Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Definition and Scope of Immovable Property
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Definition and Scope of Immovable Property
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Definition and Scope of Immovable Property
INTRODUCTION
The term ‘property’ has not been defined in the Act. When Section 6 of the Act says ‘property of
any kind’ it implies every possible interest or right that can be possessed and is a subject of
ownership. It can be tangible or intangible. It can be a physical object or something abstract.
Property of different kinds is dealt with differently. The movable property is dealt with under the
Sales of Goods Act, 1930 while the major chunk of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 deals with
immovable property. Section 3 of the Transfer of the Property Act, 1882 is called the
Interpretation clause for it explains the following terms.
It can be transferred from one place to It cannot be transferred without causing extensive damage to the
another. property. The damage relates to the nature of the
property
Registration is optional as per the Indian
Registration Act, 1908. Registration is compulsory under the Indian Registration Act, 1908 if
The Sales and Central Sales taxes are the value of the property is more than Rs. 100.
applied, The property needs to be registered at the Sub-Registrar’s office.
The appropriate stamp duty and the registration fee have to be paid.
The definition of immovable property as per the Transfer of Property Act is a negative definition.
The Section 3 reads that “immovable property” does not include standing timber, growing crops
or grass”. Standing timber refers to trees that are fit for usage in building or repairs. Growing
crop includes all such vegetables, etc that are solely grown only for their produce. Grass is
referred to as fodder.
Section 3(26) of the GENERAL CLAUSES ACT, 1897 is not an exhaustive definition. It says
that “Immovable property shall include land, benefits arising out of land and things attached to
the earth, or permanently fastened to anything attached to the earth.” It specifies the following as
immovable property.
a) LAND- It encompasses the upper as well as the lower surface of the earth. Any interest in the
same will be treated as that of immovable property. It would include wells, streams etc.
To determine whether a fixture is permanent or not, the following points need to be considered:
a) Mode of Annexation: Temporary, standing on its own weight or dug in to the earth, etc.
b) Purpose or Object of Annexation:
Trade fixtures are to be treated in association with the business and not the land as the fixtures are
attached in connection with the business. Such fixtures are to be treated as accessory to the business and
not as annexation. The position is different if the person attaching the fixtures in a business place is the
owner himself.
When it is a machinery in the factory, the court has to see the object and purpose of such installation. The
beneficial enjoyment of the machinery itself, the degree and the manner of attachment or annexation on to
the earth are other points for consideration.
The Section 2(9) of the INDIAN REGISTRATION ACT, 1908 gives out the physical aspects of
property in the definition present in the said Act. The definition under the Act is as follows, “Immovable
Property includes land, buildings, hereditary allowances, rights of ways, lights, ferries, fisheries or any
other benefit arising out of land and things attached to the earth but not standing timber, standing crops or
grass.”
Immovable Property means lands, benefits arising of the lands and the things attached to the
earth or permanently fastened to anything attached to the earth. Other than the physical aspect,
every benefit arising from and every interest in the property is also included in the definition. It
excludes three things, namely, standing timber, growing crops and grass.
For example, mangoes are treated as movable property for the intention is to pluck them
seasonally and sell them. On the other hand, when a person has a right to fish from a particular
lake, it is a benefit arising of an immovable property, namely, the lake. Hence, it will be an
immovable property.
MARSHALL vs. GREEN — It was held that if only a right to cut and enjoy the tress as timber
was sold, it is an interest in a movable property. If such a right is to extend over many years, it
will be treated as an interest in immovable property.
The real test if whether a property is immovable or immovable is the intention behind the
transfer and the transferability of the property. For example, generally a mango tree will be
treated as an immovable property but it will be treated as movable property if it is to be cut and
used to build a house.