Corporate Governance Failure at Satyam Quiz3
Corporate Governance Failure at Satyam Quiz3
Corporate Governance Failure at Satyam Quiz3
I’D: 20201-27368
Course code: M-12654
The case is about the collapse of both Satyam and its founder, Ramalinga Raju, who was a major
celebrity in corporate India.
The Satyam case is about a US$1.4 billion corporate governance fraud. Satyam is India's fourth-largest
information technology company. It offered Information Technology (IT) services to around 690 clients,
such as Nissan motors, general motors, etc.
Learning objective:
This case can help in the process of understanding how corporate governance works and how flaws, in
this kind of governance, can lead to some scandal situations. It also helps understanding the role of a
promoter, independent directors, auditors and the government in corporate governance failures. And
most of all, this case can give a great lead to clarifying corporate governance theories.
The unethical conduct was one of the main reasons behind the inadequate corporate governance at
Satyam. There was no explicit or implicit code of ethics surrounding Satyam’s corporate culture; bribery,
corruption, and exchange of favors, within and outside the company, appear to have occurred with
frequency at various levels. All the financial books showed different and false status. All the taxes on
account of the non-existent accrued interests, which were a considerable loss for the company that
continuous, damage the company finance. The true role of audit committee is to ensure transparency in
the company, that financial disclosures and financial statements provide a correct, sufficient and
creditable picture and that, cases of frauds, irregularities, failure of internal control system within the
organization, were minimized, which the committee failed to carry out in Satyam’s case.
The learning objectives from the case for future prospects of corporate governance :
The company should know that all inaccuracies must be investigated on time. if your accounts
are not balancing, or if something seems inaccurate, the make the accurate on time.
Everyone should have given the responsibilities to perform the task then check the performance
level of work of each employee so that if any one of them is not work well then it should be
easily find out the problems.
Good corporate governance should be followed lesson concerns splitting up the roles, of
the CEO and the Chairman of the Board, thus, helps avoid situations like the one at Satyam.
1. Agency theory:
It illustrates the relative between a primary person, who assigns task, and the mediator who
executes that task. It concerns solving two kinds of problems that can come up in this
relationship. In this theory, it is crystal clear to see the agent is playing the most part in
determining the status of an organization.
2. Transaction cost theory:
When company wants to exploit a firm-specific asset abroad it will more likely invest in own
facilities rather than others facilities,
For example licensing if transaction costs are high. The more intangible the firm-specific asset
is, the greater the incentive for internalization will be.
Organizing transactions may be carried out into two methods, the price system or hierarchy. The
problem with the price system may be that some market participants take advantage of
measurement difficulties to overprice and/or underperform. To avoid this 'cheating' behavior
companies internalize and integrate transactions.