the power to strive for an intellectually
discretions of our lives. perceived good and to shun an intellectual
3) It is discretion about the sort of person one perceived evil. We strive for material and
chooses to be. It is an interior action of self- spiritual things, which seem good to us. From
definition. It is not irrevocable, not final or the individual things where are good the
definitive. It is a discretion about the person intellect abstracts the universal concept of the
as a whole but not totally as we have the good in general." "Goodness" is the suitability
capacity to reverse even our basic approach of a thing to a natural tendency or appetency.
to life. The adequate good of the human will is
everything that is good. The formal object of
b. Freedom of Choice - it has to do with the will is the good as good, provided it be
realizing our capacity to be ourselves through suitable to the willing subject.
the particular choices we make. It is subject not
only to hereditary determinants of our basic
inclinations but also to limiting factors such as
unconscious motives, peer pressure, drugs, Perfect Imperfec Conditio Simple
ignorance, passions, fears, blind habits and the Voluntari t nal Voluntar
hidden persuaders of mass media [Nery, Ethics, ness Voluntar Voluntari ism
Postulates of Ethics 6-7] ism sm
The freedom of the human act, of human-as-agent, When a When a When When a
is a dividing freedom. It takes the experience of life human human human human
and splits it into alternatives. being being being is being is
possess full performs forced by performin
a. Categorical freedom of human-as agent – knowledge an action circumsta g an
it organizes life into categories and selects from and full without nces action
among those categories. It is a restricting intention to full beyond wilfully
freedom. It is categorical because freedom is an act awarenes his control either
associated with performing. Only objects can be s and to affirmativ
categorized. Our personhood is not an object. It realization perform ely or
is a freedom associated with human action. what he an action negatively
b. Transcendental freedom - at the deeper means to .
aspect of man's being, his personhood, a do. The
human person is free not only as agents but action is
also as persons. Personhood is not an object. It performed
is a subject. Freed decisions are not categories without
of objects or another. It is all objects taken fully
together. Personhood is confronted with the intending
reality (of world, situation, body, feelings, the act
attitudes and prejudices) that transcends all
Types of Voluntariness influence on the action. The action is performed
in ignorance and with ignorance.
1. Direct Voluntariness - when the act is c. Consequent Ignorance - Ignorance is
primarily intended by the performer, as an end dependent on the will's decision.
in itself or as a means to attain something else.
2. Indirect Voluntariness - when the act is the Moral Principles:
consequence of a directly willed act. In
indirectly voluntary actions: a. Invincible ignorance annuls the
a. The performer foresees the evil voluntariness of an act; therefore, imputability
consequence. and moral responsibility are absent.
b. The performer has the freedom to b. Vincible ignorance does not annul the
refrain from actions, which would voluntariness of an act but merely lessens it.
generate the foreseen evil. Moral responsibility is still present, although
c. The performer has the moral diminished.
accountability not to perform actions
that will engender an evil consequence. 2. Concupiscence or Passion - It is the natural
inclination of the sense appetite towards what
Impediments to a Human Act is consciously perceived as a sensuous evil. To
be an adult is to be aware of the extent to
There are factors that influence man's interior which anger, envy, sexual desire, and other
disposition. It affects the mental or the emotive emotions can limit one's freedom of choice.
sphere of the person affecting the voluntariness of
an act as either increased or decreased. Almoro et. Kinds of Concupiscence
al.' gives us a clearer account on the violation
moral principles. a. Antecedent Concupiscence - is present
before any act of the will is made due to the
1. Ignorance - is the absence of knowledge suddenness of the passion as surging forth
needed by man in the performance of an act. uncontrolled.
b. Consequent Concupiscence - is present
Kinds of Ignorance when the intellect is aware of the hidden
passion, and the will chooses to foster or to
a. Invincible Ignorance - the lack of required arouse the passion.
knowledge that ordinary efforts,
conscientiousness and proper diligence cannot Moral Principles:
remove. It is also known as "total ignorance". It
has the effect of completely dehumanizing a a. Antecedent Concupiscence: Voluntariness is
human act. lessened and at times, is completely destroyed
b. Vincible Ignorance - the lack of required by antecedent concupiscence.
knowledge that ordinary efforts, b. Consequent concupiscence: Voluntariness is
conscientiousness and proper diligence can not lessened by consequent concupiscence
dispel. It is also known as partial ignorance". I inasmuch as the will consents to foster or
know where I am going but do not fully arouse the passion. Consequently, there is
appreciate the implications and consequences imputability in the actions affected by passions,
of my actions. For instance, driving in excess of and moral responsibility in the agent.
the posted speed limit. 3. Fear - Fear is the apprehension of an
impending danger and prompts the agent to
Kinds of Vincible Ignorance shrink from the threatening evil. Fear and
anxiety are the enemies of full human life and
a. Antecedent Ignorance - when ignorance authentic human discretion.
comes before the will can decide on the
morality of an act. Here, action is done because Moral Principles
of ignorance and through ignorance.
b. Concomitant Ignorance - Like antecedent
ignorance, concomitant ignorance has causal
a. Ordinarily, acts done from fear are voluntary, inadvertently coming from it are involuntary,
although voluntariness is less than when fear is and not imputable.
absent in the performance of an act.
b. In extreme cases where uncontrollable fear The Ends of the Human Act
completely grips reason and the free will, the
act performed is considered an act of man and The End of the Performer
the agent is absolved from moral responsibility.
1. Proximate or Remote End - the goal which a
4. Violence- It is the exercise of an outside person performing an action intends to finish
physical force upon a his action.
Atheism denies the existence of God. It is a sin forbids the abuse of God's name, i.e., every
against the virtue of religion. It covers many improper use of the names of God, Jesus
different phenomena. Christ, but also of the Virgin Mary and all the
Saints.
Practical materialism restricts its needs and Promises made to others in God's name
aspirations to space and time. engage the divine honor, fidelity, truthfulness
and authority. They must be respected in
Atheistic humanism falsely considers man to be justice.
an end to himself, and the sole maker, with
Blasphemy is directly opposed to the 2nd focal point of the moral life. Practicing the presence
Commandment. It is contrary to the respect of God becomes essential for Christian
due God and his holy name. It is in itself a responsibility, Christian moral growth and our
grave sin. It consists in uttering against God - awareness of sin.
inwardly or outwardly - words of hatred,
reproach, or defiance, in speaking ill of God, in 1. Covenant
failing in respect toward him in one's speech, in
misusing God's name. The prohibition of In the Old Testament, sin is Miserere (an evil of
blasphemy extends to language against Christ's sin) points to violations of relationships:
Church, the saints, and sacred things. It is also
blasphemous to make use of God's name to Hattah or "to miss the mark" or "to respond"
cover up criminal practices, to reduce people to points to a willful rejection of the known will of
servitude, to torture persons or put them to God. It is action oriented toward an existing
death. The misuse of God's name to commit a relationship. The existence of the relationship
crime can provoke others to repudiate religion. makes the offense or failure possible.
Oaths, which misuse God's name, thought
without the intention of blasphemy, show lack Pesha "rebellion" is a legal term exhibiting how
of respect for the Lord. in sinning human persons reject God and his love.
The 2nd Commandment also forbids magical It denotes a deliberate action violating a
use of the divine name. concatenated engagement in community.
Such a properly directed heart yields a life of Personal sin-is a spirit of selfishness grounded in
virtue. The misdirected heart generates sin. The our hearts and wills wages war against God's plan
sinner, shackled by selfishness may accord in for our fulfillment. It is rejection, either partial; or
disengaging between moral knowledge and his total, of one's role, as a child of God and a member
will. of his people, a rejection of the spirit of sonship,
love and life.
A mechanism of the stubborn sinfulness can
activate another sort of integration. Dark Rollo may provide a helpful schema for
energies of selfishness and arrogance may understanding sin as the arrogance of power. All of
dominate the person's actions into energy of us have power. But not all of it is demonic. We
dark goals. need power to love in the first place. Power is the
capacity to influence change in others and
C. Sin: The Arrogance of Power situations for good or evil.
There are three common analogous uses of sin: There are five kinds of Power
We break the dynamic of power of sin in our lives 1. The mortal sin
when we realize that we are in fact profoundly 2. The venial sin.
loved apart from our achievements and our virtue.
Only God's love is so permanent and profound or to The greatest sin is the direct rejection of God. This
liberate us from our sin. Christian life is dialectic of is idolatry.
sin and grace, of guilt and of forgiveness. Hence, it
is breaking the spiral cycle of evil, sin, and guilt. Paul: sins which can exclude one from the reign of
God, blasphemy against the Holy Spirit will not be
Kinds of Sin forgiven because the person is closed to the power
of the Spirit to save. For example, mortal sin:
Original sin idolatry, blasphemy, murder, adultery, fornication,
false witnessing, fraud, and lying.
is the theological code word for the human
condition of living in a world where we are There are three conditions.
influenced by more evil than what we do
ourselves. 1. sufficient reflection;
Our whole being and environment is infected by 2. full consent of the will;
this condition of evil and brokenness willy-nilly. 3. Serious matter.
We feel the effect of its presence and it's in our
lack of freedom and in our vitality to love, as Unintentional ignorance can diminish or even
we would want. remove the imputability of a grave offense. But no
In Rom 7. Paul said: I do not do the good I one is deemed to be ignorant of the principles of
the moral law, which are written in the conscience
want to do; instead, I do the evil I do not want
of every man. The promptings of feelings and
to do.
passions can also diminish the voluntary and free
The full doctrine of original sin tells that though
character of the offense, as can external pressures
we may be broken, we are not disasters. We
or pathological disorders. Sin committed trough
can still become who we are made to be. The
malice, by deliberate choice of evil, is the gravest.
Formal sin A human act, which does not stem from the
core of the human person and does not
is sin in the true sense. constitute a fundamental option. It does not
engage the transcendental freedom of our
It is precisely the action for which we are deepest sphere.
morally culpable because is proceeds from It does not spring from the deepest level of our
knowledge and freedom and so carries a knowledge and freedom so as to change our
significant degree of personal involvement. fundamental commitment to be open to God,
others, and the world.
Material Sin In venial sin, there is an interior contradiction.
The more clearly we become aware of God's
is sin only in an analogous way. love for us, and the more greatly grateful for
that love we become and can clearly know our
It is an act of objective wrongdoing, an act that venial sins and the more seriously we will take
may cause great harm. But the objective them.
wrongdoing itself does not automatically make Our venial sins are what weaken the rootedness
one morally culpable or make the actions of our fundamental commitment to God and to
subjectively sinful. being a loving person.
If we take more seriously our venial sins, the
To say an action is a moral sin presumes that more attuned we will become to the call to
the action is done with evaluative knowledge conversion in our lives. The ongoing need for
and basic freedom. Through moral sin, the moral flourishing, the ongoing conversion,
sinner closes the self-off from a commitment to which ought to mark our moral lives, is the
life and love. transition bringing us back in line with our
fundamental orientation of being committed to
Moral sin radically disrupts the person’s life and love.
relationship with God and turns the person The distinction between mortal and venial sin is
away from openness to life and love. Mortal sin in the degree of personal penetration or
demands degree of self-awareness, self- personal involvement in the action.
possession, and self-determination. In mortal sin, there is a deeper core
involvement. Venial sin does not deprive the
For a sin to be mortal ("mortalia" or deadly sinner of sanctifying grace, friendship with God,
sins), the object is grave matter and which is charity, and consequently eternal happiness
also committed with full knowledge and (CCC 1863].
deliberate consent. Grave matter is specified by
Social sin
the Ten Commandments. The gravity of sins is
more or less great: murder is graver than theft. Sins gives rise to social situations and
One must also take into account who is institutions that are contrary to the divine
wronged: violence against parents is in itself goodness. Structures of sin are the expression
graver than violence against a stranger (CCC and effect of personal sins. They lead the
1857-1858). Mortal sin results in the loss of victims to do the evil in their turn. In an
charity and privation of sanctifying grace, that analogous sense, they constitute a social sin.
is, of the state of grace. It is not redeemed by
The notion of social sin articulates how social
repentance and God's forgiveness. It causes
structures can shape our existence for the
exclusion from Christ's kingdom and the eternal
worse.
death of hell, for our freedom has the power to
It describes the consequences of individual
make choices for ever with no turning back.
choices, which form structures wherein people
Although we can judge that an act is in itself a
suffer various forms of oppression and
grave offense, we must entrust judgment of
exploitation.
persons to the justice and mercy of God (CCC
For example, patterns of racial discrimination,
1861).
economic system that exploit migrant workers,
structures which make it necessary that persons
Venial Sin be illegal aliens and sanctuaries harbor them,
and the exclusion of women from certain
positions in the church.