Strategic Intervention Material: Performance Level OF Grade 7 Students OF Zambales National High School Schools Division OF Zambales, Philippines
Strategic Intervention Material: Performance Level OF Grade 7 Students OF Zambales National High School Schools Division OF Zambales, Philippines
Strategic Intervention Material: Performance Level OF Grade 7 Students OF Zambales National High School Schools Division OF Zambales, Philippines
INTRODUCTION
Mathematics is one of the most vital and tough subjects in today’s generation. No matter to
which field or profession you belong to, its use is everywhere. However, many students would
say that this subject is also one of the most difficult to learn. They seldom master some basic
concepts that leads to their low performance in terms of phasing of lessons and the
improvement is clearly affected. Specifically, some of the necessary skills in problem solving are
Translating English Phrases to Mathematical or Algebraic phrases, Translating English
Sentences into Equations and Inequalities. The students sometimes get confused on what
operation are they going to use. That is why it is necessary to have a good understanding of the
lesson. Furthermore, the teacher makes adjustments by inserting such concepts and even
recapping the different words that can be associated with the basic operations, thus in order to
lessen confusion and boost mastery, a strategic intervention material should be utilized.
Strategic Intervention Materials (SIM) are conceptualized and designed to aid the teacher
provide the students the needed support to make progress in studies. These will increase and
deepen the skills, knowledge and understanding of the student in various subject areas not only
in Mathematics but also in including various learning areas in the curriculum. SIM can give the
opportunity to explore various ideas and concepts that would enrich their understanding of
varied subject matters that sharpen their competencies. Furthermore, the strategic instructional
materials tend to reteach the lessons, which are not so much clear to the learners, and to help
them gain mastery of the skills.
In the Philippines, Strategic Intervention Material best known as SIM is an instructional material
meant to reteach concepts or topics, which are consider least mastered by the students. The
basic parts of which are: Guide Card, Activity Card, Assessment Card Enrichment Card and
Reference Card (Plenos, Josephine, 2014). It is one of the solutions employed by the Department
of Education to enhance academic achievements of students performing low in the field of
Mathematics. DepEd Memo No. 117, series of 2005 entitled “Training Workshop on Strategic
Intervention Materials (SIMs) for Successful Learning” provided math secondary teachers the
training in the preparation of SIMs. As part of intensifying and developing strategic intervention
materials as tool for remediating poor performance in Math. The Department of Education
included the SIM making as one of the contests during math competition in school, division,
regional, and national level competitions. As stipulated in the DepEd Order No. 39, s. 2012,
interventions have to be made in order to address learning gaps. The use of Strategic
Intervention Material (SIM), is identified as one of the suggested various intervention forms that
can bridge learning gaps. SIM is a remediation aid for the students at the level of their
understanding and thereby increasing their academic achievement.
Strategic Intervention Material as meant to re-teach the concepts and skills (least mastered). It
is a material given to students to help those master competency-based skills, which they were
not able to develop during a regular classroom teaching. It consists of both learning strategies
(for students) and content enhancement (for teachers). It is a multifaceted approach to help
students to become independent and successful learners. This intervention material focuses on
the skill not mastered by the students during regular class. It does not involve pretest and
posttest and includes fun activities. (Bunagan, 2012)
SIM refers to teaching aid introduced into the teaching methods to stimulate students’ interest
in the activity to increasing their level of understanding. It is a learning package composed of
guide card, several hands-on and minds-on activities, assessments, enrichments, and answer
keys which the students can bring home as supplementary learning material that will help them
work and learn independently or with their peers.
At present, in the Philippine education system, intervention materials are highly regarded as
tools for remediating poor achievements of the learners. SIM or Strategic Intervention Material
refers to a teaching aid introduced into the teaching methods to stimulate the activity of the
students and thereby increased their level of understanding It is strategically prepared and
designed for teaching remediation for low achievers in the subject. It is given after the regular
classroom instruction to students who were not able to grasp the concepts of the subject matter.
(Dy, 2011)
Instructional material plays a very important role in the teaching learning process. It enhances
the memory level of the students and makes the teaching – learning process interesting
(Nicholls, 2000; Raw, 2003).
Instructional materials are school resource inputs (SRI), they include print and non – print
items that are designed to impart information to students in the educational process.
Instructional materials also include items such as kits, textbooks, magazines, newspapers,
pictures, recordings, slides, transparencies, videos, video discs, workbooks and electronic media
including music, movie, radio, software, CD – ROMs, and online services (Dahar, 2011).
Further, Dahar (2011) investigated the effect of availability of instructional materials on the
academic performance of students in Punjab (Pakistan). He mentioned that instructional
materials play a very important role in the teaching - learning process.
The study entitled, “Strategic Intervention Material-Based Instruction, Learning Approach and
Students’ Performance in Chemistry,” gave the following conclusions: (1) Most of the students
adopted the deep learners’ approach after the exposure to the SIM – BI. Some of the surface
learners adopted the deep learners’ approach while a few deep learners adopted the surface
learners’ approach. The SIM – BI has capability of influencing the learning approach of the
students in Chemistry; (2) The use of the Strategic Intervention Material–Based Instruction
(SIM–BI) enhanced the performance of students in Chemistry regardless of learning approach
adopted; (3) The deep and surface learners performed equally well after exposure to Strategic
Intervention Material – Based Instruction (SIM – BI); and (4) Deep and surface learners have a
positive perception on the use of Strategic Intervention Material (SIM. Students find it
enjoyable, interesting and contributing positive attitude towards Chemistry. (Aranes, Espinosa,
Salviejo, 2014)
Based on the abovementioned information, the utilization of an intervention material can
significantly increase the performance of the students in the least mastered skills in
Mathematics. These studies revealed that the use of SIMs plays a pivotal role in elevating the
memory level of the students, in grasping the different concepts in Mathematics, and with the
integration of various strategies in the implementation of the material, the teaching-learning
process becomes interesting.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Design
The researcher used quasi - experimental research design, using two sections in Grade 7
students of Zambales National High School, Iba, Zambales as respondents. Experimental method
of research is a method or procedure involving the control or manipulation of conditions for the
purpose of studying the relative effects of various treatments applied to members of a sample,
or of the same treatment applied to members of different samples (Calmorin, 1995). It is a
problem-solving approach that embraces studies of an experimental nature in which the
systematic study of social life is carried out under conditions of control and experiment.
According to Aquino (1993), this is a design to investigate possible cause-and- effect
relationship by exposing one or more experimental groups to one or more treatment conditions
and comparing the results to one or more control groups not receiving the treatment, random
assignment being essential.
Instruments
The study was conducted using these instruments: Strategic Intervention Material, Pre-Test and
Post Test and Perspective Survey Questionnaire.
The Strategic Intervention Material consists of the Title Card, Guide Card, Activity Cards,
Assessment Card, Enrichment Card, Reference Card and Answer Card.
The Pre-Test and Post Test was consisting of 30 multiple-choice item to measure the degree of
change in the sample group’s understanding of the mathematics competency because of
intervention.
The Perception Survey Questionnaire (PSQ) was developed by the researcher to determine the
perceptions of the respondents regarding the use of the strategic intervention material. This
survey was consisting of 20 questions categorized as knowledge, motivation, process and
application validated by the adviser/ mentor.
Data Collection
The researcher secured a letter to the principal requesting for the approval of the conduct of the
study as well as to the Schools Division Superintendent. After the approval of the request, the
researcher personally conducted the study. The researcher administered a pre – test to both
groups. Both groups used the same kind of teacher made test. After administration of the pre –
test, results were gathered for the interpretation of data. The researcher taught the groups
using strategic intervention material then post – test was administered. The researcher
gathered the results for the interpretation of data. After the administration of Post Test, The
Perception Survey Questionnaire (PSQ) was also administered to determine the perceptions of
the respondents regarding the use of the strategic intervention material. The researcher
gathered the results for the interpretation of data
Data Analysis
The statistical tools used in the study are the following:
Mean. It is also called arithmetic mean and represented by x̅ (or “x – bar”). This is computed by
adding all the values of the variable x, (The sum of the x values is symbolized by ∑ x or
summation of x) and dividing the sum by the total number of samples, represented by n. This
will be used to determine the average of the pre-test and post-test results. The formula for this
∑𝑥
is expressed as 𝑥̅ = 𝑛
Weighted Mean. This will be used to determine the perception of the students with regards to
the knowledge, motivation, process, and transfer/ application. It is a mean calculated by giving
values in a data set more influence according to some attribute of the data. It is an average in
which each quantity to be averaged is assigned a weight, and these weightings determine the
relative importance of each quantity on the average. Weightings are the equivalent of having
that many like items with the same value involved in the average.
Likert Scale. It was used as guide in determining the effectiveness of teaching motivation
through quality education delivery. The point value, weighted value, and qualitative description
are as follows:
Point Value Weighted Value Qualitative Description
5 4.20 – 5.00 Very Much Effective
4 3.40 – 4.19 Very Effective
3 2.60 – 3.39 Effective
2 1.80 – 2.59 Less Effective
1 1.00 – 1.79 Not Effective
t-test. The t test is one type of inferential statistics. This will be used to determine whether
there is a significant relationship between the academic performance and Mathematics
competencies cited in Problem 3. The following rules are used as guide in rejecting and
accepting the null hypothesis (Reyes, 1996).
Decision Rule:
If the computed t-value is less than the critical t-value at 0.05 alpha level, the null hypothesis is
accepted. There is no significant relationship.
If the computed t-value is greater than the critical t-value at 0.05 alpha level, the null hypothesis
is rejected. There is a significant relationship.
ANOVA (Analysis of Variance). This will be used to determine the significant difference in the
perception of effectiveness between the K-12 curriculum teaching method ad Teacher Made
Strategic Intervention Material.
Decision rule:
If the computed F-value is less than the critical F-value at 0.05 alpha level, the null hypothesis is
accepted. There is no significant relationship.
If the computed F-value is greater than the critical F-value at 0.05 alpha level, the null
hypothesis is rejected. There is a significant relationship.
Table 4
Analysis on the Difference in Perception of Effectiveness between Teacher Made Strategic
Intervention Material (SIM) and the Level of Competencies on Knowledge, Motivation,
Process and Transfer/ Application
Source of SS df MS F p-value F critical Decision Interpretation
Variation computed
7.184 3 3.592 Accept Null Not Significant
Knowledge 377.443 112 3.340 1.075 0.345 2.69 Hypothesis
5.705 3 2.853 Accept Not Significant
Motivation 378.922 112 3.353 0.851 0.430 2.69 Null Hypothesis
2.672 3 1.336 Accept Null Not Significant
Process 381.955 112 3.380 0.395 0.674 2.69 Hypothesis
Transfer/ 6.451 3 3.226 Accept Null Not Significant
Application 378.176 112 3.347 0.964 0.345 2.69 Hypothesis
Total 384.627 115
It was revealed in the data that there is no significant difference on the effectiveness of the SIM
and the level of competencies towards knowledge, motivation, process, and transfer/application
as learning aspects. This means that learning aspects are not predictor variables in determining
the effects of teacher made strategic intervention material on students ‘performance in
Mathematics.
It was reported in the study conducted by Boumova (2008) as cited by Salviejo et.al (2014)
claimed the teaching is deeply teacher - centered. The traditional methodology puts the
responsibility for teaching and learning mainly on the teacher and it is believed that students
will be able to use the knowledge if they are present in the class discussions and listen to the
teacher’s explanations and examples.
The data in Table 5 presents the result of the t-test for significance of Pearson r values for the relationship
of score in the pre-test and the respective competencies at 0.05 level of significance, two-tailed test.
The null hypothesis of no significance is accepted. The findings that at the 5% level of significance, Pre-
test scores and scores in mathematics competencies are not significantly correlated could be attributed to
the difference in the time and conditions as well as the difference in the physical and emotional state of
well-being of the student- respondents during the administration of the test. This finding is similar to the
study conducted by Salviejo, Aranes, and Espinosa (2014) found that difference in the mean pre-test
scores of the two groups of learners is not significant. The result implied that at the start of the study, the
prior knowledge of surface learners and deep learners are more or less comparable.
Moreover, the findings were supported by Sahin (2010) which asserts that the effect of any strategy or
material on the academic achievement of student in any written course found to be non-significant in the
pre-test scores of the experimental and control group in the Written Expression Achievement test.
Table 6
t-test for Significance of Relationship of Scores in the Post-test and Level of Competencies
Competencies Academic Interpretation
Translate English Phrases into Pearson Correlation 0.005 Very Low Positive
Algebraic or Mathematical Sig. (2-tailed) 0.955 Correlation
phrases and vice versa N 116 Not Significant
Translate English sentence into Pearson Correlation -.142 Very Low Negative
Mathematical Sentence and Vice Sig. (2-tailed) 0.128 Correlation
Versa N 116 Not Significant
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)
The data in Table 6 presents the result of the t-test for significance of Pearson r values for the
relationship of score in the pre-test and the respective competencies at 0.05 level of
significance, two-tailed test.
The null hypothesis of no significance is accepted. The findings that at the 5% level of
significance, post-test scores and scores in mathematics competencies are not significantly
correlated could be attributed to the difference in the time and conditions as well as the
difference in the physical and emotional state of well-being of the student- respondents during
the administration of the test.
According to the study of Saclao (2016) found upon using the SIM-MOD, a posttest was given to
the participants. The p-value of 0.000 with a t value of -11.019 is an indication of the significant
differences between the scores of the participants from the control and experimental groups.
This implies that the participants who used the SIM- MOD have significant higher scores than
those who did not use the learning materials. Also, there is a significant difference (p-value of
0.000 and t-value of 7.727) present in the mean gain scores of the participants with regards to
their pretest and posttest scores. This is an indication that the use of SIM-MOD is an effective
way of improving the achievement of the students in their Mathematics subject.
According to the study conducted by Dahar (2011) explained that the use of appropriate
instructional materials has a strong relationship to the academic performance of secondary
students. Barlis (2015) also added that instructional materials play an important role in
improving students’ Mathematics achievement.
CONCLUSION
Based on the summary of the investigations, the researcher concluded that:
1. The performance of the students in Mathematics using the teacher made strategic
intervention material was fairly satisfactory in pre-test to outstanding in post-test.
2. The perception of the student-respondents toward the effectiveness of teacher made
strategic intervention material on knowledge, process, and transfer/ application was very
much effective while motivation resulted to be very effective.
3. There is no significant difference in the perception of the student-respondents on the
knowledge, motivation, process and transfer/ application in the test scores of mathematics
competencies.
4. There is highly significant relationship between students’ pre-test and post-test performance
when the teacher made strategic intervention material used as method of teaching in
teaching and learning mathematics competencies.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the findings and conclusions, the researcher offers the following recommendations:
1. For students’ better academic performance teacher made strategic intervention materials
shall be used in teaching Mathematics to enhance and develop students’ mathematical skills,
concepts, and competencies.
2. Mathematics teachers should create and produce teacher made strategic intervention
materials to address the least mastered skills and competencies.
3. Mathematics teachers should give more drill exercises and activities on Mathematics
competencies which are difficult to comprehend and less interesting topic to enhance
student interest and encourage the students to work independently.
4. Mathematics teachers shall be provided with more seminars, workshops, and in- service
training on the principles of strategic intervention material construction for effective
teaching and learning Mathematics competencies.
5. Implement continuous professional development programs for Mathematics teachers to
keep abreast with development in education with the use of teacher made strategic
intervention materials.
6. It is suggested that similar studies be made in order to widen the scope of the study and
validate the result obtained by the researcher.
REFERENCES
• Aranes, Fidela Q, Espinosa, Allen A., Salviejo, Edwin I., Strategic Intervention Material - Based on
Learning Approach and Students Performance in Chemistry p. 119
• Bunagan, F. (2012) http://www.slideshare.net/felixbunagan/strategic-intervention
http://84.22.166.132/learning-and-teaching-theory-guide/deep-and-surface-approaches -
learning.html
• Dahar, M. (2011). Effect of the Availability and the Use of Instructional Material on Academic
Performance of Students in Punjab Pakistan. Euro Journal Publishing Inc.
• DepEd Order no. 73, s. 2012. Guidelines on the Assessment and Rating of Learning Outcomes
under the K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum.
• Diaz, Ernalyn D. & Dio, Ryan V., Effectiveness of Tri in 1 Strategic Intervention Materials for Grade
9 Students Through Solomon Four - Group Design, p. 79
• Dy, Jocelyn O. (2007). Strategic Intervention Materials (SIM) in Teaching Science IV (Physics).
Retrieved August 20, 2014 from http://jhody,hubpages.com/hub/Teaching-Physics-through
Strategic-Intervention-Material- SIM.
• Escoreal, A. (2012), Strategic Intervention Material A Tool to Reduce Least Learned Skills in
Grade Four Science.
Espinosa, A. (2012), Career – Oriented Performance Tasks: Effects on Students‘Critical Thinking,
Process Skills and Interest in Chemistry. Unpublished Master ‘s Thesis.University of the
Philippines Diliman.
• Feliciano, M. (2017), A Stategic Intervention Material in Mathematics 10. Retreived
fromhttps://www.pressreader.com/philippines/sunstarpampanga/20171020/28160
3830703858 Nicholls, G (2000), Learning to Teach, pp 356 –360, Bell and Bain Ltd. Glasgow.
• Plenos, Josephine (2014). Effectiveness Of The Teacher-Made Science Strategic Intervention
Material In Increasing The Performance Level Of Grade Six Pupils Of Bacongco Elementary
School In The Specified Competency, p. 6
• Raw, V. (2003), ―Quality Teaching‖, APH Publishing Corp. Ansari Road, New Delhi Saclao, J.
(2016). Development and Impact of SIM-MOD (Strategic intervention Material and Module
Combined) on Students’ Academic Achievement in Mathematics at the *th Grade level.13th
National Convention on Statistics (NCS). EDSA Shangri- La Hotel, Mandaluyong City. Retrieved
from https://psa.gov.ph/sites.
• Salviejo, Edwin I, Aranes, F and Espinosa, A (2014) Strategic Intervention Material Based
Instruction, Learning Approach and Students’ Performance in Chemistry. International Journal of
Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. Vol 2, No. 1, On 91-123.
• Soberano, A. (2009). Strategic Intervention Materials in Chemistry: Development and
Effectiveness. Muntinlupa: SEAMEO RECSAM Sun.Star Pampanga (2017). Strategic Intervention
Materials (S.I.M.) For a Change. Retrieved March 24, 2017, from
https://www.pressreader.com/philippines/sunstar-pampanga/ 20170324/28168113970.
• Togonon, I. (2011). Development and Evaluation of Project-Based SIM (PB_SIM) in Teaching High
School Chemistry. Master’s Thesis. Technological University of the Philippines.