Universidad Del Atlántico Chemical Engineering Program Bioprocess Course 2022 Homework of Enzymatic Kinetic

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Prof. José A.

Pérez

Universidad del Atlántico


Chemical Engineering Program
Bioprocess course 2022

Homework of enzymatic kinetic

A new enzyme (E) has been isolated and purified which converts a single
substrate (S) into a single product (P). A Chemical Engineer Student determined
Mr (molar mass) by gel filtration as ~ 46,400. However, in SDS gel electrophoresis,
a molecular mass of ~ 23 kDa was indicated for the single protein band observed.
A solution of the enzyme was analyzed in the following way. The absorbance at
280 nm was found to be 0.512. A 1.00 ml portion of the same solution was
subjected to amino acid analysis and was found to contain 71.3 nmol of
tryptophan. N-terminal analysis on the same volume of enzyme revealed 23.8
nmol of N-terminal alanine. The following information can be useful to
calculate the enzyme concentration and minimum molar mass taking
account into each amino acid by separated.

[ E]A =280nm=1.55 A1280


cm
nm [mg/ml]
m Mr AA
Mr minimum= E
m AA
Where :
mE =Enzyme mass ; mAA = Amino acid mass and Mr AA =Molar mass of amino acid

1. What is the approximate molecular mass of the enzyme? Discuss this


answer. Be sure to use an appropriate number of significant figures in this
and other calculations.
2. What is the concentration of your enzyme in moles per liter of active sites?
3. What is the molar extinction coefficient ε at 280 nm where A = εcl; A =
absorbance, c = mol / liter, and l = cell width in cm. Assume that all
spectrophotometric measurements are made in 1.00 cm cuvettes.

A second preparation of the enzyme had an absorbance at 280 nm of 0.485. This


enzyme was diluted very carefully: 1.00 ml into 250 ml and this diluted enzyme
was used for the following experiments (I to III).

Experiment I. A 1.00 ml portion of the diluted enzyme was added to 250 ml of


buffered substrate at pH 7.0 and was mixed rapidly. The resulting initial substrate
concentration [S] o was 1.000 mM. This reaction mixture was held at 25.0°C and
portions were removed periodically at time t for analysis of the product P formed.
The results follow. Plot [P] vs. time.

What is km, vm and kcat?


Prof. José A. Pérez

Experiment II. In a second experiment, a series of test tubes were set up, each
containing a different amount of buffered substrate at pH 7 but each in a volume of
exactly 4.00 ml. The same enzyme solution used above (absorbance at 280 nm =
0.485) was diluted 2.00 ml in 250 ml as in I, then again 2.00 ml in 200 ml. Portions
of 1.00 ml of this twice diluted enzyme were added at t = 0 to each of the test tubes
of buffered substrate. The reaction was stopped in just 10.0 minutes by adding
perchloric acid; a suitable reagent was added to provide for a colorimetric
determination of the product. The results were as follows:

1. Plot 1/v vs 1/ [S] where v is in units of µmol per tube and [S] in
millimoles/liter. Evaluate km, vm , and kcat from this plot.
2. Plot the same data as v/[S] vs. v. Again evaluate k m and vm.

Experiment III. The preceding experiment was repeated but an inhibitor was
present in each tube in a concentration equal to 5.00 mM, 10.0 mM, or 25.0 mM.
Two different inhibitors were used, A and B. The following results were obtained.

1. Plot l/v vs 1/[S] for each of these sets of data. For each case evaluate v m,
apparent km, and inhibitor constants KI.
2. For uninhibited enzymes, when [S] = 0.4 mM what fraction of the enzyme is
ES? Free E?
Prof. José A. Pérez

3. For enzyme in the presence of 10.00 mM inhibitor and 0.8 mM substrate,


what fraction of the total enzyme is ES? EI? free E?

You might also like