Sustaining Unsustainable Abilities (1052 Words)
Sustaining Unsustainable Abilities (1052 Words)
Sustaining Unsustainable Abilities (1052 Words)
(1052 words)
One might say that sustainability is the achievement of the SDG goals to the
extent that it will promote greater social equality and economic prosperity. The
and non-human). The article further explains how vital our biodiversity and ecosystem
natural environment as building materials, and energy resources are extracted in our
ecosystem (AskAboutIreland, 2014). Multiple species are doomed to exile due to the
2015). Humans sustain unsustainable abilities at the cost of nature, but it is not too late
The three things that I significantly learned from in the reading were that the
rising numbers of endangered species are not worrying humans. We all need
biodiversity to create a safe operating space for humanity to live in until the next decade
or so. The evidence that Sumatran tigers and white rhinoceros are almost extinct does
not frighten humans one bit. More so, plant cultivations, synthetic medicines, and
industrialism. Extinction due to habitat loss should not be practiced because it threatens
non-human species in nature. The second thing I learned is that population growth is
the leading cause of unsustainable global development. Population growth should not
1
be seen as a 'good thing' for businesses and economic growth. Economic growth has
already harmed the planet's ability to support even the current population in the future
(Kopnina, 2015). The article explains how population growth has caused environmental
problems. The more people are born into this world, the more resources are required,
causing the Earth's resources to deplete rapidly. (Mayer, 2018). Depletion happens due
to biodiversity loss and deforestation, leading to my next learning, which is the impact of
wetlands, and grassland and lowers GHG (Greenhouse gas) emissions by almost ten
percent. It also promotes vegetation recovery that may benefit humanity soon.
I was confused about the way the author explains the sustainable development
goals. It is confusing for readers like me to interpret whether the author agrees with the
goals or not. The author stated that the SDG goals are unlikely to lead to economic
prosperity and great social equality while supporting childhood and maternal mortality. It
is also unclear that conventional sustainability does not offer any alternative in the
present state of inequality and poverty. As for as I know, traditional sustainability meets
human needs, improves living, and provides financial aid that makes environmental
protection possible. I do not understand why conventional sustainability does not help
fix inequality and poverty when the main aim of conventional sustainability is to
(Korten, 2010). Lack of education and economic opportunities for the poor is a top
priority in this sustainability. Another vague statement I found is that the 15th goal of
SDG, which is "Life on land," is impossible to achieve because of the terms 'sustainable
use'. It is indeed hard to restore any terrestrial ecosystem because of how humans
2
behave in this world, but it is certainly not impossible to achieve. We need to support
resource efficiency. The mentality of saying impossible to a goal that can be achieved is
preposterous.
First and foremost, I used to think that human and non-human nature are both
and wildlife. After reading the article, I now know that the first victim of unsustainability is
non-human nature. The only thing mainstreamed about the concerns of women, poor
people, and enslaved people is based on human nature. For non-human species,
concerns are highly disregarded by humans because of their mentality on how the world
works. They are deemed 'uncharismatic' due to the agencies' lack of funding (Hance,
2020). I used to think that if we reached the goal of zero poverty in all nations
After reading the article, I now know that if all people are lifted out of poverty, there will
be more consumption and a more significant resource crisis (Kopnina, 2015). If poverty
is the only thing that is solved, then present challenges such as depletion of resources
and climate change can still impact how we live. I used to think that the word
'sustainable use' means conserving and using your resources wisely for the
environments' sake. After reading the article, I now know that the word 'sustainable use'
the practice will most likely not happen, and the issues will continue until it is fixed.
3
The three questions that I would like to ask about the reading article are: Will we
be able to pursue sustainable development if population growth is the only thing that is
addressed? Why or why not? How is afforestation a benefit and a detriment in our
planet's ecosystem services? If you were a part of the United Nations, are there any
SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) that you would like to change or revise? I
would appreciate having these questions answered to learn how we can further
production of resources, and also due to population growth. The article explains how
undergoing extinction. The readers should note the recommendations on the paper to
radically re-orientate production and consumption away from those who support
unsustainability. The UN should manage population growth; people need to stop seeing
this as a 'good thing' for their companies and businesses. We should embrace
ecological justice between all species. As the article stated, our planet is the actual