Espuelas v. People, G.R. No. L-2990, 1951

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

GR NO.

L-2990 ESPUELAS vs PEOPLE DATE: 17 December 1951


Petitioner was convicted for violation of ART. 142, RPC. Said Article punishes those who shall
write, publish or circulate scurrilous libels against the Government of the Philippines or any of
the duly constituted authorities thereof or which suggest or incite rebellious conspiracies or
riots or which tend to stir up the people against the lawful authorities or to disturb the peace of
the community.

Petitioner allegedly photograph himself making it seem like he was hanging lifeless, when in
FACTS fact he was standing on a barrel. After securing the photo, Petitoner sent copies of the same to
several newspaper of general circulation throughout the PH. He also attached a suicide note to
the photo.

In the said suicide note, Petitioner blamed the government under Roxas administration and that
he is ashamed of the same.

Petitioner then admitted that he did wrote the letter and sent the same to various publications.
WHETHER OR NOT PETITIONER VIOLATED ART. 142, RPC?
ISSUE/S
A: Yes
The court notes that writings which tend to overthrow or undermine the security of the
government or to weaken the confidence of the people in the government are against the
public peace, and are criminal not only because they tend to incite to a breach of the peace but
because they are conducive to the destruction of the very government itself.

Although there is a constitutional guaranty on the freedom of speech, the same is not absolute
and should not be taken advantage.

In the case at bar, even though it can be construed from the note that it only discredit
HELD President Roxas and his men, however, this doesn’t mean that Art. 142 is not committed. Art.
142 punishes not only all libels against the Government but also libels against any of the duly
constituted authorities thereof.

The essence of seditious libel may be said to its immediate tendency to stir up general
discontent to the pitch of illegal courses; that is to say to induce people to resort to illegal
methods other than those provided by the Constitution, in order to repress the evils which
press upon their minds.

RULING: GUILTY

You might also like