Lecture-V Reaction and Separation System
Lecture-V Reaction and Separation System
Lecture-V Reaction and Separation System
Lecture - V
Integrated Process Design: Reaction and Separation
system synthesis
2. Frequently, the major investment and operating costs of a process will be those costs associated
with the separation equipment
❑ Less efficient
Reactor
▪ Less reactor cost
▪ High undesired
❑ High efficient Reactor product formed
▪ High reactor cost ▪ High separation
▪ Less undesired product formed cost
▪ Low separation cost
3. For a binary mixture, it may be possible to select a separation method that can accomplish the
separation task in just one piece of equipment. However, more commonly, the feed mixture
involves more than two components, involving more complex separation systems
Select from
distillation,
enhanced
distillation, stripping
Attempt to cool
towers, liquid-liquid
reactor
extraction, etc.
products using
cooling water
• Heuristic
– Heuristic rules that expedite the selection and positioning of
processing operations as flowsheets are assembled.
O
1
C2H4 + -2 O2 → CH2 - CH2 (R.1)
O OH OH
(R.2)
CH2 - CH2 + H2O → CH2 - CH2
➢ Since both reactions are highly exothermic, they need to be controlled carefully. But
a water spill into an ethylene-oxide storage tank could lead to an accident similar to
the Bhopal incident. Often such processes are designed with two reaction steps,
with storage of the intermediate, to enable continuous production, even when
maintenance problems shut down the first reaction operation.
R-3
R-4
Example:
HOAc
→
MeOH + HOAc MeOAc + H2O, Reaction
zone
MeOH
Conventionally, this would call for reaction:
followed by separation of products using a H 2O
sequence of separation towers. MeOH + HOAc
→ MeOAc + H O
2
Separations!!!
Combination of the
previous two flowsheets
an inert diluent
cold shots.
▪ the creation by heat transfer, shaft work, or pressure reduction of a second phase
that is immiscible with the feed phase (ESA – energy separating agent)
▪ the introduction into the system of a second fluid phase (MSA – mass separating
agent). This must be subsequently removed.
▪ the addition of a solid phase upon which adsorption can occur (MSA – mass
separating agent)
▪ Separation equipment
C 1I / C 2I C = composition variable, I, II =
SF =
C 1II / C 2II phases rich in components 1 and 2.
s
y1 / x1 K1 P1
SF = = = 1,2 = s for ideal L and V
y2 / x2 K2 P2
▪ The tower pressure does not cause the mixture to approach the TC of the
mixture.
▪ The overhead vapor can be at least partially condensed at the column pressure to
provide reflux without excessive refrigeration requirements.
▪ The bottoms temperature for the tower pressure is not so high that chemical
decomposition occurs.
• When the process involves the separation of a n-component mixture, there are
different possibilities in the component separation order, each possibility
corresponds to a different column sequence. The number of simple column
sequences(NS,) can be predicted by the formula of (Thompson and King, 1972 )
Component - # of Ns
P Separators
2 1 1
➢ When the number of
3 2 2
components increases, the
4 3 5
number of alternatives
5 4 14
increases very rapidly
6 5 42
7 6 132
8 7 429
1. There may be significant differences in the capital and operating costs between
different distillation sequences
2. Heat integration may have a significant effect on operating costs.
2 4−1 ! 6×5×4×3×2×1
𝑁𝑆 = = =5
4! 4 − 1 ! 4×3×2×1×3×2×1
4. If thermal decomposition in the reboilers contaminates the product, then this dictates that
finished products cannot be taken from the bottoms of columns.
5. Some compounds tend to polymerize when distilled unless chemicals are added to
inhibit polymerization.
6. There might be components in the feed to a distillation sequence that are difficult to
condense.
Heuristic 2. Sequences that remove the lightest components alone one by one in
column overheads should be favored. In other words, favor the direct sequence.
Heuristic 4. Favor splits in which the molar flow between top and bottom products in
individual columns is as near equal as possible.
Heuristic 5. Remove thermally unstable, corrosive, or chemically reactive
components early in the sequence.
Reaction
product mixture
Feed
Question:
Design a sequence of
ordinary distillation
columns to meet the
given specifications.
= 3.6 = 2.8
= 1.35
(a) More than 50% middle component (b) More than 50% middle component
and less than 5% heaviest component. and less than 5% lightest component.
➢ Comparing with a simple column arrangements, the distributed and prefractionator arrangements
typically require 20 to 30% less energy than conventional arrangements for the same separation duty.
(c) sloppy split sequence (d) Three component sloppy sequence with a
reduced number of columns
• If they are all two-product separators and if T equals the number of different
types, then the number of possible sequences is now given by:
T P −1
Ns =T Ns
Text Book
Group Chemical Process Design and Conceptual Design of
Integration(Robin Smith)— Chemical Process(James
Chapter 11 M. Douglas) -Chapter 7
I #2 ///
II #6 ///
III #3 ///
IV /// #7.6-4
V #5 ///