CPCJ Module 6 Prison Reform
CPCJ Module 6 Prison Reform
CPCJ Module 6 Prison Reform
Prison Reform
Module aims and structure
Punishment causes harm, not only to offenders but also to their family, friends and to communities. What
justifies the infliction of punishment? What are the aims and objectives?
- ‘an eye for an eye’ - offender is (physically) - crime is reduced due to - 1960s ‘medical’ or - offender should repair
prevented from reoffending fear of punishment ‘treatment’ model the harm caused
- offender should be
punished because by the punishment (makes you think twice!) - punishment as an - restitution and
they deserve it imposed - individual deterrence: opportunity to provide compensation
- punishment should fit - public protection crime not repeated due to reform - restorative justice
the crime - different approaches (from negative experience of - improving offenders’ interventions between
(proportional) removing thieves’ hands to punishment behaviour will reduce offender, victim and the
disqualification from - general deterrence: reoffending community
- tariff setting
driving) offenders are punished to
deter others
What justifies imprisonment?
Prison supporters argue that the sanction of imprisonment achieves all the aims of punishment. But what weight should be given to the differing aims?
“The
Retribution Incapacitation Deterrence Rehabilitation Reparation penite
shall c ntiary
ompri system
of pris se tre
oners atmen
aim o the es t
f whic sentia
their r h sha l
eform ll b e
social ation
re h a an d
Imprisonment
(Intern
ationa b ilitatio
and P l Cov
olitica
n.”
enant
l Rights on Civ
, Artic il
le 10.
3)
“The purposes of a sentence of imprisonment or similar measures deprivative of a person’s liberty are primarily to protect
society against crime and to reduce redivism. Those purposes can be achieved only if the period of imprisonment is used to
ensure, so far as possible, the reintegration of such persons into society upon release so that they can lead a law-abiding and
self-supporting life.” (Rule 4(1) of the Nelson Mandela Rules)
Key question:
To what extent has imprisonment been effective in achieving this overarching aim?
A brief history of prison reform (for example…)
1700s Key themes:
John Howard (1777)
Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Prisoners are human
Miseries of Public Prisons (1787)
beings and should be
1800s “I believe that very few men are treated at all times with
Elisabeth Fry (1827)
capable of estimating the immense
Dorothea Dix (1840)
amount of torture and agony which “humanity and with
Charles Dickens (1842)
this dreadful punishment, respect for the inherent
Fyodor Dostoevsky (1861)
Howard League for Penal Reform prolonged for years, inflicts upon human dignity of the
(1866) the sufferers; and in guessing at it human person.”
myself, and in reasoning from (International Covenant on Civil
1900s what I have seen written upon their and Political Rights, Article 10.1)
UN Standard Minimum Rules (1955) faces, and what to my certain
ACLU (1972) knowledge they feel within, I am Individuals are sent to
Amnesty International (1961) only the more convinced that there
Penal Reform International (1989) is a depth of terrible endurance prison as punishment,
which none but the sufferers not for punishment
2000s themselves can fathom, and which (Alexander Paterson, 1922)
‘African Prisons Project’ (2004) no man has a right to inflict upon
‘Call for Action’ in the Phillipines (2007) his fellow creature.” (Dickens,
‘Support to prison reform in the Kyrgyz But what are the challenges to
1842)
Republic’ (2008) prison reform?
Part II:
Why?
Overuse of pre-trial detention
Increased use of punitive criminal justice policies
Drug laws which centre on imprisonment
Lack of investment in rehabilitation and preventing reoffending
Use of imprisonment in response to minor offences, breach of conditions or people
with mental health care needs or individuals (UNODC, 2013)
Dynamic security
A dangerous, difficult
workplace? “Prison staff need to understand that interacting with prisoners in a
humane and equitable way enhances the security and good order of a
prison. (…) Irrespective of staffing ratios, each contact between staff
PTSD and prisoners reinforces the relationship between the two, which
takin
g its
priso toll on C should be a positive one, based on dignity and mutual respect in how
n gu anad
s 24 Ju
a rds! a’s people treat each other, and in compliance with international human
a c k ly, 20
r att s! 14 rights principles and due process.” (United Nations Prison Incident Management
f fi ce ye a r
o n o tw o Handbook, 2013: 21-22)
Pr is i n
4 5 % 14
ros e r il, 2 0
6A p
1
Key challenge: Implementing human rights
The Nelson Mandela Rules
1955 Standard Minimum Rules for the 17 December 2015
Treatment of Prisoners Checklist for all prisons
(UNODC, 2017)
Principles of Medical Ethics relevant to the Role of
1982
Health Personnel Rule 1: All prisoners shall be treated with respect due to their
inherent dignity and value as human beings
1984 Safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of Rule 3: …The prison system shall not… aggravate the suffering
those facing the death penalty inherent in the loss of liberty.
Rule 13: All accommodation…shall meet requirements of health,
Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of
1985 Juvenile Justice due regard being paid to climatic conditions and particularly to
(The Beijing Rules) cubic content of air, minimum floor space, lighting, heating and
ventilation.
1988 Body of Principles for the Protection Rule 35: Discipline and order shall be maintained with no more
of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or restriction than is necessary to ensure safe custody…
Imprisonment Rule 4: …purposes [of imprisonment] can be achieved only if
Basic Principles for the Treatment of Prisoners
prison of imprisonment is used to ensure… the reintegration of
1990 such persons into society on release.
Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their
Liberty Rule 24: Prisoners should enjoy the same standards of health care
Standard Minimum Rules for Non-Custodial available in the community.
Measures (The Tokyo Rules) Rule 77: …All prison staff shall at all times so conduct themselves
and perform their duties as to influence the prisoners for good by
Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and their example and to command respect.
2010 Non-custodial Measures for Women Offenders
(The Bangkok Rules)
Part III:
Sentenc
Rule 5(1) of the e plann
ing
Nelson Mandela
Rules states that: Resocialisation
“The prison regime Normalisation and rehabilitation Release
should seek to
minimize any
t i v i ti e s
differences between
c t i v e a c
r u
prison life and life at Const Rule 4(2) of the Nelson Mandela Rules states that: “prison administrations
liberty that tend to and other competent authorities should offer education, vocational training
lessen the and work, as well as other forms of assistance that are appropriate and
responsibility of the available, including those of a remedial, moral, spiritual, social and health-
prisoners or the and sports-based nature. All such programmes, activities and services
respect due to their should be delivered in line with the individual treatment needs of
dignity as human prisoners..”
beings.”
Alternatives to imprisonment
While there is growing recognition of prisoners’ rights, and improving prison conditions around the world, international
standards state that imprisonment should only be used as a last resort and that non-custodial measures should be used
as much as possible.
Decriminalisation
Diversion
Early release
from prison
Alternatives to
imprisonment
Alternatives to pre-trial
Alternatives at
detention
sentencing
Key question:
To what extent can alternatives to imprisonment assist in the process of prison reform?
More information
@DohaDeclaration [email protected]
unodc.org/dohadeclaration unodc.org/e4J