NORCboyland

STATE OF NEW YORK
LEGISLATIVE ETHICS COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF
WILLIAM F. BOYLAND, JR. NOTICE OF
MEMBER OF THE NEW YORK REASONABLE CAUSE
STATE ASSEMBLY
FINDING OF REASONABLE CAUSE FOR VIOLATION OF PUBLIC

OFFICERS LAW Sections 74 and 73-a
The Legislative Ethics Commission (“Commission”) hereby finds that there is reasonable
cause to believe that Assemblymember William F. Boyland, Jr. maintained a financial
relationship with Brookdale Hospital (or Brookdale University Hospital and Medical
Center) or other MediSys facilities which constituted a substantial conflict of interest
with the proper discharge of his duties as a Member of the New York State Assembly, in
violation of Public Officers Law §74(2). Assemblymember Boyland, therefore, by his
conduct, gave reasonable basis for the impression that Brookdale Hospital and other
related facilities could improperly influence him and unduly enjoy his favor in violation
of §74(3)(f) of the Public Officers Law. The Commission further finds reasonable cause
to believe that Assemblymember Boyland either accepted employment from Brookdale
Hospital which impaired his independence of judgment in the performance of his official
duties, in violation of §74(3)(a) or, in the alternative, accepted payment from Brookdale
Hospital (or other MediSys facilities) which constituted an unwarranted privilege, in
violation of §74(3)(d) and knowingly and willfully, with intent to deceive, reported
information he knew to be false on his annual statements of financial disclosure for
calendar years 2003 through 2009, in violation of Public Officers Law Section §73-a.
Additionally, there is reasonable cause to believe Assemblymember Boyland, by his
conduct, pursued a course of conduct which raised suspicion among the public that he is
likely to be engaged in acts that are in violation of his trust in violation of §74(3)(h).
JURISDICTION OF THE COMMISSION
The Legislative Ethics Commission was created by the Public Employees Ethics Reform
Act of 2007 (Chap. 14, L. 2007) which was signed into law on March 26, 2007. This
legislation eliminated the former Legislative Ethics Committee and established the
Legislative Ethics Commission comprised of both members of the legislature and non-
legislative members and revised the provisions of the Public Officers Law under the
Commission's jurisdiction.
The Commission is authorized by Legislative Law §80(7)(l) to conduct investigations
and carry out such proceedings as are authorized and necessary to enforce the provisions
of Public Officers Law §§73, 73-a or 74.
In cases where the Commission finds there is reasonable cause to believe that a violation
of Public Officers Law §§73, 73-a or §74 occurred, the Commission will conduct an
adjudicatory hearing at which the respondent has the right to be heard. The Commission
is empowered to assess a civil penalty or, in lieu thereof, refer the violation to an
appropriate prosecutor, depending upon the facts and circumstances. Legislative Law
§80(10)(b) provides that if the Commission determines that there is reasonable cause to
believe that a violation has occurred, in the case of a member of the Assembly, it shall
send a notice of reasonable cause: (i) to the reporting person; (ii) to the complainant if
any; and (3) in the case of an Assemblymember, to the Speaker of the Assembly.
APPLICABLE LAW AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
On June 2, 2010, the Commission, on its own initiative, voted to investigate

Assemblymember Boyland upon review of: his annual statement of financial disclosure
for Calendar year 2008 (filed April 29, 2009) and those filed in prior years; his request
for an advisory opinion regarding outside employment at Brookdale Hospital in Brooklyn
which was later withdrawn; statements made by the Assemblymember to Commission
Staff; and an initial factual review. Pursuant to Legislative Law §80(10)(a), the
Legislative Ethics Commission provided Mr. Boyland notice of the its decision to
investigate whether his employment at Brookdale Hospital (or Brookdale University
Hospital and Medical Center) constituted a conflict with his position as a member of the
New York State Assembly and whether he properly reported his employment at
Brookdale Hospital or any other Medisys managed facility and any income from those
entities on his annual statements of financial disclosure. Notice was sent to
Assemblymember Boyland via certified mailed to his home address on June 8, 2010 and
via personal service on June 14, 2010.
Legislative Law §74(2) provides the general rule for legislators with respect to conflicts
of interest and provides, in pertinent part:
No …member of the legislature..should have any interest, financial or otherwise,

direct or indirect, or engage in any business or transaction or professional activity
or incur any obligation of any nature, which is in substantial conflict with the
proper discharge of his duties in the public interest.
Legislative Law §74(3) sets forth standards of conduct and includes:
a. No…member of the legislature…should accept other employment which

will impair his independence of judgment in the exercise of his official duties
d. No …member of the legislature …should use or attempt to use his or her
official position to secure unwarranted privileges or exemptions for himself or
others, including but not limited to, the misappropriation to himself, herself, or to
others of the property, services or to others of the property, services or other
resources of the state for private business or other compensated non-governmental
purposes.
f. …[A] member of the legislature…should not by his conduct
give reasonable basis for the impression that any person can
improperly influence him or unduly enjoy his favor in the
performance of his official duties…or that he is affected by
the…influence of any party or person.
h….[A] member of the legislature…should endeavor to pursue a
course of conduct which will not raise suspicion among the public
that he is likely to be engaged in acts that are in violation of his
trust.
Legislative Law §73-a sets out the requirements for filing annual
statements of financial disclosure by legislative members and provides:
A reporting individual who …knowingly and willfully with intent
to deceive makes a false statement or gives information which such
individual knows to be false on such statement of financial
disclosure …shall be subject to a civil penalty …or, in lieu of a
civil penalty [the commission may] refer a violation to the
appropriate prosecutor.
Mr. Boyland was given fifteen days to respond to the Commission’s notice as provided
by statute. On July 9, 2010, Mr. Boyland’s attorney contacted the Commission
requesting that it hold its investigation “in abeyance” because “…there is a current
investigation by a law enforcement entity involving the same line of inquiry of the
Commission’s investigation.” After repeated requests to Mr. Boyland’s attorney for
either contact information at the “law enforcement agency” to confirm the investigation
or an affidavit from Mr. Boyland’s attorney confirming the same, the Commission
received no further correspondence from Mr. Boyland or his attorney and issued a
“Notice of Further Investigation” on January 28, 2011. On March 10, 2011,
Assemblymember Boyland was charged by complaint and, in early April, indicted in the
United States District Court, Southern District of New York. Included in the indictment
was information that Assemblymember Boyland had a “consulting job” with Brookdale
Hospital, which was given to him in exchange for undertaking action to benefit MediSys
and its constituent hospitals as the opportunity arose. Specifically, the indictment
included allegations that Mr. Boyland requested three million dollars in State funding for
MediSys and met with the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health
regarding MediSys acquisition of the Caritas Hospitals. The complaint included
information that the Assemblymember, in 2003, awarded state grants to Urban Strategies,
a MediSys social service provider. The Commission further provided Assemblymember
Boyland and his counsel with Notice of an opportunity to be heard before the
Commission on March 29, 2011. The Commission received notification from Mr.
Boyland’s attorney dated March 25, 2011 that the member would not appear before the
Commission pending resolution of the outstanding federal matter.
CONCLUSION
Based upon a review of all materials, proceedings and findings before the Commission to
date, the Legislative Ethics Commission has found reasonable cause to believe that
Assemblymember William Boyland, Jr. violated Public Officers Laws §74(2) and
§74(3)(f) and (h). In addition, the Commission has found reasonable cause to believe that
the Assemblymember violated either Public Officers Law §74(3)(a) or, in the alternative,
§74(3)(d) and §73-a.
Notice of Reasonable Cause is, hereby, also transmitted to the Speaker of the Assembly
as required by Legislative Law §80(10)(b).
The Commission also notes that Assemblymember Boyland was duly notified of his
opportunity to be heard prior to the Commission’s vote to issue a Notice of Reasonable
Cause, however he declined to exercise that opportunity.
Further adjudication of this matter including scheduling and providing Notice of an

Adjudicatory Hearing, at which Assemblymember Boyland has the right to be heard, will
be held in abeyance pending ongoing discussions with the United States Attorney’s
Office for the Southern District of New York.
Dated: May 31, 2011
_____________________________ ______________________________
Senator Andrew Lanza Assemblymember Daniel O’Donnell
Co-Chair Co-Chair
Legislative Ethics Commission

NORCboyland

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

NORCboyland

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

NORCboyland

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

STATE OF NEW YORK

LEGISLATIVE ETHICS COMMISSION

FINDING OF REASONABLE CAUSE FOR VIOLATION OF PUBLIC

JURISDICTION OF THE COMMISSION

APPLICABLE LAW AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

On June 2, 2010, the Commission, on its own initiative, voted to investigate

No …member of the legislature..should have any interest, financial or otherwise,

Legislative Law §74(3) sets forth standards of conduct and includes:

a. No…member of the legislature…should accept other employment which

Further adjudication of this matter including scheduling and providing Notice of an

Dated: May 31, 2011

Legislative Ethics Commission

You might also like