1

Title: International Human Rights Law

 2

Question 1)

Human rights are the rights that all human beings have the right to be human beings by
human wisdom. Within the same broad range of freedoms, few rights are considered of
straightforward importance. Although some international instruments have a license to criticize
these rights "through a system of social problems that threaten the country's very existence," they
all said fundamental freedoms are widespread, interconnected, related, connected. Standard to
build, and all fundamental freedoms must be treated fairly and equitably, in the same balance and
the same accentuation". 1

The concept of fundamental freedoms and everyday freedoms can be traced back to
artefacts, e.g. the Ten Commandments, The Hammurabi Code, and the Rights of Athenians.
While this module will not analyze the first areas of general liberal ideology, it is essential to
understand and see that the fundamental principles of fundamental freedoms worldwide are
moving deep in history. Although violations of fundamental freedoms have often been a
significant factor in diversity in the pursuit of the exiles and remain an obstacle to their safe
return, one should keep in mind that the principles of the same freedom apply to other issues of
movement.2 Likewise, whether it is a lead guarantee or a separate mediation, you must have a
deeper understanding of fundamental freedoms and practical standards. International law on
fundamental freedoms has addressed the various types of international law to promote and
protect fundamental freedoms at global, local and local levels. The law of absolute universal
freedom encompasses international systems and standards law.3 Some of the most basic
freedoms in the world, though not legally limited, are offered in the making, understanding and
development of fundamental international freedoms law.

UN Charter and Development of International Human Rights Law

1
Hesselman, Marlies. "Establishing a Full 'Cycle of Protection' for Disaster Victims: Preparedness, Response and
Recovery According to Regional and International Human Rights Supervisory Bodies." Tilburg Law Review 18.2
(2013): 106-32.
2
Olivier De Schutter, International Human Rights Law (Cambridge University Press 2019) p 35-57.

3
Teshome, Roman Girma. "Provision of Remedies for Violation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A
Comparative Study of the United Nations, Inter-American and African Human Rights Systems." African Journal of
International and Comparative Law 28.2 (2020): 298-318.
 3

The UN has become an essential international foundation that has developed credibly,
within the framework of its Charter, the guarantee of fundamental global freedom in law and
order. The drafting and adoption of the UDHR were attempted on their own within the
framework of the UN Charter. Therefore, the definition of the UDHR as a symbol of universal
constitutional liberty will be better informed by a brief UN Charter investigation into the basics
and developments of the universal liberty law that preceded the adoption of the UDHR. Before
the formation of the United Nations in the aftermath of World War II in 1945, previous attempts
to commemorate the general arrangements for the UN treaty following World War I in 1919
were unsuccessful.4 The primary purpose of the fundamental freedoms enshrined in the
Convention was employment rights in Article 23 of it, which states that persons from the
Organization 'shall endeavor to obtain and comply with reasonable and discriminatory conditions
for men, women, and youth, both in their professions in their nations and in all nations where
their business and modern relations are expanded and accepted so that they can receive treatment
only from the locals of the regions under their influence '. No matter what happened, various
security settlements and state revelations emerged that ensured the protection of minority rights;
the United Nations played an administrative role in the commitments made, which were
considered a global concern.5 The private bonds continued within and outside the United Nations
to ratify the legal system of universal freedom. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was
adopted in 1929 by the Institute of International Law, an independent body of experts recognised
by international law in Europe, the United States, and Asia, in which we believed it was the
responsibility of every state to recognise equal and equal rights to life, liberty, and property.
Apart from a degree connected to race, gender, nationality, language, or religion, the Institute
believed each government to be responsible for giving broad coverage of these rights to everyone
within its realm. Although the Declaration was not a formal declaration, it added to the possible
development of a legal system for equal freedom in the world in the years following its
adoption.6

4
Mujuzi, Jamil Ddamulira. "Evidence Obtained through Violating the Right to Freedom from Torture and Other
Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment in South Africa." African Human Rights Law Journal 15.1 (2015): 89-109.
5
Olivier De Schutter, International Human Rights Law (Cambridge University Press 2019) p 35-57.

6
Ní Ghráinne, Bríd, and Aisling McMahon. "Access to Abortion in Cases of Fatal Foetal Abnormality: A New
Direction for the European Court of Human Rights?" Human Rights Law Review 19.3 (2019): 561-84.
 4

The deplorable conditions during World War II also caused great sympathy for the
people. They prompted the international community to seek legal action to ensure equal freedom
and the attainment of global harmony and security. Next, it was not made clear even before the
conflict that the international obligation for basic freedom insurance should be part of a post-war
solution. Later, after announcing their guarantee of saving consecutive years in the face of war,
which twice in our lifetime has brought immeasurable sorrow,' this section of the foreword to the
United Nations Charter that emerged after the conflict states that, after announcing their
guarantee of'saving consecutive years in the face of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought
immeasurable sorrow,' 'Re-affirm trust in fundamental freedoms, in the dignity and value of the
individual, in the equal rights of citizens and nations, large and small,'.7

UDHR as A Standard Level of Success

Even though the UDHR was not a legitimate tool at its adoption, it has progressed to
ensure that its programmes now combine universal law and standard legal standards or address
unorthodox human notions. As previously said, its most essential relevance is that it provides a
legitimate object for the interpretation of the UN Charter on its shared freedom programmes, as
adopted by the UN General Assembly. The International Court of Justice (ICJ), the International
Criminal Court (ICC), domestic and regional courts have all summoned commonsense as a guide
to comprehending important liberal treaties and society. The Declaration was also adopted on
several issues, including the case of equal freedom. Article 60 of the African Charter on Human
Rights (African Charter or ACHPR), ratified by 53 African countries, is clearly in need at the
regional level.8 The African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights at the United Nations
Human Rights Council for inspiration, burial, and more interpreting the African Charter. Some
public constitutions confer an unusual position on the UDHR in their references, while others
expressly advocate the interpretation of constitutions similar to the UDHR. For example, article
102 of the 1978 Spanish Constitution states that "values comparable to the fundamental freedoms
and freedoms enshrined in the Constitution shall be taken into account by the Universal

7
Giupponi, Belen Olmos. "Free, Prior and Informed Consent (fpic) of Indigenous Peoples before Human Rights
Courts and International Investment Tribunals: Two Sides of the Same Coin?" International Journal on Minority and
Group Rights 25.4 (2018): 485-529.
8
Moffett, L. "Elaborating Justice for Victims at the International Criminal Court: Beyond Rhetoric and the Hague."
Journal of International Criminal Justice 13.2 (2015): 281-311.
 5

Declaration of Human Rights and international standards, as well as the resolution of those
guaranteed problems by Spain”.9

Question 2)

First Problem:

The virtuoso of fundamental freedom is an opportunity for complete understanding.

Human rights belong to all persons in opposition to many different forms of law is related to
certain circles, usually but not social circles. As a result, the rights enshrined in the constitution
of the community relate to the citizens of what is specified also means in some way to people
with a secure connection in that particular case (citizens, visitors etc.) No matter what happens,
established freedom does not relate to everyone but to a limited meeting. Constitutional rights
are shared as it is associated with all people a lot of non-qualification about birth, shading, and so
on; however, they are not universal in the sense of belonging. While the states have a limited
ward, human rights do not. The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights was a primary
guarantee of joint ownership with that in mind. French Proclamation of 1789 is very widespread
as it was said to introduce human rights, yet all at once, the truth is restricted to French citizens
only. To be commemorated by the 1789 Basic Freedom Insurance, it must be French.10 There
was an attempt to overcome polarity between ownership, being French, an all-inclusive, being
human also fundamental freedom, with France's victory over most of the European continent and
North Africa, which can be considered an effort to advance human development ignored as
universal rights and modern law. However, the French soldiers could not be regarded as regular
human rights providers but rather unusual conquerors, or all, as one-person soldier's country.
Given this, the French Declaration did not spread but rather indicates what can be marked as
combining all the near or direct, fruitless the effort of all involvement.11 For example, in almost
every case described by Schutter their ancestors have suffered the most serious violations of their
basic human rights, especially their security, by groups of people who pioneered. The equality
9
Poole, Avery. "The World Is Outraged": Legitimacy in the Making of the ASEAN Human Rights Body."
Contemporary Southeast Asia 37.3 (2015): 355-80.
10
Follesdal, Andreas. "Subsidiarity and International Human Rights Courts: Respecting Self-governance and
Protecting Human Rights - or Neither?" Law and Contemporary Problems 79.2 (2016): 147.
11
Krommendijk, J. "The Domestic Effectiveness of International Human Rights Monitoring in Established
Democracies. The Case of the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies." Review of International Organizations 10.4 (2015):
489-512.
 6

obligations owed to the descendants of indigenous groups whose rights were ignored are
transformed into the paid, fully understood, freedoms of their relatives. in Rawlsian the challenge
is that there are sensible forms of non-radicalism. The direct answer to the Rawlsian challenge is
that it misjudges my position. In any case, the misconception is somehow my responsibility, so
let me first state what my position is and then why Rawlsian challenge is based on
misconceptions.12

A full understanding of universal rights means that fundamental freedoms must be equal
for everyone. With the beauty of being human, each person deserves the inevitable rights and
opportunities. These freedoms guarantee the dignity and worth of the individual and ensure the
prosperity of the individual. Some find that human rights are customary. The result is that the
freedoms enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) may not make any
difference to specific nations and civil societies. However, the UDHR text is written with all the
words included.

Second Problem:

Throughout this time, we see how natural law demands fulfilment, as evidenced by the
needs of time and circumstances, the unpredictable conduct of human law; how group awareness
of the obligations and freedoms expressed in common law itself progresses slowly and painfully
in the consensus and development of the circle, and despite all the errors and inconsistencies that
go from the beginning in the process of growth and disclosure which cannot be closed. Here we
see the negative impact of economic and social cohesion, in particular, on the importance of
modern men about new ideas and new issues, rising above freedom or central independence and
interacting with the social conditions of human life, brought them the birth of emergencies and
disasters in the industrial economy and advances in the history of the working class. No
revelation of fundamental freedoms will ever be complete and complete.13 It will move at any
time inseparably from the state of moral awareness and personal development at certain
intersections. And that is why even after the remarkable victory achieved in the late eighteenth
century with the ultimate goal of that freedom, from that point, it remains a great interest to
humanity that such presentations must be renewed from one century to the next. According to
12
Olivier De Schutter, International Human Rights Law (Cambridge University Press 2019) p 35-57.
13
Herrera, Clara Burbano, and Frans Viljoen. "Danger and Fear in Prison." Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights
33.2 (2015): 163-93.
 7

Schutter, balanced political thinkers, for example, Edmund Burke and David Hume collaborated
with dissidents, for example, Jeremy Bentham to critique doctrine, in the past for fear that public
guarantees of common rights could cause social disruption, a last resort concern if common
freedom speech and decisions take the place of applicable law. All regions of the region pledged
to take united action to achieve "universal respect, recognition and fundamental freedoms and
fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion in that it
puts forward as a common practice to achieve all groups of people and all countries. Like other
political and legal systems, natural law may give rise to various arguments or assumptions that
are considered to justify or justify common law.14

Yet, the defeat of this assumption will not mean the failure of the common law itself, just
as it does not mean the loss of law itself. The triumph of juridical positivism in the nineteenth
century over the common law principle did not mean the abolition of the common law itself, but
simply the success of a genuinely authentic school over a progressive, rational school, called by
the perfect conditions adopted in school.15

Third Problem:

The judicial activism and expense of fidelity, in particular, have never have participated
in many of the world's most popular charities. Indeed, training of judges disrupting
administrative institutions into a topic a few sharp measurements over a long period, especially
in the space of protected law. Regardless of the belief system, it has become the basis for the
opposition to a particular legal decision to sue the judicial activism, inseparable from attack. The
concept of legal activism requires some careful clarification. It falls under the rubric of what is
commonly called the legal audit".16 The Constitution applies to a particular case, with the intent
that the court should consider all matters deal with that case in violation of the law, overturn the
constitution; or in comparison with the body, to repeal the law; court they should find out which
of these conflicting guidelines presides over the case. The new case law of the International
Court of equity gives one striking illustration of this proactice: on account of Ahmadou Safio
14
Olivier De Schutter, International Human Rights Law (Cambridge University Press 2019) p 35-57.
15
Lacatus, Corina. "Regulatory Networks and Regional Human Rights Governance: A Study of the European
Network of National Human Rights Institutions." International Relations (London) (2021): 4711782110528.
16
Abrusci, Elena. "A Tale of Convergence? Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation in Regional Human Rights
Bodies and the Human Rights Committee." Nordic Journal of Human Rights 35.3 (2017): 240-57.
 8

Diallo, where it was approached to apply Article 13 of the International Convenant on Civil and
Political Rightsvand Articel 12(4) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights,
concerning the states of blast of non-nationals lawfully present on a Dtate's domain, the Court
noticed that Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 to the ECHR and Article 22 of the American Convention
on Human Rights are 'close in substance' to the arrangements summoned before it and that
accordingly it's perusing of these arrangements can find support in the understanding by the
European Court kg Himan Rights and the Inter-Anerican Court of Human Rights of those
practically equivalent to statements.17

At the broadest level, legal activism is any event in which a court mediates and violates a
lawfully duly authorized law. This activism is "forcing] the formal process of the past issue it
depends on the political will". How to order this extension the definition of activism determines
whether the law is binding or the plan has failed. These values conclude that construction is
significant is essential to any proper understanding of the Constitution and, thus, the official use
of formal auditing. The founders of the Constitution could not order diplomacy. They basically
could not give the buildings from which they can emerge".18 Assuming it is an outline neglected
or, worse, intentionally attacked, at the time, recorded objects the meaning of the Constitution
must be clarified; checks as well a measure intended to measure the hungry desires of the
workers can be useless, and surprisingly significant opportunities are depicted in the Bill of
Rights will show less security from attacks by highly focused people political power.

Question 3)

The closest legal approach could be a controlling business. It can enter into participation
in a philosophical inquiry designed to differentiate or parallel the fundamental liberation issues
to elicit more significant responses to the joint liberation struggle. This approach to formal
comparisons or tests can inspire thought-provoking disputes and counter-arguments in a
particular area. In this legal system, the related law provides a philosophical meditation on the
same liberty. The difference in the legal framework for fundamental freedoms would be the

17
Olivier De Schutter, International Human Rights Law (Cambridge University Press 2019) p 35-57.
18
Lijiang Zhu. "The Right of Ethnic Minorities to Free Interpretation in Criminal Proceedings under International
Law: With Special Reference to China." Journal of East Asia and International Law 3.2 (2010): 307-35.
 9

contextual analysis of the application of the formal method of reasoning considering

investigating a response that appears to be linked to levels of equality.19

They take the test for something more subtle, such as separating standard collections of
laws from degrading rights in the liberation struggle or the struggle for total freedom.
Circumstances of this kind are insulting speech, in which the subject is the need to choose the
limits of the opportunity to speak compared to the interests of dignity. Different situations are
guidelines for wearing solid images. The subject is the state's interest in protecting its citizens
from them and other people against the individual's right to express their thoughts. Other
alternatives could be information insurance, which deals with correcting a person's right to
decide who is in contact with personal data and the seller's freedom to access information. Other
content analyses may affect the controversy regarding the antitrust law of segregation
requirement. The last section provides a reason for reviewing the insurance trend of a single type
of opportunity through the enemy of apartheid law, the opportunity for the religious decline of
various kinds, for example, civil aid rights. The right not to be oppressed always violates the
right to freedom of religion.20 The need to ensure the autonomy of strong institutions has pursued
other legal mandates to allow for the abandonment of the requirement of anti-segregation law
where strong organizations state that they need to separate remembering their strong feelings.21

These interpretations can be seen in the tendency to be cynical and careless. Even though
it is somehow rare for a scientist to rise above their point of view, there is a limit to the ethics for
an expert to make an effort to excel in this situation. A collaborative effort of different races, just
as much as collaborating with researchers whose foundation is built on a set of unconventional
rules being researched, can help raise above this difficulty. Another concern of the comparator is
the risk of being caught in the crosshairs of his experience, which could keep him in a systematic
consideration of what he is reviewing. The answer to the question comes from considering the
simplicity of the principles that analyze fair values.22 The law's innate aspect can help rise above
19
Burgorgue-Larsen, Laurence. "Decompartmentalization": The Key Technique for Interpreting Regional Human
Rights Treaties." International Journal of Constitutional Law 16.1 (2018): 187-213.

20
Hara, Abubakar Eby. "The Struggle to Uphold a Regional Human Rights Regime: The Winding Role of ASEAN
Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR)." Revista Brasileira De Política Internacional 62.1 (2019):
Revista Brasileira De Política Internacional, 2019, Vol.62 (1).
21
Olivier De Schutter, International Human Rights Law (Cambridge University Press 2019) p 35-57.
22
Gall, Chloe. "Coming to Terms with a New Role : The Approach of the International Court of Justice to the
Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties." Australian International Law Journal 21.21 (2014): 55-77.
 10

the conditions that characterize the analyst's tendency. The law as a governing body has its
limitations of consideration.

The evolution of human rights common law is not limited to states. Non-governmental
organisations have been highly influential in changing people's minds about crucial problems
and laying the framework for UN statements and agreements. Ordinary public service is
especially vital when a problem jeopardises the state's work. Yogyakarta's standards for
implementing the International Human Rights Act on Sexual Orientation and Gender
Identification are an excellent example. Even though the 29 archival criteria - linked to State
commitments regarding sexual orientation and gender identity - were adopted in November 2006
by just 29 experts from only 25 nations, they are becoming a widely acknowledged notion that
will likely drive future discussions.23 The current status of the worldwide law of freedom looks to
be very different from that of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was adopted 60
years ago.

Since World War II, significant progress has been achieved in broadening the scope of
the universal principle of equal liberty, resulting in the internationalisation of the fundamental
law of freedom. However, in recent years, attention has switched to the application and
enforcement of universal freedom standards and the establishment of secure safety nets and the
primary evaluation of standards' impact.24 The rise of at least one of those at risk of violations of
liberty, such as devastation, atrocities against humanity, and atrocities, was one of the most
prominent worries about ordinary freedom. The establishment of international criminal courts,
especially the International Criminal Court's founding in 1998, set a precedent for global law
compilation. The development of different courts, the enactment of legal legislation to embrace
equal liberties, and the explicit acknowledgement that rights are generally justified add to the
universal principle of fundamental freedoms' validity. Without a doubt, the neighbourhood will
alter dramatically during the next 60 years.25

23
Claridge, Lucy. "The Approach to UNDRIP within the African Regional Human Rights System." The International
Journal of Human Rights 23.1-2 (2019): 267-80.
24
Rowden, Rick. "The Ghosts of User Fees Past: Exploring Accountability for Victims of a 30-year Economic Policy
Mistake." Health and Human Rights 15.1 (2013): 175-85.
25
Haglund, Julienne. "Domestic Politics and the Effectiveness of Regional Human Rights Courts." International
Interactions 46.4 (2020): 551-78.